Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
Thanks for letting me know I'm wrong Luse, I wondered why I had this niggling doubt at the back of my mind.

 

LOL I appreciate  your choosing of words, nicely put. I do agree with you in so many ways. I just want accept for using it in supply runs within own Airfields, I can see your point and I do respect it if red side loose the JU 52. But you should understand the fact that I am fighting to be able to fly it.

My squad is registered on russian side, it is not easy to change side the way this server runs today. I miss the JU 87 too. Anyway I will not make a fuzz about this anymore. I hope a allied version of a transport will surface soon. In my point of view Luftwaffe got everything, and Red Army do not even get a proper Level bomber, this is one of the reasons I am not flying this game as much as it truly deserve . If I am to fly fighters I might swell fly DCS I like more complex sim flying .

Kuban will change that with its A 20 a bit, still not a proper Level bomber, but it is a improvement

Edited by 216th_LuseKofte
Posted (edited)

My main problem is that the only one speaking on what to have is Luftwaffe side, and no matter what they got it is usually not good enough. I do not fly fighters, and I have only 2 planes to fly on Russian side. 

:good:

 

  The espionage branch of the Luftwaffe is working well.

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:

 

 To be honest I would rather they remove the 52 from the server than have the VVS flying it.

Of course! you do not love to fly it... Even if I do not fly a type of plane I care about people who fly it. 

 

 Even in your post Nil with pics there is a Yak on your ass  :P

Haha! I was kind of sure someone would use my story https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/26840-junkers-52-dc3-fan-club/?p=425543  ;)

This guy was really kind of.... not logical and after he got chased by Russians! , but you get friendly fire even without tante Ju, and I had the German skin so... bug in his pilot's head!

 

I fly on both sides, but most of the time Vvs.

 

If i am on the red side, any ju52 without the special orange skin or the red one, named richtofen, is for me a valid target.

 

Every time i fly the Ju52 on the red side, i take the richtofen red, as i dont have the orange one.

 

I told this trick to a lot of french player, if it's a Ju and it's flashy, it should be considered as a russian plane.

 

If it has a normal german camo, it should be considered as german plane.

Here is the solution:

1- Lock the Richtofen and the orange Skin for Russians, Lock the rest of the officials skins for German.

2-Eventually replace paratroopers for dropable suppy for Russian, it will make a little diversity and would be less questionable to have german troops inside a Russian Tante Ju.

 

What do you think Crusader?

Edited by Nil
6./ZG26_5tuka
Posted

There are still people that can't tell the difference between a Ju-88 or He-111 and Pe-2 and who will teamkill you within a blink of an eye without trying to recognize what they're actually shooting at. I can only imagine what's going to happen if you allow both sides to fly he same aircraft let alone with same skins.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Hey can the LW have the Yak1B's with a custom skin to fly aswell ? Since the VVS has the ju, why not open the whole planeset ? Or give the blues some IL2s. Im sure everyone will respect and use special luftwaffe skins... 

 

 

 

:rolleyes:  :rolleyes:  :rolleyes:  :rolleyes:  :rolleyes:

Posted

 

 

Are they really going to have the time to do that?

I don't know, but i know a good skiner who can do it for them if they need (he had already done one for me for a mission i have done on VL where i need JU52 with VVs skin, but at that time, we only have AI JU52).

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Is the Ju52 enabled for the russian side already?

6./ZG26_5tuka
Posted (edited)

Hey can the LW have the Yak1B's with a custom skin to fly aswell ? Since the VVS has the ju, why not open the whole planeset ? Or give the blues some IL2s. Im sure everyone will respect and use special luftwaffe skins... 

 

 

whitespinner.jpg

germanf.jpg

3827c95b8de18dd00871ff9788e96092.jpg

I take the Mig-3 ;)

I'm sure even if you'd swap planesets some people would complain 'but Luftwaffe has all the goodies!'. There's no way to please everyone but there's always historical accurancy.

Edited by 6./ZG26_5tuka
  • Upvote 2
Posted

Well that is how it goes when russian side ask for something, it is for sure not the same tone the other way around 

1PL-Husar-1Esk
Posted

It's possible to add to missions reconnaissance task, or this is not fully operational yet?

IRRE-Quintus11
Posted (edited)

i suggest to increase the AAA to avoid campers like our well known  friend Sturmovnick_PL ( is that the way he wins his games) to stay alone at 5 k  above an airfield . 

Camping airfield ,shooting engines off planes  + insulting+ xenophobia  in chat ... this kinda behaviour we all like !

 

This kinda behaviour ruins the random expert server and also the work provided by people working for us to have fun . 

