Tactical Air War

[FTC_HK]

3 minutes ago, JGr8_Leopard said:

This is the official verified data. What are the confirmations of your words? Why not from June 1941?

Yak-9 M-105PF produced two plants: N153 - from October 1942  to February 1943 (from the 1st to the 3rd series, the last aircraft  - N03-51), a total of 195 aircraft; and N 166 - from January to August  1943 (from the 1st to the 6th series), a total of 264 aircraft. Thus, a total of 459 Yak-9  M-105PF aircraft were built

http://www.combatavia.info/index1yak9.html

 

Yak-1b - ("b" is unofficial suffix, just like those of Yak-7B). New upper gargrot, armoured frontal and rear glass, back view mirror, back of head and left hand are armour protected, 2xSHKAS replaced with 1xUBS, new fire control system, new control stick, new sight VV-1 instead of OPV. First flown (a/c No 35-60) in June 1942. Entered serial production 11-Aug-1942 (first 10 produced in September, replaced Yak-1 in November). 4188 were built.

https://web.archive.org/web/20130430162446/http://www.aviation.ru/Yak/#1

 

Please stop spreading bullshit.

[Norz]

1 minute ago, JGr8_Leopard said:

Don't tell me what to do.

 

Did you see my word "Please" ? 

[JGr8_Leopard]

7 минут назад, ACG_HardeKoning сказал:

Yak-9 M-105PF produced two plants: N153 - from October 1942  to February 1943 

http://www.combatavia.info/index1yak9.html

 

Yak-1b -  First flown (a/c No 35-60) in June 1942. Entered serial production 11-Aug-1942 (first 10 produced in September, replaced Yak-1 in November). 4188 were built.

https://web.archive.org/web/20130430162446/http://www.aviation.ru/Yak/#1

Ok,  wikipedia:  The first vehicles, designated FW-190A-5, entered service in November 1942.  

Adding them in November 1942?

 

http://polyot.su/main.php?id=127

Production of the Yak-9 began at the end of 1942.

 

https://avia.pro/blog/samolet-yak-9-harakteristiki-foto-video-istoriya

Introduced at the end of 1942, the Yak-9

 

End of 1942. He was in combat units not earlier than spring-summer 43

Edited November 12, 2020 by JGr8_Leopard

[todeskvlt]

1 minute ago, Norz said:

 

1. I see nothing about the ships in the mission history (Did they happend?).

 

Because server crashed after that mission but you wrote "ships" so you knew about it.

 

3 minutes ago, Norz said:

2. The only one reason for the fast front line are the 4 groups of the tanks (Mission 2, 3). If it is not a bug, than it is a very very very bad feature.

 

Maybe yes but it's Axis offensive. You can't predict everything.

[Norz]

1 minute ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

Maybe yes but it's Axis offensive. You can't predict everything.

 

4x is too many. You know, it is like that you have a home play on your stadium but decided to change the guest team from 11 to 8 or 7. 

3 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

Because server crashed after that mission but you wrote "ships" so you knew about it.

 I was not sure. I saw some picture in the thread before. SO, finally i edited my post to delete it.

Edited November 12, 2020 by Norz

[todeskvlt]

6 minutes ago, Norz said:

4x is too many. You know, it is like that you have a home play on your stadium but decided to change the guest team from 11 to 8 or 7. 

 

Yes i understand you but all issues are happening during the campaign and it takes time (and campaigns) to test and improve everything.

Edited November 12, 2020 by =LG=todeskvlt

[Norz]

9 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

Yes i understand you but all issues are happening during the campaign and it takes time (and campaigns) to test and improve everything.

 

 

 

 

Noone here will accuse the TAW team. We are here to play the campaign. Do we really want (most of the players) just to start the map No 7? I am not sure. Why do not ask the players?

 

My vote is to restart the map No6 (if it is possible to solve the issue with the tank columns).

Edited November 12, 2020 by Norz

[I./ZG1_HeTzeR]

I vote not to  

[Norz]

1 minute ago, III./ZG1_HeTzeR said:

I vote not to  

 

Do you vote just to write 4x2 for the blue team for the current TAW campaign and we will meet us in 3..4 months again ? I am just curious.

Edited November 12, 2020 by Norz

[todeskvlt]

7 minutes ago, Norz said:

 

Noone here will accuse the TAW team. We are here to play the campaign. Do we really want (most of the players) just to start the map No 7? I am not sure. Why do not ask the players?

 

My vote is to restart the map No6 (if it is possible to solve the issue with the tank columns).

