Jump to content

SYN_Vander BENCHMARK v6 to measure IL-2 performance in monitor & VR


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, RossMarBow said:

Just a heads up for zen 3 zen 4 owners

Power limits won't effect IL-2 performance unless you change to them to well below stock to like sub 50w or something ridiculously low. 

 

For x3d CO will give you a slight increase in single thread performance.

 

For tuning CO install core-cycler and change the settings file so

stressTestProgram = YCRUNCHER
mode = 00-x86
 

 What is "CO"? What does it mean?

Posted
17 minutes ago, PA_Willy said:

What is "CO"? What does it mean?

Curve Optmizer, a feature of PBO2.

32 minutes ago, Norz said:

the shared sheet usual result is avg 90...94 but mine is only 84

There is only one 10600K tested with current version of IL-2 (5.004) and the CPU test result is 99 fps.

 

If you have tested your 10600K for the CPU and achieved only 84, then you can review this items:

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, chiliwili69 said:

There is only one 10600K tested with current version of IL-2 (5.004) and the CPU test result is 99 fps.

 

If you have tested your 10600K for the CPU and achieved only 84, then you can review this items:

 

 

I see

 

 that the result is almost the same. Hm.

 

Posted (edited)


 

My new toy - finally some decent frame rates!

 

Motherboard:     Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Extreme
CPU:                 Intel 13900K
CPU Freq:            5.8 Ghz
Cores:               24  
Threads:             32  
RAM size:            32Gb (2x16GB)
RAM Freq:            7200 MHz (DDR5)
NB Freq:             5000 MHz 
RAM timings:      34-42-42-84 

GPU:                Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090 (Core 3000Mhz / RAM 26580Mhz)

 

1080P CPU Test
40902023-01-29 23:57:58 - Il-2
Frames: 8806 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 146.767 - Min: 129 - Max: 196

 

4K GPU Test
2023-01-30 00:15:53 - Il-2
Frames: 11538 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 192.300 - Min: 165 - Max: 218

 

4K GPU Test - Maxed Out Ultra settings - 8x MSAA
2023-01-30 00:22:55 - Il-2
Frames: 6964 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 116.067 - Min: 102 - Max: 131

 

spacer.png[/img]

Edited by Phat
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

O yea also for zen 3 owners 
memory overclocking gets you 5%
and 2.5% if its a x3d (reduced because of cache)

 

not sure about effects on intel or zen 4 or ddr5
but probably similar

Edited by RossMarBow
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Norz said:

Could someone make a video and share it (youtube or google drive etc) for a test process with CPU i5 10600k ?

 

I have changed my mobo set but the result is lower as expected (in the shared sheet usual result is avg 90...94 but mine is only 84)

My previous cpu was i5 10600k and i had 99 average fps during 1080 cpu test as indicated in the spreadsheet BUT with 5.1 GHZ overclocked cpu speed and with a pair of fast ddr4 3200 MHZ 14-14-14-34 memory sticks... i have done only some basic overclocking using Intel Xtu tuning utility changing only all core multiplier to 51x and Vcore voltage offset a little... 

Edited by dgiatr
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, dgiatr said:

My previous cpu was i5 10600k and i had 99 average fps during 1080 cpu test as indicated in the spreadsheet BUT with 5.1 GHZ overclocked cpu speed and with a pair of fast ddr4 3200 MHZ 14-14-14-34 memory sticks... i have done only some basic overclocking using Intel Xtu tuning utility changing only all core multiplier to 51x and Vcore voltage offset a little... 

 

Hello,

 

do you mean that the results on 20.09.2022 were without OC?

 

you wrote:

"

Just did 3 times the 1080p cpu test and my results are as below

 

2022-09-20 14:41:26 - Il-2
Frames: 5329 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 88.817 - Min: 77 - Max: 129

2022-09-20 15:06:14 - Il-2
Frames: 5038 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 83.967 - Min: 73 - Max: 115

2022-09-20 15:09:10 - Il-2
Frames: 5092 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 84.867 - Min: 74 - Max: 127

"

Not sure that OC can improve it for 15%... Is it possible to get a video from your side (with a new CPU) just from the moment to start il2 and to finish test and show the result in the text file? Just want to see the whole routine how do you the test to repeat it myself:)

 

P.S: I have also z490 and some place to OC

Edited by Norz
Posted
9 minutes ago, Norz said:

 

Hello,

 

do you mean that the results on 20.09.2022 were without OC?