Edited by -IRRE-Quintus11
Posted

VVS should get 109's as well then.  So we can pretend they are Yak-9's or something.  Then the German's should get a couple of Russian planes, cos it won't be fair otherwise. 

6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann
Posted

VVS should get 109's as well then.  So we can pretend they are Yak-9's or something.  Then the German's should get a couple of Russian planes, cos it won't be fair otherwise. 

Beat me to it. The Russians need a Medium Bomber like the Heinkel as well. It really sucks only getting 1000kg on those Peshkas. 

And of course the germans should get the I-16, because the Fw190 doesn't roll as well as it should.

And if the Russians get the Stuka, the Germans should get some Il-2s, at least until we have the Hs.129

 

 

 

i suggest to increase the AAA to avoid campers like our well known  friend Sturmovnick_PL ( is that the way he wins his games) to stay alone at 5 k  above an airfield . 

Camping airfield ,shooting engines off planes  + insulting+ xenophobia  in chat ... this kinda behaviour we all like !

 

This kinda behaviour ruins the random expert server and also the work provided by people working for us to have fun . 

There is a simple solution, it's actually my Signature.

Move all Airfields further back, a good Distance from the Front. 

Create fixed Dedicated Bomber Airfields with forward Flak Batteries to Protect Starting and Landing Planes on the Ends of the Map. Ban Blue Bombs and 2 Engine Bombers from Front Line Airfields, and allow only Light Bombers like Il-2s and Stukas to operate at the Front. 

 

It is ahistorical for Bombers to fly 20km from the Front. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

 

 

Beat me to it. The Russians need a Medium Bomber like the Heinkel as well. It really sucks only getting 1000kg on those Peshkas. 

 

Wonderful put Sir

 

 

 

Create fixed Dedicated Bomber Airfields with forward Flak Batteries to Protect Starting and Landing Planes on the Ends of the Map. Ban Blue Bombs and 2 Engine Bombers from Front Line Airfields, and allow only Light Bombers like Il-2s and Stukas to operate at the Front. 
 

 

Again spot on, you need time to climb and you need fighter escort from frontline much more effective for all. 

6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann
Posted (edited)

Maybe we should just drop Side Specific Planes altogether. Just make it like Skyknights vs. Raiders or Something. One Skin Per Side per Airplane and so on. 

 

 

 

 

Without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.
 

 

Edited by 6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann
Posted

Maybe we should just drop Side Specific Planes altogether. Just make it like Skyknights vs. Raiders or Something. One Skin Per Side per Airplane and so on.

 

 

 

 

Without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism.

 

 

Yeah ... As much as I like and practice sarcasm a lot IRL... It is hard to understand on a forum :)

 

Hopefull I know the names of the guys doing it so I can make the difference... A lot of people cannot.

 

Regading Ju52... As it adds a huge and interesting new gameplay, I am ok if the reds can use it.... BUT : we should make an official request to the devs so the make or add an offical soviet skin.... So we can lock it in server rules.

 

This debate will hopefully convince them to make a Li 2 when they have time !

 

S !

  • Upvote 1
Posted

You could disable record tracks?. Some people record track, see it and re-enter the server to search bombers.

72AG_Crusader
Posted

You could disable record tracks?. Some people record track, see it and re-enter the server to search bombers.

Track record save aircraft movements only in 9km radius from player.

Posted (edited)

sure? im in so far far away and he come to kill me. If in server was 50 players maybe.... but only 2 in both sides.....

Edited by =gRiJ=Alado
Posted

 

 

sure? im in so far far away and he come to kill me

 

Yes, pretty sure.

1PL-Husar-1Esk
Posted

You could disable record tracks?. Some people record track, see it and re-enter the server to search bombers.

One can enter the current mission, then open it in editor and find out position of hidden santa forces to - disaster!

Posted (edited)

Yes, pretty sure.

ok, but i wait to see sortie log to know how time take him to got me since he take off.

 

 

As I thought, less than 7 minutes, betwen take off and got me.... luck,? radar? ...... ok ok

Edited by =gRiJ=Alado
1PL-Husar-1Esk
Posted

Crusader what about adding reconnaissance task to campagin?

72AG_Crusader
Posted

Crusader what about adding reconnaissance task to campagin?

Until everybody can open mission with editor we wont do it. This ruins all recon significance. :(

Also, there are freezes when icons appears and disappears on the map.

We made an attemt to make some reconnaissance task - tank regiments without icon at all. But nobody attack them at all. When we set icons for them - they became popular target.

So... we have negative experience with recon.

