WWII Aircraft Suggested Plane List

[Jackfraser24]

16 hours ago, kraut1 said:

Yes, BF-109 E-4 would be nice, especially for a Battle of Britain. Fuel would be same as E7 I suppose, because in IL-2:GB no drop tanks available.

But concerning the armament: the E4 had already from early August onwards the MG-FF/M with the Mine Shells.

 

For Battle of france (we have already sufficient available maps) the -E3 would be great, and it was used during BoB too.

(in my EMG BoF mod I have changed for BoF missions the explosive charge to the russian 20mm and flew with manual propeller control)

I recon they should do drop tanks. That way we could carry out bomber escort missions without having to worry about running out of fuel.

Edited August 23, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[Jackfraser24]

Bf-109 G-10 - 10 reasons why

• The G-10 would serve a purpose in Bodenplatte pilot career.
• The G-10 would make the game be more historically accurate by being in pilot career.
• The G-10 was built in substantial numbers (2,000+ units).
• The G-10 would complement the Bf-109 G-14 and K-4 nicely.
• The G-10 was made to be a better fighter than the G-14 until the K-4 was ready.
• There are still a few G-10 units still around in air museums around the world.
• The G-10 wouldn't be too hard to model because of the relative similarity to other Bf-109G series.
• The G-10 was in IL-2 1946. It would be nice to see it in Great Battles.
• The G-10 would appeal to those who love Bf-109s, as well as virtual pilots whose ancestors flew that very sub-variant.
• I think it would be good to see as many collector planes made for Great Battles because that has got to be easy money for them.

[GOA_AveFenix506*VR*]

Bf-109 G-10 for fill that gap between the G-14 and K4.

 

Fw-190 A9 for complete the 190 Family.

 

 

Regards.

 

Karaya.

[Jackfraser24]

Bf-109 G-10 AS - 10 Reasons why

• Would help fill in some of the gaps in pilot career in Bodenplatte. 
• Would appeal to late Bf-109G fans.  
• The G-10/AS would be easy money for 1CGS.
• Could be used in a potential late war Eastern Front module such as Konigsberg, Balaton or Berlin (once computer technology is able to process the city).
• Famous fighter aces like Erich Hartmann and Heinz Ewald flew the G-10/AS. 
• It would do well as a high altitude fighter, like the G-6/AS and complement the G-10 (if that ever gets made)
• It was more streamlined than the G-10 base model due to having a smaller radio antennae. 
• Wouldn't be something new to learn how to fly (commonality with other 109s).
• I'd like to see them out do War Thunder in this area. They do not have a G-10/AS (I have no dislike towards War Thunder though, none at all).
• All and all even though I know it would just be another 109, there's nothing physically dislikable about this plane. 

Edited August 23, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[kraut1]

8 hours ago, Jackfraser24 said:

• Could be used in a potential late war Eastern Front module such as Konigsberg, Balaton or Berlin (once computer technology is able to process the city).

For late war Eastern Front "Courland Pocket October 44 - May 45" could be interesting too:

-Russian and German pilot could really end their Eastern front Pilot Career at 8th May 45.

-Ground and Sea Battles (anti ship missions).

-The only bigger city Riga would be a bit outside of the combat zone, would work with the current technology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courland_Pocket

https://ludwigheinrichdyck.wordpress.com/2019/12/08/life-and-death-struggle-for-the-courland-bridgehead/

Air Units (info for soviet air force link by @sevenless)

https://airwarpublications.com/a-beginners-guide-to-the-soviet-air-force-over-courland/

https://www.weltkrieg2.de/luftwaffe-im-letzten-kriegsjahr/

I will soon release a small mod for mission generation, could be used to test if Courland is a good topic for a new module:

 

[Jackfraser24]

34 minutes ago, kraut1 said:

For late war Eastern Front "Courland Pocket October 44 - May 45" could be interesting too:

-Russian and German pilot could really end their Eastern front Pilot Career at 8th May 45.

-Ground and Sea Battles (anti ship missions).