 

you wrote:

"

Just did 3 times the 1080p cpu test and my results are as below

 

2022-09-20 14:41:26 - Il-2
Frames: 5329 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 88.817 - Min: 77 - Max: 129

2022-09-20 15:06:14 - Il-2
Frames: 5038 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 83.967 - Min: 73 - Max: 115

2022-09-20 15:09:10 - Il-2
Frames: 5092 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 84.867 - Min: 74 - Max: 127

"

Not sure that OC can improve it for 15%... Is it possible to get a video from your side (with a new CPU) just from the moment to start il2 and to finish test and show the result in the text file? Just want to see the whole routine how you do the test to repeat it myself:)

 

P.S: I have also z490 and some place to OC

Yes those results you mentioned above are without i5 10600k overclocking , testing procedure is described at the first page of this topic and its straight forward...as i said before you have to take into account your RAM timings also...as soon as i go home i will check to find my Intel Xtu tuning  settings i think i have kept them as a screenshot somewhere..

Posted
On 1/29/2023 at 2:26 PM, Phat said:

4K GPU Test
2023-01-30 00:15:53 - Il-2
Frames: 11538 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 192.300 - Min: 165 - Max: 218

 

Thank you for this test. It is the absolute record in the 4K test. That 4090 is a monster card!

And I still don´t know if the 4K test is still somehow being constrained by the CPU.

Do you run Windows 10 or Windows11?

Do you have VR?

On 1/30/2023 at 7:57 AM, Norz said:

Not sure that OC can improve it for 15%

Yes, Overcloking CPU (how somehow RAM) can give you extra juice. (when CPU is the bottleneck)

Look to DBCOOPER test at the table. He went from 5.5 to 6 and got +12fps in the CPU test.

 

I did some tests in the past which clearly confirmed the gains:

https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/29881-overclocking-a-4790k-for-better-bos-performance/?do=findComment&comment=485112

 

Posted
2 hours ago, chiliwili69 said:

 

Thank you for this test. It is the absolute record in the 4K test. That 4090 is a monster card!

And I still don´t know if the 4K test is still somehow being constrained by the CPU.

Do you run Windows 10 or Windows11?

Do you have VR?

 

 

Hi yes it sure is a beast! W11 and Yes I have a Vive Pro with Glass Lens Mod. (no more halos and sharper image) Though I dont use it much these days. Will have to give it run soon though!

 

Posted (edited)

Here are my VivePro VR test results.  Might have to give VR another shot now it seems to be working properly!

Reprojection / Smoothing off

 

Of note: Running Windows 11 here so I had to use the Nvidia Registry fix to disable Windows 11 Multiplane Overlay to stop massive stutters in VR. (pink lines of death in the Steam VR performance overlay!)

https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5157/~/after-updating-to-nvidia-game-ready-driver-461.09-or-newer%2C-some-desktop-apps

 

VR test 1 (1080p + 106% SS)

2023-02-05 01:25:54 - Il-2
Frames: 5276 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 87.933 - Min: 81 - Max: 91

 

VR test 2 (1080P 216% SS)

2023-02-05 01:33:45 - Il-2
Frames: 5189 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 86.483 - Min: 76 - Max: 91

 

VR test 3 (1080P 216% SS + 8 x MSAA + Extreme Clouds)

2023-02-05 01:37:46 - Il-2
Frames: 2697 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 44.950 - Min: 43 - Max: 46

Edited by Phat
Posted
19 hours ago, Phat said:

VR test 1 (1080p + 106% SS)

2023-02-05 01:25:54 - Il-2
Frames: 5276 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 87.933 - Min: 81 - Max: 91

 

VR test 2 (1080P 216% SS)

2023-02-05 01:33:45 - Il-2
Frames: 5189 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 86.483 - Min: 76 - Max: 91

 

This is quite a nice VR performance! you have a top PC, definetely the 13900K coupled with a 4090 is the best PC today for high end VR devices.

