Luftschiff Posted May 31, 2017 Posted May 31, 2017 As a general rule it is more effective to work with positive reinforcement and feedback than negative - i.e award more points for the bridges (in this example) for those who do enjoy the stats rather than take the stats away completely. Especially if you still intend to have stats on fighter kills. That was one of my main issues with flying bombers in RoF - the game didn't recognize your contribution and the targets would eventually just respawn, leaving you with little in the way of satisfaction of a job well done. I do agree that spreading targets out, making single well-defended targets worth more points etc is a good idea, but I do not think that the large industrial zones or, god forbid, points in general, should go away. There should just be a little more balance between them.All this said, the Stuka is certainly one of my absolute favourites even in the current state of things. Probably have the most hours in it, too, but I haven't kept track.
InProgress Posted May 31, 2017 Author Posted May 31, 2017 Yea i would not want this stuff removed, large industrial zones are also fun for bigger bombers. We just need some targets for stuka (or IL2 in case of russians). Even bridges aren't that often on maps. Maybe scenarios with certain missions would work better than this big both side operation. Like i once said, in clod there is mission where germans take only ju87 and bf109 with 1 task. Sink ships and protect ju87. While british are suppose to stop them with fighters only. Wish we could see something like this in multiplayer, smaller scale battle but with certain mission. Imagine 20 ju87 and cover :] or he111 in big formation going for moscow
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now