-The only bigger city Riga would be a bit outside of the combat zone, would work with the current technology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courland_Pocket

https://ludwigheinrichdyck.wordpress.com/2019/12/08/life-and-death-struggle-for-the-courland-bridgehead/

Air Units (info for soviet air force link by @sevenless)

https://airwarpublications.com/a-beginners-guide-to-the-soviet-air-force-over-courland/

https://www.weltkrieg2.de/luftwaffe-im-letzten-kriegsjahr/

I will soon release a small mod for mission generation, could be used to test if Courland is a good topic for a new module:

 

You've done an amazing job so far. Doing Courland would be awesome! When are you aiming to get it done by?

 

Edited August 24, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[kraut1]

15 minutes ago, Jackfraser24 said:

That's awesome! Are you planning on making a map of the Courland next? Because that would be really cool! You've done an amazing job so far.

Not a real map, sorry. I am not able to do that.

But with the similar existing area in the RHEINLAND map and the (simple) modified GUI Map and predefined "semi historical" fronts, plane sets and ground units you can create quick playable missions and see, if the Courland topic is interesting or not.

[Jackfraser24]

1 minute ago, kraut1 said:

Not a real map, sorry. I am not able to do that.

But with the similar existing area in the RHEINLAND map and the (simple) modified GUI Map and predefined "semi historical" fronts, plane sets and ground units you can create quick playable missions and see, if the Courland topic is interesting or not.

Still though that's pretty cool what you guys are doing.

[sevenless]

13 hours ago, Jackfraser24 said:

Bf-109 G-10 AS - 10

 

Sorry nitpicking mode on:

 

There was no such thing as a G10/AS. It was either a G10 or a G14/AS.

 

And yes, for completeness sake of the 109 family we need a G10.

[=BLW=Pablo]

 

The D-13 has a more powerful engine, and this would make it a great rival for the P-51.

 

 

 

And the Gloster Meteor flew in WWII, although it didn't see combat.
But I think it would be very interesting to see it against the 262.

 

 

Edited August 25, 2024 by =BLW=Pablo

[Jackfraser24]

Bf-110 C-4 - 10 Reasons Why

• The Bf-110C in general was an iconic variant of the Bf-110 which flew sorties in the battles over Poland, France and Britain and was used on the Eastern Front during the initial stages of Operation Barbarossa. 
• The Bf-110C was significantly different to the Bf-110E as the former was effectively a downgrade in comparison to the latter in terms of performance, engine power and armament. Still, difference matters! 
• The C-4 would be useful in the upcoming Odessa module for pilot career as well as for the upcoming Karelia map (Siege of Leningrad included). They'd be useful for ground attack, fighter bombing and bomber escort missions and bomber destroying missions. 
• I believe we need more Bf-110 variants because the Bf-110 played a massive role in WWII in the air and it was not just two variants that flew sorties during the war. 
• The C-4 would be relatively easy money for 1CGS as they could base everything off of Bf-110 variants that are in the game. No, I don't know much about economics but I do believe that there will be enough players (like myself) who would buy it just to have them all. 
• The C-4 came in two variants. The C-4 base model (Zerstorer) and the C-4/B, which was a fighter bomber version of the C-4. I recon this would help make it a popular collector plane.
• The C-4 would be useful if someone wanted to make a Battle of Britain short movie on YouTube in order to make it look more authentic. Or a Battle of the Low Countries such as Belgium for that matter. 
• There are only two Bf-110s in Great Battles - the E-2 and the G-2, and to get either one of them you have to pay for entire modules to get them. So if there was a Bf-110 made as a collector plane and you liked the Bf-110, well you'd be in luck!
• The C4 would appeal to Bf-110 fans and overall I think that it would be a very popular collector plane because of it's semi-multirole capabilities, and because it would contribute to pilot career, or at least in the upcoming Odessa and Karelia maps. 
• It was in IL-2 1946. I know it was a lot easier back then to model heaps of planes in such a short time than what it would be now, but I think it would be nice to see an early version of the Bf-110 in Great Battles. 

Edited August 28, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[kraut1]

On 8/24/2024 at 11:07 AM, Jackfraser24 said:

Still though that's pretty cool what you guys are doing.