Dustybritches
Posted (edited)

My new rig results and some AMD results as they are a bit rare.

 

 Motherboard:  MSI X670 Pro          HMD: Pimax 5K Super
 CPU:                7700X                 Steam VR runtime
 CPU Freq:        PBO CO SMT off
 L3 cache:        32 MB
 Cores:             8
 Threads:         8
 RAM type:       DDR5
 RAM size:        32 GB
 CAS:                32
 GPU:                RX 7900XT


2023-02-05 19:41:09 - Il-2
Frames: 7831 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 130.517 - Min: 109 - Max: 192  (CPU test)

 

2023-02-05 20:27:06 - Il-2
Frames: 5535 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 92.250 - Min: 84 - Max: 99 (4K test)

 

2023-02-05 20:42:03 - Il-2
Frames: 4217 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 70.283 - Min: 60 - Max: 76  (VR test1)

 

 

2023-02-05 20:58:15 - Il-2
Frames: 4019 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 66.983 - Min: 60 - Max: 73 (VR test2)

 

2023-02-05 01:25:34 - Il-2  
Frames: 1839 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 30.650 - Min: 27 - Max: 33  (VR test3)

 

 

Edited by Dustybritches
Doh
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Dustybritches said:

CPU:                7700X

Hey, many thanks for this. It is the first Zen4 CPU tested here!

On the CPU test you are around the 5800X3D but if I understood correctly without activating PBO, right? or with the "off" you were only referring to SMT?

 

Also, I didn´t specify the Pmax5KSuper %SS factor in the first post. I have corrected it now. The %SS should be 60% for te VRtest1 and 123% for the VRtest2. All at 90Hz.

 

Also, do you know the speed of your RAM? Just provided by CPU-Z tool.

 

Dustybritches
Posted

Only smt set disabled ,ram speed is 6000Mt and the 5K plus settings were used for the testing which should yield the same if not slightly less favorable results. Will edit post for corrections when time permits.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 2/6/2023 at 10:56 AM, Dustybritches said:

Only smt set disabled

OK thanks. 

I was expecting a bit more on the CPU test for the ryzen 7700X. I really don´t know if the AMD GPU is constraining the CPU test somehow.

Ideally we should test the 7700X CPU with an Nvidia card, so we can compare with other CPUs.

 

Regarding the VR tests, the Pimax5KSuper uses different factors than the Pimax5K+. So, The Vr tests can not be published in the table. Sorry about that.

The VRtest1 should yield 9.5 million pixels in total and the VRtest2&3 shouldmove 19.5 million pixles in total.

  • Upvote 1
Dustybritches
Posted

Well could you enlighten me with the formula to calculate the pixel count for the 5K plus as well as the 5K super so I can get it right?

Posted (edited)
On 1/27/2023 at 2:06 AM, DBCOOPER011 said:

 

I followed this thread at OC.net to tune my 13700KF. Works good for keeping the temps as low as possible and also get good single core performance. You got an awesome CPU for 1.137V stock at 55x allcore. I think I run 1.25v on mine at that ratio...

 

https://www.overclock.net/threads/asus-maximus-z790-extreme-and-intel-i9-13900k-a-tuning-guide-for-beginners.1801569/

 

 

 

Very informative link about 13900kf and asus mb overclocking

 

Thank you DBCOOPER011 for your suggestion...

 

Trying to digest all that info thought..

