Jump to content
=LG=Kathon

Tactical Air War

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, StG77_HvB said:

 

That's an interesting phenomenon that develops when low player number periods occur at the same time every night with the same players. People start paying attention to the habits of specific individuals on the other side, and 1v1 or 2v2 cat and mouse games play out all over the map. It looks more like what I suppose WWI flying must have been like, and it's a very different dynamic than that of a full server.

 

yourdog05.jpg

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/3/2018 at 2:52 PM, Mobile_BBQ said:

  It might not be a great dogfighter,

 LIES!

On 8/3/2018 at 3:12 AM, =FSB=Man-Yac said:

Let's not open the chute killing debate again please :). LG cleary staded it is allowed. Let the pilots decide who they want to be. 

 

I agree, it's part of the game. I don't mind it. I do think it says something about a guy who does it. Then we all get to have a pooh talk trash session in TS later about it. As I like drama it's still a win.   :P

 

I think the game needs a manual chute pull option. The wait at high altitude is too short and low altitude too long. Manual ripcord pull is the answer. Pull too early and catch the tail, makes for more interesting low alt jumps.

Edited by 7./JG26_Smokejumper
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see a bit of better collision mechanics involving chutes vs. planes.  I was chute-killed (by guns) and RAMMED (body dead-center of the prop hub) simultaneously by a P-39 tonight with no ill effect to the plane at all....  Even if I was (hypothetically) blow to bits before the impact, the parachute itself would have been caught up in the propeller.   But then again, ramming survival seems to depend on ping and a coin toss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow what an horrible way to go. The p51 pilot must have struggled to pull the trigger ever again after such a horrendous spectacle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Grislawski, the exact same thing happened to Macki Steinhoff's wing man in Russia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, wombatBritishBulldogs said:

Is it modeled 😲

 

No, if you physically fly into someone in their parachute you just clip through, it doesn't hurt them or you.

Edited by 7.GShAP/Silas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I already bent my prop when flying through a chute. Don't quite know whether it is the shute itself or the body of the pilot (might have hit that one too) that bent my prop. Needless to say, I felt like a complete moron. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The interaction is there, but due to net code and ping it is kind of tricky to pull off. Like flying through a debris cloud after you take apart a bomber.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/5/2018 at 10:11 PM, StG77_HvB said:

According to Grislawski, the exact same thing happened to Macki Steinhoff's wing man in Russia.

I tried to find some information about it but didn't have any luck, do you have a source by any chance?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I read it in "Graf & Grislawski; A Pair of Aces," but I looked thru the book just now to tell you the page # and couldn't find the passage. Let me dig around a little more because it's quite a story; makes you stop reading and stare at the wall thinking about it.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, US103GarvenDreis said:

Any idea when the next TAW is up?

 

It is moved one week back every time someone asks this. 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cpt_Siddy said:

 

It is moved one week back every time someone asks this. 

Okay, I just keep asking until we can use the P-47 in the next TAW.:tease:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, US103GarvenDreis said:

Okay, I just keep asking until we can use the P-47 in the next TAW.:tease:

Lol, definitly not, we had the G14 available before last campaign, they didn't add it. So i don't think they'll do the same with the P-47

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The FW-190 A-8 went into service (early spring 1944) before the Bf-109 G-14 (midsummer 1944). Hence, by TAW's historical standards, I assume it would appear one map earlier anyway.

 

While I'd love an expanded timeframe, the VVS do need a counterpart! Their latest ingame aircraft would be the LA-5FN (summer 1943). The Yak-3 is missing here. It would be a formidable collector's plane for BoBP's timeframe in my opinion, and could challenge the G-14 in summer of 1944.

 

 

Would-be scenario:

 

The Bf-109 G-6 with injection (early winter 1943) could strike a last map balance, appearing one map after La5FN, and closing the performance gap. Unfortunately, the ingame G-6 has no injection system, not even by choice. Proposing that before the G-6's release led to a lot of flak against "Luftwaffle players". I read they were planning to put this in later as a patch, but that doesn't seem to be true. So now we are stuck with this underpowered heavy-drag beauty.. I don't know about you, but I would have liked the choice of a lockable module, at least.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe G-5/AS and G-6/AS were much more more widespread than MW50 injection G-6. DB605AM and MW50 only became production standard in June/July 1944 with the G-14. So besides some gadgets that slow the thing down, high altitude AS engine and the canopy, the 109 series does not improve much(/at all) from early 1942 to mid 1944.

 

I wonder how many much the Erla Haube alone improved 109's top speed, something like 5 km/h, at most?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel more than comfortable taking on G-14 in La-FUN.

 

La out rolls it all day erry day and they preform about the same in all other planes of control. And have relative parity in hp/kg. 

 

Same with A-8. It is so heavy that Lagg-3 can club it if it gets caught in a climb. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Cpt_Siddy said:

I feel more than comfortable taking on G-14 in La-FUN.

 

La out rolls it all day erry day and they preform about the same in all other planes of control. And have relative parity in hp/kg. 

 

Same with A-8. It is so heavy that Lagg-3 can club it if it gets caught in a climb. 

 

Late model 109's - "Get high. Run fast." 

