Jump to content

New book coming out August 14th


Recommended Posts

SYN_Mike77
Posted

here is the blurb on the book above;

 

The first book to give a detailed description of the air war over Stalingrad including maps of all the airfields and unique details of specific air battles. The material has been sourced from the Russian archives and has never been published before. Both authors are based in the Russian Federation.

[JG54]Vyper
Posted

I've been watching that book for almost a year now, and am looking forward to it being released. It has been delayed 4 or 5 times now as it gets towards a release date....so I'm keeping my fingers crossed, but I think it'll get pushed back 2-3 months yet again.

Posted

I'll order once the E-book is out. Love reading everything via my Kindle or Kindle app on my iPhone. thanks, I'll watch for this.

SYN_Mike77
Posted

Vyper, I ordered it today and got a confirmation of delivery on August 14th.  I'm not sure Amazon would confirm if they weren't pretty sure.  I'm looking forward to getting my hands on those maps. 

Posted

Considering the source, I would be concerned about objectivity here...

SYN_Mike77
Posted

So I guess you would say that only books written by Swiss authors can be trusted? 

Posted

Yep! How would a Russian possibly know about Russian aircraft? Skip it!!!

While we're on the subject, make sure you don't pick up any books on the P51D penned by American authors  - it's all crap!

LLv44_Mprhead
Posted

I haven't read anything from these authors before, so I'm going to wait until it's published and check the reviews. One of the authors have worked with Christer Bergström, so that at least speaks well of the reliability and subject is ofc interesting.

SYN_Mike77
Posted

And while we are at it, a book on german fighters or dive bombers written by german pilots should be avoided like the plague!  Nothing to learn there, nothing at all.

Posted

I ordered just ordered Black Cross / Red Star volume 3 yesterday, but this looks interesting as well. I'll probably wait for some feedback though.

Posted

Silliness.  I would question the objectivity of the reports because the source material is exclusively from the Russian archives.  I said nothing about the authors, but fee free to indulge in moral narcissism. 

Posted

Silliness.  I would question the objectivity of the reports because the source material is exclusively from the Russian archives.  I said nothing about the authors, but fee free to indulge in moral narcissism. 

 

Yes, it would be much better if the data came from German sources - we know how even handed those tend to be!

 

Look, there was no magical, neutral, history fairy hovering above the battle taking notes for us.

Any history you have about ANYTHING is going to be influenced by the source. This includes any book

you read about any battle of WWII. Welcome to reality.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

I haven't read anything from these authors before, so I'm going to wait until it's published and check the reviews. One of the authors have worked with Christer Bergström, so that at least speaks well of the reliability and subject is ofc interesting.

 

That means it will surely have some bias.

SYN_Mike77
Posted

Nothing scares me more than the claim of moral objectivity.

LLv44_Mprhead
Posted

That means it will surely have some bias.

 

Could you open that up a bit? I have read some of Bergströms books, but not all of them. Ofc everyone is biased to some extent, but is there something obvious?

Posted

Yes, it would be much better if the data came from German sources - we know how even handed those tend to be!

 

Look, there was no magical, neutral, history fairy hovering above the battle taking notes for us.

Any history you have about ANYTHING is going to be influenced by the source. This includes any book

you read about any battle of WWII. Welcome to reality.

 

German?  Why would I have a preference for German sources?  I'm Canadian.

 

I would prefer the inclusion of sources from both sides, with the claims made by each weighed against those made by the other.  Isolating your source material to one stream when each side on the eastern front is known to have highlighted their successes and hidden their failures causes concern for objectivity.

 

This is said as an academic.

 

 

Nothing scares me more than the claim of moral objectivity.

 

Who said anything about moral objectivity?

Posted

I would prefer the inclusion of sources from both sides, with the claims made by each weighed against those made by the other. 

 

Well of course, wouldn't we all.

Most often though we don't get a book written in the perfect world, so we take it as it comes, and weight it against other research we've done.

Something you'll be familiar with as an academic.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Of course, but remember all I said was that I would be concerned about its objectivity, given the source.  Then the pitchforks came out.

Posted

Well to be fair it came across at first like you were saying Russians couldn't possibly write a decent book about Russian aircraft.

Just the weaknesses of written communication we're dealing with.

Posted

That wasn't my intention at all.  That is why I said "source" and not "author".  

FlatSpinMan
Posted

What to quibble over next, guys? Referencing styles? I'm an APA-man to the bone, myself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...