FlyingNutcase Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Looking good as usual, well done. I'm really enjoying the I-16, I can't wait to see more skins and meaningful missions for it. Top notch badge art! Very impressive indeed. Edit: I like this smiley better! Indeed, the quality of the medals shouldn't be overlooked; they seem very thematic and extremely well done. Kudos 777 artists!
Feathered_IV Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 The 88 looks great and the improvements to singleplayer will be very welcome. Nice job on the medals too!
1CGS LukeFF Posted February 6, 2016 1CGS Posted February 6, 2016 Maybe the outer wing bombs, as they are not very common on actual pictures of the plane That one screenshot does show SC250s (or perhaps SC500s) on the outer wing racks, plus at least one more large bomb underneath the fuselage. This should be a really fun plane with lots of armament options. And, it can dive-bomb!
Cybermat47 Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 This should be a really fun plane with lots of armament options. And, it can dive-bomb! I think it will quickly become more popular than the He-111, thanks to how versatile it is
Boomerang Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 All looking brilliant! BOM release getting closer and closer Great work, thank you.
-JG2-Oesaumarousovo Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Full news - here is a full text and visual materialsYou're very welcome to subscribe for new videos here You can ask new questions in this thread Very nice. Ju 88 is looking great, but it I think ju 88 can have something more than other bombers, like 50mm canoon or it can have upgraded nose like ju 88C. But its your work. Full news - here is a full text and visual materialsYou're very welcome to subscribe for new videos here You can ask new questions in this thread Very nice. Ju 88 is looking great, but it I think ju 88 can have something more than other bombers, like 50mm canoon or it can have upgraded nose like ju 88C. But its your work. 1
LLv24_Zami Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Really looking fantastic. You guys are monopolizing my available flight sim time these days! I was running a mission last night and fell asleep once I gained cruising alt. Woke up ~7 min. later at the action point, same relative altitude That`s the spirit, you don`t let a little fatigue to get in the way of playing one more mission I had something like that last night. I was a bit tired after work but decided to fly one more mission in my current La-5 campaign. Everything went well, shot down couple of He-111s. I turned home with couple of escort fighters chasing me. Airfield AA took care of them. Satisfied I turned to the landing but the plane behaved a bit strangely. The reason was this: I forgot my gear up Edited February 6, 2016 by Zami 1
F/JG300_Gruber Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 That one screenshot does show SC250s (or perhaps SC500s) on the outer wing racks, plus at least one more large bomb underneath the fuselage. This should be a really fun plane with lots of armament options. And, it can dive-bomb! I meant on vintage photographs of the 88 in action.
II/JG17_HerrMurf Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 That`s the spirit, you don`t let a little fatigue to get in the way of playing one more mission I had something like that last night. I was a bit tired after work but decided to fly one more mission in my current La-5 campaign. Everything went well, shot down couple of He-111s. I turned home with couple of escort fighters chasing me. Airfield AA took care of them. Satisfied I turned to the landing but the plane behaved a bit strangely. The reason was this: 2016_2_5__23_35_42.jpg I forgot my gear up Don't forget to GUMPS, just like in real life.
LLv24_Zami Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Don't forget to GUMPS, just like in real life. Roger that This was the first time I did gear up landing with undamaged plane. I blame my job for this, it disturbs my flying Edited February 6, 2016 by Zami
Feathered_IV Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 I'll look forward to seeing the interior of the Ju-88 and the animations of the crew. I didn't really warm to the JU-88 in CloD, with it's crewman seemingly frozen in the act of eating an invisible hamburger.
CF-105 Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Roger that This was the first time I did gear up landing with undamaged plane. I blame my job for this, it disturbs my flying Remember to always flip the gear lever to the 'down' position after forgetting to lower the gear, but before anyone notices... 1
Azdack Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Hello thanks for that game! Great fun to fly with all these ww2 fighters. Question : how can I use the beautiful planes screenshots one can see in the diary 121 as wallpapers on my PC desk? Thanks for answers
LLv24_Zami Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Remember to always flip the gear lever to the 'down' position after forgetting to lower the gear, but before anyone notices... I'll add this to my checklist :D
No601_Swallow Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Hello thanks for that game! Great fun to fly with all these ww2 fighters. Question : how can I use the beautiful planes screenshots one can see in the diary 121 as wallpapers on my PC desk? Thanks for answers Absolutely. Just save it on your hard drive somewhere, and then - if I recall correctly - a simple right click on the picture gives you the option to set it as wallpaper. I've got a screensaver slideshow going, from a folder of screenies which I add to regularly as the diaries come round. Edited February 6, 2016 by No601_Swallow
216th_Lucas_From_Hell Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 The Ju-88 is looking gorgeous, and that I-16 formation heading to the party is impressive too! I'm quite happy with how the medals turned out, they look very authentic while also being aesthetically pleasing.