It's released. If you are interested you can try. You have already Bodenplatte with the map and the FW190-A8 (3 FW190-A8 sp missions are included)

https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/89214-kurland-kurzeme-194445-mod-v01/

 

[Jackfraser24]

Bf-110 C-7 - 10 Reasons Why

• The C-7 was a subvariant of the Bf-110C, which was in my opinion the most iconic of all the Bf-110 variants. It saw action during the blitzkrieg across Europe as well as the Battle of Britain. It was also produced in large numbers. 
• The C-7 would appeal to Bf-110 fans for obvious reasons. It would also appeal to players whose ancestors flew in the C-7, or people who like to do ground attack missions in planes suited for it in general. 
• The C-7 should be relatively easy to make as well as being not too time consuming because they can base it off of the other Bf-110s in the game which as most of you know are the E-2 and the G2. I believe it would be easy money too in order to fund new IL-2 projects. 
• The C-7 would be a useful asset to have in the a Siege of Odessa and a Battle of Kuban 1942 Pilot Career mode as a fighter bomber and close air support aircraft as it could carry up to 1,000 kg worth of bombs. Would also improve historical accuracy of pilot career mode.
• The C-7 would tear down the idea that the only Bf-110 to see service in the Odessa region and the Kuban region were the E-2 and G-2 respectively, when in fact there were multiple variants in an area at the same time. 
• Adding in Bf-110 variants such as the C-4, C-7 and F-2 would add a bit of variant diversity into each single Bf-110 Zerstorer units in pilot career mode, which I think would look more realistic and appealing. 
• The C-7 was greatly different to the already in the game E-2 and the probable future F-2 variants in terms of being a bit of a downgrade in terms of armament and performance, which I think will be more challenging to fly against more advanced Soviet fighters like the Yak-9 and the La-5.
• I believe we need more Bf-110 variants. Certain variants did better than others in lets say ground attack or bomber destroying missions or they were more prevalent in a given area at one stage, i.e. the Bf-110C was more numerous than the Bf-110E or G at Kuban during 1942 (might not actually be true but for example). 
• If anybody wanted to use the Normandy map to make a Battle of Britain YouTube short movie, the C-7 would make the depiction more historically accurate. Also there is a multiplayer scenario coming up where there will be an Operation Sea Lion like scenario so if anybody wanted to record a battle for YouTube, this would be great!
• The C-7 would also be useful in pilot career mode in possible future maps such as Smolensk, Crimea, Kursk or Courland/East Prussia.  

[LW_Pilot777]

Some Beaufighters ( IF , IIF , VIF and TF.X ) and ofcourse A-20G ( and some glass nose vestion like C/mk III and J/K ) ..

[FTC_ChilliBalls]

On 8/25/2024 at 11:03 PM, =BLW=Pablo said:

 

The D-13 has a more powerful engine, and this would make it a great rival for the P-51.

 

I'm not actually sure whether either the D12 or D13 ever actually flew a combat sortie, but it certainly would be a really cool plane to fly in game.

They could be a single plane as the only difference would have been the installed Motorkanone. 

As for performance, the D12 and D13 were actually slightly slower (about 5kph) than the D9 up to 4000 meters, but afterwards just simply didn't run out of steam.

 

Interestingly, the Jumo 213F they were using was basically a 213E without the intercooler due to the required space, and they were about to solve this issue with the 213EB which had a different intercooler design which did fit the D12 airframe, though none of these actually ever flew as far as I am aware.

[Jackfraser24]

Anybody got any ideas for collector planes that Great Battles really needs? I'd be interested to hear them.

[Jackfraser24]

Bf-110D - 1 Reason Why

• The Bf-110D was a long range variant of the Bf-110C which would be useful for long range strike missions as well as for anti-shipping and maritime patrol missions so it would be useful to have in a German pilot career in Kuban and Normandy. 

 

[Jackfraser24]

