Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

 

continue in the same way

Без имени-1.jpg

On the blue side, for the first time this season, there is no queue for take-off, and this should please you )

IMG-20220207-WA0013.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Posted (edited)

Of course, it makes me happy. The funny thing is that there are regularly situations where each side has an advantage in numbers. But only one side this a problem. And yes, finding such a screen was not easy, I envy persistence :) The first 1-2 minutes from the start of the server. And not even today :)

Edited by =FSG=FRITZ
=AD=Kap-the-head
Posted
2 minutes ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

Of course, it makes me happy. The funny thing is that there are regularly situations where each side has an advantage in numbers. But only one makes this a problem. And yes, finding such a screen was not easy, I envy persistence :) The first 1-2 minutes from the start of the server. And not even today :)

My friend, that's called grasping at straws.  The first map, there was maybe a total of an hour, maybe two, where the Red side had an advantage.  The reason why it is more common now, is that the Blue side loses motivation, once you can no longer dominate the map.  Only hardcore pilots as yourself, SCG, JG, LG and a few others will continue to fight. Others will simply give up.  We've seen it almost every campaign.

  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)

I will not argue, because it makes no sense to answer "for everyone". For myself, I said that the last campaign "with the armor Emils" I flew "from call to call." And the rest are not my problems  :) By the way, some of the "day aces" of your side - also in prime time do not catch :)  And another nuance: in that company the important squads of SCG and LG were on your side.

Edited by =FSG=FRITZ
Posted
42 minutes ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

And another nuance: in that company the important squads of SCG and LG were on your side.

The blue side is very lucky, now these brave guys are with you and are creating problems for us

1 hour ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

And yes, finding such a screen was not easy, I envy persistence :) The first 1-2 minutes from the start of the server. And not even today

OK, if you need the details of the server visit by the sides

Screenshot_20220209-193515_Chrome.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

This is regular. In all campaigns. On both sides. Let's see what will happen this year, but at the age of 43 :) There is no point in arguing about this at all. There are a lot of good guys with us in this campaign. For example, 72AG and KK.

Edited by =FSG=FRITZ
Posted
6 minutes ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

There are a lot of good guys with us in this campaign. For example, 72AG and KK.

Yes, a strong opponent is always very interesting

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 минуты назад, =2ndSS=Climber1 сказал:

Yes, a strong opponent is always very interesting

100%

 

Posted

Thanks for deleting the fake account in my name. ?

Posted

Für alle Piloten, die letzte Nacht die Panzer in Ryabinki angegriffen oder verteidigt haben, es war ein schöner Kampf. das ist Luftkrieg, das ist Taw.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
=FPS=Cutlass_RL
Posted

Cool skill.

I take off my hat.....:drinks:

 

 

 

  • Haha 4
  • Sad 1
Posted
6 hours ago, =FPS=Cutlass_RL said:

Cool skill.

I take off my hat.....:drinks:

 

 

 

 

When I-16 Išak is coming after you, you better jump.

 

By the way real Russians would never complain when required to fly the Išak.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
SE.VH_Boemundo
Posted (edited)

Dear Taw admins,

 

I'm not flying this TAW, I'm with a baby of 7 months so I'm dedicating to him and helping my wife. However someone with bad behaviour registered my tag and nick, exactly like here in the forum, in the wrong side. I always fly luftwaffe, registered in VVS. I'm not flying but such thing are concerning my squad members, I would like to ask TAW admins to verify it for me. It's such a bad behaviour because affects my squad, would lock me if I intend to fly and generate suspicious between my squad members.

 

https://tacticalairwar.com/pilot.php?name=SE.VH_Boemundo

Edited by SE.VH_Boemundo
  • Like 1
=/Hospiz/=MetalHead
Posted
1 hour ago, SE.VH_Boemundo said:

Dear Taw admins,

 

I'm not flying this TAW, I'm with a baby of 7 months so I'm dedicating to him and helping my wife. However someone with bad behaviour registered my tag and nick, exactly like here in the forum, in the wrong side. I always fly luftwaffe, registered in VVS. I'm not flying but such thing are concerning my squad members, I would like to ask TAW admins to verify it for me. It's such a bad behaviour because affects my squad, would lock me if I intend to fly and generate suspicious between my squad members.

