Translated QA

[76IAP-Black]

Guys!!!!

We have 7 pages full of random text, angry people and more than no real info about what will happen.

Let's wait for the official anouncment from the developers.

Everything else is a waste of time  

[CCG_Pips]

11 hours ago, BraveSirRobin said:

 

It's the only one focused on realistic WW2 air battles.  If you want to recreate Final Countdown, check out DCS.

 

No, sorry, you are confusing AIR BATTLE and DOGFIGHT between fighters.

Here is the problem. Air warfare is not just about fighters, fighter-bombers and two or three light bombers.

1C Game makes it easy, does not seek to improve its product and in this, they risk losing a lot of customers.

If it's to always do the same thing in game, then, yes DCS is much more interesting, on that way, a part of customers will go towards FPS type fighting games for example. There is one where I find a LOT of simmers...it's HELL LET LOOSE....

 

Otherwise, good flight!!

[Trooper117]

8 hours ago, SCG_motoadve said:

honestly I rather see the IL2 series getting more detailed in the FM and DM areas, lots of systems to add to improve and make it a very detailed sim, before moving to the next module.

 

OMG... how on earth would that keep the money coming in to keep the business running and pay the monthly bills for the team?... I think you may be sitting in some kind of alternative universe to the rest of us.

2 hours ago, migmadmarine said:

. We're all doing very little more than reading tea leaves right now. 

 

Ah, tea... thanks for reminding me... Time for tiffin!  

[JG27_Steini]

8 minutes ago, Trooper117 said:

 

OMG... how on earth would that keep the money coming in to keep the business running and pay the monthly bills for the team?... I think you may be sitting in some kind of alternative universe to the rest of us.

 

Ah, tea... thanks for reminding me... Time for tiffin!  

 

It would keep money coming because a lot of player wont buy the same problems again and again. Problems with radio system, career mode, chatter, AI problems are here since the beginning. I would just pay for a promise that old problems will be recodniced and fixed. Then i would buy all other modules. Currently we are getting new models and new maps. Thats not solving the problems.

[CountZero]

11 hours ago, oc2209 said:

 

Mid-war Channel? My god, how could it be anything but 90% copy paste?

 

Ditto for North Africa, at least as far as Allied and German planes go.

 

At least Berlin's redundant plane sets will have top performers on both sides. Every other theater represents retrograde performance and armament. Every single one.

 

Seems silly to go backwards when you haven't even explored the limits of forwards yet.

Again with Berlin fantasy:

" In BoM the team decided not to include Moscow in the playable area to keep the city in low-res to increase performance and avoid the option of bomb raids. Churches were also made indestructible. The other reason for choosing low-res was the fear of repeating mistakes made by our predecessors when the team lead by Oleg Maddox attempted to model London, and as a result spent too much time and resources on this task."

 

They aint gona be modeling big citys, so no Berlin, and that means no fantasy He-162 as it operated from bases NW from city.

 

Channel map 43 can have Spitfire IXc, P-38G, Beaufighter and make flyable AI B-25 and AI B-26, they still didnt anounced even B-25 as collectable, maybe they see that ppl dont buy big airplanes as collectable so better bundle them in full DLC.
And on Axis 190A4, 109G5, Ju87D5, Ju188, Do217. You say no performance airplanes but you got BoN after BoBp, A3 is best DF 190 in game A4 is better then it, 109G5 is high alt 109 , something hartmans dream of since game was started... Thats 7 out of 10 DLC airplanes that your already half done, at time when you main FM and what not guy left and you have new ppl taking over, easy way to start project runing, first months after preorder you can already have planes coming out fast.

And you already have map you just have to improve it like players ask for it made it in all seasons, and its not for free, its part of DLC so your paid for your work.

 

But more axis prototype airplanes like ta-152 and he-162 is what game needs LOL why not add P-80 Meteor Ta-183 MiG-9 Ho 229 Yak-15 and call it 1946 DLC, thats full performance focused and historical dlc your seaking, Operation Unthinkable.

