Jump to content

Tempest Mark V research


Recommended Posts

Posted

@ShamrockOneFive Thank you for replying and the suggestion about default view. Will take a look at that. Keep blasting things on infront ?

Posted

Its mutch better then it was in old il2, you can see oposite side of rudder, so you can seee all you need to check 6.

Posted
3 minutes ago, 77.CountZero said:

Its mutch better then it was in old il2, you can see oposite side of rudder, so you can seee all you need to check 6.

Yeah, old Il-2 the visibility was terrible, the bubble canopy was useless with the big headrest in the way.

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 8/22/2018 at 7:24 AM, No.41_Glen said:

Conclusion:  In January 1945, production 3rd batch with Sabre IIB Tempest were in the service, but the quantity is small. In February, Sabre IIB Tempests account for 50% victories. From September to December 1944, Sabre IIA engine Tempest were the absolute mainstream, however, their conversion to IIB status  is unknown. We don't know how much of them were upgraded to 11 lbs setup in late 1944.

 

So the Devs have decided on two models: +9 and +11lbs.

 

I have been trying to find out when the change occurred in 2nd TAF on the continent, but like a lot of WW2 subjects, the answer is blurry.

 

This post by Glen seems to match what I have gleaned from other sources, i.e. the +9 lbs version was the most common version until the end of 1944.

The +11 lbs version started appearing in substantial numbers in early 1945 and was the most prevalent version towards the end of the war.

 

Is that the consensus or is there other evidence floating around?

  • 4 months later...
  • 1CGS
Posted (edited)

I've taken advantage of the free downloads offered by the British National Archives to have a look at the reports filed by the Tempest squadrons. Of very helpful note is a list of reports from 3 Squadron from the fall of 1944 showing the total amount of ammo loaded for each mission. Every entry I've seen shows a max of 600 rounds per plane - the game's current ammo loading. 

 

(If anyone's interested in checking for themselves, the document is AIR/27/34/24).

 

EDIT: also, the one available 1945 ammo report from 3 Squadron for January shows the same thing: 600 rounds per plane.

Edited by LukeFF
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Any reports about tempests losing wings , or pilots needed to take care of pull on stick to not lose wings ?

  • 1CGS
Posted
55 minutes ago, CountZero said:

Any reports about tempests losing wings , or pilots needed to take care of pull on stick to not lose wings ?

 

No

  • Thanks 1
  • LukeFF pinned this topic
  • 1CGS
Posted (edited)

56 Squadron, August 1944:

 

56SqnAugustAmmoExpenditure.thumb.JPG.7f2b752e071334ebb694bb5d570dc05e.JPG

 

 

September 1944:

 

56SqnSeptemberAmmoExpenditure.thumb.JPG.5195828a1d6a5082f578c94b60578224.JPGCapture.thumb.JPG.db55e965a774e10d779ce0ea68723083.JPG

 

October 1944:

 

Capture2.thumb.JPG.1f13a769b6624daea9fba7c41201c9ac.JPG

Edited by LukeFF
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • 1CGS
Posted (edited)

November ammo expenditure report:

 

Capture3.thumb.JPG.2e651e7a4ba97d3ff37cd5f7739df57b.JPG

Edited by LukeFF
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

I think it would be great to have a "Extra ammo" modification then ?

 

Nice finding, Luke!

Edited by LF_Gallahad
  • 1CGS
Posted (edited)

December 1944:

 

Capture4.thumb.JPG.6a6885a0b2134b262c2ba000022e3e17.JPG

 

January 1945:

 

January45.thumb.JPG.3e08fba2665ccd164ca70e20bcb918b5.JPG

Edited by LukeFF
  • Upvote 3
Chief_Mouser
Posted

Good research Luke. Thanks.

  • 1CGS
Posted

Ack, false alarm, guys! I wasn't reading these charts correctly. Those columns are divided up into "Effective Sorties" and "Not Effective Sorties". When one adds up the numbers of aircraft in each of those columns, the number of rounds per aircraft is 600.