Bf-110 F-2 - 10 Reasons why

• The Bf-110F was an important variant of the Bf-110 numerically speaking as about 500+ of them were made, and they made a significant impact on the air war over Europe and the Soviet Union too.  
• The F-2 would have a place in Stalingrad, Kuban and Normandy pilot career mode. It would be a good bomber destroyer, ground attack, anti ship and close air support aircraft. Also it would make pilot career more historically accurate.
• The F-2 would be relatively easy to make and not too time consuming for a large twin engine heavy fighter. If they could keep making aircraft similar to what they already have in the game they could make a lot of easy money.  
• The F-2 would also help add some variety to non-player controlled planes in Advanced Quick Mission Builder. For example instead of just escorting Bf-110 E-2s in the Stalingrad AQMB the could have F-2s as well which would give the mission a bit of a different look. 
• The F-2 would help bridge the evolutionary gap between the Bf-110 E-2 and G-2. This point might not be so much of a big deal but I think it would look nice as you scroll down the aircraft menu. 
• The F-2 was an upgrade compared to the E-2 as it offered better performance, upgraded engines, and enhanced armament. It was also a downgrade compared to the G-2 and wasn't as good of a night fighter, which I think would make things more of a challenge to fly. 
• The F-2 was lighter than the G-2, generated less drag than the G-2, had a better balance between fire power and agility, and it did not have the burden of carrying heavy armament, which would be useful in bomber destroying.  
• One F-2 actually survives in the  Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin so from my understanding it would be relatively easy for the IL-2 team to study as opposed to having to all that trouble of digging up a heap of resources to make the plane as realistic as possible. 
• Pumping out new aircraft would keep Great Battles relevant for the near future. 
• It would appeal to Bf-110 fans and would make the game mean more to people whose ancestors flew the Bf-110 F-2.

[nesher666]

On 9/7/2024 at 11:15 PM, Jackfraser24 said:

Anybody got any ideas for collector planes that Great Battles really needs? I'd be interested to hear them.

https://www.artstation.com/artwork/zPG4em

 

The ultimate Jug in the ETO.

[Jackfraser24]

2 hours ago, nesher666 said:

https://www.artstation.com/artwork/zPG4em

 

The ultimate Jug in the ETO.

The P-47M would be cool to have.

[Jackfraser24]

We still need a lot more aircraft for IL-2 Great Battles.

 

Axis

• Bf-109 G-10
• Bf-110 C-7
• Bf-110 F-2
• Do-217 E-1
• Do-217 M-1
• Fw-190 A-4
• Fw-190 A-9
• He-111 H-20
• He-162 A-1/2
• Ju-87 B-2
• Ju-87 D-5
• Ju-188 A/E
• Mc.200 Serie 7

Allies

• A-20G
• A-26B
• B-25D
• B-26B
• LaGG-3 Series 4
• LaGG-3 Series 66
• La-7
• P-38G
• P-38L
• P-39D
• P-39N
• P-39Q
• P-40M
• P-40N
• P-47 D-30
• P-47M
• P-47N
• Tomahawk Mk.IIa
• Tomahawk Mk.IIb
• Yak-3
• Yak-9D
• Yak-9U

 

Edited September 13, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[Jackfraser24]

On 4/21/2022 at 9:34 AM, LukeFF said:

 

Another question. At this stage do the development team have any interest in doing some more medium bombers like the Do-217, He-111 H-20, Ju-188 A/E, A-20G, Il-4, Tu-2, B-25D and B-26B, or would they rather spend their time and money investing in the new project?

[Aapje]

They'll make whatever planes they think will make Odessa and Korea sell, with a preference for easier to make planes. We already know that bombers generally do not fare the best in this kind of determination.

Edited September 16, 2024 by Aapje

[ITAF_Rani]

[Enceladus828]

20 hours ago, Jackfraser24 said:

Another question. At this stage do the development team have any interest in doing some more medium bombers like the Do-217, He-111 H-20, Ju-188 A/E, A-20G, Il-4, Tu-2, B-25D and B-26B, or would they rather spend their time and money investing in the new project?

They're making the Tu-2 for Korea that's all we know. The A-20G is a maybe for Odessa but there are a lot of other planes I'd like to see first like the Bf-110F-2, P-39Q, IL-2M and Pe-3. At this point the He-111H-20 and Ju-188 are a dead horse.

 

15 minutes ago, ITAF_Rani said:

With no Battle of Tunisia or Sicily I highly doubt we'll get anymore Italian planes. When you think about it was unfortunately a mistake to add the MC 202 because for starters no Italian voices were officially added and historically speaking the C.202 only did 17 sorties at Stalingrad before being withdrawn. My guess is that there was a tentative plan in 2015 to do a MTO installment after BoM and the C.202 would be the stepping stone for that but changed when LOFT left.

Edited September 16, 2024 by Enceladus828

[II/JG17_HerrMurf]

As you may know, I am totally down for a D-13

 

 

Edited September 16, 2024 by II/JG17_HerrMurf

[Jackfraser24]

9 hours ago, Enceladus828 said:

They're making the Tu-2 for Korea that's all we know. The A-20G is a maybe for Odessa but there are a lot of other planes I'd like to see first like the Bf-110F-2, P-39Q, IL-2M and Pe-3. At this point the He-111H-20 and Ju-188 are a dead horse.