 

Ppl ask for shorter DLC making time, more bombers, better map, channal 43 is chepest way to do all that, and you add airplanes that can fit with other west DLCs game have, same as BoN did, and its not risky and demanding as others options in this uncertent times, now you just need to stay a flot not set any new records, channal 43 does that.

Edited September 29, 2022 by CountZero

[Rjel]

2 hours ago, 76IAP-Black said:

Guys!!!!

We have 7 pages full of random text, angry people and more than no real info about what will happen.

Let's wait for the official anouncment from the developers.

Everything else is a waste of time  

I think some of us would eat our young if we thought it would advance our argument. ? 

[RNAS10_Mitchell]

3 minutes ago, Rjel said:

I think some of us would eat our young if we thought it would advance our argument. ? 

Didn't realize that was an option.....?

[DD_Arthur]

39 minutes ago, RNAS10_Mitchell said:

Didn't realize that was an option.....?

It’s a very bad option. Much better to sell ‘em for medical experiments and spend the money on a new graphics card…

[Jaws2002]

2 hours ago, CountZero said:

Again with Berlin fantasy:

" In BoM the team decided not to include Moscow in the playable area to keep the city in low-res to increase performance and avoid the option of bomb raids. Churches were also made indestructible. The other reason for choosing low-res was the fear of repeating mistakes made by our predecessors when the team lead by Oleg Maddox attempted to model London, and as a result spent too much time and resources on this task."

 

They aint gona be modeling big citys, so no Berlin, and that means no fantasy He-162 as it operated from bases NW from city.

 

Channel map 43 can have Spitfire IXc, P-38G, Beaufighter and make flyable AI B-25 and AI B-26, they still didnt anounced even B-25 as collectable, maybe they see that ppl dont buy big airplanes as collectable so better bundle them in full DLC.
And on Axis 190A4, 109G5, Ju87D5, Ju188, Do217. You say no performance airplanes but you got BoN after BoBp, A3 is best DF 190 in game A4 is better then it, 109G5 is high alt 109 , something hartmans dream of since game was started... Thats 7 out of 10 DLC airplanes that your already half done, at time when you main FM and what not guy left and you have new ppl taking over, easy way to start project runing, first months after preorder you can already have planes coming out fast.

And you already have map you just have to improve it like players ask for it made it in all seasons, and its not for free, its part of DLC so your paid for your work.

 

But more axis prototype airplanes like ta-152 and he-162 is what game needs LOL why not add P-80 Meteor Ta-183 MiG-9 Ho 229 Yak-15 and call it 1946 DLC, thats full performance focused and historical dlc your seaking, Operation Unthinkable.

 

Ppl ask for shorter DLC making time, more bombers, better map, channal 43 is chepest way to do all that, and you add airplanes that can fit with other west DLCs game have, same as BoN did, and its not risky and demanding as others options in this uncertent times, now you just need to stay a flot not set any new records, channal 43 does that.

1943 is really redundant. There's nothing you can do with the A4 that you can't do with A3 or a5 or A6 and it's the same on the other side. I mean we already have the Spitffire MkIXC in Battle of Bodenplate.

 

But most importantly, you can play that scenario right now, on the maps that we have. You are overestimating the importance of yet another copy and paste, mid war  109/190/spitfire.

 

At least the late war eastern front would bring progress in performance. Ta152, Yak-9U, Yak-3, La-7. 

 

I'd take either late war eastern front, or early, eastern front, (with another axis country, like Finland represented) over another copy and paste of the usual suspects.

Edited September 29, 2022 by Jaws2002

[senseispcc]

The real questions are:

Do you want interesting AIR battles real ones or those that did oppose two nearly equal forces (not often real ones)?!

Do you want realistic  simulation that reproduce the real fact on the front depicted when the data is nearly possible to find? Or the fantasy of the movies?!

