What tank would you like to see next?

[=362nd_FS=RoflSeal]

IIRC only 31 StuGIII F/8 with L48 gun were produced (oct-nov 42) and G model entered serial production in dec 1942.

Spielbergers Panzer IV and its variants page 54

 

[Brano]

I wrote about StuGIII F/8 and G 

[PatrickAWlson]

Maus.  Then we can have hundreds of mice running around Stalingrad .

[Brano]

Hi Patrick,what about campaign generator for tankers?

[L3Pl4K]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturer_Emil could be nice, for balance, Wehrmacht should have 2 at the same time .

Edited December 2, 2015 by L3Pl4K

[PatrickAWlson]

Hi Patrick,what about campaign generator for tankers?

 

- not likely any time soon.  Still way too much to do in the air.

[Finkeren]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturer_Emil could be nice, for balance, Wehrmacht should have 2 at the same time .

I know you're joking, but honestly a couple of those wouldn't do much. Sure, they could one-shot a T-34 at any range, but a T-34 could one-shot it right back from any angle out beyond 1000m.

Edited December 2, 2015 by Finkeren

[Brano]

- not likely any time soon.  Still way too much to do in the air.

I dont mind waiting 

[L3Pl4K]

 

 

I know you're joking, but honestly a couple of those wouldn't do much. Sure, they could one-shot a T-34 at any range, but a T-34 could one-shot it right back from any angle out beyond 1000m.

Joke..no.. this device was in service at battle of stalingrad.

[Finkeren]

Joke..no.. this device was in service at battle of stalingrad.

I know. One was destroyed and the other captured, and it seems that they took quite a heavy toll on the red tank forces, while they were in action.

 

Still, there were just the two of them and no more, ever.

 

To include them would be more ridiculous than adding AM-38 engined MiG-3s to BoM, just because two prototypes were combat tested there.

[L3Pl4K]

 

 

I know. One was destroyed and the other captured, and it seems that they took quite a heavy toll on the red tank forces, while they were in action. Still, there were just the two of them and no more, ever. To include them would be more ridiculous than adding AM-38 engined MiG-3s to BoM, just because two prototypes were combat tested there.

 

Ok, 2x Sturer Emil and 2x MIG3 AM38 maximum per mission. If one get lost, no replacement.

[wtornado]

I don't really care... I'm in it for the planes.... The tanks are a nice option but if we never had another driveable one I would't mind. If more can be added with minimal impact on overall development fine with me but this is a flight sim first and foremost and I think that is always going to be the team's focus until perhaps later on inthesim's life cycle.

 

 

Take that back you do not mean it please!

 

 

 

 

Very sad here.

[wtornado]

I would like a Wirbelwind or a Ostwind and virtual pilots flying over head.

 

[Samusenko]

My baby the T34/76 Model 42 would complete me (I love that turret).

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Finkeren]

My baby the T34/76 Model 42 would complete me (I love that turret).

 

 

 

 

 

 

I love that model (especially with the commanders cuopola added in mid-1941)

 

However It's really a late-1942 production model, and as such it would only truly be suitable for the last part of the battle.

Edited December 4, 2015 by Finkeren

[Samusenko]

I love that model (especially with the commanders cuopola added in mid-1941)

 

However It's really a late-1942 production model, and as such it would only truly be suitable for the last part of the battle.

 

Yeah, It's a great piece of design work.

 

Late '42 (more likely early '43 but come on, that model...) is still '42 (;

 

It's my favourite tank design of the war apart from the T-34/85 Model 1944 which is gorgeous.

[MigSu]

Yeah, It's a great piece of design work.

 

Late '42 (more likely early '43 but come on, that model...) is still '42 (;

 

It's my favourite tank design of the war apart from the T-34/85 Model 1944 which is gorgeous.

[Finkeren]

I love that model (especially with the commanders cuopola added in mid-1941)

The cuopola was added in mid-1943 of course.

 

Sorry 'bout that.

[Samusenko]

 

 

So beautiful...

 

 

The cuopola was added in mid-1943 of course.

 

Sorry 'bout that.

 

I assumed you meant '43 ahah, otherwise that Cupola was being worked on by an absolute perfectionist q:

 

 

While back in this topic, might as well drop my other wants: BT7, KV-1, Panzer 38(t), Panzer IV F2 along with the SU-76 and Marder II

[Cybermat47]

While back in this topic, might as well drop my other wants: ... Marder II

Now that would be fun. Getting into some trees, watching a T-34 go past you, and blasting them with the 75mm

Edited December 4, 2015 by Cybermat47

[VBF-12_Stick-95]

What about making other current weapon objects mannable?  AAA and anti-tank.

