Damage model needs to be revisited.

[III/JG2Gustav05]

An armoured car shooting 7.62 machine gun to Tiger with driver's visor closed, then tiger's driver reports he is wounded. How could this happen?

Edited March 21, 2020 by III/JG2Gustav05

[40plus]

Maybe the incessant plinking gave him a headache ?.

 

All joking aside, completely agree. Had a perfectly healthy Tiger knocked out by a coax machine gun once ?.

Edited March 22, 2020 by pfrances

[Yogiflight]

On 3/21/2020 at 6:01 PM, III/JG2Gustav05 said:

An armoured car shooting 7.62 machine gun to Tiger with driver's visor closed, then tiger's driver reports he is wounded. How could this happen?

Must have been bouncing from the ground

[6FG_Big_Al]

If not mistaken also the tank dm is going to reviseted with the next patch so i would hold my breath and wait.

From DD 242:

Quote

Later we plan to implement the indirect fire capability for self-propelled guns (by inputting the distance and traversing angle) and new quick mission types for the tank commanders. It should be also noted that a lot of the damage calculation changes that are prepared for 4.005 also affect the detailed tanks, this is important for the quality of their damage modeling.

 

Edited March 22, 2020 by 6FG_Big_Al
added source

[VSN_Razor]

Was it the BA10M car that shot at you? Maybe it was the 45mm that wounded the driver. At least when I tried to reproduce, it was because of the 45mm

[III/JG2Gustav05]

On 3/22/2020 at 4:38 PM, VSN_Razor said:

Was it the BA10M car that shot at you? Maybe it was the 45mm that wounded the driver. At least when I tried to reproduce, it was because of the 45mm

No, it has only 7.62 mm MG. not the 45mm type you mentioned.