Team Fusion ATAG_Pattle Posted November 29, 2019 Team Fusion Posted November 29, 2019 https://ibb.co/album/ifXzfa This is the early short wing version based on the Ju-88A-1 which flew in the BoB mostly as a night intruder over British bomber fields in England. It is armed with 1 MG/FFM 20mm and four 7.92mm forward firing, and two rear defensive MG's. We are building four total Ju-88C's. The other versions are; Ju-88C-2 'long wing' version based on Ju-88A-5, Ju-88C-4, which was based on the Ju-88A-5-Late and had the up-rated Jumo 211F engine, and Ju-88C-4-Late, which additionally had two extra forward firing MG/FFM 20mm in the under nose gondola. Cheers, TFS Team 4 1 6
Beazil Posted November 30, 2019 Posted November 30, 2019 For 5.0? Or a later version? Thank you, by the way. I am looking forward to flying them.
ATAG_SKUD Posted November 30, 2019 Posted November 30, 2019 Nice Pattle? However, wouldn't the A-11 be more appropriate for N. Africa? skud
Team Fusion ATAG_Pattle Posted November 30, 2019 Author Team Fusion Posted November 30, 2019 This is for 5.0.
Team Fusion Buzzsaw Posted November 30, 2019 Team Fusion Posted November 30, 2019 2 hours ago, ATAG_SKUD said: Nice Pattle? However, wouldn't the A-11 be more appropriate for N. Africa? skud We will be building tropical versions of these models. As well as the A type Ju-88's. A-11 was a factory built tropical version of the A-4... but there were earlier field mod tropical versions of the A-5.
Avimimus Posted November 30, 2019 Posted November 30, 2019 Brilliant! I love the early and varied variants! Much more than I expected! Should be very interesting to encounter a C-1 in a Blenheim!
Team Fusion Buzzsaw Posted November 30, 2019 Team Fusion Posted November 30, 2019 2 hours ago, Avimimus said: Brilliant! I love the early and varied variants! Much more than I expected! Should be very interesting to encounter a C-1 in a Blenheim! We are not building the C-1... that version kept the A-1 glass cockpit, not the hard nose, and didn't have the armour plate to protect the pilot. Very few were built and most were converted to early C-2 standard quickly.
Beazil Posted November 30, 2019 Posted November 30, 2019 18 hours ago, ATAG_Pattle said: This is for 5.0. Ooooh goody goody! 1
Avimimus Posted November 30, 2019 Posted November 30, 2019 15 minutes ago, Buzzsaw said: We are not building the C-1... that version kept the A-1 glass cockpit, not the hard nose, and didn't have the armour plate to protect the pilot. Very few were built and most were converted to early C-2 standard quickly. Sorry! Got over excited - I meant C-1 'short span' version! Anyway - The point was that there will be more early model Cs than I ever thought I'd C... and I'm happy! ?
InProgress Posted December 3, 2019 Posted December 3, 2019 Since the screenshots are over the water I was wondering, is it going to be fixed/improved for 5.0? Like planes wont sink instantly if you try to land on water, now they just sink in that texture and you see some weird graphic effects when you do water landing.
Team Fusion Buzzsaw Posted December 5, 2019 Team Fusion Posted December 5, 2019 On 12/3/2019 at 4:06 AM, InProgress said: Since the screenshots are over the water I was wondering, is it going to be fixed/improved for 5.0? Like planes wont sink instantly if you try to land on water, now they just sink in that texture and you see some weird graphic effects when you do water landing. In CoD Aircraft don't sink immediately if they are landed at low speed... it takes a little time. But the fact is, any study of the real types showed the time between impact and the moment the aircraft sank was very short. Multi ton metal objects do not float well. ?
InProgress Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 8 hours ago, Buzzsaw said: In CoD Aircraft don't sink immediately if they are landed at low speed... it takes a little time. But the fact is, any study of the real types showed the time between impact and the moment the aircraft sank was very short. Multi ton metal objects do not float well. ? I mean this. In clod your tail is just up a bit but everything else is under water. I know plane would sink really fast but if you "land" like this, it still should float for a bit before water fills it inside. Edited December 5, 2019 by InProgress
danielprates Posted December 5, 2019 Posted December 5, 2019 I think this is specially true if the fuel tanks are mostly empty and the wing survives impact more or less whole. The thing should float well for a while. Also, it's mostly aluminium. The problem is if the airframe is so wrecked that it will let in water quickly. South and Central American Drug dealers would frequently rob low-wing airplanes, you know, Navajos, Senecas etc., and fly them with little fuel towards ships in the open seas. They would ditch in the water next to the ships and unload their cargos onto boats, with plenty of time before the airplane sank. It was common practice, perhaps it still is.
Haza Posted December 6, 2019 Posted December 6, 2019 Just now, Buzzsaw said: In CoD Aircraft don't sink immediately if they are landed at low speed... it takes a little time. But the fact is, any study of the real types showed the time between impact and the moment the aircraft sank was very short. Multi ton metal objects do not float well. ? USS Enterprise was about 94, 000 metric tons and that floated rather well. ?
Team Fusion Buzzsaw Posted December 6, 2019 Team Fusion Posted December 6, 2019 18 hours ago, InProgress said: I mean this. In clod your tail is just up a bit but everything else is under water. I know plane would sink really fast but if you "land" like this, it still should float for a bit before water fills it inside. Both of the aircraft shown are resting on the ocean bottom. As far as I can remember, first is just offshore in shallow water in the channel, second is on a reef in Pacific. Most aircraft sunk very quickly... some were worse than others. Here is a video of what I believe is an Avenger or Hellcat ditching in the ocean. (and quite a calm ocean) You will notice it goes completely under water on impact... which was quite common. A poem written about ditching characteristics of Beaufighter: When a Beau goes in Into the drink It makes you think, Because, you see, they always sink; But nobody says "Poor lad!" Or goes about looking sad; Because, you see, it's war, It's the unalterable law. Although it's perfectly certain The pilot's gone for a Burton And the observer too, It's nothing to do with you; And if they both should go To a land where falls no rain nor hail nor driven snow-- Here, there, or anywhere, Do you suppose THEY care? You shouldn't cry Or say a prayer or sigh. In the cold sea, in the dark It isn't a lark But it isn't Original Sin-- It's just a Beau going in. Gavin Ewart
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now