taffy2jeffmorgan Posted April 8, 2018 Posted April 8, 2018 Hi All, I have just been reading about the "Kommandogerat" the engine control system fitted to the BMW 801 engine of the Fw190, it controlled fuel mixture,propeller pitch,boost and magneto timing. I assume that it would have lessened the work load for the pilot, obviously years before its time, but was it a compete success ? and was a similar system ever tried and tested with British and American fighters ? Cheers.
GreenSound Posted April 8, 2018 Posted April 8, 2018 Slightly off topic, but wouldn't every aircraft "automatically" control the magneto timing? That's the system that fires the spark plugs, right? I could be totally wrong, and if I am, I would love to know how it is really working
Finkeren Posted April 8, 2018 Posted April 8, 2018 AFAIK no similar “single unit” engine control system was ever put into production, but a late-war allied fighter fitted with constant speed prop, automatic mixture, automated radiator control and boost pressure regulator would have had pretty much the same reduction in work load.
Mitthrawnuruodo Posted April 8, 2018 Posted April 8, 2018 The Kommandogerät was a mechanical-hydraulic system with many intricate parts. Therefore, the automation came at a price of increased weight and complexity. Other designers thought it was not worth it. It lives on in spirit as electronic engine control units. They now look more like mobile phones, but the function remains largely the same. In that sense, the Kommandogerät was a success.
=420=Syphen Posted April 8, 2018 Posted April 8, 2018 6 hours ago, taffy2jeffmorgan said: Hi All, I have just been reading about the "Kommandogerat" the engine control system fitted to the BMW 801 engine of the Fw190, it controlled fuel mixture,propeller pitch,boost and magneto timing. I assume that it would have lessened the work load for the pilot, obviously years before its time, but was it a compete success ? and was a similar system ever tried and tested with British and American fighters ? Cheers. The Americans certainly tested the heck out of it. Here is the NACA Report on the Kommandogerat https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930093290 It's a very technical description of the whole system. Worth a read if you nerd out on this tech stuff like I do.
taffy2jeffmorgan Posted April 8, 2018 Author Posted April 8, 2018 Thanks for that Hawkeye, an interesting read
Fern Posted April 8, 2018 Posted April 8, 2018 Kommandogerats, MECs, EECs, ECUs, DEECs, DECs, and FADECs. 60 years and we have FADECs..Crazy to think most engines run on electrical systems with no hydromechanical backups now.
ZachariasX Posted April 13, 2018 Posted April 13, 2018 On 8.4.2018 at 6:04 PM, Fern said: Kommandogerats, MECs, EECs, ECUs, DEECs, DECs, and FADECs. 60 years and we have FADECs..Crazy to think most engines run on electrical systems with no hydromechanical backups now. That's beacuse the hydromechanical stuff tends to fail as well and makes things complicated.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now