Lusekofte Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 (edited) Thanks for letting me know I'm wrong Luse, I wondered why I had this niggling doubt at the back of my mind. LOL I appreciate your choosing of words, nicely put. I do agree with you in so many ways. I just want accept for using it in supply runs within own Airfields, I can see your point and I do respect it if red side loose the JU 52. But you should understand the fact that I am fighting to be able to fly it. My squad is registered on russian side, it is not easy to change side the way this server runs today. I miss the JU 87 too. Anyway I will not make a fuzz about this anymore. I hope a allied version of a transport will surface soon. In my point of view Luftwaffe got everything, and Red Army do not even get a proper Level bomber, this is one of the reasons I am not flying this game as much as it truly deserve . If I am to fly fighters I might swell fly DCS I like more complex sim flying . Kuban will change that with its A 20 a bit, still not a proper Level bomber, but it is a improvement Edited December 28, 2016 by 216th_LuseKofte
Nil Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 (edited) My main problem is that the only one speaking on what to have is Luftwaffe side, and no matter what they got it is usually not good enough. I do not fly fighters, and I have only 2 planes to fly on Russian side. The espionage branch of the Luftwaffe is working well. To be honest I would rather they remove the 52 from the server than have the VVS flying it. Of course! you do not love to fly it... Even if I do not fly a type of plane I care about people who fly it. Even in your post Nil with pics there is a Yak on your ass Haha! I was kind of sure someone would use my story https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/26840-junkers-52-dc3-fan-club/?p=425543 This guy was really kind of.... not logical and after he got chased by Russians! , but you get friendly fire even without tante Ju, and I had the German skin so... bug in his pilot's head! I fly on both sides, but most of the time Vvs. If i am on the red side, any ju52 without the special orange skin or the red one, named richtofen, is for me a valid target. Every time i fly the Ju52 on the red side, i take the richtofen red, as i dont have the orange one. I told this trick to a lot of french player, if it's a Ju and it's flashy, it should be considered as a russian plane. If it has a normal german camo, it should be considered as german plane. Here is the solution: 1- Lock the Richtofen and the orange Skin for Russians, Lock the rest of the officials skins for German. 2-Eventually replace paratroopers for dropable suppy for Russian, it will make a little diversity and would be less questionable to have german troops inside a Russian Tante Ju. What do you think Crusader? Edited December 28, 2016 by Nil
6./ZG26_5tuka Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 There are still people that can't tell the difference between a Ju-88 or He-111 and Pe-2 and who will teamkill you within a blink of an eye without trying to recognize what they're actually shooting at. I can only imagine what's going to happen if you allow both sides to fly he same aircraft let alone with same skins. 1
Willy__ Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 Hey can the LW have the Yak1B's with a custom skin to fly aswell ? Since the VVS has the ju, why not open the whole planeset ? Or give the blues some IL2s. Im sure everyone will respect and use special luftwaffe skins...
Habu Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 Are they really going to have the time to do that? I don't know, but i know a good skiner who can do it for them if they need (he had already done one for me for a mission i have done on VL where i need JU52 with VVs skin, but at that time, we only have AI JU52). 1
FTC_Riksen Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 Is the Ju52 enabled for the russian side already?
6./ZG26_5tuka Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 (edited) Hey can the LW have the Yak1B's with a custom skin to fly aswell ? Since the VVS has the ju, why not open the whole planeset ? Or give the blues some IL2s. Im sure everyone will respect and use special luftwaffe skins... I take the Mig-3 I'm sure even if you'd swap planesets some people would complain 'but Luftwaffe has all the goodies!'. There's no way to please everyone but there's always historical accurancy. Edited December 28, 2016 by 6./ZG26_5tuka 2
Lusekofte Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 Well that is how it goes when russian side ask for something, it is for sure not the same tone the other way around
1PL-Husar-1Esk Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 It's possible to add to missions reconnaissance task, or this is not fully operational yet?
IRRE-Quintus11 Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 (edited) i suggest to increase the AAA to avoid campers like our well known friend Sturmovnick_PL ( is that the way he wins his games) to stay alone at 5 k above an airfield . Camping airfield ,shooting engines off planes + insulting+ xenophobia in chat ... this kinda behaviour we all like ! This kinda behaviour ruins the random expert server and also the work provided by people working for us to have fun . Edited December 28, 2016 by -IRRE-Quintus11
Feathered_IV Posted December 28, 2016 Posted December 28, 2016 VVS should get 109's as well then. So we can pretend they are Yak-9's or something. Then the German's should get a couple of Russian planes, cos it won't be fair otherwise.