 

With no Battle of Tunisia or Sicily I highly doubt we'll get anymore Italian planes. When you think about it was unfortunately a mistake to add the MC 202 because for starters no Italian voices were officially added and historically speaking the C.202 only did 17 sorties at Stalingrad before being withdrawn. My guess is that there was a tentative plan in 2015 to do a MTO installment after BoM and the C.202 would be the stepping stone for that but changed when LOFT left.

Honestly I don’t know what is going to come next. We’ll see what comes. They might announce something big sometime in October.

[BraveSirRobin]

4 minutes ago, Jackfraser24 said:

Honestly I don’t know what is going to come next. We’ll see what comes. They might announce something big sometime in October.

They’re doing Korea.  They’re not announcing the next thing when they’re not even close to releasing Korea.

[Jackfraser24]

1 hour ago, BraveSirRobin said:

They’re doing Korea.  They’re not announcing the next thing when they’re not even close to releasing Korea.

I meant for Great Battles and Flying Circus.

[Jackfraser24]

Odessa 1941 Plane List

 

Axis

• Bf-109 E-4
• Bf-110 C-7
• Do-17 Z-2
• He-111 H-3
• Ju-87 B-2

Soviets

• IL2 Model 1940
• I-16 18 Series
• LaGG-3 Series 1
• SB-2
• Yak-1 Series 1

 

Edited September 19, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[Jackfraser24]

Odessa 1944 Suggested Plane List

Axis

• Bf-109 G-8
• Do-217 E-1
• Fw-190 A-4
• Ju-87 D-5
• Ju-88 A-14

Soviets

• A-20G
• IL-2 Model 1944
• La-7
• Tu-2
• Yak-3

Edited September 21, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[BraveSirRobin]

On 9/17/2024 at 12:29 AM, Jackfraser24 said:

I meant for Great Battles and Flying Circus.

 

Both of those things have also been announced 

[=BLW=Pablo]

On 8/23/2024 at 12:16 PM, GOA_Bf109Pilot_VR said:

Bf-109 G-10 for fill that gap between the G-14 and K4.

 

Fw-190 A9 for complete the 190 Family.

 

 

Regards.

 

Karaya.

 

There's more to the FW family.

 

 

 

The first seven FW190 A0 has shorter wings and a smaller, lighter engine.
I'd like to see it here.

 

Again, NO images with swastikas are permitted on these message boards. - mods

[Jackfraser24]

On 9/20/2024 at 6:58 AM, BraveSirRobin said:

 

Both of those things have also been announced 

I am well aware of the Karelia/Odessa module and of Flying Circus Vol. IV. All anyone knows is that beyond the I-153 all we know of for sure that is going to come out is the Yak-3 Series 9. The Development team in Brief Room Episode 3 back in Jan 2024 may have hinted that the La-7, Yak-3 and the Ju-87 D-5 were likely their next collector planes and are now ever since that the Yak-3 has been confirmed and that they were working on other aircraft, the latter two are likely in development. They mentioned in Dev Diary 365 that other planes are in the works besides the Yak-3. This could mean that VVS planes that fought in the Karelia and Odessa regions during 1944 could also include the A-20G, IL-2 Model 1944, Tu-2, Bf-110 F-2, Do-217 M-1, Fw-190 A-4, He-111 H-20 and the Ju-188 A-1 for their pilot career modes. Those planes could also have a use for Normandy and Bodenplatte pilot careers. They mentioned in Brief Room Episode 3 that the Tu-2 and Bf-110 F-2 as well as the Fw-190 A-9 and the IL-10 are possibilities. The Fw-190 A-9 and the IL-10 don't have a place in Great Battles though, or at least at the moment. You could argue that they meant that the latter four planes that I listed above are possible because they are possible to make, but they could say that about almost any fighter or bomber that is not too complex to build. Maybe a late war Eastern Front map might come into fruition one day before they halt development on Great Battles completely. If that is true they would have to scrape the barrel to make a list of ten aircraft. This is all purely just for speculation. 

Edited September 21, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[Jackfraser24]

Would anyone be interested in the Do-217 E-1 for the Eastern Front?

