Feathered_IV Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 Looks pretty good. Must have been a bugger to choreograph though! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QijbOCvunfU
Cybermat47 Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 According to the video's description, it's from the movie Atonement. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atonement_(film) Plus, the video was uploaded in March, when the Dunkirk trailer was released this August. I actually saw this earlier, and I thought it was from Dunkirk as well. 1
Finkeren Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 I for one am curious to see, what Nolan can do with the genre. He's got a talent for making the complex and chaotic accessible to the audience, so I'm hopeful for this movie. English-language war flicks have been sorely lacking for a long time and really needs someone to reinvent the wheel. He couldn't have picked a better battle to cover, though. Defeats nearly always make the best settings for a war movie.
Uufflakke Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 Looks pretty good. Must have been a bugger to choreograph though! A five minutes in one take. That is quite a challenge with all these actors running around. But that is "just" a matter of instructing them, but how did they do that with the horses that got shot down one after the other? And what CGI is added later on to the scene? On the other hand what is a five minutes in one take. The movie Russian Ark is 90 minutes in one take.
Finkeren Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 Nothing will ever top the opening scene in A Touch Of Evil.
Finkeren Posted December 14, 2016 Posted December 14, 2016 Looks kinda promising, but a couple of red flags as well. The old sea-dog saying "There's no hiding from this, son." Is about as cliché as it gets.
Cybermat47 Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 Some people are complaining about the Buchons. They want CGI Bf-109s instead. Personally, I'd rather have real planes. We have plenty of CGI ones in vide games already. Also, this is the second time Kenneth Branagh has been in a movie with Buchons in Luftwaffe colours.
TWC_Ace Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) I will watch it...I mean, history buff here hehe....but damn, dude from One Direction is in it.....gees Edited December 15, 2016 by blackram
9./JG27golani79 Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 Why does the "109" chasing the Spitfire sound like a Stuka? xD
Cybermat47 Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 I will watch it...I mean, history buff here hehe....but damn, dude from One Direction is in it.....gees Trust in Nolan.
TWC_Ace Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) Trust in Nolan. I was born in 1976......Its probably generation thing as I cant stand most od the todays music...and attitudes Edited December 15, 2016 by blackram
Feathered_IV Posted December 15, 2016 Author Posted December 15, 2016 Yeah, nah, looks okay. Most of the outdoor shots show a not too subtle attempt to try and limit the camera view and disguise how few assets and extras they have to work with. I'm looking forward to it, but it didn't give a real sense of scale.
Dakpilot Posted December 15, 2016 Posted December 15, 2016 Some people are complaining about the Buchons. They want CGI Bf-109s instead. Personally, I'd rather have real planes. We have plenty of CGI ones in vide games already. Also, this is the second time Kenneth Branagh has been in a movie with Buchons in Luftwaffe colours. I don't understand why you can't have real aircraft with a bit of post process CGI edit to achieve a more historically accurate result probably purely budgetary, and considered not necessary for what bean counters consider majority market audience. I once got into trouble on a movie set when I politely pointed out that the wheels of a certain type of aircraft were the wrong colour, I was was told in no uncertain terms not to upset the art director and only 1% of people would notice or care Cheers Dakpilot
Sokol1 Posted December 16, 2016 Posted December 16, 2016 Don't worry, the director supposed blew up that ugly Buchón - to avoid use that ugly CGI explosions. http://ww2awartobewon.com/wwii-news/christopher-nolan-destroy-plane/
MarcoRossolini Posted December 17, 2016 Posted December 17, 2016 Don't worry, the director supposed blew up that ugly Buchón - to avoid use that ugly CGI explosions. http://ww2awartobewon.com/wwii-news/christopher-nolan-destroy-plane/ If that's the case then I for one will not be paying a cent toward it. Not that one little guy would make a difference but...
Cybermat47 Posted December 17, 2016 Posted December 17, 2016 Don't worry, the director supposed blew up that ugly Buchón - to avoid use that ugly CGI explosions. http://ww2awartobewon.com/wwii-news/christopher-nolan-destroy-plane/ Well, the article says that it's an authentic WWII Luftwaffe aircraft, which it isn't, so I highly doubt it happened. If that's the case then I for one will not be paying a cent toward it. It's not the case
kestrel79 Posted December 17, 2016 Posted December 17, 2016 I thought the real planes looked great, CGI planes in movies always look off. Even if it isn't a true 109 it's all good.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now