Call Of Duty Modern Warfare Trailer

[6./ZG26_Custard]

After some massive letdowns from other FPS developers I certainly hope that this will hit the nail on the head and do the business . Modern Warfare 4 was a massive favourite of mine when it was released back in 2007 and its good to see Price and hopefully "soap" back in action.

 

 

[Leon_Portier]

I´ll be happy if the new Cod will be good, even when I dont have much interest in the series.

[Jaws2002]

More bs propaganda, masquarading as games.

When I see  Al Nusra/White Helmet cut throats,  portrayed as heroes and saviors, even in games, i want to puke.

 A miseable world we live in and we are heading to really dark times.

Edited June 6, 2019 by Jaws2002

[Jaws2002]

Don't get me wrong. I did like the first one, but looks like now they went full propaganda and bs lies, showing the terrorists as heroes.

 

[InProgress]

It may be the first CoD after MW3 that i will buy. Still i don't trust activision, so i will wait and see. Trailer looks good and from what i read, it is suppose to be brutal game, blood, gore and body physics (you will be able to shoot at them and bullets will still hit and affect them). You can even kill civilians in firefight without that idiotic game over screen with "friendly fire wont be tolerated". Article said that some tester cried after playing some missions they may tone it down because of it, these testers are really annoying sometimes, when you hear that ending was changed because stupid testing group thought it was too sad to something...

 

Half of the campaign you are going to play as woman fighter, unofrtunately it's going to be made up country so that's lame. Kind of shame tho, i was hoping to play as special forces entire game, now if you are just a random girl it may be quite meh with regular running around and shooting at stuff. But we will see what they can do. Still waiting for insurgency 2 campaign. And really hope CoD campaign won't be 4h rush and gameplay will change, if they will just do another crappy cod clone where you run and shoot just like it was in CoD 2... omg. Just change it already for something more realistic and get rid of that ugly hud + add legs.

Edited June 8, 2019 by InProgress

[Trooper117]

1 hour ago, InProgress said:

 

Half of the campaign you are going to play as woman fighter,

 

 

That alone is enough to stop me buying it... I'm a bloke, I don't play any game pretending I'm a woman.

If for instance they gave you the choice of playing the game as a woman or a man... (like in the latest Assassins Creed game) then fair enough.

I'm sick of the politically correct BS that seems to creep into most games now.

[InProgress]

Just read article about new MW, a lot of people got butthurt about showing real war i guess. Too brutal, even some veterans are against it (and i thought they fought for freedom, guess not).

https://www.resetera.com/threads/two-iraq-war-veterans-share-their-thoughts-on-cod-modern-warfares-depiction-of-realism-2019.122897/

 

Also I can't understand how making game as close to the reality as possible, no matter how brutal would that be, is a bad thing. Should it be happy place where everyone have fun and finds war good fun? Or maybe other way around, show how bad is it and kind of enlighten people that it's not such a great experience. Anyway we already had some similar games like spec ops the line. I think people are just angry because CoD is popular, if that was some no name game no one would care.

 

The subject of the controversy is a scene in which, during the storming of SAS commandos at the house, we aim at a woman holding a small child in her arms. Shooting it is probably possible and will not necessarily end the mission.  The engine of the game is to assess whether we hit the civilian especially or accidentally.

 

Thanks to people like this, games like Six Days in Fallujah were canceled.

 

Anyway IW already said they will censore/remove some stuff so yeah, game looks less and less interesting. Afterall it's up to players to deciede to play normal way and watch his fire or just play like an idiot and shoot everything that moves.

Edited June 15, 2019 by InProgress

[Feathered_IV]

I'd be fine with the idea if the character in game happened to be a woman.  It would be far more preferable than having to play as a bandicoot of frikken hedgehog.

[Cybermat47]

On 6/8/2019 at 9:38 PM, Trooper117 said:

I'm sick of the politically correct BS that seems to creep into most games now.

 

The character in question is based on the real Kurdish female militia troops known as the YPJ.

 

This isn’t politically correct fantasy like in Battlefield V, it’s just a reflection of the reality that there are female militiamen now seeing combat in modern warfare.

[Trooper117]

12 minutes ago, [Pb]Cybermat47 said:

 

The character in question is based on the real Kurdish female militia troops known as the YPJ.

 

This isn’t politically correct fantasy like in Battlefield V, it’s just a reflection of the reality that there are female militiamen now seeing combat in modern warfare.

 

Haven't got a problem with that at all... My problem is I just don't want to go through a campaign I might be enjoying immensely, and suddenly I'm forced to be a woman combatant... sorry, it's not my cup of tea.