Edited September 24, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[Jackfraser24]

Bf-109 G-6 Romanian Version

Why?

• Would appeal to Romanian audiences and ancestors of Romanians who flew in sorties in operations against Allied forces. It would commemorate history for them.
• Had some differences in performance compared to German built G-6s due to different manufacturing processes and using slightly different materials to make their G-6s. 
• The G-6 was an important fighter plane in the Romanian Air Force of WWII, and having a Romanian licence built G-6 would be a valuable plane to have in Odessa pilot career mode.
• The cockpit labels and signs were in Romanian which would help relate to Romanian audiences better.
• It would complement the IAR-80/81 nicely.

[Jackfraser24]

On 9/17/2024 at 5:22 AM, Enceladus828 said:

They're making the Tu-2 for Korea that's all we know. The A-20G is a maybe for Odessa but there are a lot of other planes I'd like to see first like the Bf-110F-2, P-39Q, IL-2M and Pe-3. At this point the He-111H-20 and Ju-188 are a dead horse.

Would you want the IL-2 dev team doing aircraft like the Yak-9D and U for Odessa and Karelia 1944? They were very important Yak-9 variants towards the end of the war. 

[Jackfraser24]

Do-217 M-1 - 10 Reasons Why

• The Do-217 M-1 would enhance Stalingrad and Kuban pilot career mode by filling in some of the gaps as a medium sized tactical bomber and would complement the He-111 and Ju-88 nicely. Also it would give us another type of bomber to shoot down. 
• The Do-217 M-1 would also have a place in pilot career on the Western Front, especially in Normandy when the Luftwaffe's bomber force was still operable. Many Do-217s, both belonging to the K and M variants were stationed in France during the Invasion of Normandy. 
• The Do-217 M-1 was fast (475 km/h at sea level; 560 km/h at 5,700 meters), had a good range (2,180 km) and offered pilots a good field of view thanks to it's fully glazed cockpit, similar to that of the He-111P and H. 
• I think it is time that IL-2 introduced a new family of aircraft into Great Battles. I think the sensation of shear novelty of introducing an all new plane rather than just another variant of an existing type will keep people interested in Great Battles. 
• The M-1 variant of the Do-217 was a numerically important variant. Out of nearly 2,000 Do-217s built, 438 (according to Wikipedia) were M-1s. So if they were going to cover any variant of the Do-217, I think that this would be the most appropriate. 
• If the Do-217 M-1 was going to be made I reckon that the DLC would also include the K-1 variant. The K-1 and M-1 were virtually the same aircraft just with different engines. This would increase its value as a collector plane. 
• The Do-217 M-1 would be a useful to have in a multiplayer battle. It had a maximum bomb load of 4,000 kilograms, which over half of it could be stored internally. A whole wave of these bombers could do a lot of damage to your enemy. 
• The Do-217 M-1 would appeal to players whose ancestors flew them during the war, those who prefer the Do-217 over the Ju-88 and He-111, or people in general who just like the look of the plane, or is impressed with its performance. 
• There are still quite a few European Axis aircraft left out of the game that I think should be in it. I understand that they cannot do them all, and that they don't need to, but I think that the importance of the Do-217 in the Luftwaffe cannot be ignored.
• The Do-217 K-1 (and K-2 for that matter) was in IL-2 1946 as an unplayable aircraft in the base game, and I am sure there are many who wish that the IL-2 team would make one for Great Battles. I know bombers take longer to make and and I appreciate and respect that fact. Just an idea though!

Edited October 8, 2024 by Jackfraser24

[Docholiday]

In my Opinion a really new plane would be more interesting !

 

Not the 10th version of planes we have already in the game ..

 

My all time favourites would Be

 

-  Beaufighter X   (or 6c)

-  B-25 G (The Pacific Straffers)

-  A- 26 Invader

-  A-20G  (with straffer nose)

 

 

Cheers

 

Doc

[Jackfraser24]

4 hours ago, Docholiday said:

In my Opinion a really new plane would be more interesting !

 

Not the 10th version of planes we have already in the game ..

 

My all time favourites would Be

 

-  Beaufighter X   (or 6c)

-  B-25 G (The Pacific Straffers)

-  A- 26 Invader

-  A-20G  (with straffer nose)

 

 

Cheers

 

Doc

A Beaufighter would be nice to have in Great Battles.