SCG_motoadve Posted June 18, 2016 Posted June 18, 2016 Negavitve Gs in the Rata should makes the carburator cut out. In BOM it does. I liked it more how was modeled in the original IL2 Was this a just a regular carburated engine? If so, it takes quite a bit too long to cut out ,just gets silent and no sputtering. Im just comparing to doing negative Gs in a real carburated airplane I have done its like cof cof gets silent, then re starts. Rata you do the negative G and takes quite a bit long for the engine to get silent. COD on the other side happens way too easily in the Hurri and Spit. Maybe that is the way it was in real life and is modeled right I dont know, but I remember the RATA from original IL2 and used to cut easier than this one.
seafireliv Posted June 18, 2016 Posted June 18, 2016 I agree and pointed this out, but the chorus of disapproval informed me it was correct in BOS. I still have no idea which is more realistic. I always thought IL2`46 was as it was much more severe.
wtornado Posted June 19, 2016 Posted June 19, 2016 (edited) Maybe they can model the Spitfire MK I the same way if it does not stall all the better. Edited June 19, 2016 by WTornado
Brano Posted June 19, 2016 Posted June 19, 2016 M-63 engine has special 4l fuel tank installed in front of carburetor AK-63 TK (or AK-25 4DF). Fuel from this tank is flowing to the carburetor under pressure. 1
SCG_motoadve Posted June 19, 2016 Author Posted June 19, 2016 M-63 engine has special 4l fuel tank installed in front of carburetor AK-63 TK (or AK-25 4DF). Fuel from this tank is flowing to the carburetor under pressure. I was suspecting it had to have some kind of modification. Thanks for the info.
-TBC-AeroAce Posted June 22, 2016 Posted June 22, 2016 Just a side question. Are all the other aircraft fuel injected?
Brano Posted June 22, 2016 Posted June 22, 2016 Wrongly formulated question. Direct injection of fuel is smtg different than feeding of fuel into carburetor under pressure and not only gravity. To add to the M-63 engine pressurized flood tank. It was essential to release the air pressure when ishak was on the ground from this tank,because if throttle remained opened after engine shut down,needle in carburetor would be open and fuel would flood the cylinders.
ST_ami7b5 Posted June 23, 2016 Posted June 23, 2016 Wrongly formulated question. Direct injection of fuel is smtg different than feeding of fuel into carburetor under pressure and not only gravity. To add to the M-63 engine pressurized flood tank. It was essential to release the air pressure when ishak was on the ground from this tank,because if throttle remained opened after engine shut down,needle in carburetor would be open and fuel would flood the cylinders. I don't believe this answer comes after six beers and 3 borovickas...
Brano Posted June 23, 2016 Posted June 23, 2016 I don't believe it myself but after two decades of injecting borovicka into my combustion chamber I'm kind of resistant to it :D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now