Do you want campaigns or battles? (until now all IL2 Sturmovik battles were campaigns) Battles take a maximum of ten 10 days(1day  to 10 days)! Not a mission but short campaigns are battles.

France 1940 Air Campaign?!

Russia all war grand north  air campaign?!

Russia  Germany and Poland end of the war air campaign?! (you could also add operation Bagration)

Russia operations from after Kursk to Budapest ?!

Greece and Yugoslavia 1941 Campaign...?!

Sicily and Italy until 1945 Campaign?!

All this are possible plus all those in the Pacific and  China, Burma ...the slow and difficult one in the Aleutians!

And yes, the game could be better, but never forget it is only a game and the FPS are still nice even on a  "normal" pc! Thanks to the team for this!

And yes, the game is not cheap but this are great games whit a lot of content in it 80 dollars a year is not to much for what we get!

Every thing could be better, we could also do so like at the moment in this GAME to be constructive and ask not demand.

 

Have a pleasant game all and every one!

 

My favorite Campaign to be should be , The campaign of France 1940 were the Germans did loose nearly 900 planes and was fought in nearly equal terms.

 

 

  

 

 

[Alexmarine]

23 minutes ago, Jaws2002 said:

 

I'd take either late war eastern front, or early, eastern front, (with another axis country, like Finland represented) over another copy and paste of the usual suspects.

 

Even with Finland I guess that we are in Early War territory, something that it's not considered financially viable at the moment (BoM was not overly successful and it includes planes that are already well into the early war period, going for even earlier ones it's unlikely). I don't think we are going to see anything with a planeset that it's not 42/43 at the least. 

[Jaws2002]

The planes Finland used are pretty popular. BOM was not popular because of the habit of this team to start with very popular planes and then go down the list. You were supposed to build hype, not have the most fun planes thrown in first. They could have started with BOM.  Start early and then customers are getting a constant stream of higher performance planes. If you spoil the customer with high power monsters you are killing the interest for earlier planes.

ROF and FC did the same thing. Those started with late war monsters and then added more and more boring planes. 

Edited September 29, 2022 by Jaws2002

[I./JG1_Baron]

Only my two cents:

 

Personally, I think that another part from the eastern front would be suicide in a way. Sure, there are voices here about Murmansk, Poland, Berlin... But what can we get there to make it attractive? Under the Soviet Yak-3, Yak-9U, or UD, La-7, IL-10. It will be much more difficult for the Germans - Bf-109G-10, Fw-190A-9 - and so on? I don't think the He-162, Ho-229 and others would be a benefit (although the He-162 would be nice as a collector's aircraft). However, Planeset is only one side of the story. It would be necessary to make new maps. For example Murmansk is not a village, I'm not even talking about Warsaw, so it would place much greater demands on both the developers and the required hardware.
As for Korea, with a little goodwill, there would be no problem with the planeset, except for one but fundamental exception - the B-29, possibly the B-50. Without these machines, Korea more or less loses its meaning.
So where could the GB series go? So, if there is no PTO (which is a huge pity, not all PTOs need aircraft carriers, moreover, the Imperial Japanese Air Force operated from land bases - yes, I mean, for example, Hayate, Raiden, Shiden, Hien, G4M Betty, Toryu and others. ), it would probably be best to go to the Italian front. Even if it weren't for Sicily, Italy itself offers enough possibilities. And not only in WW2, but also in WW1. I could quite imagine flying on an MC. 200, G. 50, Re.2000, MC. 205, G. 55, Re. 2001, Re. 2002, Re. 2005, S. M. 79.... These are just some of the fighting machines that appeared in MTO. On the other hand, there could be tropicalized Spitfires and Hurricanes, A-36 Apache, early P-38 versions F and G, P-47C and others, although also Blenheims (but such a Swordfish would also be fun, right?).
I hope that one day we will also look at the beginning of WW2, specifically France 1940 (we already have the map, just make a planeset), Poland 1939 and Barbarossa 1941 would also be interesting.

