Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

Things can improve

But not you. It seems like every time you get challenged, you run to complain)

  • Haha 1
Posted

Broken FM...this forum is about TAW server. Post your tears on bugs forum. We are not devs of FM or this game...we are devs of TAW server. I ate so much popcorn reading those post that I will be fat because of you guys...shame on You!!! I will blame you all if my girlfriend will brake up with me cause I'm fat...

 

Ps. Please continue...i like popcorn and your tears ;)

  • Haha 3
  • Upvote 3
Posted

I have never mentioned Flight model before on this forum lol

10 minutes ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

But not you. It seems like every time you get challenged, you run to complain)

You dont know me kid, stop bitching around

Posted (edited)

Those who oppose the gunners, they do not want more realism. They just can't shoot down a bomber and so they want to simplify this game to their level.

Previously, when  I attacking ground targets, many times died from the fire of anti-aircraft guns. But I never wanted to ask them to be less accurate. I took it as a challenge and learned how to bomb the enemy from level, then found a way to evade the fire of anti-aircraft guns. Now , died only if I'm wrong or if I accidentally killed for a 5K (I also think it's real). The one who asks to make the rules easier will never succeed.

I believe that in order to make the game interesting, АА and gunners must be accurate. As far as I understand, the server is positioned as a platform for playing a team game of squads and well-trained pilots, and not a children's playroom for singles with low skill.

Edited by =2ndSS=Lawyer1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Average Pe-2 experience on TAW

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

Those who oppose the gunners, they do not want more realism. They just can't shoot down a bomber and so they want to simplify this game to their level.

Previously, when attacking ground targets, many times died from the fire of anti-aircraft guns. But I never wanted to ask them to be less accurate. I took it as a challenge and learned how to bomb the enemy from level, then found a way to evade the fire of anti-aircraft guns. Now , rosebay only if I'm wrong or if I accidentally killed for a 5K (I also think it's real). The one who asks to make the rules easier will never succeed.

I believe that in order to make the game interesting, АА and gunners must be accurate. As far as I understand, the server is positioned as a platform for playing a team game of squads and well-trained pilots, and not a children's playroom for singles with low skill.

Human gunner, if you dont need super aim and auto spotting just get human gunners, you wont because you'll cry out of the server 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

 

You dont know me kid, stop bitching around

I can feel your tears and moans, that's enough, I don't need to know anything more about you

Posted

Or is that you need that AI gunner to be over defended to have things simplified? Mh ?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

Human gunner, if you dont need super aim and auto spotting just get human gunners, you wont because you'll cry out of the server 

 I'd love to play for gunners if there's nothing else left. It will be just one more test to pass. And each of my 1 shoted aircraft will be more valuable than your 20, because I overcame the difficulty, and you showed weakness.

Posted

Hi all. Funny situation: i fly at 5k, looking at 6 and in this moment my plane was damaged. I start the record. In the track nobody.shooting.zip

I have already lost several lives in this way, but only now I  make record(((

Posted

We will see about that once you'll fly with a human gunner instead of AI

Posted

Look, prancingwilly2, what do you want, or propose we do with the back gunners?

 

Personally, i am all for disabling the back gunners, as i man my gunner position for better results, but other than this, there is nothing TAW team can do for you.

 

You might want to go complain about the gunner accuracy somewhere else, where you might be listened by the people who can actually do something about the game code that governs their behavior.

 

Now please, rather than doing this useless back and forth, lets focus on the campaign at hand.

Just now, Prancingkiller2 said:

We will see about that once you'll fly with a human gunner instead of AI

 human gunners are better than AI in my experience 

Posted

But I'm afraid only one, that many other bomber pilots will stop flying in this case and the server will be empty

Posted
Just now, Cpt_Siddy said:

Look, prancingwilly2, what do you want, or propose we do with the back gunners?

 

Personally, i am all for disabling the back gunners, as i man my gunner position for better results, but other than this, there is nothing TAW team can do for you.

 

You might want to go complain about the gunner accuracy somewhere else, where you might be listened by the people who can actually do something about the game code that governs their behavior.

 

Now please, rather than doing this useless back and forth, lets focus on the campaign at hand.

Other then you're pathetic lies have been told me that there's an AI level to be set

Posted
Just now, Prancingkiller2 said:

Other then you're pathetic lies have been told me that there's an AI level to be set

 

Show me on the dolly, where did the Pe-2 back gunner touch you? 

