Bigscreen Beyond 2

[2/JG26_natris]

Please chilli are you sensitive to refresh rate? For me lower refresh rates lead to "blinking" picture, and when eg. looking at ground it is very hard for me to search for dots for prolonged time. I had this problem with 60hz G2 and afaik also with Pimax Crystal 72hz (not sure); 90hz is fine for me (I also needed at least 75hz on old crts). I wonder how the 75hz base works. AFAIK all the VR goggles work so that the picture blinks for a bit and then it is black rest of the time; that would mean that it may be problematic; or am I totally off? Please when you receive it, can you comment with regards to this?

Edited April 24 by 2/JG26_natris

[chiliwili69]

2 hours ago, 2/JG26_natris said:

Please when you receive it, can you comment with regards to this?

 

Yes sure.

I had no problems with my previous headsets at lower frequencies than 90Hz. All of them were fine but never went below 72Hz:

Index (80Hz), Rift-S (80Hz), Pico4 (72 Hz), Quest Pro (72&80Hz), CrystalLight (72Hz) and currently Quest3 (72Hz)

 

[chiliwili69]

Some delays for the BSB2, they have to scrap 5000 circuit boards!, good they caught it before delivering:

https://store.bigscreenvr.com/blogs/beyond/improved-controller-tracking-and-production-delay-for-bigscreen-beyond-2

[chiliwili69]

nice surprise!

 

[chiliwili69]

And here compared with the Quest3. It is amazing how the Quest3 with 2064x2208 pixels and streaming is so close to a 2560x2560 with DP.

Most likely if I will keep the BSB2 is because confort and forget about batteries and Wifis. I forget Meta!.

 

[chiliwili69]

It looks like glare is an issue here for dark scenes...

 

[Aapje]

Yeah, they have OLED which is great for blacks and then they undermine that advantage with the glare.

 

Just like they undermine the advantage of a light headset with a facial interface that doesn't breathe.

 

[chiliwili69]

Today I got a message from DHL Germany, my pre-order will arrive next Tuesday-23rd Sept. Let´s see If I also suffer from the diplopia issue...🤪

[Goldwrench]

Got mine last Saturday (9/13). Of course I was out-of-town at the time! I have put it through its paces a bit this week. The glare is not as pronounced as the BSB1, but it is definitely still there. The glare was not reduced nearly as much they claimed IMO. For flight sims like Il-2, it is even more noticeable because it is at the bottom which is where the dark instrument panels are. The real game changer for me is the independent IPD adjustment for each eye. I have significantly sharper visuals (which also lead to better depth perception) because with the custom face gasket Bigscreen provided with my BSB1, I really needed a different IPD for each eye. The BSB2 fixes that, so now my left eye is as sharp as my right eye. It does have a noticeably bigger FOV than BSB1 which is compounded by a significantly larger sweet spot. These combine for a much larger perceived area of sharpness. Ok, I'm going to go fly some P-47 missions now!

[chiliwili69]

16 hours ago, Goldwrench said:

The real game changer for me is the independent IPD adjustment for each eye.

Yes, this is one of the features which I think it is unique in this device, as far as I know no other devices allow to set the via hardware the IPD of each eye, no all faces are 100% symetrical.

 

One critical question!!😬😬😬  Do you suffer the diplopia in this headset? look here.

Please give me some hope!

 

[Goldwrench]

4 hours ago, chiliwili69 said:

 

 

One critical question!!😬😬😬  Do you suffer the diplopia in this headset? look here.

Please give me some hope!

 

No, and that applies to both BSB1 and BSB2. I did have to look up diplopia to figure out what the heck you’re talking about! 😂

[Varibraun]

19 hours ago, chiliwili69 said:

Yes, this is one of the features which I think it is unique in this device, as far as I know no other devices allow to set the via hardware the IPD of each eye, no all faces are 100% symetrical.

 

Yes, I really wish that Pimax had this too, I still haven't had much success with adjusting the offsets myself in the Pimax Play software.  I will be interested to hear your thoughts in addition to @Goldwrench on this feature.

[chiliwili69]

17 hours ago, Goldwrench said:

No, and that applies to both BSB1 and BSB2.

Hey!! this is good then. @Merlin-the-mog, this should be then not a problem of IL-2 but something in your software configuration with IL-2.

[chiliwili69]

Well guys, my BSB2 arrived today! So, I have been testing it for 2 hours with the audio strap.  And no diplopia at all.

 

Configuration was like with the Index, just lunch IL-2 and all is done. I was really missing this easiness.

 

With the Quest3 I had to do a number of things (be sure Q3 battery is charged, be sure at least one controller has battery, prepare extra battery nearby, switch on device, launch streaming app, link device with Airlink, close all those meta default windows, go to desktop, launch IL-2), but now just launch IL-2.

 

I run in 75Hz mode which gives clearly a more detailed image of the scene. I put 130% supersampling in SteamVR (4060x4060) which is about 33 million pixels and my 5080 was about 80% loaded. Perhaps I can put a bit more like 150% but the image is clearly better than in the Quest3 for the same amount of pixels.

So in terms of image clarity is a clear winner over the Quest3.

 

 

But the best aspect of the BSB2 over the Quest3 is not the better image or forget about Wifis or batteries, it is the light weight and the feeling of not having a brick hanging in your face. The lack of rotational inertias when the head is turned is definetely a good thing.

 

The custom made rubber mask fits perfectly in my face, so well that now I am totally blinded (with all my previous devices I always was able to look a little bit through the nose, I miss that).

 

The Audio strap is ok, and combined with the rubber mask is ok as well, but I would prefer that they made a bigger and more traditional face mask like the Index or Quest3.

Perhaps someone will invent a clasical mask for the B2B. The headphones are ok (of course better than Quest3) but I they are floating over my ear like the old headphones of the first walkmans. I need to see if I can use normal Hifi headphones.

 

I use just one BaseStation and the overall tracking is as good as with the Index, but I need to test it more.

 

In terms of FOV, I would say it is similar to the Quest3.

 

The glare is there in dark scenes with bright lights, but in daylight scenes no issue at all.

 

I have two weeks to decide if I keep it and sell the Q3. For now the BSB2 is winning, for need to test it in longer sessions.

Edited Tuesday at 10:43 PM by chiliwili69

[Goldwrench]

25 minutes ago, chiliwili69 said:

I run in 75Hz mode which gives clearly a more detailed image of the scene. I put 130% supersampling in SteamVR (4060x4060) which is about 33 million pixels and my 5080 was about 80% loaded. Perhaps I can put a bit more like 150% but the image is clearly better than in the Quest3 for the same amount of pixels.

So in terms of image clarity is a clear winner over the Quest3.

I don't think 150% will benefit you. TBH, 130% probably isn't doing much either. It doesn't for me. You could run at 100% and with a 5080 you could then increase in-game graphics settings and still maintain low frame times.

[Aapje]

On 9/24/2025 at 12:39 AM, chiliwili69 said:

With the Quest3 I had to do a number of things (be sure Q3 battery is charged, be sure at least one controller has battery, prepare extra battery nearby, switch on device, launch streaming app, link device with Airlink, close all those meta default windows, go to desktop, launch IL-2), but now just launch IL-2.

 

I don't think that wireless Quest is a fair comparison to a wired BSB2. My wired Quest 3 experience lacks most of these downsides.