Cybermat47 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 There's a game that is in active development, is F2P, has a mode called Simulator Battles in arena mode, and has well over 200 playable planes, as well as almost all areas of war. War Thunder doesn't have the same degree of technical accuracy as the IL-2 Sturmovik series, due to the large amount of aircraft, ground vehicles, and now watercraft in the game, and there's almost no historical accuracy - recently, I was flying a RAF Spitfire Mk.Ia over Mongolia to defend the Soviet Union from the Empire of Japan in September 1939. I crashed while chasing an RAF Typhoon flying for the IJA. War Thunder is a fun game, no doubt about it, but it offers a very different experience from IL-2 Sturmovik. 2
ElPerk Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 War Thunder doesn't have the same degree of technical accuracy as the IL-2 Sturmovik series, due to the large amount of aircraft, ground vehicles, and now watercraft in the game, and there's almost no historical accuracy - recently, I was flying a RAF Spitfire Mk.Ia over Mongolia to defend the Soviet Union from the Empire of Japan in September 1939. I crashed while chasing an RAF Typhoon flying for the IJA. War Thunder is a fun game, no doubt about it, but it offers a very different experience from IL-2 Sturmovik. Obviously. Hence my post! I was mostly criticizing the idea of "common sense" of excluding historical content already utilized by other similar games. In that case, why exclude WT? If WT is excluded because of gameplay mechanics, doesn't that mean gameplay is often as, if not more, important than the planeset itself?
Trident_109 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Sigh... no announcement today? Ohhhh Cute_retriever. Prepare for a PM from the mods regarding your dog pic. LOL I used that avatar once. Well for a few days anyway. Alright... back on topic. WHAT!!!?? No announcement yet?!!?
Danziger Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Yeah I imagine they will do it Friday so they will be out of the office on the weekend to avoid the wave of hate that's coming inevitably.
=362nd_FS=Hiromachi Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 I hope they do it in the late afternoon rather than evening, Friday evening is always a good opportunity to go out and not care.
beepee Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Wave of hate?... I don't think so mate Maybe not hate...but throwing of toys and gnashing of teeth if the announcement is not EXACTLY what some think it should be. :D
Trooper117 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 There is a lot of positive stuff coming this week... as to the theatre, I have my preference of course, if it doesn't pan out then so be it... will it send me into fits of despair? of course not. Will I still buy it?... absolutely Yes, there will be people who will maybe have no interest in the next theatre... so what? They are allowed their opinions just as we are allowed ours. Regardless, I'm looking forward to the news... plus I'm pretty sure it won't be followed by a wave of hate. Remember guys, just because people have and give different views, doesn't mean they hate the game... they just have different expectations.
II/JG17_HerrMurf Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Sure but you gotta admit the amount of vitriol in a flight sim forum is only slightly less than that of a political forum. Regardless of what the announcement is there will be about three pages of OMGOMGOMG followed by a trickle of DOOM which grows to a crescendo over the following weeks. I see what he was saying. For the record, I'm in regardless but bring on a change of venue in one of the next two chapters.
Gambit21 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 I'm looking forward to the theater after this next release and the roadmap. What is directly next doesn't matter to me as much. That will probably be/should be something to capitalize on the current plane set.
BraveSirRobin Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Sure but you gotta admit the amount of vitriol in a flight sim forum is only slightly less than that of a political forum. Regardless of what the announcement is there will be about three pages of OMGOMGOMG followed by a trickle of DOOM which grows to a crescendo over the following weeks. I see what he was saying. It doesn't even seem to matter what the announcement is. Step 1: OMGOMGOMG Step 2: Hints of doom. Step 3: DOOOOOOOOOM!!!
Asgar Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 so, what's it gonna be? Mediterranean theater? or Kuban to finish off the Eastern front and head towards new theaters of war knowing that the Eastern front is well served for the coming years?
1PL-Banzai-1Esk Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 (edited) They'll do Kuban first and announce that the next project after that will be Med That's my prediction as well. First another Eastern Front scenario and then some Western Front theatre to sweeten the deal. Edited September 7, 2016 by 307_Banzai
Gambit21 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 (edited) Won't be western front (Meaning Europe, B17's etc) Edited September 7, 2016 by Gambit21
[CPT]Pike*HarryM Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 To me it seems like a coin toss between Kuban and Med, I'm guessing Med since Jason has a little more leverage now and might want to broaden the western market some (makes business sense also).