 

https://tacticalairwar.com/pilot.php?name=SE.VH_Boemundo


Thank you for the report. Sadly, you are not the only one. There is some troll impersonating people and creating dozens of fake accounts. Do not worry, we'll take care of that.

PS. Congratulations on your baby!

=FPS=Cutlass_RL
Posted (edited)

An explanation is required from the server administration about where the tanks appeared in the mission: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=76

if they were not there in the previous one: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=75

 

If they appear from the settlement Peskovatka, it may make sense them there and to hold 1-2 missions that the air force could have at least some opportunity to counter....?


We also need clarification about where the tanks coming from at the Shkolny airfield in the mission came from: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=78

if in the previous mission both tank columns in this direction were destroyed: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=76 

 

Оn the last map of winter Moscow, tank columns of the Reds advancing from the depths of the territory advanced to the enemy airfield 1-3 missions. and the enemy had the opportunity to scout and attack them. Why does it not work like this on the map of Stalingrad ....?

 

 

Edited by =FPS=Cutlass_RL
Posted
2 minutes ago, =FPS=Cutlass_RL said:

An explanation is required from the server administration about where the tanks appeared in the mission: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=76

if they were not there in the previous one: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=75

 

If they appear from the settlement Peskovatka, it may make sense them there and to hold 1-2 missions that the air force could have at least some opportunity to counter....?


We also need clarification about where the tanks coming from at the Shkolny airfield in the mission came from: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=78

if in the previous mission both tank columns in this direction were destroyed: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=76 

 

 

 

It was Steiner's attack, ordered by he himself, A. Hitler.

 

On another note, server is full again. Which is great! Long live this server!

=FPS=Cutlass_RL
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, messsucher said:

 

It was Steiner's attack, ordered by he himself, A. Hitler.

 

On another note, server is full again. Which is great! Long live this server!

That is, you can be sure that the next map will be "Zhukov's attack ordered by Stalin himself" ....?

 

If there is a desire to translate everything into "smehuechki" - humor department in another forum thread....:bye:

Edited by =FPS=Cutlass_RL
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, =FPS=Cutlass_RL said:

That is, you can be sure that the next map will be "Zhukov's attack ordered by Stalin himself" ....?

 

If there is a desire to translate everything into "smehuechki" - humor department in another forum thread....:bye:

 

Funny thing is that I would not want to be on that attack's way.

Posted
23 hours ago, =FPS=Cutlass_RL said:

An explanation is required from the server administration about where the tanks appeared in the mission: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=76

if they were not there in the previous one: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=75

 

If they appear from the settlement Peskovatka, it may make sense them there and to hold 1-2 missions that the air force could have at least some opportunity to counter....?


We also need clarification about where the tanks coming from at the Shkolny airfield in the mission came from: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=78

if in the previous mission both tank columns in this direction were destroyed: https://tacticalairwar.com/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=76 

 

Оn the last map of winter Moscow, tank columns of the Reds advancing from the depths of the territory advanced to the enemy airfield 1-3 missions. and the enemy had the opportunity to scout and attack them. Why does it not work like this on the map of Stalingrad ....?

 

 

 

 

1. In mission #76 there is a new tank convoy attacking Kachalinskaya from Peskovatka. It could have been attacked and destroyed by air force from Erzovka or Shkolniy. The distance between  Kachalinskaya and Peskovatka is very small so tanks can capture it in two missions. 

 

2.

Mission #76 tanks from Karpovka attacking Varvarovka and from Kalach attacking Verh. Tsaritsinsky (both destryed)

Mission #77 new tanks from Karpovka to Shkolniy (only slightly damaged)

Mission #78 the same tanks from Karpokvka advanced to Shkolniy

 

3. If the road distance between two enemy cities is big then it takes some missions for tanks to get to the destination If the distance is small and the road is a straight line then tanks need less missions to capture enemy city. 

4 hours ago, 72AG_SerWolf said:

Also. 

https://tacticalairwar.com/pilot_sortie.php?id=7451&name=Bark

"Pilot Exit", 0 experience, but +10CP.

Why? 

