What person(s) is/are responsible for the flight-physics?

[A_S]

What person(s) is/are responsible for the flight-physics?

 

Don´t worry, i do not intent to open a complaining thread regards, but i am seriously interested so i can address/ask personally the responsible persons via pm IF i have a question or report of that sort.

Edited April 10, 2014 by A-S

[FuriousMeow]

You won't be able to just PM that person.

 

They are the person that did the AFM for DCS' Su25. Your credentials I'm sure are far better.

 

If you want to question or report something, Early Access forum. That's the only place.

Edited April 10, 2014 by FuriousMeow

[BraveSirRobin]

I can't help you with BoS's FM person, but I might be able to get you a private audience with the Pope.

[76SQN-J0NJ0N]

Do you think the person responsible would stick their actual name in public? After the years of abuse that every FM from every game has received (from at least some quarters) it would take an exceptionally brave/ foolish individual to put their head on the block like that.

[PantsPilot]

The pope's busy playing/flying BOS

[A_S]

Eyes open if you buy an egg... the names are documented on their page. And thanks Extreme_One.

PS: some replies above are ridicilously typical ...

[t4trouble]

 

Eyes open if you buy an egg... the names are documented on their page. And thanks Extreme_One.

PS: some replies above are ridicilously typical ...

 

Make the forums unpleasant...

[VBF-12_Stick-95]

Here's all the actors:

 

http://il2sturmovik.com/about/

[BraveSirRobin]

Make the forums unpleasant...

 

It's not as unpleasant as Petrovich's life will be when we all start sending him e-mails detailing how the FMs should be done.

[FuriousMeow]

It's truly ridiculous that some think they should have a direct life line to the developers over everyone else.

 

That's why the EA forums are here, but sure - you are more important than everyone else.

Edited April 10, 2014 by FuriousMeow

[A_S]

What is wrong with helping someone?

 

Delicate matters like FMs and their discussions and debates on public forums have not only proven negative, but also completly unproductive in the past (with exceptions). As those mostly ended up in big dramas, the "closed doors" developement mindset is understandable aswell. Regardless, good work can be and especially can afford to be "transparent".

At first the quality of a product will show itself by its documentation included (if at all) and as they are nowhere close there yet.. its too early for critics anyways.

Then users and fans or "helpers" - if you will - can (if desired) try to feedback. Blind pride and ignorance or religious followshipment are useless attributes here and a waste of time, meaning if feedback or critics, then matters need to be as scientific and reconstructable as possible. In my personal opinion developing on a private poll- or open-opinion based plattform (aka forum) is worse than politics.. lots of noises..and nothing gets done.

I aleady can hear "bitchings" and "complaints" about too low drag values for extended flaps in certain regimes.. too exaggerated environmental effects .. and i am sure soon or later "someone" will make a post somewhere here about those things. I just prefer not to particapte in public endless dramas and help (if i can) via direct channels. Fact is, that minor flaws in the FM can TOTALLY change the dynamics of a dogfight from realistic to arcadic.. THAT is to UNDERSTAND.

 

Stuipid comments like "do you wish an audience with the pope" are just completly unmature and childish premature ejaculations of thoughts imo. and i have no time replying to those.

 

Look, i only asked for a "direct line" as you call it ..and the responses are ALREADY OMG. What do you think would have happened if i would have stated my thoughts on the FM publically ?   .. See, what i am saying now?

Edited April 10, 2014 by A-S