Jump to content

Discussion about DCS:WW2 goes here.


Recommended Posts

BraveSirRobin
Posted

I really don't understand the frustration with Luthier.  If you had problems with the level of communication during the development of CoD, why did you buy into DCS WW2?

Posted (edited)

Update 27 is out, the P-47 external 3d model looks really nice, just missing it's clothes, some pics of the 109 pit too.

 

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/508681281/dcs-wwii-europe-1944/posts/734565?ref=activity

 

If I'm not mistaken we are being shown 2 models of P-47 too, one has a dorsal extension from the fin.

"Only one variant is going to make it into the final game, but it’ll be decided later once the programming begins."

 

Looks good though. As does the Bf 109 cockpit.

Edited by AndyJWest
DD_bongodriver
Posted

Yeah I premed a bit and edited before I fully read the update.

Posted

I really don't understand the frustration with Luthier.  If you had problems with the level of communication during the development of CoD, why did you buy into DCS WW2?

 

Also to be fair he's been sending out fairly regular updates for the past while with info, screenshots showing progress, etc. There were updates on 31/01, 25/01, 18/01, 27/12, 14/12, 06/12, 22/11, 12/11, 01/11. It's not the exceptional 777 weekly regularity but still pretty decent for a games developer and sufficient for where they're at in the project. Hopefully the backers website will get sorted out in Feb as other than that I can't see anything to really gripe about.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

It's pretty safe to assume that they are working for ED. Sure they have 3rd party label but most likely most people working on that team are on ED or take salary straight from them. It's not like you can get too far with 150k.

 

And why people are so negative about updates? When did we see first screenshots or map screenshots from bos? Clearly not in first few months of the development. Remember that they have been working with this only for 6 month soon. I would take once a month large updates over these smaller ones that show just obvious reconstructions of planes. I'm more interested in the map and how it looks but pretty safe to expect that we won't see anything too fancy before summer.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Seems they are having fun! ;)

LLv44_Mprhead
Posted

Update 28, not much to show, progress on the D9 manual and 1 shot of the 262 external 3d, looking good.

 

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/508681281/dcs-wwii-europe-1944/posts

 

I was just thinking of that. And then I was thinking that couple of week ago I was thinking "It doesn't matter if there isn't that much to show, just make some kind of update!" Or maybe I think too much.

Posted

Sounds like the Dora is getting close to beta release if the manual is done. At least that's what I'm telling myself. Can't wait to fly that bird.

Posted

Dora was on hold before Christmas. So not sure if we see it in another few months if they don't push release to same point as dcs ww2.

  • 1CGS
Posted

A screenshot of MS Word. Yay.  :mellow:

  • Upvote 1
Posted

A screenshot of MS Word. Yay.  :mellow:

Yeah, I honed in on that, too, since I was curious to see how he is designing the manual. That and there wasn't much else to look at in this update.

 

Charlo

DD_bongodriver
Posted

Hey, it's an update, what else do we need, it's all about updates and communication.

LLv44_Mprhead
Posted

I much rather have an update that basically only says "we are working on it" than no update at all...

  • Upvote 1
BraveSirRobin
Posted

Because you think they might not be working on it?

Posted

I'm curious to see work on other parts of the game besides the aircraft. All these companies seem to have model making down pretty good.

LLv44_Mprhead
Posted

Because you think they might not be working on it?

 

Dunno, for some reason I feel that if you say you will try to make an update every friday, then it's good manners to also do so. I guess I'm just funny that way.

Posted

I'm curious to see work on other parts of the game besides the aircraft. All these companies seem to have model making down pretty good.

 

I suspect there's not too much done in that area yet.  Even BoS has a long way to go before gameplay elements are ready for consideration.

Posted

Ah well... while I'm waiting there is always this!

 

post-75-0-36008700-1392313814_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
Sternjaeger
Posted

any updates on this?

 

EDIT:

Just saw the latest news, getting a bit of a deja-vu feeling growing on me atm..

Bladderburst
Posted

Still have bad stutter in DCS world and nothing seems to fix it.

I was having a blast in my kamov until BS2. Shame.

Posted

i'm sorry, but dcs engine doesn't even have proper multicore support while il2 engine supports 4 cores.

 

this is a must for any serious sim. you cna't expect to caculate ballistics, flight physics, etc with 1 core for everything and 1 pipeline on the second core for sound.

 

that's why dcs slows the f down everytime you put more than 15 ai objects in the game.

Posted (edited)

i'm sorry, but dcs engine doesn't even have proper multicore support while il2 engine supports 4 cores.

