=FEW=Hauggy Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 It's not up to me and I'm expecting a little something even if I won't hate them or anything for not doing so.
1CGS BlackSix Posted March 16, 2018 1CGS Posted March 16, 2018 13 minutes ago, Finkeren said: Let them have this Friday off They’ve earned it. 3 2 16 5
Herne Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 just noticed that members viewing thingy is gone. I'll miss Finkerens updates when dev's are updating threads
Finkeren Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 1 minute ago, =FEW=Herne said: just noticed that members viewing thingy is gone. I'll miss Finkerens updates when dev's are updating threads Actually it’s been replaced by something better: A search filter when viewing online users. Makes stalking the devs easy as pie 1
Rjel Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 I'd hope they all take the next couple of weeks off. Then back to work. I'd like my P-51 by Fall if you don't mind?
=SqSq=switch201 Posted March 16, 2018 Posted March 16, 2018 This thread is where the real IL-2 fun is had. 1
Danziger Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 I wonder what it will be Friday since we have Kuban released. U-2? Bodenplatte progress? Flying Circus and Tank Battles pre order?
Legioneod Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, BorysVorobyov said: I wonder what it will be Friday since we have Kuban released. U-2? Bodenplatte progress? Flying Circus and Tank Battles pre order? I don't think we'll see anything for a while since Kuban just released. I'd love to be wrong though. I wonder if Bodenplatte is still scheduled to hit early access this spring or if it is delayed? Edited March 19, 2018 by Legioneod
Herne Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 I'd be interested to see, some initial stats since 3.001. For example how many careers were started, how many virtual pilots were killed or captured. kind of thing, throw in some co-op figures. I'd also love to see some news on the PO-2, but i'm not expecting to see anything regarding BoBP or the other upcoming titles for a while.
Trooper117 Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 I'm certainly not expecting anything on Bodenplatte anytime soon. But yes, news on the PO-2 would be a nice update
[APAF]VR_Spartan85 Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 Probably an address to bug fixes and performance tweaks. It was a massive release, these guys sure worked hard getting it to us. an update on the po-2 would be cool, and it’s addition to career mode would be awesome as night missions! Stats would be nice too! A bit early but I’m sure they are off the charts already... I’m not too concerned about Bodenplatte at the moment, I feel as though I’ve started a whole new sim and have enough planes to have fun with... i would just like to see things stable for everyone first then we can work towards further aircraft projects.. anyone encounter cloud layering yet in any weather?? I’m yet to experience it... 1 2
Royal_Flight Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 Update on the Po-2 would be great. And the Li-2... I hope this third-party thing works out.
Uufflakke Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, spartan85 said: anyone encounter cloud layering yet in any weather?? I’m yet to experience it... Once in a while I had the luck to fly through the cloud layers. As far as I know it happens at random. If I knew what triggers the cloud layers I would only select this weather type on each and every map. Or selecting Overcast for the rain effect. Edited March 19, 2018 by Uufflakke 3
[APAF]VR_Spartan85 Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 10 minutes ago, Uufflakke said: Once in a while I had the luck to fly through the cloud layers. As far as I know it happens at random. If I knew what triggers the cloud layers I would only select this weather type on each and every map. Or selecting Overcast for the rain effect. Wowzers!!???!! That looks amazing! What were the conditions you were flying here??
scrapmetal Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 Absolutely stunning clouds! That's why I keep coming back to IL-2 BoX. Nothing beats them.
Uufflakke Posted March 19, 2018 Posted March 19, 2018 47 minutes ago, spartan85 said: Wowzers!!???!! That looks amazing! What were the conditions you were flying here?? Weather Conditions set to Heave Clouds. Me and MajorDisturbance discussed it a bit here: https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/3892-post-your-screenshots-vids-here/?page=56&tab=comments#comment-587858 When I copied his settings + time + cloud height I did not get these beautiful clouds. It must have been a couple of other quick missions later that they popped up to my surprise. But only once.
Herne Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 Had to bring this thread back to the front page, it's Thursday, not seeing this thread on the front page at this time of week is just . . . unnatural 1
[APAF]VR_Spartan85 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 1 hour ago, =FEW=Herne said: Had to bring this thread back to the front page, it's Thursday, not seeing this thread on the front page at this time of week is just . . . unnatural You beat me to it..
Luftschiff Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 Maybe a lil' hotfix for today's DD, then? Some news on the third party projects? Seems early for WIPS of Bodenplatte content.
