Guest deleted@50488 Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 (edited) were the Bf109 E, F or G series supposed to operate? Around 8km the aircraft in il2 all become a bit difficult to control, and if you manage to go even higher, the problem will be aggravated... Edited July 14, 2016 by jcomm
PatrickAWlson Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 They should be controllable well past 10K meters. Wikipedia has 13K as a max altitude for a Me109 G6 for what it's worth. Whatever one's faith in Wikipedia, bombers routinely operated at around 7-9K, so 8K is definitely not a max for a 109.
NN_Elanion Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Hello Jcomm,What do you mean exactly ?How difficult?As you speed (climb) enough not to start feeling the stall or instability?Good flying in the blue sky
ShamrockOneFive Posted July 13, 2016 Posted July 13, 2016 Keep in mind that the maximum rated altitude for the aircraft up there is where you're really pushing the envelope (so to speak). It's one of those things done on a good day under the best possible circumstance. Having read the stories about some of the Spitfires that were flying intercepts of Ju86Ps flying high over Malta... They were really pushing what the Spitfire V with some equipment left off could do and that firing at the recon planes was difficult - if a 20mm cannon froze in the -50 degree temps - it would cause a stall nearly instantly. Now that's talking 30,000 feet and more which is 9000 meters and up. The air does get thin up there.
Guest deleted@50488 Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 Yep, I actually know how thin it gets, because of rl work at the metoffice :-) and because I'm a pilot irl too :-), but I feel the aircraft a bit more prone to stall and twitchy on the controls than I would expect at "only" 8000m, or 9000m... Dogfighting at those levels is probably not a good idea either ...
Brano Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 Quick google search,interesting post in discussion with some basic explanations about critical altitude and such. https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/critical-altitudes.35530/ If you are interested in messers,check kurfursts site.Lots of data and test reports http://www.kurfurst.org/
Guest deleted@50488 Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 Thx guys for your hints! Will have to read :-)
wtornado Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 Keep in mind that the maximum rated altitude for the aircraft up there is where you're really pushing the envelope (so to speak). It's one of those things done on a good day under the best possible circumstance. Having read the stories about some of the Spitfires that were flying intercepts of Ju86Ps flying high over Malta... They were really pushing what the Spitfire V with some equipment left off could do and that firing at the recon planes was difficult - if a 20mm cannon froze in the -50 degree temps - it would cause a stall nearly instantly. Now that's talking 30,000 feet and more which is 9000 meters and up. The air does get thin up there. If we had Spitfire MK IX's in this sim the online war would be over if it was modeled right.. It was a MK IX stripped of its armor that got the first confirmed kill of a JU-86 P kill over Britain The standard MK IX could fly well at 38 000 feet but it could climb higher and the HF MK VIII could fly up to 44 000 feet(13 000m). All this done between 1942-43
Guest deleted@50488 Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 If we had Spitfire MK IX's in this sim the online war would be over if it was modeled right.. It was a MK IX stripped of its armor that got the first confirmed kill of a JU-86 P kill over Britain The standard MK IX could fly well at 38 000 feet but it could climb higher and the HF MK VIII could fly up to 44 000 feet(13 000m). All this done between 1942-43 Wow! That's stratospheric flight :-)
ShamrockOneFive Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 If we had Spitfire MK IX's in this sim the online war would be over if it was modeled right.. It was a MK IX stripped of its armor that got the first confirmed kill of a JU-86 P kill over Britain The standard MK IX could fly well at 38 000 feet but it could climb higher and the HF MK VIII could fly up to 44 000 feet(13 000m). All this done between 1942-43 The online war tends to get fought at middling altitudes. No-one flies that high except for the view :D But yeah, the IX models despite being a stop gap model of the Spitfire ended up being very impressive indeed!
wtornado Posted July 15, 2016 Posted July 15, 2016 They model me this and I will crush all Airforces and dominate the planet. Mauh hahahaa.
Dutchvdm Posted July 15, 2016 Posted July 15, 2016 Nice video. The have another video with a MIG-25. But it's an old one. Grt M
Y-29.Silky Posted July 18, 2016 Posted July 18, 2016 (edited) Reading the Memphis Belle's pilots memoir, they'd be flying at 25-30,000ft; he mentioned Stukas would be at 35,000ft (10668 meters) trying to drop bombs on their formation. And that was early 1943. Edited July 18, 2016 by Y-29.Silky
Dakpilot Posted July 18, 2016 Posted July 18, 2016 Sounds a bit high for a Stuka...seems to be about 10,000ft above it's service ceiling Pilot anecdotes.. Cheers Dakpilot
Yogiflight Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 As far as I know, it were more likely 109s diving down in Stuka-attacks and throwing their bombs on them. It is, what I heard, how they did their bombattacks on the bomberformations.
CisTer-dB- Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 Yep, I actually know how thin it gets, because of rl work at the metoffice :-) and because I'm a pilot irl too :-), but I feel the aircraft a bit more prone to stall and twitchy on the controls than I would expect at "only" 8000m, or 9000m... Dogfighting at those levels is probably not a good idea either ... It's like that on the deck so it's even worst at high level, but that a long story
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now