  • Haha 2
Posted
47 minutes ago, Pict said:

You can make it up, as you obviously just did :)

ok boomer

Posted (edited)

Server TAW there is long and administration perfectly knows what settings need for AI, to server was interesting for all and a long time, and not only for inept fighters. Just stop responding to this Troll who prefers to write rather than fly)

Edited by =2ndSS=Lawyer1
Posted (edited)

Look how this little acne nerds get mad when you try to talk about their daddy gunner ahah just pathetic, 

And that's just the proof that you know that the accuracy is wrong

Edited by Prancingkiller2
Posted

TAW could be a really nice server. If the atmosphere wasn't that toxic.

Posted

People, like this 2 guys up here, really enjoy to drag discussion in this way

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

Look how this little acne nerds get mad when you try to talk about their daddy gunner ahah just pathetic, 

And that's just the proof that you know that the accuracy is wrong

 

 

Jebus frack superstar.

 

We know the accuracy on AI gunners is wrong. They are AI gunners and they score shots that are impossible to score by humans on occasions, but more often than not, they miss 100% easy shots that your average human player can score 9/10 times. 

 

What i don't get, is why, on the gods green earth, are you crying about it here. To us? And not the game developers, who hold all the power over such matters as AI logic and the predictive gunning and lightning fast gun tracking. 110, 111, Ju-88, Pe-2 and the worst offender of them all, Ju-87 are all deadly to attack from the rear. Only difference is, that while as a soviet pilot you might face four different air frames with gunners, on LW side you mostly see only Pe-2's (and rare il2).

 

Perhaps you better check your bias, my boy? :dance:

6 minutes ago, No.322_Nocke said:

TAW could be a really nice server. If the atmosphere wasn't that toxic.

 

Someone being an ahole, on internet? 

 

Come fly the TAW, far less words and more pew pew in game. (with occasional chute killing :dance:)

Edited by Cpt_Siddy
  • Upvote 2
Posted

I guess you just didnt understand a single thing, but it's okay kid, nobody expect you to understand at this point

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

I guess you just didnt understand a single thing, but it's okay kid, nobody expect you to understand at this point

 

No, i do understand that your rectally annihilated behind needs some soothing salve.

https://taw.stg2.de/pilot_sortie.php?id=26632&name=Prancingkiller

https://taw.stg2.de/pilot_sortie.php?id=24781&name=Prancingkiller

https://taw.stg2.de/pilot_sortie.php?id=22469&name=Prancingkiller

https://taw.stg2.de/pilot_sortie.php?id=21561&name=Prancingkiller

But i am just wondering, why are you looking for it in here of all places? 

Edited by Cpt_Siddy
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

We will see about that once you'll fly with a human gunner instead of AI

 

humanGunners.thumb.JPG.c0bc6b1d9fa2daa8f8864c08a667fc79.JPG

 

Spoiler

 

 

Edited by Pict
Posted

Not in a single one of this logs i was hit flying like in the video lol, i've sent images and ACMI, and stop talking like im the only one ahah that's pathetic aswell, you know exatly that the most part of the pilots think the same about gunners

Posted
7 minutes ago, Cpt_Siddy said:

 

 

Jebus frack superstar.

 

We know the accuracy on AI gunners is wrong. They are AI gunners and they score shots that are impossible to score by humans on occasions, but more often than not, they miss 100% easy shots that your average human player can score 9/10 times. 

 

What i don't get, is why, on the gods green earth, are you crying about it here. To us? And not the game developers, who hold all the power over such matters as AI logic and the predictive gunning and lightning fast gun tracking. 110, 111, Ju-88, Pe-2 and the worst offender of them all, Ju-87 are all deadly to attack from the rear. Only difference is, that while as a soviet pilot you might face four different air frames with gunners, on LW side you mostly see only Pe-2's (and rare il2).

 

Perhaps you better check your bias, my boy? :dance:

 

Someone being an ahole, on internet? 

 

Come fly the TAW, far less words and more pew pew in game. (with occasional chute killing :dance:)

And has always been, look closely, he's crying on the forum for two days, and he has only two reactions to his message. That's all you need to know about his level of support from other pilots. Very well, that such weaklings as he, very little among those who plays on TAW. Better not waste your time on him

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Cpt_Siddy said:

 

These logs speak volumes and appear to have touched a nerve :biggrin:

Edited by Pict
Posted

I'll be more then happy to talk about that on teamspeak, where other guys organize themself to fly and where i've never seen you being online.. too bad you prefer to live in the forum instead of talking to the guys that actually fly in the server, maybe you'll know what the problems are and what people think

Posted
12 minutes ago, Cpt_Siddy said:

And if I constantly fly up to the anti-aircraft gun so that it kills me every time, can I ask then to remove the anti-aircraft guns from the server? ?

