Tante Ju

[Rama]

I don't know many games and even less simms where the dev is listening and responding to the community as much as here.

Now, if you expect the dev to give information about everything what is said in internal dev discussion, then your expectations aren't realistic.

 

Dev will not communicate on possible features, they will only communication on features that has been decided. Nothing is worse than approximative communication on hypothetic features that the public will take as granted promises...

[6./ZG26_5tuka]

You know all good things take time!

Hope this still isn't a closed case though (for devs I mean). I'd rather wait a little until they gathered inspiration, ideas, ressources and time together instead of it scraping any plans for it totally since it can't be realised currently.

Edited October 3, 2014 by [Jg26]5tuka

[Emil_Junus]

UP!

 

 

To devs: Imagine you would take 15$ for a flyable Ju 52 and only the half of the people, who voted for YES, would buy it, you would get 3000$. And I don't think, there will be only 200 people, who want a flyable Tante Ju..

[Neil]

UP!

 

 

To devs: Imagine you would take 15$ for a flyable Ju 52 and only the half of the people, who voted for YES, would buy it, you would get 3000$. And I don't think, there will be only 200 people, who want a flyable Tante Ju..

Thanks Emil for bringing up this topic, I was affraid that people forget flyable Tante Ju. 

I would ready to pay 15$ (en even more) for it!

Dev team are very busy to develop DOS, but we can always talk about tante Ju in this topic to keep her alive!

 

here is a good 5 min modern video with some good comment!

A must see!

https://youtu.be/Ik2DDXaXbms

[Habu]

They ears us. I hope that those who asked on that thread will answer to the call.

 

http://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/24126-developer-diary-part-129-discussion/