Talon_ Posted September 15, 2019 Posted September 15, 2019 56 minutes ago, jvm said: Then I wonder what airfield is it? Ed: I just realize the screenshots may have been made with BoK map, where airfields do resemble this one... It's over continental Europe - France, Belgium, the Netherlands or Germany.
ITAF_Rani Posted September 15, 2019 Posted September 15, 2019 Jason these american warbirds are the state of art. My compliments
Falcon41 Posted September 15, 2019 Posted September 15, 2019 Jason, Great update, the team is amazing in the work they create, the P-51, the P-38 and the B-25 are works of art. Their addition to the series will make a fantastic simulation even better. Job well done ?
-332FG-Hank_DG Posted September 15, 2019 Posted September 15, 2019 6 hours ago, jvm said: Then I wonder what airfield is it? Ed: I just realize the screenshots may have been made with BoK map, where airfields do resemble this one... They were made with the Bodenplatte map
1CGS LukeFF Posted September 15, 2019 1CGS Posted September 15, 2019 11 hours ago, OREL_Shifty said: I love the PSP runways (Pierced Steel Plank Runway, or "Marston Matt" or "Marston Matting") used in ETO and PTO. You can buy surplus sections of it here in the US. ? 7 hours ago, jvm said: Then I wonder what airfield is it? The last shot of the P-38 was taken over Cologne-Ostheim.
FeuerFliegen Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 Nice to see the P-38J-25 has airbrakes.... at first I thought it didn't because I remember playing another flight game with the J-15 model, and from what I remember, it didn't have airbrakes. Does anyone know what other upgrades the J-25 might have over the J-15? I'm also wondering if it has boosted control tabs, like the P-38L.
Talon_ Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 2 hours ago, FeuerFliegen said: Nice to see the P-38J-25 has airbrakes.... at first I thought it didn't because I remember playing another flight game with the J-15 model, and from what I remember, it didn't have airbrakes. Does anyone know what other upgrades the J-25 might have over the J-15? I'm also wondering if it has boosted control tabs, like the P-38L. Yes it has boosted ailerons 2
Brano Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 (edited) On 9/13/2019 at 8:13 PM, Pierre64 said: Originally applied during a shuttle-bombing escort mission and seen also on Ole V, this legend in Cyrillic translates as "Major Vazh Hovde", the name of the pilot’s father who was of Russian origin. (source : the old Mustang Aces of Eight Air Force by Jerry Scutts, Osprey). Edit : the profile above and more infos on Colonel Billy Hovde in this thread https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/new-book-illustrations-355th-fg-tfw.12629/ It is not "Vazh" but "VDZh" which is russian transcription of initials of major William Johnston (Hovde). V=W in William and DZh is for J in Johnston. Edit: Same as with Stalin's family name Jughashvili = Джугашвили Edited September 16, 2019 by Brano edit 1
FeuerFliegen Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Talon_ said: Yes it has boosted ailerons So, only the ailerons, but not elevators or rudder? Edit: Just looked it up and I see that the J-25 was the first P-38 with boosted ailerons. I'm very happy that we're getting this model as opposed to an older one. Edited September 16, 2019 by FeuerFliegen
Feathered_IV Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 14 hours ago, LukeFF said: You can buy surplus sections of it here in the US. ? The last shot of the P-38 was taken over Cologne-Ostheim. Interesting history for that airfield according to: Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Germany (1937 Borders) By Henry L. deZeng IV Bombed continuously by the RAF and the USAAF from 1940-45, and Ostheim airfield was hit many times. 10 Nov 44: bombed by 97 B-17 Fortresses. 17 Nov 44: airfield unserviceable indefinitely due to runway craters; Russians and Ukrainian women being used to effect repairs. 10 Jan 45: bombed by 83 B-17s - 14 x Ju 87s from NSGr. 2 put out of action with minor to severe damage. 6 Feb 45: bombed by 12 B-17s as a target of opportunity. 8 Mar 45: airfield evacuated and captured by elements of U.S. 13th Armored Div on 13th April
Trooper117 Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 Luckily, the B-17's don't actually have to be circling the airfield in question dropping bombs... they are already back at home airfield having bombed the crap out of it! And if we are being a tad pedantic, the B-25's can bomb the crap out of it as well...
EAF19_Marsh Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 6 hours ago, Feathered_IV said: Russians and Ukrainian women being used to effect repairs. Ouch! Something fortunately not modelled.