Expelled Olympic track runners - "Get high. Run fast."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/5/2018 at 7:00 PM, 7.GShAP/Silas said:

 

No, if you physically fly into someone in their parachute you just clip through, it doesn't hurt them or you.

 

I've taken damage from physically hitting the pilot before.  Been a few months so not sure it still hurts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, woodrowwilson_pr said:

 

I've taken damage from physically hitting the pilot before.  Been a few months so not sure it still hurts.

 

 

It was probably just lag in my case, then.

 

 

On another note, when did the VVS have the P-47?  Would it fit into the typical timeframe of the TAW campaigns?

Edited by 7.GShAP/Silas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some 200 odd were sent in mid 43, those being D variants. And another 200 about a year later. Of the 400 odd sent only 130 survived the war. It seems they were mostly used in defense of major cities and the bulk of them may have been used for training or technical analysis; the Soviets were fond of taking things apart, finding out how it was made and incorporating what they though best into their own designs. That is what Wikipedia has to say on the matter at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Disarray said:

 the Soviets were fond of taking things apart, finding out how it was made and incorporating what they though best into their own designs. 


That's such a polite way of saying it, lol!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, based on what I can find, in this case that is what they did. Not like other cases where they took things apart, made copious and detailed notes, put it back together again and said, "Look at this NEW AND TOTALLY ORIGINAL plane we have built. Isn't it cool, America? Why, I bet you'd like something like this, hu?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the U.S. F-86 was a copy of an end-war Kurt Tank design, among endless other examples.  All countries do it, since before the Romans copied the gladius from the Spanish Celts.

Edited by 7.GShAP/Silas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎8‎/‎7‎/‎2018 at 12:45 PM, StG77_HvB said:

I thought I read it in "Graf & Grislawski; A Pair of Aces," but I looked thru the book just now to tell you the page # and couldn't find the passage. Let me dig around a little more because it's quite a story; makes you stop reading and stare at the wall thinking about it.

 

Stop looking, that story is in the book "The Final Hours" by Johannes Steinhoff. It's on my bookshelf after you sold it to me ;) - great read.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They say there's 3 things that you lose when you get older. The first one's memory, and I don't remember the other two....

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, -=AnTifA=-woodrowwilson_pr said:

Great, now it's pushed back a week...

Hey what can I say..I'm all about giving. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, -=AnTifA=-woodrowwilson_pr said:

Great, now it's pushed back a week...

 

Yeah, thanks allot! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My father and two brothers bought Il-2 a few years back and we had no idea there was such an organized multiplayer server, the WOL server is fun for an occasional shootout but TAW seems so much better function with goal oriented missions that carry over through the days and weeks. Imagine our disappointment when we heard the campaign had just ended! Woe betide us!

 

Very excited for the next season, we'll be there on day 1!

Question: is there any plans for TAW to include other parts of the great battles series? like tanks? or Bodenplatte? I know it wouldn't make much sense to include other theatres in a campaign on eastern front.

And does anyone know the hub to find squadrons to fly with? we are looking for wingmen! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, madlarkin8 said:

Question: is there any plans for TAW to include other parts of the great battles series? like tanks? or Bodenplatte? I know it wouldn't make much sense to include other theatres in a campaign on eastern front.

And does anyone know the hub to find squadrons to fly with? we are looking for wingmen! 

 

No clue on future plans, but I will say that with only 84 players per server, having tanks would remove viable pilot slots.  So I’m not sure on what scale combined operations servers will be, but TAW is too large for that at the moment, so I can’t say what they plan on doing.  Besides, from what I gather about server hosting, there is a limit to how much a server can actually handle, so too much action will lag the server no matter what.

 

And as far as wingmen go, there is a virtual squadrons thread inthese forums, good chance there are squads looking for pilots there.  Personally, I would like to form a group of pilots for TAW based solely off of what available days and times you can fly.  My previous squadrons were dedicated to fly together, but rarely could we actually get more than two or three people at once on TAW - not enough pilots to accomplish much.  We just didn’t have the same times available for flying.  And being a lone wolf on TAW is possible, but I highly suggest you avoid that method on TAW, because deaths and the like are extra painful with the death penalty and harsh statistics scoring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, madlarkin8 said:

Question: is there any plans for TAW to include other parts of the great battles series? like tanks? or Bodenplatte? I know it wouldn't make much sense to include other theatres in a campaign on eastern front.

 

Just speculating, but I see two options for including Bodenplatte planes:

 

1. Some of the planes in Bodenplatte were used towards the end of the war on the Eastern front (Fw-190 A8/F8, P-47 and potentially Spit Mk IX lend-lease, correct me if I'm wrong on these though), so we could see these added on a potential additional map rotation (currently there are 8 maps in a campaign, ending with La-5FN vs. Bf-109 G6 + Fw-190 A5).

2. Alternatively, we could see a 'TAW rotation', where we have 1 campaign on the Eastern front, then 1 Bodenplatte campaign (or more like 2-3 Eastern front, 1 Bodenplatte).

 

Either one of these would have to deal with people complaining about having to buy all the different 'modules', but honestly this is already the case with current TAW, and you will always have 'older' aircraft that were still in service at the time, so people with only BoS/BoM can still fly something at least.

Edited by BubbRubb11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...