some incredible restored ww2 tank photos

[NoelGallagher]

some of them looks like as if it's taken from yesterday ...

enjoy

 

market garden - oosterbeek

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited February 5, 2022 by NoelGallagher

[No_Face]

The restoration work is incredible. On YT, there are also videos that I find incredible in terms of quality.

The picture of the Sherman with all the sandbags is nice. I've never seen so many bags with the steel frame to hold them before.

Edited February 5, 2022 by No_Face

[messsucher]

Awesome pics. The Sherman is mobile bunker.

[NoelGallagher]

9 hours ago, No_Face said:

The restoration work is incredible. On YT, there are also videos that I find incredible in terms of quality.

The picture of the Sherman with all the sandbags is nice. I've never seen so many bags with the steel frame to hold them before.

This? 

 

Edited February 5, 2022 by NoelGallagher

[No_Face]

4 hours ago, NoelGallagher said:

This?

I was thinking about this video:

 

 

but yours works too. ?
 

The work to improve quality is incredible. So much so that sometimes I wonder if these are real images. I don't have any doubts about the ones in the video I posted because they are scenes of life (with ruins as well) but I'm more suspicious of the images of soldiers or battles because it can be people doing reenactments.

 

Even my old cell phone doesn't have such a good quality ? (it is really old that said)

EDIT :

 

Besides, when I see this I think that knowing the truth will be harder and harder. Old documents (photos or videos) once restored can look too clean to be authentic. On the other hand, it is easy to make these same documents look old.

 

Today, technology allows deepfake so much that we can make believe that someone said something (when it is not true) whether it is for the present (we can take the face of a president and make him say something very dangerous for the world politics) but it also means that it can work for the past, people will have fun to take an unpublished video of an important man (for example Winston Churchill) and lend him some fire words that can trigger diplomatic breaks...

 

It's a great world we live in, isn't it? ?

 

Edited February 5, 2022 by No_Face

[NoelGallagher]

17 hours ago, No_Face said:

I was thinking about this video:

 

 

but yours works too. ?
 

The work to improve quality is incredible. So much so that sometimes I wonder if these are real images. I don't have any doubts about the ones in the video I posted because they are scenes of life (with ruins as well) but I'm more suspicious of the images of soldiers or battles because it can be people doing reenactments.

 

Even my old cell phone doesn't have such a good quality ? (it is really old that said)

EDIT :

 

Besides, when I see this I think that knowing the truth will be harder and harder. Old documents (photos or videos) once restored can look too clean to be authentic. On the other hand, it is easy to make these same documents look old.

 

Today, technology allows deepfake so much that we can make believe that someone said something (when it is not true) whether it is for the present (we can take the face of a president and make him say something very dangerous for the world politics) but it also means that it can work for the past, people will have fun to take an unpublished video of an important man (for example Winston Churchill) and lend him some fire words that can trigger diplomatic breaks...

 

It's a great world we live in, isn't it? ?

 

well yes 

but the technology we think we have now is tip of the atom compared to what we really have but not available to public

this is one of the patent

and US governemnt funded this project as it states 

Xuckin crazy...

well if they really have this they can bend the space time literally...

artificial gravitational wave generator lol

it sounds like a joke but what if it's not?

let alone fkaing the video..

if this really works they can literally copy the persons physical body one to one

 

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/21/5a/a6/c9ad768eb3a443/US10322827.pdf

Edited February 6, 2022 by NoelGallagher