Asgar Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 They'll do Kuban first and announce that the next project after that will be Med that's what i'm thinking, it also makes sense because it allows to re-use more of the current plane set
GrendelsDad Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 As much as I want the Pacific at some point. I could see this as a logical step to the open seas. Get the "sea legs" cut in the MED. then go for the Pacific.
LuftManu Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Not more Eastern front please! They need to open up more posibilities! 1
wtornado Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 (edited) It will be Kuban some else is doing the MTO. Tarot cards say all will be released and talked about Thursday at midnight Moscow time. Edited September 7, 2016 by WTornado
LuftManu Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 It will be Kuban some else is doing the MTO. Dont start with this nosense, If somebody does X and another guy makes Y, I will be buying or getting the better. End of the story.
[DBS]Prody Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 i don't care about the theater as long as it has a four-engine bomber
Gambit21 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Not more Eastern front please! They need to open up more posibilities! I'm a Pacific guy, but a lot of work and sweat and grief has already been invested here. Might as well keep the momentum and build on it for one more cycle.
216th_Jordan Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 (edited) Kuban makes the most sense NOW. Med or pacific seem the logical follow ups. I don't know why kuban is dismissed so much. Its got a whole lot to offer, from scenery to planeset and shipping. Edited September 7, 2016 by 216th_Jordan
Gambit21 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 I'm admittedly largely ignorant of the Med - never studied it. I was largely ignorant about the Eastern Front as well before the first IL2 back in the day. I look forward to exploring the Med at some point.
wtornado Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Dont start with this nosense, If somebody does X and another guy makes Y, I will be buying or getting the better. End of the story. ???One will be free and the other is to buy.You install the free stuff and analyse the others you buy and get all the community feed back first.
Gambit21 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Kuban makes the most sense NOW. Med or pacific seem the logical follow ups. I don't know why kuban is dismissed so much. Its got a whole lot to offer, from scenery to planeset and shipping. Yeah - favorite Eastern map in old sim
Jade_Monkey Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 I think the clue was in "ground vehicles". North Africa? kursk? Alamein?
SYN_Haashashin Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Im allmost sure I will announce something tomorrow :lol:
BlitzPig_EL Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 OK, my prediction... Kuban, with the P39 and A20, premium planes will be Spitfire and Yak 9. This will help finish out the Eastern front for the time being, and give us aircraft for the Med, which will be the next installment.
AndyJWest Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 OK, my prediction... Kuban, with the P39 and A20, premium planes will be Spitfire and Yak 9. This will help finish out the Eastern front for the time being, and give us aircraft for the Med, which will be the next installment. Not sure about Spit and Yak 9 being premium, but otherwise that's more or less my best guess too.
BlitzPig_EL Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 (edited) The Spit and Yak 9 were quick wild guesses because I forgot about the prem... oops... Collector planes. I know there should be some Axis birds too, but how many more 109s are there in this time frame? Perhaps the CR 42 Falco would be a good addition, along with the I-153? Edited September 7, 2016 by BlitzPig_EL
Voidhunger Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 La5F or La5FN for the battle of Kuban? Or both were that at the time?
kendo Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 Personally I think they will go West next. Unanswerable case commercially.
Trooper117 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 I don't want an Eastern Front scenario next... but if it has to be one, then yes, the Kuban would be the one I would go for... that or an Op Barbarossa scenario.
II/JG17_HerrMurf Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 (edited) I would think Spit or Yak 7 as premium while expecting a Yak 9 as included. Just like I'd expect a 109 G6 and an F model 190 as standard with a 109 G10 or 190 A4 or 5 as premiums. Actually, if I were them I'd stick with six standards; one fighter, one bomber, and one liaison/transport/recon/float per release and start including pairs of fighters as premiums. There are probably enough fighters to add someone's favorite 'crap' plate and stay at four AC per side for each release if six causes too much controversy. But start selling the premiums as twin packs and maximize your profits. I'd still be all in...... But that's just me. Edited September 7, 2016 by II/JG17_HerrMurf
VBF-12_Stick-95 Posted September 7, 2016 Posted September 7, 2016 I keep thinking about all the work they are doing in v2.004 to improve the aircraft struts. Going to need good struts to land on a carrier.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now