Jump to content

Developer Diary, Part 51


Recommended Posts

Posted

NICE

Improvement in FM realism. Thank you :)

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Thanks team.  As much as I would like to see major new elements added each week I appreciate that you don't serve things up until they are ready.  And that the overall project seems to be on schedule.  Thank you!

Burning_Bridges
Posted

If cold air is denser, wouldn't it also increase drag?

Posted

Freycinet said:

 

For true flight simmers this was a very good update

 

I agree, but can you please stop these side-swipes/put-downs at those who may have been less than bowled over...? (...what is an *untrue* flight simmer? A *flight-liar*? :) )

  • Upvote 1
DD_bongodriver
Posted

If cold air is denser, wouldn't it also increase drag?

yes it does is the short answer.

Posted

Looking good guys..  I agree totally with Freycinet as well.  Patiently watching this sim unfold and loving the results. 

Posted (edited)

If cold air is denser, wouldn't it also increase drag?

Yes, it would. If the engine developed the same power, you'd achieve a higher indicated air speed but a lower true air speed. With your engine creating more power, you'll end up with a similar true air speed, but a considerably higher indicated air speed.

 

In a simple estimate a temperature drop of 10% absolute (like -15°C instead of +15°C) will give you 10% higher density, which will give you 10% more drag at the same true speed but also give you 10% more power. You should see an about 5% difference on your speed indicator. The effect on climb rate, however, will be a lot bigger.

Edited by JtD
=IRFC=SmokinHole
Posted

The effect of temperature on performance isn't minor or academic--it's HUGE. On a hot summer day my initial climb rate is about 2500 FPM. I don't fly much in the winter but I had to recently to test after some maintenance. At 5•C I was averaging somewhere around 3000-3500 FPM. Cold air does help overcome the lack of density at higher altitudes but the influence is not as great. You can be at ISA -40C at sea level but climb up to 20000 and the seasonal temperature differences are more minor, say ISA to ISA - 15C.

Posted

Nice progress, keep it up!!!

Posted

Looking good :biggrin: Cooler Air has increased density and as such tends to have increased moisture content which improves atomisation ,(the attachment of fuel particles to air particles ). With the additional density & moisture combustion pressure increases slightly and when ignition happens from the spark in a petrol engine the resulting rapid burn is far more even and efficient .The draw back when the engine is cold is the need to increate fuel to air ratio to start up and gradually reduce it until the optimal engine operating temperature is reached . With Compression ignition Engines  the diesel fuel may solidify in extreme cold and  requires either additive or warming to liquefy .A heater may be used in the air intake ,combustion cylinder or both to warm the air prior to starting the engine promoting  detonation on injection and many pumps also have a cold start button that will briefly give extra fuel for the injectors at the initial crank up which will briefly increase pressure over normal cold engine compression values .

Posted

good news, thank you.

and now I'd like to test the Il2 :cool:

Posted

If this experience doesn't teach me anything else, it has really put into context the massive amount of work that goes into each little step forward. Rather like RoF, you can almost sense the sweat and tears each week! I'm not one to expect an aircraft a week in any case, but it's a real insight.

Thanks devs!

Posted

 

Hello everyone.

 

It's +28 C and a light midday rain on the Caribbean isles.

 

Aaaah, i knew there was good contact to Luthier - best greetings :lol:

Posted

FM looks better now. I agree too, but dont like this new "motion blur" from cocpit and outside.

Posted

The trails look nice. It would be even nicer if the development of trails depend on external conditions. Depending on external condition the trail length could change or there could be no trail at all. 

Posted

So are we now allowed to make our own graphic settings decisions again? Or at least turn &%!?# SSAO off?

 

(sorry for the negativity, but I'm simply not seeing myself shell out 400 bucks for a new GPU just because of this...)

Posted

Where is the new spotter mission?

Posted

the radio spotter work fine but it is to quietly


Where is the new spotter mission?

stalingrad air and ground mission

Posted

Cool, fly high this weekend :)

 

I watched a show about fighter training and some of the f-16 pilots that was transferred to alaska from more southern bases said the fighters preformed better in sharp turns because of the cold air. The engine got little more power too. They said the air is like metal, it expands in warm and shrink in cold. Takeoff roll was shorter in alaska than california.

Posted

FM looks better now. I agree too, but dont like this new "motion blur" from cocpit and outside.

as I wrote in F5 thread:

 

"The disturbing thing (for me) is that the blur effect is active also when changing FOV (zoom in/out) and when looking around with trackir... I try to focus my eyes when looking around.

 

I like the new Stalingrad map - buildings (remains) are no longer only black & white".

DD_bongodriver
Posted

still not fixed the nose bounce/wobble thing, what is the deal with the view always returning to centre? when did that happen?

Posted

 what is the deal with the view always returning to centre? when did that happen?