HandyNasty Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 I have mixed feelings between a) showing progress on new content b) showing progress on fixing/debugging/amelioration of the stuff they implemented in 3.001 (the freeze when opening the stats comes to mind amongst others)
[APAF]VR_Spartan85 Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 I anticipate that if we even do have a dev diary tomorrow, it’s mostly going to be addressing all the amaze and the concerns from 3.001 update... If about hot fixes in the works, but usually they would just toss those to us any time of the week if it were crucial and they had the fix for it... I just want to hear from them in a positive manner, and hope they aren’t stumped on bugs we’ve encountered..
ATA_Vasilij Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 I wish nothing but optimalisation of current 3.001 prerelease alpha very unstable not tested and never played before update published sooner than it had to be :D :D No more content please, no new planes, just fixing current version to bring it to the shiny place where it deserves to be. (please read with humour) 4
THERION Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, 3.IAP_Vasilij said: I wish nothing but optimalisation of current 3.001 prerelease alpha very unstable not tested and never played before update published sooner than it had to be :D :D No more content please, no new planes, just fixing current version to bring it to the shiny place where it deserves to be. (please read with humour) Exactly what I thought the last days! More content, new this and that, mods... It drives me nuts! Better fix the things we have and already paid for. Then, let's see then...
216th_Jordan Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 (edited) Both things don't exclude each other and while we get new content we also get updates and improvements of problems. People who make 3D models don't fix software bugs. This version was thorougly tested, but you cannot test everything. For most people the update brought many improvements, some systems have problems. Issues have been reported before release but not everything can always be fixed immediately and some things need longer to be fixed. Thats just the way it is with SW. Edited March 22, 2018 by 216th_Jordan 1
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 (edited) Can I [edited] in it? Edited March 23, 2018 by SYN_Haashashin Poor taste 1 1 1
[APAF]VR_Spartan85 Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 7 hours ago, Space_Ghost said: Can [edited] in it? Lol please tell me this was meant for someone but accidentally posted in the forums 2
soupdragon Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 (edited) On 23/3/2018 at 12:19 PM, Space_Ghost said: Can [edited] in it? On 23/3/2018 at 12:34 PM, spartan85 said: Lol please tell me this was meant for someone but accidentally posted in the forums ROFLMAO SD Edited March 24, 2018 by SYN_Haashashin
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 16 minutes ago, spartan85 said: Lol please tell me this was meant for someone but accidentally posted in the forums That's just like... your opinion... man... 1
[APAF]VR_Spartan85 Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 Well it’s just nice to get home from the night shift full of groggy old mechanics and start of the morning with a bit of humour thanks Space_Ghost
Hauksbee Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 On 7/24/2015 at 3:10 AM, =EXPEND=DendroAspis said: Its almost time for the Macchi! and the P-38. 19 hours ago, 19//Rekt said: I think the devs have done a pretty good job of fixing problems as well as adding new stuff. Off the top of my head: Was wondering about Jason's comments on the difficulty of doing Japanese aircraft for a Pacific Theatre of the BOX series. IL-2 1946 had plenty of Japanese planes, so why couldn't new planes simply be modeled on those?
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 13 minutes ago, Hauksbee said: and the P-38. Was wondering about Jason's comments on the difficulty of doing Japanese aircraft for a Pacific Theatre of the BOX series. IL-2 1946 had plenty of Japanese planes, so why couldn't new planes simply be modeled on those? Because outside of options/gameplay, 1946 had a turd of a FM. It'd be like trying to write an orchestral masterpiece while limiting yourself to two or three notes.
SJ_Butcher Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 On 19/3/2018 at 3:40 PM, spartan85 said: Wowzers!!???!! That looks amazing! What were the conditions you were flying here?? My clouds look like [edited] everything ultra here @120 fps
MrNoice Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 hope we will get a bobp emblem and news about the bobp early access
dburne Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Hauksbee said: and the P-38. Was wondering about Jason's comments on the difficulty of doing Japanese aircraft for a Pacific Theatre of the BOX series. IL-2 1946 had plenty of Japanese planes, so why couldn't new planes simply be modeled on those? I think I saw a comment some time ago, may be due to how accurate 1CGS would want to model these aircraft, I think the PF team may have taken some liberties in that department.
CCG_Pips Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 35 minutes ago, SJ_Butcher said: My clouds look like shit, everything ultra here @120 fps Your eyes may be ?? 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now