Chuck_Owl Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 lol no. good bye Do you ever have anything constructive to say about anything at all? 4
II./JG27_Rich Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 (edited) P-40 comes in at 1:50. This was a Planes of Fame video but their music was a little.....funkie. Mines better Edited April 3, 2015 by II./JG27_Rich
EAF19_Swoop Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 BOS, BOM, DCS and my favourite COD (I get emotional over Spitfires), what an exciting time for us. All boys desert action with the P40, dangerous carrier and convoy flying with the Marlet, Faith, Hope and Charity for the safe delivery of Patch 5. Rock on TF & thx. Btw Chuck, lovely manuals mate, I like the extras about the history and mechanics, but I'm still staying away from the over boost on the Spit.
Beazil Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 The 108 shot down 2 Mosquitos in the film 633 Squadron, so using your logic it is a perfectly reasonable reason to do its cockpit for CloD...period.. I can't find any info on any bf 108 armament. As in they had none that I can find. Not against the 108 just wanting a source.
DD_Arthur Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 (edited) Not against the 108 just wanting a source. Go to 8.08 and 10.04 for full confirmation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWERDEx9t9Y Edited April 3, 2015 by DD_Arthur 1
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted April 4, 2015 Posted April 4, 2015 Do you ever have anything constructive to say about anything at all? I think coherence would be a more pressing issue in his posts.
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted April 4, 2015 Posted April 4, 2015 I can't find any info on any bf 108 armament. As in they had none that I can find. Not against the 108 just wanting a source. "No German aircraft of the right type were available; consequently Messerschmitt Bf 108 aircraft were used to represent the Messerschmitt Bf 109. Bergman's original escape from Norway is in a Miles Messenger." He was making a joke (I think) about the movie 633 Squadron. None of that is the point, really... BSR doesn't contribute anything to Cliffs or TF (including even flying the sim...) and the importance of his input in what should/shouldn't be or what is/isn't productive is about as deep as that. That's like me spending months criticizing BOS without having purchased it... Without having flown more than that which would equate to having a superficial look at the project. A lot of people seem to take the stance that if you see deep underlying issues in the game design, the continuity of the project or the "simulator" aspect of its modeling it's because you haven't flown the sim or you are not flying it... He can be as contrarian as he wants, just as I can be... But at least I'm actually flying the things I criticize.
II./JG27_Rich Posted April 4, 2015 Posted April 4, 2015 (edited) My favorite IL-2 1946 movie of all time. Lots of P-40s and F4s Edited April 4, 2015 by II./JG27_Rich
von_Greiff Posted April 4, 2015 Posted April 4, 2015 (edited) My favorite IL-2 1946 movie of all time. Lots of P-40s and F4s +1 ...and I luv dis english accent! (Crusaaiider and baaattle and so on ...very atmospherical!) yours v. Greiff PS: and of course "Come with me" another great one to mention!!! Edited April 4, 2015 by von_Greiff
[KWN]T-oddball Posted April 4, 2015 Posted April 4, 2015 Yeah I just hope the textures on the final product are better than the ones in that screenshot... We shall see. http://www.gimp.org/ get to work... 1
sallee Posted April 4, 2015 Posted April 4, 2015 Go to 8.08 and 10.04 for full confirmation I got the reference, Arthur! LOL!
Team Fusion Buzzsaw Posted April 6, 2015 Team Fusion Posted April 6, 2015 (edited) Yeah I just hope the textures on the final product are better than the ones in that screenshot... We shall see. If you are referring to the shot of the Carrier in the post above, that model was just a testbed for carrier work, minus most of the weapons etc.... look at some of the other official updates for ship releases (like the Tribal Class Destroyer) to see the quality for final textures and components. In any case, we are not guaranteeing a Carrier for TF 5.0. Edited April 6, 2015 by Buzzsaw
Lusekofte Posted April 6, 2015 Posted April 6, 2015 The Wellington is for me the most important addition and a Beufighter. This will make the RAF as powerful as the Luftwaffe. The P-40 well that is a added bonus, it just might make me a RAF fighter pilot now and then. It is truly a great achievement done by TF, I salute you guys for keeping a good sim alive together with ATAG
II./JG27_Rich Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) You should check out the list given in the March 27th update. There are quite a few planes in there. http://theairtacticalassaultgroup.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16534&page=4 Edited April 8, 2015 by II./JG27_Rich
StarLightSong Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 Exciting but they do set a high bar for "paid" development teams. 1
1./JG42Nephris Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 Am really excited about the development and what TF is able to do for "free". I would love to see a big fix on the ground handling. The 109 is somewhat porked on the ground.
BlueHeron Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 Don't know if it's porked, but taxiing the 109 sure is difficult!