  • Upvote 3
NZTyphoon
Posted

Really interesting info Luke, thanks for that. Also notable is that long range tanks aren't listed in any of the 'LOADS CARRIED/EXPENDED' columns...does this mean that they weren't used, or were they overlooked for some reason?

  • 1CGS
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, NZTyphoon said:

Really interesting info Luke, thanks for that. Also notable is that long range tanks aren't listed in any of the 'LOADS CARRIED/EXPENDED' columns...does this mean that they weren't used, or were they overlooked for some reason?

 

I think drop tanks are listed under the category of "Bombs, RPs, L R Tanks, etc (By Types)." For instance, for 56 Squadron's January 1945 report, the third row highlighted shows 8 total planes that flew an Armed Recce, has "16" under the category of "Loads Carried" and "12" under the category of "Loads Expended." That tells me all 8 planes that day carried 2 drop tanks, and all but 4 were jettisoned.

 

Furthermore, many of the entries elsewhere in the ORB list these missions as "Long Range Armed Recce." So, I take that to mean these were missions flown with drop tanks.

Edited by LukeFF
  • Thanks 1
NZTyphoon
Posted
9 hours ago, LukeFF said:

 

I think drop tanks are listed under the category of "Bombs, RPs, L R Tanks, etc (By Types)." For instance, for 56 Squadron's January 1945 report, the third row highlighted shows 8 total planes that flew an Armed Recce, has "16" under the category of "Loads Carried" and "12" under the category of "Loads Expended." That tells me all 8 planes that day carried 2 drop tanks, and all but 4 were jettisoned.

 

Furthermore, many of the entries elsewhere in the ORB list these missions as "Long Range Armed Recce." So, I take that to mean these were missions flown with drop tanks.

Doh! (facepalm here) You're right - I missed reading the 45 Gal LRT in the first columns of the LOADS CARRIED/LOADS EXPENDED...

January45.JPG.f93744b1655cca19790fdebbad6779c9.thumb.JPG.1c6675d54e174527cb5bf51f10785b7f.JPG

  • 3 months later...
LLv34_Flanker
Posted

S! 

 

At work a nice manual found...just a teaser. 

 

 

IMG-20200817-WA0003.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
LLv34_Flanker
Posted (edited)

S! 

 

Another one..from the manual above. 

 

 

IMG-20200817-WA0006.jpeg

Edited by LLv34_Flanker
  • Upvote 1
LLv34_Flanker
Posted

S! 

 

The ammo is numbered rather than names. Does game indicate which ammo is used in Tempest? Could post appropriate pages of the manual. 

  • 5 months later...
  • 1CGS
Posted (edited)
On 8/24/2018 at 8:36 PM, No.41_Glen said:

 

Second production batch of 300 aircraft built by Hawker Aircraft Ltd, Langley, Buckinghamshire. EJ504, EJ518-EJ560, EJ577-EJ611, EJ626-EJ672, EJ685-EJ723, EJ739-EJ788, EJ800-EJ846, EJ859-EJ896. Series 2 aircraft, Sabre IIA engines with modifications, short-barrel cannon, spring tab ailerons. Deliveries commenced 5-44, completed 9-44; average rate of production approximately 18 aircraft per week.

 

Second production batch of 300 Tempest Vs built by Hawker at Langley: EJ504; EJ518-EJ560; EJ577-EJ611; EJ616-EJ-672; EJ685-EJ723; EJ739-EJ788; EJ-800-EJ846; EJ859-EJ896 Sabre IIA or IIB, Hispano V cannon, spring-tab ailerons Deliveries commenced 5-44; completed 9-44 18 aircraft per week. (From Francis K Mason Hawker Aircraft Since 1960, 1991 page 567

 

http://www.hawkertempest.se/index.php/piloter/victories

29 Sept

Fw190

1

56

S/L D.V.C. Cotes-Preedy

US-C (EJ721)