Edited September 29, 2022 by I./JG1_Baron

[BraveSirRobin]

7 hours ago, LuseKofte said:

Do you know this for sure?

I am not arguing, I just have not seen any numbers. In fact I believed no one had.

Because the way things are going, following your logic this sim has few if any option left. 1 year late war.

No carrier ops , mean no Korea.

I for one hope for early war, I know you disagree an think it is a lower. I think or hope it is not

I don’t remember his exact words, but when Jason announced BoBP he made it pretty clear that if it didn’t do better than the prior modules then they would not be able to continue.  

[Rothary]

I don't know why people keep referring to Finland as early war despite the fact that the Continuation War lasted from 1941 all the way to 1944, with the most intense fighting specifically taking place in the summer of 1944 with Germany continuing the fight past that. If we want to make full use of existing planes for Finland, it'd have to extend to 1944. Some squadrons didn't receive their Bf109s until then. With Finland the focus would specifically be in summer and autumn of 1944 and I don't know why that's considered "early war eastern front".

 

Polls also show Finland being ever so slightly more popular than Berlin as an option. Personally to me while Berlin ties up the eastern front nicely chronologically with a couple new late war planes, that's really it for my interest in a scenario involving Germany for the 6th time in a row, but this time over a far more boring map. Meanwhile Finland would add the first non-german axis-aligned faction (ignoring Romania in smaller scale soon), more interesting map with lot's of lakes, islands and jagged coastline (existing work on the map supposedly already exists, which would likely help with development), possibly new mission types such as anti-submarine patrols over the Gulf of Finland. More varied and unique plane set that'd potentially serve future western or Italian front. Career could stretch from 1941 all the way to late 1944 involving both Finland and Germany (maybe Finland even switching sides towards the end?). All Berlin offers in my eyes are a couple late war aircraft but not much else. I'd take Finland over that any day and not because I'm Finnish - I wouldn't mind Italy for much the same reasons.

[Zooropa_Fly]

Instead of a next 'module', how about a couple of 'extension packs' to existing ones ?

 

Say around 4 new planes, relevant extra map, a few more ships / vehicles / other objects of the period.

[Jaegermeister]

2 hours ago, I./JG1_Baron said:

... it would probably be best to go to the Italian front. Even if it weren't for Sicily, Italy itself offers enough possibilities. And not only in WW2, but also in WW1. I could quite imagine flying on an MC. 200, G. 50, Re.2000, MC. 205, G. 55, Re. 2001, Re. 2002, Re. 2005, S. M. 79.... These are just some of the fighting machines that appeared in MTO. On the other hand, there could be tropicalized Spitfires and Hurricanes, A-36 Apache, early P-38 versions F and G, P-47C and others, although also Blenheims (but such a Swordfish would also be fun, right?).

 

What I would like to see...
 

Spoiler

 

 

This map would be the same area as Rhineland, but less ground texture to model. As far as variety and possible scenarios, this offers the best options. 

 

Maybe torpedo bombers are in the future too, which would open up a whole new set of mission types and aircraft like the Fairey Swordfish

 

 

Edited September 29, 2022 by Jaegermeister

[Chief_Mouser]

3 minutes ago, Jaegermeister said:

 

What I would like to see...
 

  Hide contents

 

 

This map would be the same area as Rhineland, but less ground texture to model. As far as variety and possible scenarios, this offers the best options. 

 

 

 

Ditch one of the Spitfires and put a Wellington or Baltimore in there.

[Jaegermeister]

11 minutes ago, 216th_Cat said:

 

Ditch one of the Spitfires and put a Wellington or Baltimore in there.

 

Sure, lots of options... The Fiat G.55 would be better too. A new Bf109 engined fighter.

[Feldgrun]

On 9/27/2022 at 7:04 AM, Voidhunger said:

"- We have discussed what the next project will be and now the team has an energy surge. "

 

More Yaks on the Eastern Front?

