Jump to content

P-40 payload


Recommended Posts

Ghost666
6 hours ago, greybeard_52 said:

2021_4_13__15_47_42.jpg

Don't really know what you are saying. The basic load for the P-40 is 1410 IIRC and you are showing 1686, that's 276 or so extra additional rounds. Don't see a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites
PatrickAWlson

@greybeard_52 I do not necessarily model every possible payload.  Sometimes more are added and I miss them.  Others, especially the IL2, have so many combinations that it becomes onerous.  The one that you point our seems worth having.   

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
greybeard_52
3 hours ago, PatrickAWlson said:

I do not necessarily model every possible payload... The one that you point our seems worth having.

I forgot to add "hope this help" to my post, as it was meant to be a help and not a rebuke. Obviously it is your choice and I am already grateful to you for everything there is. I am pleased, however, that you find my suggestion worthy of consideration: according to "Curtiss P-40 In Action" (E.R. McDowell, Squadron / Signal Publications, 1976, ISBN 0-89747-025-7), in fact, that was the standard armament, and not a modification.

 

Cheers,

GB

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
PatrickAWlson
7 hours ago, greybeard_52 said:

I forgot to add "hope this help" to my post, as it was meant to be a help and not a rebuke. Obviously it is your choice and I am already grateful to you for everything there is. I am pleased, however, that you find my suggestion worthy of consideration: according to "Curtiss P-40 In Action" (E.R. McDowell, Squadron / Signal Publications, 1976, ISBN 0-89747-025-7), in fact, that was the standard armament, and not a modification.

 

Cheers,

GB

 

Feedback is always appreciated.  The payloads can be tricky.  With the Bodenplatte release they changed quite a few things about how payloads were designated.  Until I understood what was done I had something like 3 payloads for the P-38 because that was all that could be generated using the old designation methods.  it is also the case that 1C is constantly improving existing product.  This is a very good thing but I do not necessarily pick up on it when it happens.  New payloads, new skins, new ground unit types, new statics, new structures ... I always appreciate it when somebody points it out because I do not always catch it myself.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...