AEthelraedUnraed Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Some nice AT obstacles there, and at least the Czech Hedgehog should be very useable to add some flavour to the other maps as well. 2
ShamrockOneFive Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Great developer diary! I love the new aircraft of course but it's also great to see these other details like the radars, temporary harbours, cathedrals, etc. Makes for a complete experience.
Voyager Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Is there any information on what engines will be available for the Dh.4? I gather the preferred Eagle VIII was not as available as wished, so it ended up with a pretty wide array of different power plants. If this is a successful plane, I'd suspect the US made Liberty powered DH.4's would be a fun premium plane. Apparently they also often switched the pilot and fuel tank position so it had a pretty distinctive look too.
Denum Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Well. I hope the crew was able to take some time off. I squeaked out for a two week rest and the first week back was like a tsunami..
=AD=uumembwa Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 I see on the first screen... Can we use this things to drive into the ship, do you know what i am saying, on the tank inside the ship it will be possibly? 1
Alexander9822 Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Can we expect the Flak truck soon? since it is basically complete looking at the pictures.
ShamrockOneFive Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, Alexander9822 said: Can we expect the Flak truck soon? since it is basically complete looking at the pictures. Best guess is that the Sd.Kfz. 10/5 Flak 38, SPAD 7 and DH4 are all going to come in a patch by the end of August. Maybe the P-51B as well. I should stress that this is a guess. Edited July 31, 2021 by ShamrockOneFive
R7-S276 Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Good news and nice work, but I still not understand why the B-25 and the announced B-26 are AI airplane and not fly able… still wish one day the copilot seat (and radio/navigator) could be occupied by human and not only AI.
ScotsmanFlyingscotsman Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Excellent information update, looking forward to the Mustang, like all the new flak vehicles, just wish you flak guys were not so accurate! IMHO yes the beaches look deserted but it would be a frame by frame stutter stagger by instead of a fast flyby, unless we can all beam forward to around the year 2525, when the CPU's are up scratch!
Diggun Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 (edited) Anyone figured out where that Mustang is flying over? Doesn't look like Rhineland to me... Edited July 31, 2021 by Diggun
Cybermat47 Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 5 minutes ago, Diggun said: Anyone figured out where that Mustang is flying over? Doesn't look like Rhineland to me... Could be Rhineland, there are some islands off the Dutch coast.
FAW-Tromplamort Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 I'm quite surprised to see the cathedral of Evreux so nicely modeled as I believed that Evreux wasn't on the map for Battle of Normandy or on the very border. And as I live in the vicinity of Evreux I can tell that the cathedral is quite accurately modeled well done guys! One question will you model as well the norman Beffroi who is another unique landmark of the city? All in all I can't wait to fly over my homeland in the virtual sky of Il2 Great Battle.
Jade_Monkey Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 57 minutes ago, FAW-Tromplamort said: I'm quite surprised to see the cathedral of Evreux so nicely modeled as I believed that Evreux wasn't on the map for Battle of Normandy or on the very border. And as I live in the vicinity of Evreux I can tell that the cathedral is quite accurately modeled well done guys! One question will you model as well the norman Beffroi who is another unique landmark of the city? All in all I can't wait to fly over my homeland in the virtual sky of Il2 Great Battle. Good news, the initial tentative map was updated soon after the Normandy announcement and it looks like Evreux is safely within the new map's borders. 2
ilmavoimat Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 It's a shame that Amiens is off the Eastern edge of the updated map though, it means Operation Jericho is off the menu!
