1CGS LukeFF Posted February 3, 2017 1CGS Posted February 3, 2017 (edited) I've read competing reasons for as to why the 190 A-5 had its engine moved forward: both so it could carry more ordnance and so to reduce engine vibration. Are both reasons correct, or is it only one? Edited February 3, 2017 by LukeFF
HighStick Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 Also to fix problems with engine overheating.
JG5_Zesphr Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 (edited) Yea CoM as the one I've come across the most Edited February 3, 2017 by JG5_Zesphr
Retnek Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 1) optimized centre of gravity for bigger bomb loads and a broader variety of load-outs (confirmed by trustworthy publications) 2) reduce vibration with a new engine suspension (read it a few times, but not in trustworthy publications) 3) counter the additional weight of additional radio equipment in the tail (imho this was an advantage, but not a reason for it) The problem with engine overheating was - according to my sources - solved with the A3-model by a redesign of the engine-compartment.
CUJO_1970 Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 I've read competing reasons for as to why the 190 A-5 had its engine moved forward: both so it could carry more ordnance and so to reduce engine vibration. Are both reasons correct, or is it only one? By this time I believe any issues with overheat or engine vibration was solved already long ago. You can read Donald Caldwell writing on JG/26 technical officers working on early FW-190 program and issues with engine fittings and exhaust routing they reworked. The official reason was to compensate for CG shift with addition of ETC 501 rack and ordnance and I believe that is the only reason.
CUJO_1970 Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 The problem with engine overheating was - according to my sources - solved with the A3-model by a redesign of the engine-compartment. Problem area with cockpit/engine overheat was due in part to lower two cylinders in rear row - getting so hot that exhaust pipes were burning through. They redesigned the exhaust system and re-routed it. (per Donald Caldwell) I've never read of vibration being any real problem on the early FW by German, British or US testing - unless Bosch spark plugs were fouled, that could lead to rough running engine - but Eric Brown said BMW ran smooth. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now