Dutchvdm Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 I wonder what they will do with the two bomb bays of the Ju-88. They where only for small bombs like 50 kg or smaller. 18 50 kg bombs in the first bay and 10 in the second. But i believe it was not uncommon to use the first bay for extra fuel. Grt Martijn
Asgar Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 both bomb bays could be used for extra fuel as far as i know. about 1600l in the front and about 1200l in the back i think ...not sure though. it's been a while i read about it
216th_Lucas_From_Hell Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 That much fuel plus the usual internal load is perfect, just in case you need to bomb Moscow from Stalingrad.
Finkeren Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 Boy, that's a lot of fuel. The 88s will make nice warm bonfires that will burn a looooong time for the benefit of our freezing comrades in the glorious Red tank force, after we shoot them down.
Asgar Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 well, you don't have to take the additional fuel tanks. that's just what fit's in the bomb bays
Blitzen Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) That much fuel plus the usual internal load is perfect, just in case you need to bomb Moscow from Stalingrad. Strange that you should say that !! I just happen to have an old clipping from a 1941 LIFE Magazine: A possible real time & place candidate for first skins when plane & template are released?? Edited February 6, 2016 by Blitzen 3
Plurp Posted February 6, 2016 Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) both bomb bays could be used for extra fuel as far as i know. about 1600l in the front and about 1200l in the back i think ...not sure though. it's been a while i read about it According to Ju-88-1 Betriebsanleitung (1940 Mar) the front tank was 1220, rear tank was 680. I would think it would be the same for the A-4. Both, I believe, were able to be jettisoned. Edited February 6, 2016 by Beedo
Asgar Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 as i said. it's been a while since i read up on it
216th_Lucas_From_Hell Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 I suppose if they do include it, the extra fuel has its uses, particularly if you include losing half your fuel to flak and fighters in your flight plan
Finkeren Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 Strange that you should say that !! I just happen to have an old clipping from a 1941 LIFE Magazine: A possible real time & place candidate for first skins when plane & template are released?? Love that picture. Not least because of the camouflaged building in the background. The many wild attempts at altering the looks of Moscow is one of the things I'm really gonna miss about not being able to fly over the city.
F/JG300_Gruber Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 I don't think we will see those spare fuel tanks in the bomb bays for the same reasons they did not include droptanks on others aircrafts.
Roast Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) Great news, especially that Ju-88 does look superb I asume that a Hungarian skin for the Ju-88 will be included? Edited February 7, 2016 by Roast
Jade_Monkey Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 Strange that you should say that !! I just happen to have an old clipping from a 1941 LIFE Magazine: A possible real time & place candidate for first skins when plane & template are released?? Very interesting picture! I assume that the "Stuka Ju-88" is just a lack of knowledge on the journalist's side, right? I don't think we will see those spare fuel tanks in the bomb bays for the same reasons they did not include droptanks on others aircrafts. Since they are internal, I'm not sure how much work that would represent for the devs. If you dont want to make them jettisonable like Beedo said, it could be as easy as just increasing the fuel values for the plane, maybe lock the bomb bay doors. Maybe it would be more work if they have to include the fuel to the damage model (the leaks and fire).