DN308 Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 1 hour ago, Jade_Monkey said: Good news, the initial tentative map was updated soon after the Normandy announcement and it looks like Evreux is safely within the new map's borders. Unfortunately, my birth’s home is still out range of the map. 4 minutes ago, ilmavoimat said: It's a shame that Amiens is off the Eastern edge of the updated map though, it means Operation Jericho is off the menu! You’re right. It makes me a little bit disappointed
BlitzPig_EL Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 (edited) If Amiens was on the map, the devs would be forced to do central Paris in detail. Willing to wait another year for that to the exclusion of everything else? Edited July 31, 2021 by BlitzPig_EL
ilmavoimat Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 (edited) Fair point, it wasn't a criticism just an observation. I'm still barely holding my fudge waiting for the C-47!!? Edited July 31, 2021 by ilmavoimat
Avimimus Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 1 hour ago, BlitzPig_EL said: If Amiens was on the map, the devs would be forced to do central Paris in detail. Willing to wait another year for that to the exclusion of everything else? ...and buy a new computer 13 hours ago, Voyager said: Is there any information on what engines will be available for the Dh.4? I gather the preferred Eagle VIII was not as available as wished, so it ended up with a pretty wide array of different power plants. If this is a successful plane, I'd suspect the US made Liberty powered DH.4's would be a fun premium plane. Apparently they also often switched the pilot and fuel tank position so it had a pretty distinctive look too. I assume Rolls Royce Eagle VII rated at 275hp (320hp at 1800 RPM), since that was the case in Rise of Flight. Honestly, the biggest need in engine variants is to have some weaker engined allied two-seaters (especially the Sopwith Strutter) in order to ensure there will be at least a few targets that Central Powers aircraft can catch. Of course the Camel, S.E.5 and Pfalz D.XII could all also do with having some of their more common engine variants available (although technically the S.E.5 would be a different aircraft from the S.E.5a). P.S. We could also do with an early war slow Central Power two seater, however that would be an entirely new aircraft (e.g. Pfalz E.II, LVG C.II), to act as a target for the Sikorsky and Airco someday - even just as AI aircraft it'd be great. Some B variants carried defensive guns - so they are also an option.
BigMotor Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 Really enjoy these updates, thanks Han. So much work and you make it look easy but of course we know it is very hard.
THERION Posted July 31, 2021 Posted July 31, 2021 3 hours ago, Avimimus said: ...and buy a new computer ... and still complaining about annoying stutters over cities?
1CGS LukeFF Posted August 1, 2021 1CGS Posted August 1, 2021 1 hour ago, [-=BP=-]Slegawsky_VR said: Mixed up? Nope 1
Jaegermeister Posted August 1, 2021 Posted August 1, 2021 1 hour ago, LukeFF said: Nope Isn't that a Mustang Mk III?
1CGS LukeFF Posted August 1, 2021 1CGS Posted August 1, 2021 49 minutes ago, Jaegermeister said: Isn't that a Mustang Mk III? Yes, the British designation for the P-51 B/C.
Gambit21 Posted August 1, 2021 Posted August 1, 2021 On 7/31/2021 at 9:04 AM, BlitzPig_EL said: If Amiens was on the map, the devs would be forced to do central Paris in detail. Willing to wait another year for that to the exclusion of everything else? Plus that operation would result in just how much time on-target for a given Mossie? It’s an interesting historical event but hardly something to make to drive map development. What matters is critical to the mission infrastructure like the mo-flucken marshalling yards. I don’t give a rip about some prison building.
ShamrockOneFive Posted August 1, 2021 Posted August 1, 2021 6 hours ago, [-=BP=-]Slegawsky_VR said: RAF or USAF? Mixed up? Remember, the Mustang came about because the British Purchasing Commission was looking for a company to license build more P-40's because they needed more fighters. North American answered the call and said they could have their own fighter design up and running quickly and they succeeded. The first Mustang's in combat service were with the RAF. By the Normandy 1944 timeline, over a dozen squadrons were equipped with the P-51B also known as the Mustang Mark III. These included around a half dozen Polish/RAF units. They were used for everything from tactical fighter-bombing to fighter sweeps and escort. 4 1 1
[-=BP=-]Slegawsky_VR Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 Raf with stripes that confused a bit.