 

On 9/27/2022 at 7:58 AM, Denum said:

I can honestly say whatever the next module is no matter where it is and when it is I'm buying it.

I probably will too, but that doesn't mean we can't complain a bit about our [less than ideal] choices. 

 

On 9/27/2022 at 8:13 AM, =EXPEND=CG_Justin said:

So, where do we go from here? Heavies?

We can only dream, for now, unless that's what the devs are excited about (unlikely, but I'd love to see them prove me wrong).

 

On 9/27/2022 at 8:34 AM, CountZero said:

Rabaul to vella Lavella 600+km, islands cant be moved closer , carriers can be moved closer, no ones gona care if distance betwen carriers and carriers or island of midway is 100km, ppl gona care if solomons map is not 1:1.  Simple.

No need to make map quite that big. Bougainville (Kahili Airfield) to Guadalcanal (Henderson Airfield) would be sufficient. Lots of little airfields in between.

 

 

Edited September 29, 2022 by Feldgrun

[oc2209]

13 hours ago, CountZero said:

Again with Berlin fantasy:

" In BoM the team decided not to include Moscow in the playable area to keep the city in low-res to increase performance and avoid the option of bomb raids. Churches were also made indestructible. The other reason for choosing low-res was the fear of repeating mistakes made by our predecessors when the team lead by Oleg Maddox attempted to model London, and as a result spent too much time and resources on this task."

 

They aint gona be modeling big citys, so no Berlin, and that means no fantasy He-162 as it operated from bases NW from city.

 

I already explained that I didn't mean Berlin itself would be included in the sim. I'm sure there are ways to include portions of the immediate area without having the city itself.

 

13 hours ago, CountZero said:

But more axis prototype airplanes like ta-152 and he-162 is what game needs

 

Yeah, that's exactly what the game needs. Because German plane selection is very limited compared to Allied. You want German fans to buy an entire module for 1-2 planes, you d*** well better make those planes interesting.

 

13 hours ago, CountZero said:

LOL why not add P-80 Meteor Ta-183 MiG-9 Ho 229 Yak-15 and call it 1946 DLC, thats full performance focused and historical dlc your seaking, Operation Unthinkable.

 

Because none of those planes saw operational combat, unlike both the Ta-152 and He-162.

 

Remember, we're getting the teardrop Spit XIV, which saw about as much service as the above two.

 

Don't make BS comparisons. It's insulting.

 

Edit:

 

Tone it down just a notch, please.

 

Smith

 

 

[l_commando]

 

My (edited and refined) two cents from a Reddit post on this very topic:

 

1. I think Tunisia could be a real possibility since TFS 6.0 is most likely going to cover the Malta Blitz. Probably the most doable too

 

2. I would also like to see Sicily or Italy for the reasons others have mentioned but I feel the biggest challenge would be the map. It would be by far the largest and most urbanized map in BoX history since in order to portray the theatre appropriately one would need to model almost the entire country. Most Allied bases were either on Sicily, Corsica, or around Foggia and most Axis bases were in the far north.

 

3. I also think the Pacific without carriers is perfectly doable if you do something like the Battle of the Solomons, Battle of New Guinea, or a Battle of Burma focused on the Flying Tigers. But it's already been ruled out so it's a moot point I guess.

 

4. I think Korea would still be considered too controversial which is partially why so few Korean War games have been made. North Korea tends to flip out whenever the war is depicted in media it has no direct hand in creating. China was also not thrilled about discussing the war in media until very recently.

 

5. A late Eastern Front module would also be doable but it would probably also catch a lot of flak -to use a phrase- due to recent events.

 

6. If the devs want to do the Strategic Bombing Offensive in a new game (and I think they should at least give it a shot), they should try to get it out before Microprose’s B-17 reboot comes out

Edited September 29, 2022 by l_commando
formatting

[DD_Arthur]

4 minutes ago, oc2209 said:

Don't make bullshit comparisons. It's insulting.

Please. This has been an interesting and spirited discussion.

Lets not provoke a lock. S!