 

this is a must for any serious sim. you cna't expect to caculate ballistics, flight physics, etc with 1 core for everything and 1 pipeline on the second core for sound.

 

that's why dcs slows the f down everytime you put more than 15 ai objects in the game.

Better multicore support would be great for DCS to go along with the graphical improvements coming in edge (direct x11 and 4 gpu support) but as I understand it's a massive undertaking as a lot of code must be rewritten and might not be possible right now. That said I don't agree with what you say about "15 ai objects" - my recent experience in the current patch, playing on the Dogs of War server with 20 AI fighters, 8-10 players and tons of active ground units has been smooth. Not saying these numbers are great but certainly better than that described - I doubt DCS will complete with pure numbers compared with CLoD or BoS but they're very different games (i.e. highly detailed study sim vs combat flight sims). I'm having just as much fun online in DCS with smaller numbers as I'm having flying CLoD with 80 players... and I hope to have lots of fun online in BoS in the future.

Edited by No.64_Bounder
Posted (edited)
About the update #30, are we supposed to find our rewards under our DCS profile now???

Fat chance :rolleyes:

How could Luther possibly consider pulling that one off without contacting every Kickstarter participants individualy, beats me or he would have to consider starting accounts from scrats using our Kickstarter profile.

Why would anything correspond like nickname or email address - that last one links me however, not the nick, probably already taken anyway ..

Checked in of course & no joy.

Anybody smarter than dumb me with idées?

Tells enough one has to come in here trying to get some answers.

Edited by West
Posted

Must admit I haven't paid much attention to this one lately.  Whats the state of play at the moment - isn't there an Alpha due to be released very soon?

LLv44_Mprhead
Posted

Btw, ED published couple of WIP pictures of 190 D-9 yesterday. So there is at least work going on with that.

Posted

Must admit I haven't paid much attention to this one lately.  Whats the state of play at the moment - isn't there an Alpha due to be released very soon?

 

I'm afraid there is still quite a long way to Alpha...

Posted (edited)

Release of the Alpha was "estimated" to be in February 2014. Beta in May 2014.

 

This is what Luthier wrote in Update #26 in January:

 

 

The order in which the planes will be completed is as follows. The FW.190D-9, in the development of which our team is also taking part, will be completed first (no ETA, not up to me too announce). The Bf.109K-4 will come next. Then the P-47. Then the Me.262. Then the Spitfire. The plan is still to release these piece-meal to all alpha-access backers as they are being done.

So basically, backers might get alpha access, when the FW190 is completed and he can't say when that is, because it's not up to him (the project leader) to announce it.

 

Which might mean, that he doesn't feel responsible for announcing delays with the planned alpha release either (which would explain why he didn't do that so far).

Edited by Matt
Posted (edited)

Not ready yet.

 

 

Thx EA, pfff, for everybody the same I guess ....

 

However the link + exemple of Luther's profile + "I guess the page is ready for the world" made me to presumpious I guess.

 

Back to the garden for some spring tidying up, nice weather here!
Edited by West
Posted

 

So basically, backers might get alpha access, when the FW190 is completed and he can't say when that is, because it's not up to him (the project leader) to announce it.

 

 

 

He can't announce the release date of the FW190 as that's an Eagle Dynamics led project. RRG have helped out with making the cockpit and some other stuff but any formal communication on when the FW190 beta will be released will come from Wags.

Feathered_IV
Posted

I remember reading Luthier's claim of a flyable alpha by last month.  At the time I thought it was more inspired by BoS's development cycle than any realistic estimate of his own.  One to two years would seem more realistic, particularly for the Beta.  The 190 alone has been in development for a couple of years now, so I can't imagine how they can manage four more by the September date they've set themselves. 

Posted

The 190 alone has been in development for a couple of years now, so I can't imagine how they can manage four more by the September date they've set themselves.

 

Yep, fw190 have been compleatly sideproject for the ED. Btw. Those fw190 shots are running on the some kind of iteration of EDGE, which interest me much more than plane models at this point.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Yep, fw190 have been compleatly sideproject for the ED. Btw. Those fw190 shots are running on the some kind of iteration of EDGE, which interest me much more than plane models at this point.

with edge, they're going to open up the second core.

 

*snickers*

DD_bongodriver
Posted

I love a good peanut and caramel based confection.

Feathered_IV
Posted

I suddenly have an urge to play Take on Mars

Posted

with edge, they're going to open up the second core.

 

*snickers*

 

There has been some confusion here.  Right now DCS uses one core for the game and another for sound.  So far as I know that will not change with edge, but it will finally make use of sli and crossfire.

Posted

with edge, they're going to open up the second core.

 

*snickers*

Apparently you don't know what EDGE is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...