II./SG.1-MarkWilhelmsson Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 I recall hearing somewhere that the Mustang without tail fillet had poor dive characteristics because it did porpoise radically during high speed dives. Is that truth? 1
ShamrockOneFive Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 1 hour ago, II./SG.1-MarkWilhelmsson said: I recall hearing somewhere that the Mustang without tail fillet had poor dive characteristics because it did porpoise radically during high speed dives. Is that truth? That'd be the early P-51D. (See report: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/mustang/mustangIV-divetest.html) The P-51B doesn't need a tail fillet because it has the whole fuselage back there. The A/B/C models had better stability but poorer rear visibility. The D model cut down the fuselage for better visibility and then they later learned that it needed the fillet to resolve the stability problem. It was then retrofitted onto earlier models. 2
DBFlyguy Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, ShamrockOneFive said: That'd be the early P-51D. (See report: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/mustang/mustangIV-divetest.html) The P-51B doesn't need a tail fillet because it has the whole fuselage back there. The A/B/C models had better stability but poorer rear visibility. The D model cut down the fuselage for better visibility and then they later learned that it needed the fillet to resolve the stability problem. It was then retrofitted onto earlier models. The tail fillet was also retrofitted to the B and C as well just in smaller numbers since most were eventually replaced by D's, all versions of the P-51 had some sort of stability issues in slow flight (slow rolls), not just the D. 1 hour ago, [-=BP=-]Slegawsky_VR said: RAF stripe? The horizontal white ID stripe on the vertical stab was typically a USAAF thing, not an RAF one. There were a few RAF squadrons that had horizontal stripes on the vertical stab but not white, but maybe this could just be a generic "placeholder" skin? Edited August 2, 2021 by DBFlyguy 2 3
ShamrockOneFive Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 2 hours ago, DBFlyguy said: The tail fillet was also retrofitted to the B and C as well just in smaller numbers since most were eventually replaced by D's, all versions of the P-51 had some sort of stability issues in slow flight (slow rolls), not just the D. Oh, now that's interesting. I didn't know that! 1
catchthefoxes Posted August 2, 2021 Posted August 2, 2021 3 hours ago, DBFlyguy said: The tail fillet was also retrofitted to the B and C as well just in smaller numbers since most were eventually replaced by D's, all versions of the P-51 had some sort of stability issues in slow flight (slow rolls), not just the D. The horizontal white ID stripe on the vertical stab was typically a USAAF thing, not an RAF one. There were a few RAF squadrons that had horizontal stripes on the vertical stab but not white, but maybe this could just be a generic "placeholder" skin? Need one for the P-47 too. itd be cool to have it as a mod for the P-51 as well 1
Javo0143 Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 Do you know guys what tanks are going to be added in Normandy? Just asking, im curious 1
Thad Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 Negative. Most of us are hopeful for some new tanks though.
Jade_Monkey Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 2 hours ago, Javo0143 said: Do you know guys what tanks are going to be added in Normandy? Just asking, im curious If you are thinking of AI tanks, I don't know if anything is planned but I guess the Firefly the Churchill, the king tiger and the stug are good candidates. If you are thinking of playable tanks, that is not part of BoN development. It could be a future tank crew installment if there is an appetite for it.
Gambit21 Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 We were told that with Normandy will come many “tanks and vehicles” however I took that to mean AI.
[F.Circus]FrangibleCover Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 On 7/31/2021 at 4:52 PM, ilmavoimat said: It's a shame that Amiens is off the Eastern edge of the updated map though, it means Operation Jericho is off the menu! Personally I shall be bombing Rouen, it's about the same distance inland as Amiens and has a convenient cross shaped building to use as a target!
DD_Arthur Posted August 3, 2021 Posted August 3, 2021 45 minutes ago, [F.Circus]FrangibleCover said: Personally I shall be bombing Rouen, it's about the same distance inland as Amiens and has a convenient cross shaped building to use as a target! I’m looking forward to bombing Hastings. As a kid, once a month for years and years we’d have to pile in the family car and drive from London to Hastings so grandma could try and poison us with her cooking. Followed by a hyperthermia inducing walk amongst the tank traps on the beach? ”Come friendly bombs, let them rain on Hastings...” ? 1 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now