 

Edited by dgiatr
Posted (edited)

Motherboard:  Crosshair Hero VI          HMD: Valve Index SS=106% @ 90hz
 CPU:                5950X                 Steam VR runtime
 CPU Freq:       SMT on 5050 ghz
 Cores:             16
 Threads:         32
 RAM type:       DDR4 /3200mhz
 RAM size:        32 GB
 CAS:                14
 GPU:                RTX 4090  / Rebar off

 

 

2023-02-14 11:20:09 - Il-2
Frames: 6904 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 115.067 - Min: 93 - Max: 155 (CPU test)

 

2023-02-14 11:25:03 - Il-2
Frames: 4174- Time: 60000ms - Avg: 69.567 - Min: 49 - Max: 90  (VR test1)

 

 

 

Unbenannt.JPG

Edited by voodoomom
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Updated the CPU test for the current version.

 
 

CPU test
Frames: 7831 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 130.517 - Min: 113 - Max: 179

 

 Motherboard:  Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4
 CPU:                 12900K
 CPU Freq:        5.3 GHz
 L3 cache:         30 Mb
 Cores:               8+8
 Threads:           24
 RAM type:        DDR4
 RAM size:         16 GB (2x8)
 NB Freq:           4500 MHz
 RAM Freq:        3800 MHz 
 RAM Latency:  17-18-18-34
 GPU:                 RTX 3080

 OS:                    Windows 10 (x64, 21H2)

 IL2:                   5.004b

 CPU Cooling:   NZXT Kraken X73

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

CPU test
2023-02-24 22:00:52 - Il-2
Frames: 9082 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 151.367 - Min: 130 - Max: 199

 

 Motherboard:  Gigabyte Z690 Gaming X V2
 CPU:                 13700KF
 CPU Freq:        5.6 GHz
 L3 cache:         30 Mb
 Cores:               8+8
 Threads:           24
 RAM type:        DDR4
 RAM size:         32GB (4x8)
 NB Freq:           4500 MHz
 RAM Freq:        3600MHz 
 RAM Latency:  14-14-14-30  G1
 GPU:                 RTX 3080 12GB

 OS:                    Windows 11

 IL2:                   5.004b

 CPU Cooling:   NZXT Kraken X63

Edited by horendus
  • Thanks 2
TCW_DirtyMike0330
Posted

Motherboard: Gigabyte B650 Aorus Pro AX with updated F4b BIOS
CPU:                 AMD Ryzen 9 7950x3D with updated 5.02.19.2221 chipset

Cores:               16 
Threads:           32
RAM size:        32Gb (2x16GB)
RAM Freq:       6000 MHz

NB Freq:          2995 MHz
RAM timings:  36-36-36-76
GPU:                 4090

 

 

 

CPU TEST IN 1080P:

2023-03-02 07:18:34 - Il-2
Frames: 9021 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 150.350 - Min: 128 - Max: 202

 

GPU TEST IN 4K:

2023-03-02 07:27:58 - Il-2
Frames: 11673 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 194.550 - Min: 172 - Max: 229

 

VRTEST WITH 1080P SETTINGS:

2023-03-02 07:40:21 - Il-2
Frames: 5171 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 86.183 - Min: 72 - Max: 91

 

VR TEST WITH 4K SETTINGS  (CLOUDS EXTREME, MSAA X8)

2023-03-02 07:33:53 - Il-2
Frames: 4150 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 69.167 - Min: 60 - Max: 79

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
102nd-YU-cmirko
Posted (edited)

5800X3D, x570 Aorus Pro, 32gb DDR4-3800 CL16 (4x8gb), FCLK 1900, 6900XT / updated bios to AGESA V2 1.2.0.8 and AMD chipset drivers (5.02.19.2221), AMD Catalyst 23.2.2 in win10 (build 19045.2673)

 

CPU TEST 

2023-03-02 20:02:45 - Il-2
Frames: 6433 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 107.217 - Min: 88 - Max: 152

 

VR2 test 

VD streamer 1.26.4, 3120x3120 streaming resolution 150 mbit, h.264 

latest open composite with OpenXR toolkit 1.2.4 (rendered 4056x4056 as 130%)

 

2023-03-02 20:23:19 - Il-2
Frames: 3311 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 55.183 - Min: 45 - Max: 60

 

 

 

 