I'm a bloke, I like the role of playing a bloke in all my games... If they give me the option to choose to play as male or female operator, then I'm happy... the latest Assassins Creed got that aspect right... they gave people the choice.

[Cybermat47]

41 minutes ago, Trooper117 said:

 

Haven't got a problem with that at all... My problem is I just don't want to go through a campaign I might be enjoying immensely, and suddenly I'm forced to be a woman combatant... sorry, it's not my cup of tea.

I'm a bloke, I like the role of playing a bloke in all my games... If they give me the option to choose to play as male or female operator, then I'm happy... the latest Assassins Creed got that aspect right... they gave people the choice.

 

Fair enough, to each their own.

 

That reminds me though, I reckon we’re overdue for another FPS like Halo: Reach, where you could completely customise your character’s armour and choose their gender for the campaign and multiplayer. True, the character ended up being a bit of a cardboard cutout, but they were your avatar, not (entirely) someone else’s creation. I don’t think we’ve ever had that level of customisation in an FPS since.

[LukeFF]

5 hours ago, InProgress said:

Just read article about new MW, a lot of people got butthurt about showing real war i guess. Too brutal, even some veterans are against it (and i thought they fought for freedom, guess not).

https://www.resetera.com/threads/two-iraq-war-veterans-share-their-thoughts-on-cod-modern-warfares-depiction-of-realism-2019.122897/

 

Also I can't understand how making game as close to the reality as possible, no matter how brutal would that be, is a bad thing. Should it be happy place where everyone have fun and finds war good fun? Or maybe other way around, show how bad is it and kind of enlighten people that it's not such a great experience. Anyway we already had some similar games like spec ops the line. I think people are just angry because CoD is popular, if that was some no name game no one would care.

 

The subject of the controversy is a scene in which, during the storming of SAS commandos at the house, we aim at a woman holding a small child in her arms. Shooting it is probably possible and will not necessarily end the mission.  The engine of the game is to assess whether we hit the civilian especially or accidentally.

 

Thanks to people like this, games like Six Days in Fallujah were canceled.

 

Anyway IW already said they will censore/remove some stuff so yeah, game looks less and less interesting. Afterall it's up to players to deciede to play normal way and watch his fire or just play like an idiot and shoot everything that moves.

 

Spoken like someone who hasn't been within a thousand miles of an active warzone.

[6./ZG26_Custard]

I really enjoyed the single player campaign missions in COD 4 MW for 2004. For me, this title really was the pinnacle of the series and after this its was pretty much a downward slide  

All Ghillied Up was an amazing section of the game.

 

 

 

On 6/6/2019 at 4:39 PM, Jaws2002 said:

Al Nusra/White Helmet cut throats,  portrayed as heroes and saviors, even in games

I really hope they don't

4 hours ago, [Pb]Cybermat47 said:

The character in question is based on the real Kurdish female militia troops known as the YPJ

The YPJ has had lots of support from the west, saying that, they are reported to have or have had links to the Kurdistan Workers' Party and other Communist organisations  which many countries including the USA have designated as a terrorist group. 

On 6/8/2019 at 12:38 PM, Trooper117 said:

I'm sick of the politically correct BS that seems to creep into most games now.

Unfortunately it seems to have crept into most things (film , television and entertainment) theses days mate. 

[Trooper117]

48 minutes ago, 6./ZG26_Custard said:

I really enjoyed the single player campaign missions in COD 4 MW for 2004. For me, this title really was the pinnacle of the series and after this its was pretty much a downward slide  

All Ghillied Up was an amazing section of the game.

 

Yes... I played that campaign several times. The game seems to have gone steadily downhill sadly (for me anyway)...

[CanadaOne]

On ‎6‎/‎8‎/‎2019 at 6:02 AM, InProgress said:

 

Half of the campaign you are going to play as woman fighter, . . .

 

Can my female character leave the battle scene, hook up with some lovely peasant girls, and frolic in the river?

[Jaws2002]

2 hours ago, 6./ZG26_Custard said:

 

I really hope they don't

 

 Well, it's right there in the trailer. They show the White helmet /al nusra cutthroats "rescuing" someone and they get bombed with "chemical weapons"  by a Russian Su-25.

 

Exactly like the fake videos we've seen in the main stream news media this last few years.

 

 

 

Pure propaganda bs.

