Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Giovanni_Giorgio
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, LLv24_Zami said:

I'm glad you have higher principles and not flying without resistance. We need that in this community.

Screenshot_20201103-112018.thumb.png.6a5a55d513ac324cbd198cff991dc8b6.png

 

 


Nice try. We have to respond and fly during the daytime, otherwise the campaign would have been over a long time ago. But most of us would prefer to not do this and fly on evenings only when serve is full and numbers are more even. Also, the fixes that I proposed would work for the both teams.

Edited by mincer
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, mincer said:


Nice try. We have to respond and fly during the daytime, otherwise the campaign would have been over a long time ago. But most of us would prefer to not do this and fly on evenings only when serve is full and numbers are more even. Also, the fixes that I proposed would work for the both teams.

I don`t even have to try, it goes both ways. But only one side brings it up regularly when they are loosing.

 

But if there`s reasonable improvements to this situation, that would be nice.

Edited by LLv24_Zami
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 1
Giovanni_Giorgio
Posted
4 minutes ago, LLv24_Zami said:

But if there`s reasonable improvements to this situation, that would be nice.


Yes. Look, we all greatly enjoy the TAW. But none of us likes the fact that we have to fly during the day hours to keep it going and be competitive. 

Posted
1 hour ago, LLv24_Zami said:

I'm glad you have higher principles and not flying without resistance. We need that in this community.

Screenshot_20201103-112018.thumb.png.6a5a55d513ac324cbd198cff991dc8b6.png

 

 

haha.jpg.0d2ad5c20cce4d2defa831993eb35262.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LLv24_Zami said:

I'm glad you have higher principles and not flying without resistance. We need that in this community.

Screenshot_20201103-112018.thumb.png.6a5a55d513ac324cbd198cff991dc8b6.png

 

 

20201103_135424.thumb.jpg.633d9d12abc6eed5148f0eb4dcc09471.jpg

Here you can better see who is bigger and when

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Cpt_Siddy said:

 

 

12 minutes ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

 

Here you can better see who is bigger and when

Sure, never said it is even all the time. But not complaining about it either. It`s 24/7 server, s**t happens

Edited by LLv24_Zami
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, LLv24_Zami said:

 

Sure, never said it is even all the time. But not complaining about it either. It`s 24/7 server, s**t happens

Sure is some passive-aggressive complaining. 

 

Edited by Cpt_Siddy
Posted
6 minutes ago, Cpt_Siddy said:

Sure is some passive-aggressive complaining. 

 

Oookay ?

FTC_DerSheriff
Posted

Reds finally Fell asleep after 72h of sleep deprivation?

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, DerSheriff said:

Reds finally Fell asleep after 72h of sleep deprivation?

 

Yes, and now you have at least some chance of winning. Don't miss it)

FTC_DerSheriff
Posted
1 minute ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

Yes, and now you have at least some chance of winning. Don't miss it)

Waited for my chance. To bad I have a job and a familiy. Really a detriment to my TAW bouncer career

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, DerSheriff said:

Reds finally Fell asleep after 72h of sleep deprivation?

 

just a toilet break 

  • Haha 5
Posted
12 minutes ago, DerSheriff said:

To bad I have a job and a familiy.

Other members of the blue team will do it, don't worry)

Operatsiya_Ivy
Posted

stop slut player shaming yo

  • Haha 1
Posted

@=LG=Kathon What is the formula for calculating scores in the Top 5 Fighter Squad?
It seems that before it was considered simple: air kills of a squad minus the death of pilots.

Posted
22 hours ago, III./ZG1_HeTzeR said:

Today red tanks where still on the road and not in field formation, but they took our AF Kachalinskaya, It looked like a bug since our defence was good and it was not even in attack mode.

 

After the capture they moved S into attack formation and attacked Kalach AF.

 

This must be a bug, since normaly once the tanks took an objective, they disapear

 

https://taw.stg2.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=271

Not a bug.