VD2.jpeg

Screenshot_VirtualDesktop.Android_2023.03.02-20.21.49.457_871.jpeg

VD1.png

Screenshot_VirtualDesktop.Android_2023.03.02-20.22.00.614_214.jpeg

Edited by 102nd-YU-cmirko
  • Thanks 1
chiliwili69
Posted
7 hours ago, TCW_DirtyMike0330 said:

VRTEST WITH 1080P SETTINGS:

2023-03-02 07:40:21 - Il-2
Frames: 5171 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 86.183 - Min: 72 - Max: 91

 

VR TEST WITH 4K SETTINGS  (CLOUDS EXTREME, MSAA X8)

2023-03-02 07:33:53 - Il-2
Frames: 4150 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 69.167 - Min: 60 - Max: 79

 

Many many thanks for running the tests for this most awaited CPU.

The CPU test gave a very nice mark for an out-of-box chip, on pair with the top chips of 13th gen. What CPU cooling system do you use?

 

Regarding the two VRtests you did, it is not clear to me how they correspond to the VRtest1, VRtest2 and VRtest3 defined in the instructions.

 

As per the instructions, the VRtest1 and VRtest2 use the same CPUtest settings but with different %SS (supersampling or custom render scale how it is called in OpenXR).

For the Reverb G2, the %SS to use is 50% for the VRtest1 and 100% for the VRtest2.

What custom render scale did you used in your "VRTEST WITH 1080P SETTINGS"?

 

As per the instructions, then the VRtest3 uses the same seetings than VRtest2 (so, CPUtest settings & 100%SS) but adding cloudextreme and MSAAX8.

The 4Ktest Settings are not used in any VR test.

 

Is that clear or have I complicated more?

  • Upvote 1
TCW_DirtyMike0330
Posted
15 minutes ago, chiliwili69 said:

 

Many many thanks for running the tests for this most awaited CPU.

The CPU test gave a very nice mark for an out-of-box chip, on pair with the top chips of 13th gen. What CPU cooling system do you use?

 

Regarding the two VRtests you did, it is not clear to me how they correspond to the VRtest1, VRtest2 and VRtest3 defined in the instructions.

 

As per the instructions, the VRtest1 and VRtest2 use the same CPUtest settings but with different %SS (supersampling or custom render scale how it is called in OpenXR).

For the Reverb G2, the %SS to use is 50% for the VRtest1 and 100% for the VRtest2.

What custom render scale did you used in your "VRTEST WITH 1080P SETTINGS"?

 

As per the instructions, then the VRtest3 uses the same seetings than VRtest2 (so, CPUtest settings & 100%SS) but adding cloudextreme and MSAAX8.

The 4Ktest Settings are not used in any VR test.

 

Is that clear or have I complicated more?

 

Ah ok, hopefully I did not mess up the VR ones but I did not touch my G2 resolution at all; so whatever it is natively (I assume 100%?) is what I ran both tests with. I used the CPU 1080p settings for VRtest1 and then just added extreme clouds and MSAA x8 for VRtest2. So I skipped the one that required any adjusting of my native rendering on the G2. 

chiliwili69
Posted
3 minutes ago, TCW_DirtyMike0330 said:

so whatever it is natively (I assume 100%?) is what I ran both tests with

OK then. If it is 100% then your first VRtest would correspond tot he VRtest2 and your second exactly to the VRtest3.

I am not familiar with OpenXR toolkit (I have been always using SteamVR since I use the Index).

Do you know where you can see the render scale you use or the pixels per eye in OpenXR?

chiliwili69
Posted

It looks like you can see it in Settings:

Set render scale

 

Does anybody know if for the G2 when you put 100% in OpenXR for WMR Custom Render scale the resolution per eye is then around 3162x3093 (so 19.5 million pixels in total)?

TCW_DirtyMike0330
Posted
19 minutes ago, chiliwili69 said:

It looks like you can see it in Settings:

Set render scale

 

Does anybody know if for the G2 when you put 100% in OpenXR for WMR Custom Render scale the resolution per eye is then around 3162x3093 (so 19.5 million pixels in total)?

