Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators CLOD
Posted

There seems to be two conflicting accounts of this event on 3 September 1944.

 

According to Caldwell in JG 26 War Diary Volume Two 1943–1945, he was shot down by P-51 Mustangs of 55th Fighter Group 338th Squadron. However, according to Thomas and Davey in Griffon Spitfire Aces, he was shot down by RAF Spitfires.

 

Which one is more likely? I will be basing a video on the results discussed.

 

Soto

Posted

Shore confirmed he was shot down by a Spitfire Mk XII

Posted

He was shot down flying a defective machine he should have left at the airfield...and it cost him his life.

  • Haha 1
  • Moderators CLOD
Posted
On 1/6/2022 at 5:05 PM, jeanba said:

Shore confirmed he was shot down by a Spitfire Mk XII

Any more info about this?

Posted

Caldwell has a more in depth explanation of his theory that responds to Chris Shores’ in the more recent edition of his work.  I’ll try to upload some stuff for you when I’m back home this weekend.

 

 

  • Moderators CLOD
Posted
On 1/14/2022 at 7:57 AM, VBF-12_KW said:

Caldwell has a more in depth explanation of his theory that responds to Chris Shores’ in the more recent edition of his work.  I’ll try to upload some stuff for you when I’m back home this weekend.

Thanks that would be great

Posted

Lang was flying a 190 with gear problems that day...they could not get the the gear to remain retracted on the ground as it was undergoing maintenance...this is from Caldwell's JG/26 book.

 

Lang's wingman eyewitness as seeing the gear extended in flight on Lang's aircraft prior to him going down.

 

  • 3 weeks later...
PatrickAWlson
Posted

These sorts of things can be debated forever.  All manner of confusion can be seen in WWI claims.  In WWII, with so many planes in the air, relatively small personal markings, action spread over a much wider area,  and everything taking place at 3x the speed of WWI, it becomes exponentially more difficult.

 

One point the authors make was the location of the claim.  While that is a data point, it is not conclusive.  The idea that a pilot would know exactly where he was in Belgium is pretty optimistic. 

 

Spitfire or Mustang?  In WWI they didn't even get the number of wings right.  In WWII it's pretty easy to mistake a Spitfire for a Mustang for an Me109 for a LaGG for whatever.  When I fly the sim I often have no idea what I shot down.  I know it was the other side because it had a red dot over it.  Quite often I have to look at the in game debrief to see what it really was.  Pretty sure identification was more difficult for real pilots actually fighting for their lives.

 

BTW: Lang's wingman called out P-47s :) 

  • 1CGS
Posted
1 hour ago, PatrickAWlson said:

Spitfire or Mustang?  In WWI they didn't even get the number of wings right.  In WWII it's pretty easy to mistake a Spitfire for a Mustang for an Me109 for a LaGG for whatever.  When I fly the sim I often have no idea what I shot down.  I know it was the other side because it had a red dot over it.  Quite often I have to look at the in game debrief to see what it really was.  Pretty sure identification was more difficult for real pilots actually fighting for their lives.

 

Yes, it was a very common thing. It's a routine matter in the Black Cross / Red Star books to read an account where a pilot claims he shot down, say, a LaGG-3, when in reality it was a Yak. Heck, you had quite a few claims as late as the winter of 1942-43 where German pilot claimed to engage MiG-3s, even though that plane had largely been withdrawn from the front by that point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...