Posted

 

 

ok, but i wait to see sortie log to know how time take him to got me since he take off.     As I thought, less than 7 minutes, betwen take off and got me.... luck,? radar? ...... ok ok

 

Just record a track yourself, you clearly see the planes disappearing when it reach the max distance. ;)  

Posted

Just record a track yourself, you clearly see the planes disappearing when it reach the max distance. ;)  

so

 

 

One can enter the current mission, then open it in editor and find out position of hidden santa forces to - disaster!

this its true?

Posted

Beat me to it. The Russians need a Medium Bomber like the Heinkel as well. It really sucks only getting 1000kg on those Peshkas. 

And of course the germans should get the I-16, because the Fw190 doesn't roll as well as it should.

And if the Russians get the Stuka, the Germans should get some Il-2s, at least until we have the Hs.129

 

Great idea!  I think the German side should get T-34's too, because they used them on a couple of occasions.

Thanks to 72AG for opening the door to all these new features.

  • Upvote 1
1PL-Husar-1Esk
Posted

Until everybody can open mission with editor we wont do it. This ruins all recon significance. :(

.

Thx for answer.

 

Btw. What about recon style from Rise of flight (not to discover enemy units but take pictures of enemy positions, fortyfications or front line ?

6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann
Posted

PzIII_08.jpg

PzIII_IV_01.jpg

 

Great idea!  I think the German side should get T-34's too, because they used them on a couple of occasions.

Thanks to 72AG for opening the door to all these new features.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

i suggest to increase the AAA to avoid campers like our well known  friend Sturmovnick_PL ( is that the way he wins his games) to stay alone at 5 k  above an airfield . 

 

What´s wrong with it? If you see airfield under attack, just take another.

 

insulting+ xenophobia  in chat ... this kinda behaviour we all like !

 

And turn off chat as I did. Because I can´t stand this bullshit and whining :)

Posted

Apologies if this has been covered but havent gone through the 35 pages.

I dont seem to get the chat message informing me of my available planes. Is there a way to check my garage details?

 

Thanks

Posted (edited)
Or try to find out how much cargo can each plane really haul and use historic data for credits no matter the speed.

 

The PE 2 was not used fr supply runs ever, other than mail if circumstances was given. So historical data just wont do.  Bombload was not entirely based on weight , but hard points and what bombs was available . 

So since the use of JU 52 for supplies are denied by almighty luftwaffe on the historical bases , Russian side should not have to run supplies, since we do not have planes that historically flew transport, for the sake of the almighty history. We should not have the JU 87 G1 not the 37 mm on the IL 2. 

It seems to me the cause of refusing JU 52 is based on petty reasons and selective historical preferences 

Edited by 216th_LuseKofte
  • Upvote 2
150GCT_Veltro
Posted

Is not acceptable a VVS Ju-52....really.

Give them a Pe-2 for transport missions, and more points to the Ju-52 because of speed difference.

Posted

Is not acceptable a VVS Ju-52....really.

Give them a Pe-2 for transport missions, and more points to the Ju-52 because of speed difference.

 

Then gives the Pe-2 the ability to drop paratroopers and cargo payloads!

 

Oh wait...

 

 

 

:dash:

  • Upvote 1
150GCT_Veltro
Posted

Then gives the Pe-2 the ability to drop paratroopers and cargo payloads!

 

Oh wait...

 

 

 

:dash:

 

They don't have this feature, so they don't need this kinde of mission.

We need something different for VVS.

6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann
Posted

Air Transport simply wasn't as big for the Soviets as it was for the Germans. Their main means of delivering Cargo was the Railway System, so if you really want a Transport, why not a 

 

Class E 0-10-0 Steam Loco?

 

 russia10011.jpg

  • Upvote 3
Posted

Joke aside, would love to have trains on the server :(

  • Upvote 1
Posted

When I look at the train in this sim... they are so well made, it could be almost a Train Simulator!!

6./ZG26_5tuka
Posted

Takeoff with a russian Ju-52 with mate for paradrop mission. After climbing to 150m (1min of flight) a russian Lagg-3 came by killing us both despite chat warning.

Well done whining folks because getting teamkilled is great fun! :dash:

 

Really, this is a bad joke.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Yes it is probable not doable having it on Russian side, But I get shot down by friendly in my PE 2, After countless attacks caused the PE 2 sturdiness and my gunners not shooting back he says sorry it is only a game when he see he get punished for shooting down a friendly. So that fact is not a JU 52 problem.

 

I do not ask for paratrooper missions on russian side, mostly because I struggle with the sight of German paratroopers coming out, I have absolutely no problem flying supply missions with it. But I realise the oposission and feelings connecting to it is maybe a price too high. I already pissed off a couple of your squad mates with my opinion, and are really more interested getting friendly again with your squad than having the JU 52.

Posted

Joke aside, would love to have trains on the server :(

Me too. Why there is no trains?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...