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) Am really excited about the development and what TF is able to do for "free". I would love to see a big fix on the ground handling. The 109 is somewhat porked on the ground. Ground handling is perfectly fine (maybe even a little "arcade-y") and considerably more acceptable than what BOS is doing where all control surfaces and all engine settings contribute little or nothing to authority on the ground (inb4 ice on da runways!!@! Not... ). What doesn't work is the tailwheel lock. The swaying experienced in the 109 is entirely due to the fact that the lock doesn't work. Aside from that... Have you tried the K-4 in DCS? Till you try to fly a 109 in that simulator you have no idea how delicate that slim-track landing gear is. Edited April 8, 2015 by 4./JG26_Adler
1./JG42Nephris Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 Well one cant discuss about different favours, isnt it.
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted April 8, 2015 Posted April 8, 2015 (edited) Well one cant discuss about different favours, isnt it. Not sure what you're saying there... The landing gear on the K-4 were relatively unchanged from that of the B-1... EDIT: And I also wasn't trying to have a jab at you... I was just explaining that a lot of the poor ground behavior in Cliffs is having a non-functional tailwheel lock. Edited April 8, 2015 by 4./JG26_Adler
II./JG27_Rich Posted April 9, 2015 Posted April 9, 2015 You should check out the list given in the March 27th update. There are quite a few planes in there. http://theairtacticalassaultgroup.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16534&page=4 I made this. I feel it's pretty close..I forgot the armed Tiger Moth but those are not that trhilling
=LD=Penshoon Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Anyone know if TF have managed to fix the FFB in clod yet?
wellenbrecher Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 (edited) Never had a FFB stick and I don't know what nature the problem with FFB in CloD is either, but I know that this thread exists. Maybe it can help you? /edit After actually reading the thread, nope, doesn't look like FFB works particularly well with CloD even with the tweaking. Edited April 10, 2015 by wellenbrecher
DD_Arthur Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Anyone know if TF have managed to fix the FFB in clod yet? Unfortunately not but you never know. FFB still works fine - when its working - but low speed manoeuvre's are still... er, exciting. Especially take off!
=LD=Penshoon Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Thanks guys, sounds the same as last I've tried. For me it didn't feel like the stick was connected to the plane the same way that it feels in DCS/BOS/ROF, some kind of input lag between the game & the stick output, hard to describe. The effects also disappeared from time to time and force trim didn't work either. Hopefully they can improve it in the future.
Team Fusion Buzzsaw Posted April 10, 2015 Team Fusion Posted April 10, 2015 Not sure what you're saying there... The landing gear on the K-4 were relatively unchanged from that of the B-1... EDIT: And I also wasn't trying to have a jab at you... I was just explaining that a lot of the poor ground behavior in Cliffs is having a non-functional tailwheel lock. 109E did not have a tail lock.
von_Greiff Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 To all! ....got me hooked again! Can anyone explain to me what the difference between the 109E and 109E/N is?? (N for nitro? ...it was methano!l ) Have a nice weekend yours v.Greiff
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 To all! ....got me hooked again! Can anyone explain to me what the difference between the 109E and 109E/N is?? (N for nitro? ...it was methano!l ) Have a nice weekend yours v.Greiff Different engines I believe.
von_Greiff Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Different engines I believe. My tought too, bud! .....but what is the difference?
SCG_Space_Ghost Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 My tought too, bud! .....but what is the difference? Uhhh... Different engines..? Not sure that I understand what you're asking...
1CGS LukeFF Posted April 10, 2015 1CGS Posted April 10, 2015 My tought too, bud! .....but what is the difference? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_109_variants#E-7
von_Greiff Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Thank you, Luke! ....sometimes things are so easy ....Riverside, bro!? ...remember Huntington Beach and a Rockclub in Orange County pretty well, think they do too!
Sokol1 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 (edited) Can anyone explain to me what the difference between the 109E and 109E/N is?? (N for nitro? ...it was methano!l ) What E? That game has - besides E-4/N: E-1 E-3 E-3/B E-4 E-4/B TF Wiki with basics - and operation - of each plane: http://www.theairtacticalassaultgroup.com/wiki/doku.php?id=germanflightmanuals Edited April 10, 2015 by Sokol1
1CGS LukeFF Posted April 11, 2015 1CGS Posted April 11, 2015 Thank you, Luke! ....sometimes things are so easy ....Riverside, bro!? ...remember Huntington Beach and a Rockclub in Orange County pretty well, think they do too! Sure thing. And yep, Riverside is where I am at - just down the road from Jason.
II./JG27_Rich Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 (edited) They're going to have a hard time keeping up to me in my F Edited April 11, 2015 by II./JG27_Rich
II./JG27_Rich Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 They're going to have a hard time keeping up to me in my F
JG4_Continuo Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 (edited) 109E did not have a tail lock. Are you absolutely sure about that? I remember reading something about the tail lock in the original bf109e-manual? EDIT: Just checked back, looks like I was wrong... Edited April 11, 2015 by JG4_Continuo
II./JG27_Rich Posted April 11, 2015 Posted April 11, 2015 Find a real 109 E cockpit and see if it has the lever There it is
Recommended Posts