8 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

i've never seen you being online..

Oh Yes, Siddy and I fly very little TAW (46 and 55 hours in this war), I would like more

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

This Pe-2 pilot needs a taxi skin :)

 

Hard to tell just how many attacked him, but they all did it from the 6 o'clock point blank and most flew on over and right in front of him like the guy who not only got it from the rear gunners but got chopped in half by a rocket from the Pe-2  fired after it had lost it's other wing :biggrin:

 

Quote

Ended up with three 109s shot down including one very special one...

 

 

 

Edited by Pict
  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
  • Upvote 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

And if I constantly fly up to the anti-aircraft gun so that it kills me every time, can I ask then to remove the anti-aircraft guns from the server? ?

Oh Yes, Siddy and I fly very little TAW (46 and 55 hours in this war), I would like more

You can't even read properly, Imagine beign that stupid

Posted
11 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

You can't even read properly, Imagine beign that stupid

I can't write it. I am Russian-speaking and translate through Google. But I have the dignity not to whine and complain, unlike you

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

I can't write it. I am Russian-speaking and translate through Google. But I have the dignity not to whine and complain, unlike you

then take your dignity with you and stop saying bullshits when you clearly can't even understand.

Edited by Prancingkiller2
Posted
15 minutes ago, Prancingkiller2 said:

then take you dignity with you and stop saying bullshits when you clearly can't even understand.

This you not becomes correctly to speak, so you even Google incorrectly translates))

Posted
39 minutes ago, LLv24_Oke said:

Hey chutekiller...next time press disco before u see me...happy BLACK FRIDAY....

http://taw.stg2.de/pilot_sortie.php?id=31643&name==2ndSS=Only

Our pilot says that he was kicked from the server when he was already diving into his field and getting ready to landing. As a result, the strick and combat missions broke off, he lost his plane, and stats wrote his to you as a victory. He did not make sense to make a disco in this situation. He just has a connection problem today. Your accusations are unfair

=BES=Senor_Jefe
Posted
4 hours ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

Those who oppose the gunners, they do not want more realism. They just can't shoot down a bomber and so they want to simplify this game to their level.

Previously, when  I attacking ground targets, many times died from the fire of anti-aircraft guns. But I never wanted to ask them to be less accurate. I took it as a challenge and learned how to bomb the enemy from level, then found a way to evade the fire of anti-aircraft guns. Now , died only if I'm wrong or if I accidentally killed for a 5K (I also think it's real). The one who asks to make the rules easier will never succeed.

I believe that in order to make the game interesting, АА and gunners must be accurate. As far as I understand, the server is positioned as a platform for playing a team game of squads and well-trained pilots, and not a children's playroom for singles with low skill.

No dog in this fight, but that logic is a 2 way street. See single ship pe2 flights constantly. The "well you shouldn't fly alone" argument doesn't work only for the fighter, yet you'll see then on the losing end 95% of the time.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Senor_Jefe-6 said:

No dog in this fight, but that logic is a 2 way street. See single ship pe2 flights constantly. The "well you shouldn't fly alone" argument doesn't work only for the fighter, yet you'll see then on the losing end 95% of the time.

A lone unaccompanied bomber is a gift for a good fighter. 90% that the bomber will be destroyed, unless the fighter makes a mistake. If someone has a problem shooting down a lone bomber, then this is definitely not because of the gunners

  • Upvote 1
69th_Mobile_BBQ
Posted
15 minutes ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

A lone unaccompanied bomber is a gift for a good fighter. 90% that the bomber will be destroyed, unless the fighter makes a mistake. If someone has a problem shooting down a lone bomber, then this is definitely not because of the gunners

 

Unless you're flying early war Russian and are trying to climb up to 6k to catch a Ju-88.  Even if you get up there and close enough to activate the gunners, they can dive away with a 100+kph max critical dive speed.  You'll either have to let them go or let them laugh about that MiG or Yak that ripped himself apart chasing and didn't even get close.  

  • Upvote 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...