343KKT_Kintaro Posted March 2, 2022 Posted March 2, 2022 (edited) Hi devs, hi Jason &... thank you for this! Spectacular screenshots. Nothing serious obviously but please feel free to fix the labels as follows: Image 1: correct Image 2: should read "WIP: GOTHA G.V" Image 3: correct Image 4: should read "WIP: Handley Page 0-400" Image 5: should read "WIP: Handley Page 0-400" Image 6: should read "WIP: Handley Page 0-400" Image 7: correct Image 8: correct Image 9: correct I edited the OP so that the wrong labels are correctly notified. I hope I made no mistakes this time. Edited March 2, 2022 by 343KKT_Kintaro
Jade_Monkey Posted March 2, 2022 Posted March 2, 2022 Those are the Gotha skins for the ju88 c6. All good. 4
Asgar Posted March 2, 2022 Posted March 2, 2022 1 minute ago, Jade_Monkey said: Those are the Gotha skins for the ju88 c6. All good. It’s always funny and surprising to me how many people know about the fake Glas nose paint but not the fake Gotha paint! 7
56RAF_Stickz Posted March 2, 2022 Posted March 2, 2022 2 hours ago, 343KKT_Kintaro said: Please feel to fix the labels "WIP: JUNKERS JU 88 C-6" on images 2, 3 and 4. Indeed, IMHO they should read "WIP: GOTHA G.V". Hi kintaro: just to be pedantic, could also point out to you that image 4 is a HP 0/400. Then image 5 and 6 are also HP 0/400 rather than ju88
firdimigdi Posted March 2, 2022 Posted March 2, 2022 2 hours ago, 343KKT_Kintaro said: Hi devs, hi Jason &... thank your for this! Spectacular screenshots. Please feel to fix the labels "WIP: JUNKERS JU 88 C-6" on images 2, 3 and 4. Indeed, IMHO they should read "WIP: GOTHA G.V". In some cases the germans painted a fake window in the front of the C6 to make it look like a different variant and in other cases they got a bit carried away. 2
Cybermat47 Posted March 2, 2022 Posted March 2, 2022 Seems kind of needless to me. We can all see that those aren't Ju 88s. There were Ju 88s painted to resemble Gotha G.Vs, though. Here's a photo of one: 3 1
343KKT_Kintaro Posted March 2, 2022 Author Posted March 2, 2022 (edited) 32 minutes ago, 56RAF_Stickz said: Hi kintaro: just to be pedantic, could also point out to you that image 4 is a HP 0/400. Then image 5 and 6 are also HP 0/400 rather than ju88 Not pedantic at all, I started my tpic with a complete blunder! A few labels are wrong anyway. I edited the OP so I hope now my suggestion will be accepted. Edited March 2, 2022 by 343KKT_Kintaro OT -> OP
Avimimus Posted March 2, 2022 Posted March 2, 2022 No wonder people think the Ju-88C6 won't do well as a fighter in multiplayer! Too many bracing wires! 2
343KKT_Kintaro Posted March 2, 2022 Author Posted March 2, 2022 Stop it you fellas! Very soon I'll be running out of Haha notifications! 3
Recommended Posts