 

What do you mean by this?

Posted (edited)

Some more .../... and can't get rid of.  Motion Blur.

 

 

At this point I'm not even surprised anymore.

Edited by Rama
DD_bongodriver
Posted

I am not using TrackIR since mine broke, so I was using mouselook, before the viepoint would stay where I put it but now it keeps self centering to the forward view


Posted

So are we now allowed to make our own graphic settings decisions again? Or at least turn &%!?# SSAO off?

 

(sorry for the negativity, but I'm simply not seeing myself shell out 400 bucks for a new GPU just because of this...)

 

I have to agree with you, ROF allows us to shut this off. Why are we being ignored, this sim is unplayable with the graphics the way they are.

=38=Tatarenko
Posted

 

I am not using TrackIR since mine broke, so I was using mouselook, before the viepoint would stay where I put it but now it keeps self centering to the forward view

 

There are four view options that can be cycled by pressing F9.

LLv44_Mprhead
Posted

I have to agree with you, ROF allows us to shut this off. Why are we being ignored, this sim is unplayable with the graphics the way they are.

 

Nope, it's not. Just finished flying couple of missions. Point is, it's not unplayable for all, seems that most of us can play. It is unfortunate that some are having so seriuos problems with it, but I am sure it will get fixed.

Posted

The gauges are all out of focus/blurry now  when I switch views and go back to cockpit view, momentarily.

I am still having severe stuttering/framerate issues when strafing ground targets and fps set to unlimited. This on balanced preset.

Dead Zones still resetting to 0 between each session ( closing and opening of the program).

  • Upvote 1
  • 1CGS
Posted

hmmm.... and ... how do I know the engine temperature in Bf when the thermometer is not working?

 

Does it really have to be explained again why some things are incomplete right now?

  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)

Stalingrad has lost the monochromatic look it had which I think is an improvement. Though it's a little difficult to be sure because things are out of focus a lot of the time from the (truly God awful!) motion blur effect.

 

Really, who thought this was a good idea? It's even triggered from the cinematic effect movement on external view F2. And as already mentioned instruments are blurred when you adjust your view. Not a good idea to inflict this on us when there is NO way to turn it off.

 

Sorry to be so critical, but it is really annoying!! 

Edited by kendo
  • Upvote 1
Posted

Stalingrad has lost the monochromatic look it had which I think is an improvement. Though it's a little difficult to be sure because things are out of focus a lot of the time from the (truly God awful!) motion blur effect.

 

Really, who thought this was a good idea? It's even triggered from the cinematic effect movement on external view F2. And as already mentioned instruments are blurred when you adjust your view. Not a good idea to inflict this on us when there is NO way to turn it off.

 

Sorry to be so critical, but it is really annoying!! 

 

Yeah noticed it when doing my strafing run but the stuttering/low fps made it hard to tell which was which...

Posted

Some more .../... and can't get rid of.  Motion Blur.

 

 

At this point I'm not even surprised anymore.

No great fan of that myself. Still, if it took a week to add it, perhaps it will take a week to get rid. I thought I'd had too much gin (as if that's possible).

Posted

Hi!

 

I'd like to throw in my lot for the anti-motion blur crowd. I've a good rig and it does not hurt my performance I just cannot stand it. Motion blur immediately takes me out of the action and destroys the suspension of disbelief. There I am with the full sensation of flight, turn my head slowly, and I'm back in my office looking at a blurry monitor. I'm sure other folks have different opinions and those are totally valid. Things like SSAO and Motion blur ( also shadows and reflections ) are the reason for graphics settings.   I am ok, with the graphics profile idea in general, but there certainly need to be some options that are toggle-able regardless of graphics profile. Hopefully that will be the case by release time.

 

Thanks

No601_Prangster
Posted

Stalingrad looks really realistic now with better colours and more detail. The 109 cockpit has been repainted with much better weathering and I'm not having a problem with the motion blur.

 

My 770 card runs Ultra High settings at a consistent 60fps (Vsync). Nice work!

Posted

Motion blur can be turned off:

 

Options - Camera - Cinematic camera = Off

  • Upvote 2
ATAG_Slipstream
Posted

Just need SSAO off switch now.

Posted (edited)

Had another flight and I agree Stalingrad is looking incredible now. Have more buildings been added now as well or is it just the colours that have been changed? 

 

Whatever, the effect now is extremely realistic. The artillery shelling seems to be heavier now too. The landscape generally is looking better than ever, but flying low over Stalingrad and looking back over the length of the city with shells exploding on land and in the frozen river and the palls of black smoke - WOW!!

 

Good work.

 

(Just make the blur optional please - without me having to turn off the cinematic effect - which I like!)

Edited by kendo
Posted

@Jaws. Thanks! I had not seen that.  It is nothing concrete but the sim feels very very good right now. I'm loving the lagg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...