Emmerich area

 

29 Sept

Fw190

1

56

F/L A.R. Moore

US-M (EJ741)

Emmerich area

 

19 Nov

Me262

1/2
1/2

486

P/O O.D. Eagleson
F/L Taylor-Cannon

SA- (JN858)
SA- (EJ828)

Rheine

The last A/C with EJ896 series number, is 55 after EJ828 which had a victory on 19 Nov 1944, that's only three weeks gap(18 aircraft per week), so the last A/C of 2nd Batch(EJ896) joined the war no later than 10 December. This is the hard evidence that SabreIIB engine involved in 1944's battle.

 

 

 

Sorry to dredge up such an old reply, but I wanted to chime in here, since I have all the Tempest squadron ORBs. Anyways, it is plain from the records that 56 Squadron was using EJ Series Tempests from July 1944. Their first missions with Tempests were flown on July 2, and we can see the following EJ planes were utilized on that day:

 

EJ 559

EJ 536

 

EJ Series planes were not the most common type in the squadron, but they definitely show up throughout the month. I see these planes on hand flying missions with 56 Squadron during July 1944 (probably others as well, this was just a quick scan).

 

EJ 559

EJ 536

EJ 547

EJ 533

EJ 534

EJ 559

 

In August 1944, you start seeing a lot more EJ-series planes.

 

Meanwhile, 3 Squadron received their first EJ Series Tempest in early June 1944. At that time they had on hand (from the EJ production block)

 

EJ 504  - first flown operationally June 2; strangely, it then doesn't show up again for the rest of the month

EJ 525 -  first flown on 17 June by Wing Commander Beamont

 

So, in other words, Tempests with Sabre IIB engines were flying with 56 Squadron since July 1944, and 3 Squadron since June 1944. It doesn't look like 486 Squadron got EJ planes until some time later.

 

In conclusion, it's plainly obvious that Tempests had engines with IIB engines even since before the V-1 threat began, and they of course would have continued using them at +11 lbs on the Continent in the fall of 1944.

 

Attached is 56 Squadron's reports for July 1944.

 

AIR-27-531-34.zip

Edited by LukeFF
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)

Also using +11 lbs boost Tempest V over the Continent in the summer of 1944.  Below is an operations record book account of anti-diver (V-1 flying bomb) operations and armed recce over the continent in the same month of August 44.  You will see 25th Aug starting with anti-diver patrols and then an armed recce into France at Cassel, Nr St Omer.  Anti diver patrols are then resumed on 26th Aug.  Then on 27th Aug another armed recce near St Omer.  Then on 28th Aug an attack on a radar station in France at Cassel, near St Omer.  Seems they made a hell of a mess of it!

 

So +11 lbs boost Tempest V anti-diver squadrons were also on operations over Europe in between anti-diver operations during August 1944 (as well as September, see second operations book extract below).

 

Source for operational record book extracts here: Newchurch Village :: 56 Sqn Operations Record Books

25to31aug1944-sm.jpg

Some more 56 squadron (+11 lbs boost anti-diver rostered unit) Tempest V operations over the European continent detailed below.  I see they destroyed a staff car and FW 190's.

Last 2 missions from base on the continent at Grimbergen.  Note that activity recorded on this sheet covers to the end of September 1944, starting in England and then moving to Europe.

 

18to30Sept1944.jpg

Edited by ACG_Talisman
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
  • 1CGS
Posted

Another snippet on Tempest ammo loadouts, this time from 274 Squadron on 18 September 1944: one mission to attack flak positions in support of Market Garden, and another to target cover to Halifax bombers. In both cases, the ammo load is given as "8 x 600 x 20mm". In other words, 8 Tempests each carrying 600 rounds, so 150 rounds per gun.

 

Note as well the usage of drop tanks, since they were still based in the UK at this time.

 

897856485_274Squadron.thumb.JPG.a3ef182c6f10bdc245d940d169955d4f.JPG

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...