6./ZG26_Custard Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Always glad to see more aircraft on the horizon. Purely for a personal viewpoint, other than the possibility of a 30mm in the nose the G6 won't bring much new to the table. I can see this aircraft being the bomber killer of choice but will it need a fighter escort 2
6./ZG26_McKvack Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 IMO its a very valuable plane because it was the most produced variant and real fighters got curves! 8
6./ZG26_Custard Posted September 29, 2017 Author Posted September 29, 2017 IMO its a very valuable plane because it was the most produced variant and real fighters got curves! Don't get me wrong, I love it
Asgar Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 MG 131, almost same trajectory as the MG 151/20. 3 high caliber weapons hitting the same place on the enemy aircraft plus the 131 had HEI-T rounds. fire, death and destruction 3
JG27*Kornezov Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) other than the possibility of a 30mm in the nose the G6 won't bring much new to the table. I also think so. In any other game I played il 2 1946 and WT the g6 was totally outclassed by its rival opponents. The issue is so big that from that time period I totally switch to the FW series. Only the pe 2 crews will suffer a lot. I remember when in the old game (il2 46) in a War mode the main fighter on the german side was the g6 vs la 5 fn, the losses were really massive. Loosing each campaign and each mission. As for me the time period up to the battle of Cuban is where I want to dogfight. After that there are no real dogfights, as the Yak 3 and La 5 FN come into play the germans have nothing to oppose regarding pure dogfighting capabilities. The game becomes more schematic and predictable. Even when I am in a la 5fn when I outmaneuver a 109 I am not proud of it. Edited September 29, 2017 by JG27_Kornezov 2
BOO Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 real fighters got curves! Ill buy it and ill fly it because of this! I love the look of the G6. I could bring an F22 into most servers and still loose so it being outclassed makes no difference to me!!
6./ZG26_Custard Posted September 29, 2017 Author Posted September 29, 2017 I also think so. In any other game I played il 2 1946 and WT the g6 was totally outclassed by its rival opponents. The issue is so big that from that time period totally switch to the FW series. I remember when in the old game (il2 46) in a War mode the main fighter on the german side, the losses were really massive. Loosing each campaign and each mission. It's a case of BIG firepower but.........not so much maneuverability. It will have to be flown sensibly.
Voidhunger Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Im really looking forward to it even if we dont get the unhistorical 30mm and Erla canopy. I really like the look of the G series. Its not the sexy late G variant but it looks far better than what we have now. 1
MrNoice Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 MG 131, almost same trajectory as the MG 151/20. 3 high caliber weapons hitting the same place on the enemy aircraft plus the 131 had HEI-T rounds. fire, death and destruction you forgot the MG 151/20 HE Minengeschoss ? ;D not half as good as it should in IL2 BoX its even better in all other WW2 Plane Games 2
DD_Arthur Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 It will need Fighter Cover. Lol. Quite possibly!
L3Pl4K Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Will with the Beule the more detailed cooler model with shut-off valves added(109F+G)? Or get we another unfinished product? 1
Finkeren Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 It will be even better at the usual 109 shtick of dropping down from orbit guns blazing at hapless Yaks. And while it does represent a turning point, where the 109s started looking increasingly inelegant, the two blisters does give it a certain brutal look. Will with the Beule the more detailed cooler model with shut-off valves added(109F+G)? Or get we another unfinished product? Cut the crap. Just because certain features aren't modeled (yet), it doesn't mean anything is "unfinished". 5
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 It will be even better at the usual 109 shtick of dropping down from orbit guns blazing at hapless Yaks. And while it does represent a turning point, where the 109s started looking increasingly inelegant, the two blisters does give it a certain brutal look. They didn't. This was like the Acne Phase in the ageing Process, All the models after it look better again. 1
Irgendjemand Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 down from orbit not since you cannot pull her out of the dive anymore at high speed. 1
Jade_Monkey Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Im more excited about the MGs than potentially getting the 30mm. 4
216th_Peterla Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Im more excited about the MGs than potentially getting the 30mm.This
Yogiflight Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Im more excited about the MGs than potentially getting the 30mm. Absolutely. With the current modelling of the mineshell damage, they will definitely be more effective, than the MG151/20 and not that far behind the MK108, but with higher firing rate and more ammunition.
MrNoice Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Absolutely. With the current modelling of the mineshell damage, they will definitely be more effective, than the MG151/20 and not that far behind the MK108, but with higher firing rate and more ammunition. totally ;D I can only agree with that
SC_Manu653 Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 I remember, on Il2 46, struggling with the G6 on Italian campaign against P-38... if we were not disciplined it was a dead bird. For me the advantage will the two 13mm... it will saw wing without using the 20mm !
StG77_Kondor Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 I remember, on Il2 46, struggling with the G6 on Italian campaign against P-38... if we were not disciplined it was a dead bird. For me the advantage will the two 13mm... it will saw wing without using the 20mm ! I remember the IL-2 '46 G6 very well. Was this before or after they fixed the FM for it? Remember when it first came out for the game it was an absolute DOG. And not like ~10% 'worse' than a G2, it acted like a totally different aircraft. Never forgot the UBIzoo battles over the data Oleg and his team used to create the FM. Long story short I think they inadvertently used flight data from a Russian captured G6 that obviously was not 100%. After the FM was fixed for it, it wasn't that bad. Heavier than a G2, but was still very capable of beating contemporary Russian planes.
chris455 Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Will the G-6 be free to those who pre-ordered BoK?
Finkeren Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Will the G-6 be free to those who pre-ordered BoK? Of course not. It's a collector's plane outside the main titles, same as the Yak-1b and the Ju 52.