I just checked in Open XR toolkit and the per eye resolution is showing as 3168x3096. In OpenXR tools for WMR, I do not have the custom render box checked, so it should be defaulted to 100. Hope that helps!

  • Thanks 1
=SRS=SLaXOR
Posted (edited)

Hi guys. I'm getting interesting results when overclocking my i7-7700k. When I get from 4.5Ghz to 4.8Ghz (no change to Ucore nor memory clocks) I got around 8-9 FPS extra in 1080 CPU test. But going any higher (I tried 4.9-5.1) I'm not getting any extra FPS at all. Basically max performance stays at 4.8 level. Anyone has any ideas why it may be the case? I also tried to increase uncore to 4.5 but no improvements as well.

Thanks in advance.

 

My hardware:

i7-7700K / RTX4080/ 32GB DDR4 3000@CL15 / Quest 2

Edited by slaxor
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, TCW_DirtyMike0330 said:

I just checked in Open XR toolkit and the per eye resolution is showing as 3168x3096. In OpenXR tools for WMR, I do not have the custom render box checked, so it should be defaulted to 100. Hope that helps!

Since you use openxr toolkit, i think that the resolution which is indicated inside openxr toolkit is what finally matters.

4 hours ago, slaxor said:

Hi guys. I'm getting interesting results when overclocking my i7-7700k. When I get from 4.5Ghz to 4.8Ghz (no change to Ucore nor memory clocks) I got around 8-9 FPS extra in 1080 CPU test. But going any higher (I tried 4.9-5.1) I'm not getting any extra FPS at all. Basically max performance stays at 4.8 level. Anyone has any ideas why it may be the case? I also tried to increase uncore to 4.5 but no improvements as well.

Thanks in advance.

 

My hardware:

i7-7700K / RTX4080/ 32GB DDR4 3000@CL15 / Quest 2

i think that's normal, the same thing happened to me while overclocking, after achieving 5.1 ghz from O.C i didnt get any more fps gain from further overclocking.

Edited by dgiatr
  • Thanks 1
chiliwili69
Posted
10 hours ago, TCW_DirtyMike0330 said:

I just checked in Open XR toolkit and the per eye resolution is showing as 3168x3096. In OpenXR tools for WMR, I do not have the custom render box checked, so it should be defaulted to 100. Hope that helps!

Ok thanks.

Then your first test was VRtest2 and the second was VRtest3.  In the VRtest2 you are on pair with the 13700K and 13900K CPU, but in the VRtest3 you are well above (69fps) the other test of a 13900K (45fps).

 

BTW, did you activated PBO in the BIOS?

What CPU cooling do you use (liquid, air, what model)?

 

And just in case you want to experiment a bit more, have you tried to disable the CCD1 to see if it gives you an extra performance in IL-2?

  • Upvote 1
chiliwili69
Posted
6 hours ago, slaxor said:

When I get from 4.5Ghz to 4.8Ghz (no change to Ucore nor memory clocks) I got around 8-9 FPS extra in 1080 CPU test

 

In the past I was also experimenting with my previous Intel CPU (now I am on a Ryzen 5600X,  thinking to upgrade).

Here you can see my results, but I remember that when trying to go further the gain was not the same.

I think this could be some bottleneck of the CPU (throtling because Amps limit, or power limit) or perhaps internal bandwiths of the CPU. But I really didn´t know.

Posted
On 3/3/2023 at 2:46 AM, slaxor said:

But going any higher (I tried 4.9-5.1) I'm not getting any extra FPS at all.

I have the same effect on the i9-7900X. At a certain frequency, the CPU starts internal throttling during the game even if you set higher frequencies. In my case that happens even if I disable cores down to four. 4.7ish GHz is about the top it will reach even when set to 4.9.

=SRS=SLaXOR
Posted

When you say "throttling", do you mean CPU freq throttling? I don't see on graph - freq stays at 5.1 all the time. Also other benchmark shows improved performance at higher freq but not IL2 1080 test.

