namhee2 Posted June 16, 2021 Posted June 16, 2021 I read in a book about the KG 55 that it was commissioned in September 1941 to disrupt the Red Army's rail traffic. It is reported that the train drivers very often stopped the locomotive when they saw the He 111. I tried to create it with the ME, unfortunately the locomotive does not react to the trigger formation "Panic Stop". I thought, with the proximity trigger, to place a "delete" on the WPT to stop the train, unfortunately the delete trigger does not accept the WPT a lot. Who has another idea?
JimTM Posted June 16, 2021 Posted June 16, 2021 (edited) Try a Force Complete set to high, object linked to the train. UPDATE: Sorry, I have a note that it does not work. Edited June 16, 2021 by JimTM 1
namhee2 Posted June 16, 2021 Author Posted June 16, 2021 53 minutes ago, JimTM said: Try a Force Complete set to high, object linked to the train. UPDATE: Sorry, I have a note that it does not work. I just realized that ...... I could place the WPT where I want to attack (then the train will stop automatically) and then place a new WPT with a time delay if the pilot takes too long to attack the train .
JG4_Deciman Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 Tried to disable the waypoint instead of deleting it? Deci
IckyATLAS Posted June 17, 2021 Posted June 17, 2021 21 hours ago, namhee2 said: I read in a book about the KG 55 that it was commissioned in September 1941 to disrupt the Red Army's rail traffic. It is reported that the train drivers very often stopped the locomotive when they saw the He 111. I tried to create it with the ME, unfortunately the locomotive does not react to the trigger formation "Panic Stop". I thought, with the proximity trigger, to place a "delete" on the WPT to stop the train, unfortunately the delete trigger does not accept the WPT a lot. Who has another idea? Strange the behaviour of stopping the loco as you see the attacking plane. You become a sitting duck. SUre you can jump away from the loco and save your life. But if you try to be a hero and save the loco at least, then I would have accelerated to the max and then slowed and reaccelerated so as to make the pilots life more difficult with a train which speed changes erratically, at least for bombing.
namhee2 Posted June 17, 2021 Author Posted June 17, 2021 6 minutes ago, IckyATLAS said: Strange the behaviour of stopping the loco as you see the attacking plane. You become a sitting duck. SUre you can jump away from the loco and save your life. But if you try to be a hero and save the loco at least, then I would have accelerated to the max and then slowed and reaccelerated so as to make the pilots life more difficult with a train which speed changes erratically, at least for bombing. pages 221 to 230
1CGS LukeFF Posted June 17, 2021 1CGS Posted June 17, 2021 5 hours ago, IckyATLAS said: Strange the behaviour of stopping the loco as you see the attacking plane. You become a sitting duck. SUre you can jump away from the loco and save your life. But if you try to be a hero and save the loco at least, then I would have accelerated to the max and then slowed and reaccelerated so as to make the pilots life more difficult with a train which speed changes erratically, at least for bombing. 1. It takes a long time for a locomotive pulling a full load of railcars to accelerate and decelerate. 2. Part of the point of stopping was to allow the flak gunners a better chance at hitting their target. Because of that, Typhoons and Tempests would typically not attack a train that was stopped on the tracks, because it meant the element of surprise had been lost and the gunners were waiting for them.
IckyATLAS Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 13 hours ago, LukeFF said: 1. It takes a long time for a locomotive pulling a full load of railcars to accelerate and decelerate. 2. Part of the point of stopping was to allow the flak gunners a better chance at hitting their target. Because of that, Typhoons and Tempests would typically not attack a train that was stopped on the tracks, because it meant the element of surprise had been lost and the gunners were waiting for them. For an AAA equipped train stopping does indeed make a lot of sense. But for an unarmed train, another strategy would be to slow down disconnect the railcars (due to high inertia of the convoy the railcars will continue following the loco for a few minutes at least and this won't be seen by the pilots) and when you see the planes coming down for attack then brutally accelerate the Loco full steam without the carriages. This would surprise the planes as two targets separate. I suppose saving the Loco is the only valuable thing as anyway the carriages and their load are doomed not having AAA to protect them. If you saved the Loco you can come back after the planes are gone and pull away what has remained and maybe salvage some of the stuff. AN interesting topic to study.
Rjel Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 Like Luke said, I don't think you can "brutally accelerate" a locomotive from a standing stop or even a slow speed. This clip has been posted here before but it illustrates the point well. The Train (4/10) Movie CLIP - Spitfire Attack (1964) HD - YouTube
namhee2 Posted June 18, 2021 Author Posted June 18, 2021 By the way, it would also be very interesting if we had a "boxnb ammo" wagon. 1
IckyATLAS Posted June 18, 2021 Posted June 18, 2021 45 minutes ago, Rjel said: Like Luke said, I don't think you can "brutally accelerate" a locomotive from a standing stop or even a slow speed. This clip has been posted here before but it illustrates the point well. The Train (4/10) Movie CLIP - Spitfire Attack (1964) HD - YouTube Nice video indeed. In need to look more into steam locomotive performances. I am too used to electric locomotives which clearly is totally different.
1CGS LukeFF Posted June 18, 2021 1CGS Posted June 18, 2021 11 hours ago, IckyATLAS said: But for an unarmed train, another strategy would be to slow down disconnect the railcars (due to high inertia of the convoy the railcars will continue following the loco for a few minutes at least and this won't be seen by the pilots) and when you see the planes coming down for attack then brutally accelerate the Loco full steam without the carriages. This would surprise the planes as two targets separate. I suppose saving the Loco is the only valuable thing as anyway the carriages and their load are doomed not having AAA to protect them. If you saved the Loco you can come back after the planes are gone and pull away what has remained and maybe salvage some of the stuff. AN interesting topic to study. I think you've been watching a tad too many Hollywood films. ?
Beebop Posted June 23, 2021 Posted June 23, 2021 On 6/18/2021 at 1:04 PM, LukeFF said: I think you've been watching a tad too many Hollywood films. The RAF did. They invented the "Blockbuster" bomb. ?
jollyjack Posted July 21, 2021 Posted July 21, 2021 On 6/18/2021 at 10:04 PM, LukeFF said: I think you've been watching a tad too many Hollywood films. ? PS are there any Bollywood films with train attacks by planes? That would make a good show with wagon roofs loaded with chickens, live stock etc for IL2. But i guess Pacific comes first (without trains alas) ...
1CGS LukeFF Posted July 21, 2021 1CGS Posted July 21, 2021 5 hours ago, jollyjack said: PS are there any Bollywood films with train attacks by planes? That would make a good show with wagon roofs loaded with chickens, live stock etc for IL2. But i guess Pacific comes first (without trains alas) ... I'm sure if you asked that in the Free Subject section, you'd get a response there. Otherwise, please keep off-topic comments out of this discussion.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now