Jump to content

Recommended Posts

lightbulbjim
Posted

Yeah, looks very interesting indeed!

=EXPEND=Tripwire
Posted

Someone brightened up the original image.

Can still see what appears to be lighthouse sensors on the headset.

 

image.thumb.png.49abdee047d9e139077b429ed6af4bd0.png

Posted

Isn't it just a re-badged Vive?

  • Confused 1
=EXPEND=Tripwire
Posted
57 minutes ago, Uffz-Prien said:

Isn't it just a re-badged Vive?

 

Odd comment to make?

 

You mean because its likely using Valves own lighthouse tracking technology? No other specs are confirmed yet other than speculation based on the chipsets visible on the PCB in the leaked images from a year ago.

Posted (edited)

Because, from what I can make out, they already use the Vive as their 'in house' headset. Figured maybe they'd just re-badged it, because I fail to see how they could have so quickly developed their own from scratch and have it ready for May.

Edited by Uffz-Prien
=EXPEND=Tripwire
Posted (edited)

They provided a great deal of R&D to HTC to build the Vive - because Valve would have lacked the ability to manufacture their own consumer grade hardware at scale then and needed a partner to get the design to market before the Rift once facebook bought Oculus and Valve and Oculus stopped working together on VR design from that point on.

 

Its been 3 years since the release of the OG Vive, and 6 months since leaked images of the headset undergoing testing were taken. Lets see what they have achieved.

Edited by =EXPEND=Tripwire
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
chiliwili69
Posted

Wow!  May is just 1 month wait!  Very interesting year this one!

Posted

One thing about it we are going to have some nice choices for VR devices in the next few weeks.

Big change from a year ago.

Posted

Hope this info will be updated from time to time esp.after the release to see if its the right HDR to replace my Rift....

gort-day-earth-stood-still-1951-gif.gif

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, dburne said:

One thing about it we are going to have some nice choices for VR devices in the next few weeks.

Big change from a year ago.

Unfortunately without some seriously wild software improvements they are all going to be rather useless for high fidelity simulators and other titles. I've basically stopped even messing with VR now since getting the odyssey. Which makes me pretty sad really.

Edited by JonRedcorn
Posted
48 minutes ago, dburne said:

Pre-orders opening in May, shipping to begin in June.

 

https://uploadvr.com/valve-index-vr-headset-listed-on-steam-apparent-june-15-ship-date/

It's a sweet looking headset for sure, just have no interest in any of these new headsets, if anything the oculus rift s kind of interests me with it's 80hz refresh rate. 60hz in the odyssey is too low and the picture is too dark, 80 might be a good compromise.

SCG_Fenris_Wolf
Posted

You can adjust the gamma value to compensate.

It'll lead to less godrayish effects too. Activating bloom also helps.

 

It's not the same picture, but neither worse nor better. Just give it a try if you have doubts ;)

Posted (edited)

Valve Index perking more and more of my interest.

This may be the one for me.

 

 

Edited by dburne
Posted
2 hours ago, SCG_Fenris_Wolf said:

You can adjust the gamma value to compensate.

It'll lead to less godrayish effects too. Activating bloom also helps.

 

It's not the same picture, but neither worse nor better. Just give it a try if you have doubts ;)

Trust me I've tried it you end up with a washed out picture. Plus the 60hz was making me feel sick. Hadn't felt like that since I got my rift over a year ago. Have you been using it? 

Posted
3 hours ago, dburne said:

Valve Index perking more and more of my interest.

This may be the one for me.

 

 



While I've had my mind set on the 5k+ for a while now, this does start to look like a contender. The 130fov should drastically improve situational awareness in il2, only need the official numbers to confirm these and see what the cosmos is about.

SCG_Fenris_Wolf
Posted
22 hours ago, JonRedcorn said:

Trust me I've tried it you end up with a washed out picture. Plus the 60hz was making me feel sick. Hadn't felt like that since I got my rift over a year ago. Have you been using it? 

Only for experimentation, but my rig keeps 80-90Hz above 1-2km altitude. 60Hz I can take, not making me feel sick. I got an iron stomach from sailing and flying gliders. But the 3D feeling gets lost a bit.

 

I returned to 90Hz but came to notice that the irregular stuttering/ghosting of perpendicular moving airplanes at high speeds seems to be much more pronounced in 90Hz mode, if the framerate doesn't get up to 90fps but hovers between 70-80 - in combat situations. That made aiming considerably harder. Most of my attacks are slashing attacks at steep angles, so this is important to me.

 

SR-F_Winger
Posted

IF they have a resolution matching or close to the Reverb and really manage to somewhat increase the FOV, then this will be the route to go for me i believe.

I wonder what this 2 lenses design will bring. Cant wait for May 1st.

Posted (edited)

For those of us with eyes next to our ears (me 70mm ipd) Reverb and Rift S does not seem to be an option. Hoping the cosmos has it all and a proper ipd range.

Edited by SvAF/F16_radek
SCG_Fenris_Wolf
Posted

Very true. I am comfortable with 66-69mm IPD. 

It all depends on the lenses, eventually. The bigger their sweet spot is, the less importance physical IPD retains.

 

The best scenario is giant sweetspots, and physical IPD adjustments negligible in the future for those headsets without an IPD modifier.

 

The worst scenario is that they have small sweetspots, and that the Valve's Index IPD modifier is only there because it uses terrible tiny sweet spot lenses like the VivePro.

 

 

I trust in you Gabe. Do the right thing.

 

 

Guest deleted@134347
Posted
1 minute ago, SCG_Fenris_Wolf said:

The bigger their sweet spot is, the less importance physical IPD retains

 

unfortunately, I don't believe that's the case, purely from my own experience with VivePro. 

 

The original Fresnel lenses in vPro had a horrible sweet spot, very tiny. However the IPD adjustment within the headset didn't seem to affect anything as far as the viewing comfort went.

 

I switched to GearVR lenses. Sweet spot is ~90% of the lense. And the IPD adjustment is extremely important, i.e. if it's not set close to your requirement you will feel cross-eyed when taking off the headset..

SCG_Fenris_Wolf
Posted (edited)

Ouch !

 

Hope that's because you did something wrong in the assembly.

 

In the Odyssey, changing the IPD to minimum makes near objects sharp and far objects unsharp. I have a larger IPD.

That observation led me to the conclusion, that physical IPD adjustment alters the sweet spot by shifting it around. I still assume this is the case, as it's easily reproducible.

Edited by SCG_Fenris_Wolf
Guest deleted@134347
Posted
2 minutes ago, SCG_Fenris_Wolf said:

Ouch !

 

yeah, the optics is pretty counter-intuitive. I'm not sure if it's a thing with GearVR lense specific focal length, or shape of a lense...  Anyway, in my opinion until you put it on and try it for yourself don't hold any high expectations for any advertised implementations. ?

SCG_Fenris_Wolf
Posted

I sure won't, I'll remain critical and will wait for some in-depth critical reviews.

 

 

No preordering. That's also something Gabe taught us.

  • 1 month later...
lightbulbjim
Posted

Looks like it's not available in Australia (at least for preorder). Shame, as this looked like one of the best upgrades from a Rift CV1.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...