Posted (edited)

So after doing all tests 1080 cpu, vrtest1, vrtest2 and vrtest3 with my new cpu and some basic cpu overclocking here are my results :

 

Motherboard: Asus z690 P D4
CPU: i9 13900kf
CPU Freq: 5900 Mhz, OCTVB to boost1 , (P cores 2x59, 4x58, 6x57, 8x56 and E cores to: 16x44)
Cores: 8P, 16E
Threads: 32
RAM: 16 GB DDR4
RAM Freq: 3200 Mhz XMPI
NB Freq: 4600 Mhz
RAM timings: 14 14 14 34
GPU: 3090 Ti with default clocks 
 
Basically, at the beginning i have done some cpu undervolting in order to achieve lower temps from my stock cpu BIOS settings using the following BIOS settings :
 
  • MCE=Enforce All Limits
  • LLC#4
  • DC_LL = 0.70 ( only with that setting vid core matches to v core....)
  • AC_LL = 0.12
  • IA VR Voltage limit = AUTO

 

and after that i created frequency groups for P-Cores and done some "thermal opportunity" overclocking by setting OCTVB to : +1Boost,

so my P cores work to the following combinations: 2x59, 4x58, 6x57, 8x56 and E cores to: 16x44.

 

Generally i dont run any other heavy multi core applications in my P.C. and with that settings I dont suffer from any instability issues playing heavy il2 scenarios with G2

 
So with that settings i get only about 3 more fps during Synvander 1080 cpu test comparing to 1080 cpu test with stock cpu bios settings BUT my cpu runs WAY MORE cooler than before with no thermal throttling at all during dense il2 playing with G2 headset.
 
So :
 

1080 CPU TEST WITH OCTVB TO BOOST1

 

2023-03-04 08:15:41 - Il-2

Frames: 9475 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 157.917 - Min: 133 - Max: 204
 
2023-03-04 08:19:48 - Il-2
Frames: 9537 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 158.950 - Min: 139 - Max: 201
 
2023-03-04 08:22:00 - Il-2
Frames: 9466 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 157.767 - Min: 137 - Max: 207
 
 
VR TEST1 WITH STEAM VR
 
2023-03-04 09:27:32 - Il-2
Frames: 4966 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 82.767 - Min: 66 - Max: 91
 
2023-03-04 09:29:25 - Il-2
Frames: 4977 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 82.950 - Min: 65 - Max: 91
 
2023-03-04 09:31:19 - Il-2
Frames: 4944 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 82.400 - Min: 66 - Max: 91
 

 

VR TEST1 WITH OPENCOMPOSITE+OPENXR TOOLKIT
 
2023-03-04 12:00:35 - Il-2
Frames: 5344 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 89.067 - Min: 84 - Max: 92
 
2023-03-04 12:03:04 - Il-2
Frames: 5336 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 88.933 - Min: 84 - Max: 92
 
2023-03-04 12:04:49 - Il-2
Frames: 5255 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 87.583 - Min: 80 - Max: 92
 
 
VR TEST2 WITH STEAM VR
 
2023-03-04 10:04:20 - Il-2
Frames: 4474 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 74.567 - Min: 61 - Max: 91
 
2023-03-04 10:06:16 - Il-2
Frames: 4498 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 74.967 - Min: 60 - Max: 91
 
2023-03-04 10:08:15 - Il-2
Frames: 4461 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 74.350 - Min: 62 - Max: 91
 

 

VR TEST2 WITH OPENCOMPOSITE+OPENXR TOOLKIT ( i see a gain of about 12 fps comparing to steamVR!!)

