qtStamphth Posted May 31, 2014 Posted May 31, 2014 Is the difference in reaction time from trigger press to ammunition exit of electronic firing perceivable vs percussion cap to warrant consideration in game? The Fw 190 used pushrods on most if not all of its major flight controls. Will that be taken into account in the game's damage control?
JtD Posted May 31, 2014 Posted May 31, 2014 Is the difference in reaction time from trigger press to ammunition exit of electronic firing perceivable vs percussion cap to warrant consideration in game? I can only answer this one - the difference is hardly relevant, maybe something like 1/100th of a second vs. 1/70th. The last time I checked in game, all guns on the Bf 109F-4 had an about 1/10th s delay. So, first, we need to cut down the relatively large error which is there and maybe then we can go into the other detail. Btw, the wing mounted MG/FF-M were pneumatically operated, so once you get the aircraft, it's possible to check for differences there. 2
Sternjaeger Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 ..and for the record, it was electric priming, not electronic. The main difference was reliability really, the "response time" difference is negligible. What they still need to address is the delayed response of the triggers, but I'm confident that will be addressed at some point.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now