Finkeren Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) I assume that the "Stuka Ju-88" is just a lack of knowledge on the journalist's side, right? No, why would it be? The early Ju 88s were all stukas since "stuka" is simply an acronym for "STUrzKAmpfflugzeug" in English: Dive bomber. Since the Ju 88A4 was equipped with dive brakes and external hard points useful for diving attacks, it was classified as a dive bomber, even though it rarely performed in that role by 1941. In principle ALL dive bombers regardless of which side they belonged to would be called stukas in German. As the war progressed, and the Ju 87 essentially became the only German aircraft to perform that role, it became common to refer only to Ju 87 as "Stuka" as a callsign or affectionate nickname. Edited February 7, 2016 by Finkeren
LLv24_Zami Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 No, why would it be? The early Ju 88s were all stukas since "stuka" is simply an acronym for "STUrzKAmpfflugzeug" in English: Dive bomber. Since the Ju 88A4 was equipped with dive brakes and external hard points useful for diving attacks, it was classified as a dive bomber, even though it rarely performed in that role by 1941. In principle ALL dive bombers regardless of which side they belonged to would be called stukas in German. As the war progressed, and the Ju 87 essentially became the only German aircraft to perform that role, it became common to refer only to Ju 87 as "Stuka" as a callsign or affectionate nickname. Germans and their obsession with dive bombing. Even the He-177 was supposed to do that. That`s insane
Finkeren Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 Germans and their obsession with dive bombing. Even the He-177 was supposed to do that. That`s insane The Ju 88 like the Pe-2 was actually fairly succesful when deployed as a dive bomber. Bomb sight technology of the late interwar years had let many air power analysts to suppose, that dive bombing was pretty much the only way to do precision bombing and therefore it was incorporated into a lot of designs, not all of which were particularly suited for it. It wasn't just a German thing, though the RLM held on to the idea a bit longer than others.
LLv24_Zami Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 The Ju 88 like the Pe-2 was actually fairly succesful when deployed as a dive bomber. Bomb sight technology of the late interwar years had let many air power analysts to suppose, that dive bombing was pretty much the only way to do precision bombing and therefore it was incorporated into a lot of designs, not all of which were particularly suited for it. It wasn't just a German thing, though the RLM held on to the idea a bit longer than others. But the idea of heavy bomber doing dive bombing is just insane IMO. On the side note, Finns did not dive bomb with Ju-88 even though it was capable of it. They preferred glide bombing style.
Blitzen Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 The Ju 88 like the Pe-2 was actually fairly succesful when deployed as a dive bomber. Bomb sight technology of the late interwar years had let many air power analysts to suppose, that dive bombing was pretty much the only way to do precision bombing and therefore it was incorporated into a lot of designs, not all of which were particularly suited for it. It wasn't just a German thing, though the RLM held on to the idea a bit longer than others. I believe one Do-217 ( and only one) was experimentally fitted with a uniquely designed air-brake.If memory serves it wasn't a success...but still perhaps BoM and/or BoS will give us a Do-217 and an option for the dive-brake so we can see for ourselves....Stuka-Do-217? having said all of that about STUKA ,I'll be it was the LIFE writer who just made an intentional mistake.The use of the word Stuka was an attention grabber in the early war years because it was initially viewed a a sort of super weapon,especially after Poland & France.
6./ZG26_5tuka Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) The dive breaks on the Do-217 were removed because they were unsufficient and caused instability when deployed. I on't think it will be much of a gain if eventually modeled in BoX. Dive bombing with planes like the Ju88 wasn't easy and showed less sucess than the smaller Ju-87s. Those large aircrafts required large recovery arcs to not over G and were very vulnerable by Flak due to their shere size. Thats why the Ju-88 effectively remained unique as a multi purpose aircraft capeable of high speed level bombing, dive bombing, nightfighting and tank hunting. Edited February 7, 2016 by Stab/JG26_5tuka
Finkeren Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 (edited) Thats why the Ju-88 effectively remained unique as a multi purpose aircraft capeable of high speed level bombing, dive bombing, nightfighting and tank hunting. Except the Pe-2/3 served in those exact roles, so it wasn't really "unique" (though you could argue, that the Ju 88 was uniquely effective in most of the roles it was used for) Edited February 7, 2016 by Finkeren
6./ZG26_5tuka Posted February 7, 2016 Posted February 7, 2016 Except the Pe-2/3 served in those exact roles, so it wasn't really "unique" (though you could argue, that the Ju 88 was uniquely effective in most of the roles it was used for) Although I referred more to the Luftwaffe you could argue that the Peshkas were not as much dive bombers as Ju88s were. They did not posess a "StuVi" (dive visor) and no recovery automatic system. Pilots had to aim with their reflex gunsight. As result they were not very accurate. Also, russians were not too familiar with dive bombing and lacked expirienced pilots as opposed to the Luftwaffe. They developed some rather strange methods of dive bombing which didn't promise great sucess.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now