[Niagara]

ok ill make it easy :  Flying Tigers or New Guinea ?? ..

[oc2209]

7 minutes ago, DD_Arthur said:

Please. This has been an interesting and spirited discussion.

Lets not provoke a lock. S!

 

I'll stop right there, sorry. I'm just tired of simple statements I make being turned into absurdity.

[DD_Arthur]

3 minutes ago, l_commando said:

 

My (edited and refined) two cents from a Reddit post on this very topic:

 

1. I think Tunisia could be a real possibility since TFS 6.0 is most likely going to cover the Malta Blitz. 

 

 

6. If the devs want to do the Strategic Bombing Offensive in a new game (and I think they should at least give it a shot), they should try to get it out before Microprose’s B-17 reboot comes out

I think it reasonable to state that TFS’s future releases have absolutely no bearing on the direction this series takes and a little Googling will reveal that Microprose’s efforts boil down to one man in a shed in Canada.

[l_commando]

17 minutes ago, DD_Arthur said:

I think it reasonable to state that TFS’s future releases have absolutely no bearing on the direction this series takes and a little Googling will reveal that Microprose’s efforts boil down to one man in a shed in Canada.

 

I'm personally pretty impressed that one man in a shed in Canada could come out with Regiments and Task Force Admiral

[MAJ_stug41]

LOOOUUUD YELLIIING!!!!!!

Where is the IAR and Stug I paid for last year? Harrumph, harrumph!

 

Anyway, more I think about midwar channel the more I like it over late east.

bristol beaufighter?

Flyable b25? B26?

Wellington?

Do217?

110f to get those tasty 601f series engines as a nice intermediate between E and G, and some fun loadouts?

Earlier p38?

Redone p40, and a later version?

 

All of these would be great for some type of midwar italy map as well. Hell, go for midwar italy and throw in a couple of italian planes to balance out all the potential allied midwar aircraft and they contribute roundly to everything!

Edited September 29, 2022 by stug41

[DD_Arthur]

18 minutes ago, l_commando said:

 

I'm personally pretty impressed that one man in a shed in Canada could come out with Regiments and Task Force Admiral

 

No. Our Canadian friend has had nothing to do with those titles.  Our sun will go supanova before Microprose gets a B17 in the air.

[Jaws2002]

 

57 minutes ago, stug41 said:

LOOOUUUD YELLIIING!!!!!!

Where is the IAR and Stug I paid for last year? Harrumph, harrumph!

 

 

They are being worked on and are in advanced stages of development. I think the work on  texture and campaign/missions for the IAR already started. So everything is moving along nicely.

 

Edited September 29, 2022 by Jaws2002

[Niagara]

1 hour ago, stug41 said:

LOOOUUUD YELLIIING!!!!!!

Where is the IAR and Stug I paid for last year? Harrumph, harrumph!

 

Anyway, more I think about midwar channel the more I like it over late east.

bristol beaufighter?

Flyable b25? B26?

Wellington?

Do217?

110f to get those tasty 601f series engines as a nice intermediate between E and G, and some fun loadouts?

Earlier p38?

Redone p40, and a later version?

 

All of these would be great for some type of midwar italy map as well. Hell, go for midwar italy and throw in a couple of italian planes to balance out all the potential allied midwar aircraft and they contribute roundly to everything!

===MID WAR CHANNEL ==sounding better --and toss in the A20G ..

[MisterSmith]

4 hours ago, DD_Arthur said:

Please. This has been an interesting and spirited discussion.

Lets not provoke a lock. S!

 

No lock. Just tone it down a bit.

 

Smith

[Lusekofte]

20 hours ago, Rothary said:

I don't know why people keep referring to Finland as early war despite the fact that the Continuation War lasted from 1941 all the way to 1944, with the most intense fighting specifically taking place in the summer of 1944 with Germany continuing the fight past that. If we want to make full use of existing planes for Finland, it'd have to extend to 1944. Some squadrons didn't receive their Bf109s until then. With Finland the focus would specifically be in summer and autumn of 1944 and I don't know why that's considered "early war eastern front".

