Me 109k4 with db engine

[ElotheSaint]

  In the game the me109k4 with db engine and P51D have equal climb rate.I think that is wrong because the k4 climb a lot better tha P51d and I think it have better acceleration too than a P51D.Also the weapons from the k4 i think is unrealistic because,I spend all my ammo to the P51 and the P51 still stands.

[CountZero]

K4 DB-605DB engine:
Climb rate at sea level: 20.5 m/s
Climb rate at 3000 m: 17.5 m/s
Climb rate at 6000 m: 13.4 m/s

 

P-51D

Climb at engine mode - WEP
Climb rate at sea level: 18.1 m/s (3567 feet/min)
Climb rate at 3000 m (9843 feet): 15.7 m/s (3083 feet/min)
Climb rate at 6000 m (19685 feet): 12.4 m/s (2433 feet/min)

[ElotheSaint]

2 hours ago, CountZero said:

K4 DB-605DB engine:
Climb rate at sea level: 20.5 m/s
Climb rate at 3000 m: 17.5 m/s
Climb rate at 6000 m: 13.4 m/s

 

P-51D

Climb at engine mode - WEP
Climb rate at sea level: 18.1 m/s (3567 feet/min)
Climb rate at 3000 m (9843 feet): 15.7 m/s (3083 feet/min)
Climb rate at 6000 m (19685 feet): 12.4 m/s (2433 feet/min)

The better climb from a me 109k4 with db engine is 25m/s,not 20.5m/s.And the top speed is 708kmh not 703kmh.I think is unrealistic,and if you look for the better climb from a p51d you going to see what the better climb is 16,3 m/s or maybe 18.1m/s in other variants.And the 109 have better refrigeration system too and better aceleration.

Edited November 16, 2022 by ElotheSaint

[LukeFF]

Gonna need a lot more supporting evidence than that. ?

[CountZero]

2 hours ago, ElotheSaint said:

The better climb from a me 109k4 with db engine is 25m/s,not 20.5m/s.And the top speed is 708kmh not 703kmh.I think is unrealistic,and if you look for the better climb from a p51d you going to see what the better climb is 16,3 m/s or maybe 18.1m/s in other variants.And the 109 have better refrigeration system too and better aceleration.

Show them the tests and the data if you think they are wrong, i just posted numbers they give in game.

[Otto_bann]

In this simulator and at low altitude, 51 can follow K4 in climb at big angle, not at low slope : don't climd too hardly if your K4 is followed by 51. The difference was changed not so long ago. 

 

Anyway, it's a game simulator, not an technical acuracy association : many diffencies with IRL exist

Edited November 16, 2022 by Otto_bann

[ElotheSaint]

Yes in the simulator you can follow a k4 but in the real life you can`t.I know is a game ,but always games favor allied aircraft and disfavor axis aircraft,always i see that.The k4 better climb is 25ms per second(with db engine,not dc engine,the dc engine has more power) and the mustang even with fuel of 150 octans has a climb rate from 18m/s, is big difference from climb rate, the k4 better climb 25ms  and the mustang 18 ms ,that difference from climb rate doesnt exist in the game.And the K4 with db engine can achieve 710km/htop speed and in the game the k4 has a top speed from 703kms and the 109 k4 with dc engine can achieve 727 kmh and in the game can achieve 713km/h,so wrong.And even the k4 have more aceleration and better system of refrigeration.

Edited March 23, 2024 by ElotheSaint

[ElotheSaint]

On 2/12/2023 at 5:38 PM, ElotheSaint said:

Yes in the simulator you can follow a k4 but in the real life you can`t.I know is a game ,but always games favor allied aircraft and disfavor axis aircraft,always i see that.The k4 better climb is 25ms per second(with db engine,not dc engine,the dc engine has more power) and the mustang even with fuel of 150 octans has a climb rate from 18m/s, is big difference from climb rate, the k4 better climb 25ms  and the mustang 18 ms ,that difference from climb rate doesnt exist in the game.And the K4 with db engine can achieve 710km/htop speed and in the game the k4 has a top speed from 703kms and the 109 k4 with dc engine can achieve 727 kmh and in the game can achieve 713km/h,so wrong.And even the k4 have more aceleration and better system of refrigeration.

 

[ElotheSaint]