 

2023-03-04 11:34:33 - Il-2
Frames: 5190 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 86.500 - Min: 79 - Max: 92
 
2023-03-04 11:36:24 - Il-2
Frames: 5101 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 85.017 - Min: 79 - Max: 91
 
2023-03-04 11:41:39 - Il-2
Frames: 5202 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 86.700 - Min: 80 - Max: 91
 
2023-03-04 11:43:40 - Il-2
Frames: 5162 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 86.033 - Min: 80 - Max: 91
 
2023-03-04 11:45:58 - Il-2
Frames: 5101 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 85.017 - Min: 78 - Max: 91
 
VR TEST 3 WITH STEAM VR
 
2023-03-04 10:23:09 - Il-2
Frames: 2621 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 43.683 - Min: 38 - Max: 46
 
2023-03-04 10:25:28 - Il-2
Frames: 2551 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 42.517 - Min: 37 - Max: 46
 
2023-03-04 10:27:21 - Il-2
Frames: 2607 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 43.450 - Min: 37 - Max: 46
 

 

VR TEST 3 WITH OPENCOMPOSITE+OPENXR TOOLKIT( i see a gain of about 15 fps comparing to steamVR!!!! )
 
2023-03-04 10:56:26 - Il-2
Frames: 3537 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 58.950 - Min: 48 - Max: 67
 
2023-03-04 10:58:20 - Il-2
Frames: 3527 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 58.783 - Min: 48 - Max: 67
 
2023-03-04 11:00:30 - Il-2
Frames: 3501 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 58.350 - Min: 48 - Max: 66
 
Finally i set OCTVB to : +2Boost, so my cpu will run to the following combinations : P cores 2x60, 4x59, 6x58, 8x57 and E cores to: 16x44)
and my results are the following :
 
1080 CPU TEST WITH OCTVB TO BOOST2
 
2023-03-05 09:33:09 - Il-2
Frames: 9425 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 157.083 - Min: 137 - Max: 201
 
2023-03-05 09:35:57 - Il-2
Frames: 9321 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 155.350 - Min: 137 - Max: 200
 
2023-03-05 09:38:26 - Il-2
Frames: 9348 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 155.800 - Min: 136 - Max: 199
 
as you can see i dont get any more fps during 1080 cpu test , i also suffer from thermal throttling during heavy il2 playing.
 
I also suspect that i cannot get more fps than 157 due to DDR4 memory plus mobo d4 combination?
 
...your comments are welcomed...
Edited by dgiatr
  • Thanks 2
Posted
10 часов назад, dgiatr сказал:

...your comments are welcomed...

Looks like it's time for me to change my 12900k to at least 13700k. :)

chiliwili69
Posted
On 3/6/2023 at 8:16 AM, dgiatr said:

So after doing all tests 1080 cpu, vrtest1, vrtest2 and vrtest3 with my new cpu and some basic cpu overclocking here are my results

 

Wow!,  Thank so much for taking the time to perform all those test after adjusting your CPU settings.

All your results are well aligned with the other 13th gen, even with DDR5.

It is very interesting and illustrative all the tests done with SteamVR. It is amazing the free improvement you get just by using OC/XR in all the tests. You showed that quite well.

 

I am only curious about your Uncore frequency (1600). Is there any way to increase that in the Intel platform? (I don´t know if it would have any impact on performance).

thermoregulator
Posted (edited)

I wanted to try to benchmark 7590x3d. The benchmark mission does not load and all it says is "Mission description is loading". Any ideas?

 

Edit: Ok, it works. I have still some issues with fps capped on 120 Hz, so no results yet.

Edited by thermoregulator
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, chiliwili69 said:

 

Wow!,  Thank so much for taking the time to perform all those test after adjusting your CPU settings.

All your results are well aligned with the other 13th gen, even with DDR5.

It is very interesting and illustrative all the tests done with SteamVR. It is amazing the free improvement you get just by using OC/XR in all the tests. You showed that quite well.

 

I am only curious about your Uncore frequency (1600). Is there any way to increase that in the Intel platform? (I don´t know if it would have any impact on performance).

Sorry my mistake! NB freq is 4600 Mhz not 1600 Mhz ,

 

i changed that so you can change it in your online sheet..

 

Thank you for your remark!

Edited by dgiatr
  • Thanks 1
chiliwili69
Posted
11 hours ago, thermoregulator said:

I have still some issues with fps capped on 120 Hz

 

Is your monitor a 120Hz monitor?  (Remember that Fraps always shows the monitor freq, either 60 or 120 or whatever, before you launch the mission. While you run the mission is uncaped).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...