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 VVS should get 109's as well then. So we can pretend they are Yak-9's or something. Then the German's should get a couple of Russian planes, cos it won't be fair otherwise. Beat me to it. The Russians need a Medium Bomber like the Heinkel as well. It really sucks only getting 1000kg on those Peshkas. And of course the germans should get the I-16, because the Fw190 doesn't roll as well as it should. And if the Russians get the Stuka, the Germans should get some Il-2s, at least until we have the Hs.129 i suggest to increase the AAA to avoid campers like our well known friend Sturmovnick_PL ( is that the way he wins his games) to stay alone at 5 k above an airfield . Camping airfield ,shooting engines off planes + insulting+ xenophobia in chat ... this kinda behaviour we all like ! This kinda behaviour ruins the random expert server and also the work provided by people working for us to have fun . There is a simple solution, it's actually my Signature. Move all Airfields further back, a good Distance from the Front. Create fixed Dedicated Bomber Airfields with forward Flak Batteries to Protect Starting and Landing Planes on the Ends of the Map. Ban Blue Bombs and 2 Engine Bombers from Front Line Airfields, and allow only Light Bombers like Il-2s and Stukas to operate at the Front. It is ahistorical for Bombers to fly 20km from the Front. 1
Lusekofte Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Beat me to it. The Russians need a Medium Bomber like the Heinkel as well. It really sucks only getting 1000kg on those Peshkas. Wonderful put Sir Create fixed Dedicated Bomber Airfields with forward Flak Batteries to Protect Starting and Landing Planes on the Ends of the Map. Ban Blue Bombs and 2 Engine Bombers from Front Line Airfields, and allow only Light Bombers like Il-2s and Stukas to operate at the Front. Again spot on, you need time to climb and you need fighter escort from frontline much more effective for all.
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) Maybe we should just drop Side Specific Planes altogether. Just make it like Skyknights vs. Raiders or Something. One Skin Per Side per Airplane and so on. Without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism. Edited December 29, 2016 by 6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann
Trinkof Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Maybe we should just drop Side Specific Planes altogether. Just make it like Skyknights vs. Raiders or Something. One Skin Per Side per Airplane and so on. Without a clear indication of the author's intent, it is difficult or impossible to tell the difference between an expression of sincere extremism and a parody of extremism. Yeah ... As much as I like and practice sarcasm a lot IRL... It is hard to understand on a forum Hopefull I know the names of the guys doing it so I can make the difference... A lot of people cannot. Regading Ju52... As it adds a huge and interesting new gameplay, I am ok if the reds can use it.... BUT : we should make an official request to the devs so the make or add an offical soviet skin.... So we can lock it in server rules. This debate will hopefully convince them to make a Li 2 when they have time ! S ! 1
=gRiJ=Alado Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 You could disable record tracks?. Some people record track, see it and re-enter the server to search bombers.
72AG_Crusader Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 You could disable record tracks?. Some people record track, see it and re-enter the server to search bombers. Track record save aircraft movements only in 9km radius from player.
=gRiJ=Alado Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) sure? im in so far far away and he come to kill me. If in server was 50 players maybe.... but only 2 in both sides..... Edited December 29, 2016 by =gRiJ=Alado
Willy__ Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 sure? im in so far far away and he come to kill me Yes, pretty sure.
1PL-Husar-1Esk Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 You could disable record tracks?. Some people record track, see it and re-enter the server to search bombers. One can enter the current mission, then open it in editor and find out position of hidden santa forces to - disaster!
=gRiJ=Alado Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) Yes, pretty sure. ok, but i wait to see sortie log to know how time take him to got me since he take off. As I thought, less than 7 minutes, betwen take off and got me.... luck,? radar? ...... ok ok Edited December 29, 2016 by =gRiJ=Alado
1PL-Husar-1Esk Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Crusader what about adding reconnaissance task to campagin?
72AG_Crusader Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Crusader what about adding reconnaissance task to campagin? Until everybody can open mission with editor we wont do it. This ruins all recon significance. Also, there are freezes when icons appears and disappears on the map. We made an attemt to make some reconnaissance task - tank regiments without icon at all. But nobody attack them at all. When we set icons for them - they became popular target. So... we have negative experience with recon.