 

Is not up to me. You talked about bugs so i just wanted to know what bugs exactly, that's all. On map 8 you will have same situation but reversed.

[Norz]

3 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

Is not up to me. You talked about bugs so i just wanted to know what bugs exactly, that's all. On map 8 you will have same situation but reversed.

 

 

 

 

So, we have calculated to finish the current campaign in one week? (Map 7 in 3..6 days, Map 8 in 1 day). Sad!

 

P.S. I will send my new monitor back to amazon. I will not use it in next 4 months. You will be responsible for that!

Edited November 12, 2020 by Norz

[72AGk_Maiskiy_Juk]

21 minutes ago, Norz said:

 

Noone here will accuse the TAW team. We are here to play the campaign. Do we really want (most of the players) just to start the map No 7? I am not sure. Why do not ask the players?

 

My vote is to restart the map No6 (if it is possible to solve the issue with the tank columns).

Restarting a single mission, or the entire map #6?

[Norz]

Just now, SV7_Zommer said:

Restarting a single mission, or the entire map #6?

 

As I can see the whole story was started in the mission No2.

[I./ZG1_HeTzeR]

I dont see why (of course I see why, you are losing) you want to restart the whole map, since there are no bugs(no more then usual), this is a blue attack map, that means that there will be more blue tanks....read the f*cking manual but let me just do that for you: 

#1 Moscow North – Axis offensive

#2 Moscow South – draw

#3 Moscow North – Allied counteroffensive

#4 Stalingrad Center – Axis offensive

#5 Stalingrad South – draw

#6 Kuban – Axis offensive---->we are here

#7 Stalingrad Center – Allied counteroffensive

#8 Kuban – Allied counteroffensive---->you get more red tanks here

Edited November 12, 2020 by III./ZG1_HeTzeR

[Norz]

12 minutes ago, III./ZG1_HeTzeR said:

I dont see why (of course I see why, you are losing) you want to restart the whole map, since there are no bugs(no more then usual), this is a blue attack map, that means that there will be more blue tanks....read the f*cking manual but let me just do that for you: 

#1 Moscow North – Axis offensive

#2 Moscow South – draw

#3 Moscow North – Allied counteroffensive

#4 Stalingrad Center – Axis offensive

#5 Stalingrad South – draw

#6 Kuban – Axis offensive---->we are here

#7 Stalingrad Center – Allied counteroffensive

#8 Kuban – Allied counteroffensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now I understand clearly what do you mean with the sentence "Axis offensive". Thank you for help. Do you want to ask to modify the manual? 4x tank columns during the mission No2. It will be clear for all players (instead just Axis offensive or Allied counteroffensive).

 

P.S: You can read. Glad to know it.

 

#1 Moscow North – Axis offensive

 

http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=1

http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=2

http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=3

http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=4

http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=5

http://taw-server.de/pilots_mission.php?mission_id=6

...

 

I hope you can calculate the number of the tank groups on your own.

Edited November 12, 2020 by Norz

[=LG/F=Kathon]

The campaign will be resumed tomorrow on 13.11.2020 at about 18:00 UTC. I need to do more tests 

[SCG_Fenris_Wolf]

I vote to restart the campaign after stuff got fixed.

 

With the Hurricane.

 

With the Google sheet to achieve balance voluntarily for the big squads.

 

Let the forums burn, it's winter anyway we could use some warmth.

[todeskvlt]

Just now, SCG_Fenris_Wolf said:

I vote to restart the campaign after stuff got fixed.

 

With the Hurricane.

 

With the Google sheet to achieve balance voluntarily for the big squads.

 

Let the forums burn, it's winter anyway we could use some warmth.

 

I vote to restart the campaign anytime when something is wrong or someone is unhappy with the result

[SCG_Fenris_Wolf]

1 minute ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

I vote to restart the campaign anytime when something is wrong or someone is unhappy with the result

Sounds like a good idea

 

Who gets the reset button

 

Siddy?

[JG4_Widukind]

I vote for more sanity in this Forum

[E69_McKinley]

People dont think about this is a Game  for enjoy??

I cant believe...

[Blakhart]

Kathon testing features

 

https://www.sadistic.pl/sterownik-do-swiatla-dyskotekowego-vt528676.htm

Edited November 12, 2020 by =LG=Blakhart

[=19GvFAB=Vlad-Executor]

War. War never changes.

 

The End of the map occurred pretty much as we had predicted. Too many attacks of tanks from blue side, not enough space or resources for reds. The details are trivial and pointless, the reasons, as always, purely human ones.