  • If tanks are near (16km or less) an enemy city they form an attack formation. In that case they were little farther.
  • If defense position is in good level after the mission then tanks wait one mission for air support. Here defense in Kachalinskaya was destroyed: http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=271
  • So tanks attacked the city, captured it and there were enough tanks and trucks alive (not destroyed) so it was possible to form another tank convoy to next enemy city. 
  • Those tanks were about 14km from Peskovatka so they formed an attack position. 

 

 

1 hour ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

@=LG=Kathon What is the formula for calculating scores in the Top 5 Fighter Squad?
It seems that before it was considered simple: air kills of a squad minus the death of pilots.

It's AK-(Deaths+Captures+Discos) 

On 11/2/2020 at 7:09 PM, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

I wonder if the Shkolny airfield was captured by the blue, then where the red warehouse should have appeared?

No, in that case it will not spawned at all. 

  • Thanks 1
I./ZG1_Badger1-1
Posted
1 hour ago, =LG=Kathon said:

Not a bug.

  • If tanks are near (16km or less) an enemy city they form an attack formation. In that case they were little farther.
  • If defense position is in good level after the mission then tanks wait one mission for air support. Here defense in Kachalinskaya was destroyed: http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=271
  • So tanks attacked the city, captured it and there were enough tanks and trucks alive (not destroyed) so it was possible to form another tank convoy to next enemy city. 
  • Those tanks were about 14km from Peskovatka so they formed an attack position. 

 

 

It's AK-(Deaths+Captures+Discos) 

No, in that case it will not spawned at all. 

 But they where on the road and not in attack formation ?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, =2ndSS=Lawyer1 said:

@=LG=Kathon What is the formula for calculating scores in the Top 5 Fighter Squad?
It seems that before it was considered simple: air kills of a squad minus the death of pilots.

I think, now that is:

AK - (KIA + DISCO)

For the whole squad offcourse. MIA was not included before and neither is now... Can you confirm@=LG=Kathon?

Edited by CSW_Hot_Dog
Posted (edited)

Battle-of-Moscow-film-images-aabcea54-27

Stalin: "Can we hold Moscow? Speak to me honestly, like a communist."

Zhukov: "Yes, we can!" 

 

 

I want to congratulate all the Red Army pilots! History repeats itself!

 

Capture.JPG

Edited by Xiaozhan
  • Thanks 2
Posted
27 minutes ago, Xiaozhan said:

Battle-of-Moscow-film-images-aabcea54-27

Stalin: "Can we hold Moscow? Speak to me honestly, like a communist."

Zhukov: "Yes, we can!" 

 

 

I want to congratulate all the Red Army pilots! History repeats itself!

 

Capture.JPG

Lol 

Red is back to square one from four days ago ...Good effort from red team . 

Some great raids well planned and executed . 

  • Upvote 1
Giovanni_Giorgio
Posted
14 hours ago, DerSheriff said:

Reds finally Fell asleep after 72h of sleep deprivation?

 


giphy.gif

Posted
18 hours ago, 1stCL/rudidlo said:

Still not enough to simulate WWII tactics. During the war, ratio of captured cities to airfields was more than opposite.

Technically cities are captured in TAW, and most just happen to have an airfield nearby so that is captured as well.  I read this either in the manual or from a reply by Kathon some time ago.  As if to support this, if memory serves, the distance from the city to the tank column (and not from the nearby airfield) dictates when the airfield is closed (I.e. < 25 km or 15 for a corner airfield).

Posted
4 hours ago, KoN_ said:

Lol 

Red is back to square one from four days ago ...Good effort from red team . 

Some great raids well planned and executed . 

Leninsk was destroyed by 58%. The red team was on the verge of defeat

Posted
19 часов назад, Cpt_Siddy сказал:

just a toilet break 

 

Posted

From the manual-

 

"if tank limit is exceeded then tank convoys are not generated, when both sides lose all their tanks, map ends with a draw"

 

Question- So when one side loses all of their tanks, how long does the map go on to give that team a chance to also finish off the enemy tanks so it ends in a draw?  Or do both sides have to coincidently lose all of their tanks in the same mission?

 

Also, as far as the manual goes, "Options to download, print, and copy have been disabled on this file"

 

Can you disable this?  I was trying to copy and paste a section to a friend earlier, but I was prevented from doing so.