Willy__ Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 ok, but i wait to see sortie log to know how time take him to got me since he take off. As I thought, less than 7 minutes, betwen take off and got me.... luck,? radar? ...... ok ok Just record a track yourself, you clearly see the planes disappearing when it reach the max distance.
=gRiJ=Alado Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Just record a track yourself, you clearly see the planes disappearing when it reach the max distance. so One can enter the current mission, then open it in editor and find out position of hidden santa forces to - disaster! this its true?
Feathered_IV Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Beat me to it. The Russians need a Medium Bomber like the Heinkel as well. It really sucks only getting 1000kg on those Peshkas. And of course the germans should get the I-16, because the Fw190 doesn't roll as well as it should. And if the Russians get the Stuka, the Germans should get some Il-2s, at least until we have the Hs.129 Great idea! I think the German side should get T-34's too, because they used them on a couple of occasions. Thanks to 72AG for opening the door to all these new features. 1
1PL-Husar-1Esk Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Until everybody can open mission with editor we wont do it. This ruins all recon significance. . Thx for answer. Btw. What about recon style from Rise of flight (not to discover enemy units but take pictures of enemy positions, fortyfications or front line ?
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Great idea! I think the German side should get T-34's too, because they used them on a couple of occasions. Thanks to 72AG for opening the door to all these new features. 1
1stCL/Punkey Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 i suggest to increase the AAA to avoid campers like our well known friend Sturmovnick_PL ( is that the way he wins his games) to stay alone at 5 k above an airfield . What´s wrong with it? If you see airfield under attack, just take another. insulting+ xenophobia in chat ... this kinda behaviour we all like ! And turn off chat as I did. Because I can´t stand this bullshit and whining
HunDread Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Apologies if this has been covered but havent gone through the 35 pages. I dont seem to get the chat message informing me of my available planes. Is there a way to check my garage details? Thanks
Lusekofte Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) Or try to find out how much cargo can each plane really haul and use historic data for credits no matter the speed. The PE 2 was not used fr supply runs ever, other than mail if circumstances was given. So historical data just wont do. Bombload was not entirely based on weight , but hard points and what bombs was available . So since the use of JU 52 for supplies are denied by almighty luftwaffe on the historical bases , Russian side should not have to run supplies, since we do not have planes that historically flew transport, for the sake of the almighty history. We should not have the JU 87 G1 not the 37 mm on the IL 2. It seems to me the cause of refusing JU 52 is based on petty reasons and selective historical preferences Edited December 29, 2016 by 216th_LuseKofte 2
150GCT_Veltro Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Is not acceptable a VVS Ju-52....really. Give them a Pe-2 for transport missions, and more points to the Ju-52 because of speed difference.
IRRE_Centx Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Is not acceptable a VVS Ju-52....really. Give them a Pe-2 for transport missions, and more points to the Ju-52 because of speed difference. Then gives the Pe-2 the ability to drop paratroopers and cargo payloads! Oh wait... 1
150GCT_Veltro Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Then gives the Pe-2 the ability to drop paratroopers and cargo payloads! Oh wait... They don't have this feature, so they don't need this kinde of mission. We need something different for VVS.
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Air Transport simply wasn't as big for the Soviets as it was for the Germans. Their main means of delivering Cargo was the Railway System, so if you really want a Transport, why not a Class E 0-10-0 Steam Loco? 3
IRRE_Centx Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Joke aside, would love to have trains on the server 1
Nil Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 When I look at the train in this sim... they are so well made, it could be almost a Train Simulator!!
6./ZG26_5tuka Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Takeoff with a russian Ju-52 with mate for paradrop mission. After climbing to 150m (1min of flight) a russian Lagg-3 came by killing us both despite chat warning. Well done whining folks because getting teamkilled is great fun! Really, this is a bad joke. 1
Lusekofte Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Yes it is probable not doable having it on Russian side, But I get shot down by friendly in my PE 2, After countless attacks caused the PE 2 sturdiness and my gunners not shooting back he says sorry it is only a game when he see he get punished for shooting down a friendly. So that fact is not a JU 52 problem. I do not ask for paratrooper missions on russian side, mostly because I struggle with the sight of German paratroopers coming out, I have absolutely no problem flying supply missions with it. But I realise the oposission and feelings connecting to it is maybe a price too high. I already pissed off a couple of your squad mates with my opinion, and are really more interested getting friendly again with your squad than having the JU 52.
Mad_Mikhael Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Joke aside, would love to have trains on the server Me too. Why there is no trains?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now