No.23_Starling Posted November 14, 2023 Posted November 14, 2023 13 hours ago, ST_Catchov said: On reflection, the dihedral design of the upper wing was a simple yet brilliant way to improve upward and forward visibility. You gotta hand it to those French dudes for their innovative approach to aircraft design during the Great War. I'm warming to the Hanriot despite the fact I once called it a retarded Camel (to my eternal shame). My apologies Bender. If we ever get revised FMs with turn rates for the Albis and Pfalz more in keeping with @Holtzauge’s models I think that could breathe new life into something like the HD1. In RoF I flew it because it could outclimb the DII but trying to turn with it was a bad idea. That always felt backwards somehow to me - I expected to BnZ in the Albi. 1
ZachariasX Posted November 14, 2023 Posted November 14, 2023 3 hours ago, US103_Rummell said: If we ever get revised FMs with turn rates for the Albis and Pfalz more in keeping with @Holtzauge’s models I think that could breathe new life into something like the HD1. In RoF I flew it because it could outclimb the DII but trying to turn with it was a bad idea. That always felt backwards somehow to me - I expected to BnZ in the Albi. Given it is only a handful of us pestering the devs to implement a plausible FM (as opposed to constant terror regarding the P40 timer where there is constantly voiced customer dissatisfaction), I think we have to moderate our hopes to get more plausible FM's implemented. As long as people don't care too much for it, it will not impact sales, mking it a non-issue anyway. Remember, WT sells well. As for myself, I had hopes, but as things are going I see little point in buying FC4 given some of those those corresponding aircraft are drastically off in the FM (also to cater playability in RoF). Personally, I find it an attitude that sheds a dim light on the venture as a whole, including the to be announced announcement of an announcement. But at least we had a good run. 3
Holtzauge Posted November 14, 2023 Posted November 14, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, ZachariasX said: Given it is only a handful of us pestering the devs to implement a plausible FM (as opposed to constant terror regarding the P40 timer where there is constantly voiced customer dissatisfaction), I think we have to moderate our hopes to get more plausible FM's implemented. As long as people don't care too much for it, it will not impact sales, mking it a non-issue anyway. Remember, WT sells well. As for myself, I had hopes, but as things are going I see little point in buying FC4 given some of those those corresponding aircraft are drastically off in the FM (also to cater playability in RoF). Personally, I find it an attitude that sheds a dim light on the venture as a whole, including the to be announced announcement of an announcement. But at least we had a good run. I think that sums it up pretty well @ZachariasX. If canned porridge is selling, why change the recipe? Edited November 14, 2023 by Holtzauge
JGr2/J5_Klugermann Posted November 14, 2023 Posted November 14, 2023 Must have flown a lot against Plank and Wild Bill.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now