The red defense was nearly wiped clean of life. A great cleansing, an blue bombs by human hands, quickly raged out of control. Spears of TNT fire rained from the skies. Red airfields were swallowed in flames and fell beneath the boiling oceans. Allies was almost extinguished, and their spirit of victory becoming part of the ash that blanketed the earth.

 

A quiet darkness fell across the Map-6, lasting many hours. Few survived the devastation. Some had been fortunate enough to reach safety,  on the forum, where they continued their war. When the great offline-darkness passed, and the taw-server went up, these forum-inhabitants emerged to begin their lives again in the new war again on new map...

And it all started all over again...

 

War. War never changes.

Edited November 12, 2020 by =19GvFAB=Vlad-Executor

[AKA_Relent]

22 hours ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

Still it is not a bug. No one expected that front line will move so fast in one day. This is how map started:

 

 

It's not a problem now? Isn't it? Ships and warehouses have constant spawn places, not dynamic.

Given that the front line was changed (at the start) as above from previous Kuban maps,  maybe the static ships location could be moved more to the rear and less to the side, to avoid this situation.  Seems a good location would be south west of Anapa/west of Gelendzhik.

[Coldman]

 

 

[=AD=Denisik_FL]

1 hour to go?! 0_o

[[110]xJammer]

Tbh it would be nice to see more advanced aircraft / payloads be gated behind the player's experience level, just like its done with 262. (i.e. 23mm laggs, yak9/ts, k4 engine, 150oct, etc. etc.). And the current spread of aircraft could be wrapped up into "tiers" just like right now yak1b and yak9 share the same hangar slot. 

Edited November 13, 2020 by [110]xJammer

[SE.VH_V1PER]

 

Congratulations to the admins.
Make a campaign at this level it's not easy. Congratulations again. Sorry if the text is bad. English is not my main language.
PK_Viper

Edited November 13, 2020 by PK_Viper

[=AD=Denisik_FL]

Where are you Red?

[C-47A]

21 hours ago, =19GvFAB=Vlad-Executor said:

War. War never changes.

 

"War never changes" vs "War has changed"

Quite the contrary, war has changed. I find the latter to be more accurate in terms of the techniques used to win these wars. Level bombing for example is entirely pointless in IL-2, for why would you waste all that time and effort climbing when you can more accurately wipe out the whole depot by cleaning up the AAA & low altitude bombing it in under 10 min.

https://i.imgur.com/DvSoAb7.mp4
https://i.imgur.com/VtL3ebS.mp4

 

On the western front TAW you don't even need to clean the AAA.

https://i.imgur.com/7QqGDH3.mp4

IL-2 has proven to me that war does changed, the limitations imposed upon us by the game lead us to adapt, overcome, and to improvise.

 

[Coldman]

DEVS!!! add pls G-6 late next week when it comes to TAW plane set ?

[KG100_Brannon]

Nice promo trailer =LG=.  Enjoyed it.

[=AD=Denisik_FL]

7 hours ago, =LG=Coldman said:

 

 

 

Nice flights! 1 shot - one kill, this is bad, the developers of the game did it wrong, the plane should not fall from the 1st hit ... Now we are waiting for the same video for the Reds)

[Plev]

Is it possible to have my password reset? I was registered as 69th_Andy but changed my name to ACG_Andy and now I'm locked out of that account on TAW

[[GCA]T1m270]

Website Cities display is broken after restart. 

[O_Mollusc]

8 hours ago, ACG_Andy said:

Is it possible to have my password reset? I was registered as 69th_Andy but changed my name to ACG_Andy and now I'm locked out of that account on TAW

Did you change your official IL-2 in-game name to match the new one?

[Giovanni_Giorgio]

Does anyone actually enjoy the campaign? IMHO the first 2 + maybe third maps were fun and interesting, then it all turned into an endless boring swamp. 

[todeskvlt]

12 hours ago, =22AMG=Denisik said:

Nice flights! 1 shot - one kill, this is bad, the developers of the game did it wrong, the plane should not fall from the 1st hit

 

You can do the same if you learn how to shoot good instead of crashing on enemy hangars like yesterday.

[Giovanni_Giorgio]

2 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

You can do the same if you learn how to shoot good 

Really? We really can do that?

[=AD=Denisik_FL]

14 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

You can do the same if you learn how to shoot good instead of crashing on enemy hangars like yesterday.

Do you want to say that you shoot well ?!))) Go behind the red, and repeat the result, then you can talk to. Home aces of Goering.

16 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

crashing on enemy hangars

If you're already falling, then why not fall into the hangar?)