 

[R6ckStar]

On ‎6‎/‎15‎/‎2019 at 9:48 PM, Jaws2002 said:

 Well, it's right there in the trailer. They show the White helmet /al nusra cutthroats "rescuing" someone and they get bombed with "chemical weapons"  by a Russian Su-25.

 

Exactly like the fake videos we've seen in the main stream news media this last few years.

 

 

 

Pure propaganda bs.

 

Well those are news to me, the White helmets being cutthroats.

 

Care to give some insight on that view?

[Trooper117]

Custard mentioned earlier how he really enjoyed playing CoD4 Modern Warfare single player campaign... I'm of the same opinion, I played it to death years ago.

In fact, his post made me want to play it again... this time however, I'm playing the remastered version, brought out in 2017.

The graphics are a big improvement to the look of the campaign, (at the time, I thought the original graphics were superb, but what a difference 10 or so years can make) ...

 

I'm now 'Soap' again, along with the other characters that make this campaign one of CoD's best in the series... Just rescued a Russian informer and heading for extraction, so I'm now moving onto the AC-130 gunship mission to assist in that, and boy, does it deal out death and destruction on a large scale

 

Edited June 20, 2019 by Trooper117

[Jaws2002]

7 hours ago, R6ckStar said:

Well those are news to me, the White helmets being cutthroats.

 

Care to give some insight on that view?

 

They are a fake political tool to justify wars against independent nations.

 In Aleppo they had their HQ literly just across the hallway from the HQ of Al Nusra, in the exact same building.

I remember back in 2018 even their youtube chanel was registered by Al Nusra and they also collected the revenue generated by the "white helmets" chanel. 

 You need to research this things in alternative news chanels and pay attention to what's happening, because the mainstream media works with them.

 I'll give you just some high level credible information here. 

Here you can find details about the UN panel review in 2018 into White helmets activity in Syria. There are a lot of documents and videos here about their activity.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/un-panel-details-organ-theft-staged-attacks-white-helmets/253441/

 

Another link to the un panel on white helmets 

https://www.unmultimedia.org/avlibrary/asset/2338/2338981/

 

 

I'm not going to post links here but you can search it for yourself. There are videos of while helmets assisting al nusra during executions. 

There's a metric ton of information out there to show you excactly who this cutthroats are. It's 21st century, you have the internet at your finger tips. You should stay informed.

 

The last thing i want in a game is more of the same lies.

 

 

[RhumbaAzul]

On 6/15/2019 at 6:28 PM, LukeFF said:

 

Spoken like someone who hasn't been within a thousand miles of an active warzone.

A game isn't the 'real world', just like the real world isn't a 'game'. What you're basically saying is that the only people who have an opinion on combat games are those who've experienced actual combat? if so? you're gonna have a real small audience for your proposed games.

Edited June 25, 2019 by RhumbaAzul
Spilling

[InProgress]

8 hours ago, RhumbaAzul said:

A game isn't the 'real world', just like the real world isn't a 'game'. What you're basically saying is that the only people who have an opinion on combat games are those who've experienced actual combat? if so? you're gonna have a real small audience for your proposed games.

I mean how dare you want a realistic war game? Go to war before you can have opinion about A GAME. It's ok to watch band of brothers but how dare you want band of brothers style game? It's the best to have this guy on ignore list. 

 

[Cybermat47]

8 hours ago, RhumbaAzul said:

A game isn't the 'real world', just like the real world isn't a 'game'. What you're basically saying is that the only people who have an opinion on combat games are those who've experienced actual combat? if so? you're gonna have a real small audience for your proposed games.

 

I think that his point was that people who have lived through war in real life don’t necessarily want to be reminded of their experiences in entertainment. I suspect that more than a few of them would consider making a game, something meant to be played for fun, into a realistic depiction of warfare, as being pretty ghoulish.

[SIA_Sp00k]

So their in full tac, its night, we’re moving with weapons into the shoulder and one of our professional soldiers has a lit stogey in his gob. LOL

[[PFR]Sarpalaxan]

Activision is just playing all sides. Hey look those evil sjw journalists want to censor our game Pwuise buy to show them that they are evil. Hey look we have strong Wamen. Pwuise buy to show those Nazis that they are evil. Hey US Army. Look how badass your soldiers look in this and how we make people feel with those poor soldiers who accidentally shoot at babies. Pwuise give money to us so that people don't think about laughing drone pilots mowing down civilians and creating future terrorists when they hear your Name.

[Feathered_IV]

Well, there are also people out there who always seem to want touchy-feely portrayals of the SS as simple hardworking joes in fetching summer fashions whose only crime was looking really kewl.