 

Polls also show Finland being ever so slightly more popular than Berlin as an option. Personally to me while Berlin ties up the eastern front nicely chronologically with a couple new late war planes, that's really it for my interest in a scenario involving Germany for the 6th time in a row, but this time over a far more boring map. Meanwhile Finland would add the first non-german axis-aligned faction (ignoring Romania in smaller scale soon), more interesting map with lot's of lakes, islands and jagged coastline (existing work on the map supposedly already exists, which would likely help with development), possibly new mission types such as anti-submarine patrols over the Gulf of Finland. More varied and unique plane set that'd potentially serve future western or Italian front. Career could stretch from 1941 all the way to late 1944 involving both Finland and Germany (maybe Finland even switching sides towards the end?). All Berlin offers in my eyes are a couple late war aircraft but not much else. I'd take Finland over that any day and not because I'm Finnish - I wouldn't mind Italy for much the same reasons.

I do it because I feel if you do the map, you do winter war too. Not excluding continuence war

[Voidhunger]

My biggest issue with this game is the time dilation, but it seems to me that im almost the only one.

I have decent hardware but its such a game breaker for me that i just cant play anymore. Sometimes only QMB is what i play.

Am I realy alone on this matter? Are all of you ok with this? I find it very strange.

Most of you are older than me so maybe your head is not is not as receptive as mine

[dburne]

15 minutes ago, Voidhunger said:

My biggest issue with this game is the time dilation, but it seems to me that im almost the only one.

I have decent hardware but its such a game breaker for me that i just cant play anymore. Sometimes only QMB is what i play.

Am I realy alone on this matter? Are all of you ok with this? I find it very strange.

Most of you are older than me so maybe your head is not is not as receptive as mine

 

It is just one of those things we deal with and have to accept. No you are not alone.

Edited September 30, 2022 by dburne

[Gambit21]

38 minutes ago, Voidhunger said:

My biggest issue with this game is the time dilation, but it seems to me that im almost the only one.

I have decent hardware but its such a game breaker for me that i just cant play anymore. Sometimes only QMB is what i play.

Am I realy alone on this matter? Are all of you ok with this? I find it very strange.

Most of you are older than me so maybe your head is not is not as receptive as mine

We’ve had many discussions regarding time dilation - not sure why you think you’re the only one who experiences it. 

[Voidhunger]

3 hours ago, Gambit21 said:

We’ve had many discussions regarding time dilation - not sure why you think you’re the only one who experiences it. 

there were not many people in those discussions and some people claimed that its just my hardware and that there is no issue.

[Gambit21]

32 minutes ago, Voidhunger said:

there were not many people in those discussions and some people claimed that its just my hardware and that there is no issue.

 
Do a search. 

[BraveSirRobin]

1 hour ago, Voidhunger said:

there were not many people in those discussions and some people claimed that its just my hardware and that there is no issue.

I think most of us figure that if there was an easy way to make it better then they would have already done that.

[Guster]

On 9/29/2022 at 11:32 AM, Zooropa_Fly said:

 

 

Update the scoring - still can't belive we don't get shooting stats displayed, when I think they are recorded. And no - I don't want my rubbish gunners' stats included with mine thank you !

Maybe a more detailed description of what you've destroyed and hence a wider variety of points awarded.

 

Agree. The point system is not my cuppa at all. I'd prefer a simple kill/shared kill solution, and the option to completely disable scoring for multiplayer.

 

On 9/29/2022 at 11:32 AM, Zooropa_Fly said:

 

What else.. how about setting the default 'object disappear' time to around a couple of minutes. At least long enough to stop most mid-air evaporations. Nothing worse.

I don't expect a change like this would break the game.

 

The object disappear should be set in-game for single player, and in the mission editor for multiplayer. That way we can each set it to taste, or effectively disable it.