Ghost666 Posted April 13, 2021 Posted April 13, 2021 6 hours ago, greybeard_52 said: Don't really know what you are saying. The basic load for the P-40 is 1410 IIRC and you are showing 1686, that's 276 or so extra additional rounds. Don't see a problem.
PatrickAWlson Posted April 14, 2021 Posted April 14, 2021 @greybeard_52 I do not necessarily model every possible payload. Sometimes more are added and I miss them. Others, especially the IL2, have so many combinations that it becomes onerous. The one that you point our seems worth having.
greybeard_52 Posted April 14, 2021 Author Posted April 14, 2021 3 hours ago, PatrickAWlson said: I do not necessarily model every possible payload... The one that you point our seems worth having. I forgot to add "hope this help" to my post, as it was meant to be a help and not a rebuke. Obviously it is your choice and I am already grateful to you for everything there is. I am pleased, however, that you find my suggestion worthy of consideration: according to "Curtiss P-40 In Action" (E.R. McDowell, Squadron / Signal Publications, 1976, ISBN 0-89747-025-7), in fact, that was the standard armament, and not a modification. Cheers, GB 1
PatrickAWlson Posted April 14, 2021 Posted April 14, 2021 7 hours ago, greybeard_52 said: I forgot to add "hope this help" to my post, as it was meant to be a help and not a rebuke. Obviously it is your choice and I am already grateful to you for everything there is. I am pleased, however, that you find my suggestion worthy of consideration: according to "Curtiss P-40 In Action" (E.R. McDowell, Squadron / Signal Publications, 1976, ISBN 0-89747-025-7), in fact, that was the standard armament, and not a modification. Cheers, GB Feedback is always appreciated. The payloads can be tricky. With the Bodenplatte release they changed quite a few things about how payloads were designated. Until I understood what was done I had something like 3 payloads for the P-38 because that was all that could be generated using the old designation methods. it is also the case that 1C is constantly improving existing product. This is a very good thing but I do not necessarily pick up on it when it happens. New payloads, new skins, new ground unit types, new statics, new structures ... I always appreciate it when somebody points it out because I do not always catch it myself. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now