[Yogiflight]

Or both in one. The fabulose "AchtAcht". AAA and Antitank gun in one.

[wtornado]

Have you guys ever owned the 1c ''Theatre of War'' collection.

 

Four games from the Russian front right up Korean War.

 

The AT gun crews with that game then were so much fun

to see them operate, loading the gun swinging the gun around.

 

Still play it today.

 

1c Maddox ring a bell who made that collection?

 

When you look at that game you see IL-2 1946 in the graphics

in it except you are on the ground.

 

That T-34-85 is smoking like a K car in that video.

Edited December 5, 2015 by WTornado

[Mirones]

some Stug3 and other Panzer IV  F2 or F1 + Matilda and Crusader in pair with an Hurrican and Spitfire we could have north africa.

[Samusenko]

Now that would be fun. Getting into some trees, watching a T-34 go past you, and blasting them with the 75mm

 

Yeeeees, I love the Marder as well as all of the 38(t) chassis' tanks, the Hetzer is my favourite from that group.

 

 

Lend lease Valentine's would be nice to see too!

 

Edited December 5, 2015 by Samusenko

[kendo]

Now that would be fun. Getting into some trees, watching a T-34 go past you, and blasting them with the 75mm

 

Ref the Marder: Not so much fun getting drilled through the paper-thin armour though. Or outflanked and machine-gunned from the rear.

Edited December 5, 2015 by kendo

[216th_Lucas_From_Hell]

When artillery correcting is introduced, I think the BM-13/Katyusha would be an awesome addition. One player circling around in a Pe-2 while the other makes it rain fire on the fields.

[-TBC-AeroAce]

Not really sure about the practicality of a player controlled Katyusha as its a one shot thing (I know it has many rockets). I guess the thing would probably take 10-20 mins to rearm 

 

 

From wiki

 "Katyusha batteries were often massed in very large numbers to create a shock effect on enemy forces. The weapon's disadvantage was the long time it took to reload a launcher, in contrast to conventional guns which could sustain a continuous low rate of fire."

 

 

It would be cool as an AI player controlled vehicle

Edited December 5, 2015 by [TBC]AeroACE

[216th_Lucas_From_Hell]

Fair point, actually. A BT-7 would be useful though, not because of its guns and armour but because of the speed.

[RAY-EU]

Tiger I .

 

Intel i7 5930K , Asus Rampage V Extrem Usb 3.1 , liquid refrigeration Restorator 3 MAX , Win 10 Pro , 2 SSD In raid 0 with target Pcie-E for the future helmet VR of HTC ViVe for Steam in release Prototipe and release date early 2016 with complementary Asus VR monitor Nvidia designed 28 '.

 

for next of Ww2 Fw 190 A5 Ata 1.62 .

[RAY-EU]

Tiger I .

 

& 128 GB of RAM memory .

[muff1n]

there is the one and only and please no after war or on sketch-only tanks

 

Edited December 10, 2015 by Muffin

[senseispcc]

For me this is not a tank game so i have no opinion and ask for infantry !!!

[wtornado]

For me this is not a tank game so i have no opinion and ask for infantry !!!

There are no real WWII tank simulations that are any good

 

T-34 vs Tiger was the best one I had that was closest to a tank sim.

 

If they do it historically right with this game it could attract other types

of players to the game in tanks.

 

It just makes me happier to destroy human controlled and not AI controlled

tanks ingame with my IL-2 or my Stuka.

 

If I only flew fighters I would be indifferent but I fly everything.

[Dennis_Nedry]

Hs 129!

[RAY-EU]

 

Tiger I

& Infantry

[Fern]

The P-51 tank or the P-47 tank.

[Jaws2002]

 My all time favorite:

 

the awesome Jagdpanther:  

 

[LLv32_mrkus]

Playable AAA (static and on tracks/wheels) would be really fun in my opinion.

[TheElf]

A Bergepanzer would be nice.  It would add an extra element to gameplay if you could respond to a damaged player's call and trundle out to save them.  Getting points for it of course.

 

 

agreed.  Everyone wants to shoot stuff.  Such violence...

 

Seriously a recovery mission would be cool, for both tankers and pilots.  Good thinking Fink.