1CGS LukeFF Posted September 16, 2019 1CGS Posted September 16, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, Feathered_IV said: Interesting history for that airfield according to: Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Germany (1937 Borders) By Henry L. deZeng IV Bombed continuously by the RAF and the USAAF from 1940-45, and Ostheim airfield was hit many times. 10 Nov 44: bombed by 97 B-17 Fortresses. 17 Nov 44: airfield unserviceable indefinitely due to runway craters; Russians and Ukrainian women being used to effect repairs. 10 Jan 45: bombed by 83 B-17s - 14 x Ju 87s from NSGr. 2 put out of action with minor to severe damage. 6 Feb 45: bombed by 12 B-17s as a target of opportunity. 8 Mar 45: airfield evacuated and captured by elements of U.S. 13th Armored Div on 13th April You are welcome to add a zillion craters to the map if it's not to your liking after release, since it seems to be about the only thing you ever want to talk about in regards to the map. Edited September 16, 2019 by LukeFF 1
EAF19_Marsh Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 15 minutes ago, LukeFF said: in regards to the map. ‘...with regard to..’ or ‘...regarding...’ ? 2 1
sevenless Posted September 16, 2019 Posted September 16, 2019 Can´t wait to see something similar come true with this sim. 1 3
Feathered_IV Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 5 hours ago, LukeFF said: You are welcome to add a zillion craters to the map if it's not to your liking after release, since it seems to be about the only thing you ever want to talk about in regards to the map. That wouldn't work. The craters would need to be painted onto the ground textures themselves to look convincing. Adding scores of those identical near-black fresh crater decals in FMB would bring down performance and fail to provide a natural or realistic look. The airfield had bomb craters both old and new. Some of them a year or more old, other ones more recent. Still more would have been filled in and marked by a discolouration of the earth. Others may appear grassed over or covered in a blanket of snow. You can show all this without the performance hit if it is part of the airfield textures; Balancing the location and types of craters to allow the player to still use the airfield, but having enough ambient destruction in the outlying areas a give a convincing effect. Trying to do this in FMB by comparison just wouldn't work, and you would probably see it just as rarely as you do realistic damage in missions involving Gumrak or Pitomnik. Which is to say, never.
Krisu Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 Thank you for sharing all that goes into making aircraft, it was really entertaining to read and I'm getting excited with the idea of having more RAW POWER than the thousand year reich machines ... -_- Anyways. Much appreciated Tempest story for real definitely better than getting a single vague sentence with the word "models" in it. I'd probably be lost with engine management for now but I don't know, I'll see I guess. Could've should've must've practice with the P-40, oh well. Regards, you really do deserve every penny. PEACE
Danziger Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 14 hours ago, Feathered_IV said: That wouldn't work. The craters would need to be painted onto the ground textures themselves to look convincing. Adding scores of those identical near-black fresh crater decals in FMB would bring down performance and fail to provide a natural or realistic look. The airfield had bomb craters both old and new. Some of them a year or more old, other ones more recent. Still more would have been filled in and marked by a discolouration of the earth. Others may appear grassed over or covered in a blanket of snow. You can show all this without the performance hit if it is part of the airfield textures; Balancing the location and types of craters to allow the player to still use the airfield, but having enough ambient destruction in the outlying areas a give a convincing effect. Trying to do this in FMB by comparison just wouldn't work, and you would probably see it just as rarely as you do realistic damage in missions involving Gumrak or Pitomnik. Which is to say, never. There have been some mods that retexture the maps. Maybe someone can do a bombed out version?
Falcon41 Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 Jason, With all the discussion about bomb craters I’d like to know what are your plans regarding updating the Mission Editor. Since it’s release I’ve noticed several changes in the ME but have yet to see an update that gives us a final, or at least, the most recent version. What are the team’s plans?
Gambit21 Posted September 17, 2019 Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) Craters are easy to add, and their impact on FPS is zero to negligible IME. It would be nice to have a more "grassed over" crater of a color that matches the (multiple) background texture, or "snowed" over for the snow maps. As it is we have what we have...maybe we'll have more later crater blocks later but who knows. Regarding the editor, what do you mean you have seen the final or most recent version? I can tell you on good authority that the editor is not going to change in any appreciable way, nor does it need to...right now we just need it stable. Edited September 18, 2019 by Gambit21 1
Falcon41 Posted September 18, 2019 Posted September 18, 2019 (edited) Gambit21, What I meant was that when using the ME I’ve noticed multiple ways of achieving a given result. I think it must be my unfamiliarity with the ME overall and the fact that several guides provide different solutions which to a novice is confusing. I just need to get more familiar with the ME. Edited September 18, 2019 by Falcon41 Wrong spelling
Gambit21 Posted September 18, 2019 Posted September 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Falcon41 said: Gambit21, What I meant was that when using the ME I’ve noticed multiple ways of achieving a given result. I think it must be my unfamiliarity with the ME overall and the fact that several guides provide different solutions which to a novice is confusing. I just need to get more familiar with the ME. Ahh...well there are often multiple ways of achieving a result. If you have any specific questions you can ask them in the mission editor forum.
Dogbert1953 Posted September 18, 2019 Posted September 18, 2019 Haven't visited the forum since August 3. A lot has been done, so well done the devs.
AH_Col_Hogan Posted September 19, 2019 Posted September 19, 2019 Any chance of some teaser video? Would love to hear those Alisons.
334th_fulminator Posted September 23, 2019 Posted September 23, 2019 On 9/15/2019 at 1:00 PM, Trooper117 said: Hope not... there is no such thing as balance in war. Strange, there was me thinking it's a game...
Trooper117 Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 It certainly is a game... about war, strangely enough.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now