-=PHX=-SuperEtendard Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Apparently it will have performance close to the 109 F-2 at low altitude, something like 520/530 top speed. Heavier than a G2, but was still very capable of beating contemporary Russian planes. Compared to the 1.42 ata G-2 the G-6 downgrade in performance was really noticed in the 1943 missions. I always took the G-2 if both were available... the 30mm could vaporise enemy fighters with 1 or 2 hits but it had low ammo and the trajectory didn't help, so most of the time I prefered the 20mm. Also you had to fight against increased performance allied fighters (La-5FN, P-38J, P-39N/Q, Spit mk VIII) so mid-late 1943 LW pilots have to be more disciplined than before because they can't anymore dictate the fight in terms of speed, they have some climbrate advantage against some planes but not all of them.
Thad Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Of course not. It's a collector's plane outside the main titles, same as the Yak-1b and the Ju 52. Oh, boy.. another opportunity to support the simulation. 1
SC_Manu653 Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 I remember the IL-2 '46 G6 very well. Was this before or after they fixed the FM for it? Remember when it first came out for the game it was an absolute DOG. And not like ~10% 'worse' than a G2, it acted like a totally different aircraft. Never forgot the UBIzoo battles over the data Oleg and his team used to create the FM. Long story short I think they inadvertently used flight data from a Russian captured G6 that obviously was not 100%. After the FM was fixed for it, it wasn't that bad. Heavier than a G2, but was still very capable of beating contemporary Russian planes. Don't really remember it was between 2001 and 2008... But the G2 for me was better than G6 .
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 I think the G-6 will be to the 109s what the Yak-7 is to the Yak-1. 1
216th_Peterla Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 I remember the G6 Early of the old IL2-46 to be my most unfavorable aircraft, going in the career as fast I could to get other variants. Not sure if was an fm issue or real aircraft data.
Finkeren Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 I remember the G6 Early of the old IL2-46 to be my most unfavorable aircraft, going in the career as fast I could to get other variants. Not sure if was an fm issue or real aircraft data.The G6 in the original IL2 was FUBAR, nothing to do with reality. 3
LLv24_Zami Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Im more excited about the MGs than potentially getting the 30mm. Same here. I think the 13mms will make a difference.
III/JG2Gustav05 Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Maybe I 'd better hold on the preorder till get what's her climb rate we' gonna have in this 2nd generation il2.
JG27*Kornezov Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) I just want the regular G2 with no engine limitations for Kuban. Not the g4, no it is not the same thing. Why the red side has La 5f with upgraded engine and the blue side does not? Edited September 29, 2017 by JG27_Kornezov 6
Finkeren Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 I just want the regular G2 with no engine limitations for Kuban. Not the g4, no it is not the same thing. Why the red side has La 5f with upgraded engine and the blue side does not? Because the La-5F was super-easy to make. It was all about removing the time limit on the boosted mode. To open the G2 throttle limit would require actually adding more power to the engine and transfer the heat model etc. from the G4 to the G2 and test the effect on an airframe which is very similar but not exactly the same. It's not a lot of work, but it's still much more than it took to make the La-5F. 2
MrNoice Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) The devs should update the G-2 for Kuban with a mod " unlocked throttle" that would be great it would be a better G4 ... to be honest the G4 is useless at all... its but the biggest problem is that the german planes suffer from instant power loose when damaged while russians like mig 3 fly over 10min with damaged engine ;D Edited September 29, 2017 by Luftwolf 3
-=PHX=-SuperEtendard Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) I just want the regular G2 with no engine limitations for Kuban. Not the g4, no it is not the same thing. Why the red side has La 5f with upgraded engine and the blue side does not? Also because the 1.42 ata was cleared in October 1943 IIRC? I think if they were to be 100% strict the G-4 for Kuban wouldn't have got it either... The F engines for the La-5 started coming in February 1943 iirc. Plus the La-5F in game is just the F engine with the series 8 1942 airframe La-5... it doesn't have the improvements (higher speed, less weight, etc) + rear visibility canopy a "proper" mid-1943 La-5F would have. Basically the La-5F upgrade is more appropiate for the Kuban timeframe. I would like to have 1.42 ata for the G-2, as it gives it usefulness as a late 1943 plane, the more variants we have the more timeframe we can cover with the planes. But the F engine is an earlier feature. It would be like asking for a cannon Spitfire for Battle of Britain since the German get them in the 109 E-3. mig 3 fly over 10min with damaged engine ;D Actually the MiG-3 is the most vulnerable Russian plane to engine damage, sometimes you can get the engine dead seconds after the enemy's pass, don't know if it's because of the bigger frontal section of the plane making it more easily hit.. but it gets taken out with few hits and it doesn't last long when severly damaged, much less than the Klimovs. Edited September 29, 2017 by -=PHX=-SuperEtendard 2
[CPT]Pike*HarryM Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 (edited) This skin will have a proper plane to put it on... Edited September 29, 2017 by [CPT]Pike*HarryM 3
curiousGamblerr Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 This skin will have a proper plane to put it on... I'm not particularly moved by the G6 but I love that so much. We gotta add it to a thread about suggested skins, if the devs open one like they have in the past for some other planes.
1CGS LukeFF Posted September 29, 2017 1CGS Posted September 29, 2017 I just want the regular G2 with no engine limitations for Kuban. Not the g4, no it is not the same thing. The devs should update the G-2 for Kuban with a mod " unlocked throttle" that would be great Not gonna happen.
Recommended Posts