Posted
1 hour ago, SCG_FeuerFliegen said:

Also, as far as the manual goes, "Options to download, print, and copy have been disabled on this file"

Can you disable this?  I was trying to copy and paste a section to a friend earlier, but I was prevented from doing so.

 

Done. Thank you.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
13 hours ago, III./ZG1_HeTzeR said:

 But they where on the road and not in attack formation ?

 

Correct :) They were more than 16km from the Kachalinskaya so they were on the road.  Taks are able to move up to about 20km between missions so it was possible to capture that city after that mission because there were no defense at all. 

1 hour ago, SCG_FeuerFliegen said:

From the manual-

 

"if tank limit is exceeded then tank convoys are not generated, when both sides lose all their tanks, map ends with a draw"

 

Question- So when one side loses all of their tanks, how long does the map go on to give that team a chance to also finish off the enemy tanks so it ends in a draw?  Or do both sides have to coincidently lose all of their tanks in the same mission?

 

Also, as far as the manual goes, "Options to download, print, and copy have been disabled on this file"

 

Can you disable this?  I was trying to copy and paste a section to a friend earlier, but I was prevented from doing so.

When one side loses all of their tanks there are 3 options:

1. Opposite side also loses all of their tanks after some time => map ends in a draw.

2. Opposite side captures or closes all of enemy city/airfields after some time => opposite side wins

3. Warehouse is generated and not completely destroyed so that side is able to generate tanks again => maps goes on. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Xiaozhan said:

I want to congratulate all the Red Army pilots! History repeats itself!

 

Capture.JPG

 

Mission 252 was like 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 20
Posted (edited)

@=LG=Kathon

In the rules point 2 there is a rule. "If you create a new account (the same side) it will be automatically locked."
Are these pilots banned for creating two or more accounts? This violation of the rules leads to the devaluation of virtual life. You don't have to think about your survival at all, as you can always create another 1 account.

606680418e8e37dea2e1250c9e4275a5.jpg

Edited by JGr8_Leopard
  • Upvote 5
=AD=Denisik_FL
Posted
3 minutes ago, JGr8_Leopard said:

@=LG=Kathon

In the rules point 2 there is a rule. "If you create a new account (the same side) it will be automatically locked."
Are these pilots banned for creating two or more accounts? This violation of the rules leads to the devaluation of virtual life. You don't have to think about your survival at all, as you can always create another 1 account.

606680418e8e37dea2e1250c9e4275a5.jpg

 

 

Can you fight on the server, but on the forum?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Guest deleted@233953
Posted
31 minutes ago, =22AMG=Denisik said:

 

 

Can you fight on the server, but on the forum?

 

Exactly. Rules are not for everyone right? I just buyed second game because  so cheap now ?  Maybe need U2 for supply also ? 

I./ZG1_Badger1-1
Posted

Maybe and to counter this behaviour, we should go back to the roots(ADW) and just get banned for 10-15min EVERY time we die or get captured.

 

A 15min break isnt that bad but benefits the other team plus might discourage people in buying new accounts etc.

 

Switching back and forth( plus getting permabanned if kathon wants to) is maybe more of a hassle, then just get another beer and slap the wife 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Start permabanning people who has a cat and wife flying and you can play a co-op against AI.

 

There is not very big line to join the red side. 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
3 часа назад, =22AMG=Denisik сказал:

Can you fight on the server, but on the forum?

There are rules. They have a ban on the creation of multiple accounts.

  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)

I think you dont understand the rule:

-Try it yourself, create in TAW new registration with different name and new registration will be locked. Every Il2 account has its own ID and it is allowed to have only one TAW registration per side under this ID.

-These people probably buy two or more IL2 accounts, its not that hard with current sale prices and they can create one TAW registration per side under each of il2 account. You can also buy another instance of Il2BOS for $11.99 and have two accounts. These people only named their TAW registration similary, but under different il2 accounts. If they choose completely different names, you would not even notice.

-LG has no other possibilities than check game ID, what if I name my TAW registration JGr8_Leopart, would you want to be my and your account banned?

Edited by CSW_Hot_Dog
  • Upvote 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...