It will be fixed.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, =19GvFAB=Vlad-Executor said:

Is there an bug here?

Pilots issued a new aircraft for 3 CM.

https://tacticalairwar.com/pilot.php?name=Andriy69

 

1643000486_.png.a154e7fd4630742e1a1dbeb3dcefd112.png

it's because if you do a transport mission you get back a Basic Plane, so died in his basic plane, he had no planes anymore, he flew a transport mission and he gained back his basic plane

  • Thanks 1
=/Hospiz/=MetalHead
Posted
On 2/12/2022 at 3:55 PM, 72AG_SerWolf said:


If you look at these, several of them are just few minutes after take off. I'd say it's more of a proof that this guy might have some connection problems.
You can't really tell if it was intentional or accidental just by the logs. 
BTW. My squadmates engaged and shot down this guy recently. He chose to stay and fight (and die) instead of just disconnect. That says something.

We'd like to avoid banning people without hard evidence.
Best option is to record your engagements so you can catch someone red handed.
Thank you for report nevertheless.

  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted

let's stop this 13 years old things maybe?

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

It ain't TAW, if the war does not spread to the forum too.

Edited by messsucher
Typofix.
Posted (edited)
12 часов назад, =/Hospiz/=Metal_von_Head сказал:

We'd like to avoid banning people without hard evidence.
Best option is to record your engagements so you can catch someone red handed.
Thank you for report nevertheless.

And isn't it clear from the log of Bark's mission, to which I gave the link, that the "burning ball" came out of the game?

Edited by =FSG=FRITZ
72AGk_Maiskiy_Juk
Posted

While we are "joking very wittily", the blue side risks losing another battle.

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 минуту назад, SV7_Zommer сказал:

While we are "joking very wittily", the blue side risks losing another battle.

The blue side will now go to work. And red, it seems, this server catches as work :)

Posted
10 minutes ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

The blue side will now go to work. And red, it seems, this server catches as work :)

Numerical superiority doesn't help anymore?

Posted
1 час назад, =2ndSS=Climber1 сказал:

Numerical superiority doesn't help anymore?

How do I know? He, in the right column, there are 10 people, questions to them.

 

Без имени-1.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

How do I know? He, in the right column, there are 10 people, questions to them.

I saw you a few hours ago flying in a group of blue against one red)))

Mission#107

Posted (edited)

Siddy, you're so funny:

Без имени-1.jpg

Edited by =FSG=FRITZ
Posted
Just now, =FSG=FRITZ said:

Sidi, you're so funny:

Без имени-1.jpg

I understand that when you fly in the majority it's good, and when the enemy has the majority it's bad, but I'll give you a link to a resource where there is a schedule for visiting the server. It's perfectly clear which side usually has the advantage over the pilots

http://www.thewetbandits.org/smf/index.php?topic=285.0

 

  • Upvote 1
=/Hospiz/=MetalHead
Posted
4 hours ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

And isn't it clear from the log of Bark's mission, to which I gave the link, that the "burning ball" came out of the game?


It is clear. He got DISCO for that - it equals death, same penalties apply. Anyone who exits game while taking damage, or shortly after, gets DISCO and is punished accordingly.

Posted
19 минут назад, =/Hospiz/=Metal_von_Head сказал:

It is clear. He got DISCO for that - it equals death, same penalties apply. Anyone who exits game while taking damage, or shortly after, gets DISCO and is punished accordingly.

Not quite. He received minus 800. But death in its status and minus the pilot aside - no.

1 час назад, =2ndSS=Climber1 сказал:

I understand that when you fly in the majority it's good, and when the enemy has the majority it's bad, but I'll give you a link to a resource where there is a schedule for visiting the server. It's perfectly clear which side usually has the advantage over the pilots

http://www.thewetbandits.org/smf/index.php?topic=285.0

 

In this war - yes, in the past - it was different. There is never a balance here. Neither by time of day, nor by wars in general. There is no point in talking about this. But let's talk :)

  • Like 1
Posted
5 минут назад, kafa131 сказал:

=FSG=FRITZ  Go fight dude.

Unfortunately, I am not paid real money for TAW. And children want to eat. So, for now, no way :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...