Libel Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 Hi guys, quick musing:Would there be any difference in weight on the mountings between these two, and does it have any effect on performance? I've had a play with it, but can't see a noticeable difference.
216th_Lucas_From_Hell Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 The ShVAK weights some 40kg if I remember correctly while the VYa-23 is closer to 70kg or so. These are their empty weights. Then you need to factor in that the ShVAK allows for nearly twice as many rounds as the VYa-23, and consider how lighter are the 20mm shells compared to the 23mm ones. In short I have no idea of the final result, but these are the factors to be accounted
Finkeren Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 When you select a field mod in the sim, you can see how much extra weight it puts on, when you mouse over the selection IIRC. The difference between the ShVAK and the VYa-23 is neglible I think.
JtD Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 Should be around 30kg or ~1% of the aircraft weight or ~10% of the fuel fuel load. Not much.
MarcoRossolini Posted October 24, 2015 Posted October 24, 2015 Love the 23mm on the Lagg, don't leave the airfield without it, in the early days of the dogfighting on multiplayer a single shell could do serious or fatal damage to a 109, and its RoF is excellent.
Willy__ Posted October 24, 2015 Posted October 24, 2015 (edited) 37 is a waste of time Imo Its a nice tankbuster Edited October 24, 2015 by istruba
Libel Posted October 25, 2015 Author Posted October 25, 2015 Yeah, I found that the difference was negligible. According to my research, the ShVAK 20mm is about 20kg lighter, and each individual VYa-23 23mm shell weighs almost 2x as much as a 20mm shell due to higher powder load, but as the total ammo count is lower, it basically balances the weights. Was wondering if anyone else had anything to add to that.
[CPT]Pike*HarryM Posted October 25, 2015 Posted October 25, 2015 With the 23 you can choose all HE loadout, useful for bringing down bombers, ShVAK you can't choose.
Finkeren Posted October 25, 2015 Posted October 25, 2015 (edited) With the 23 you can choose all HE loadout, useful for bringing down bombers, ShVAK you can't choose.Actually I think most people agree, that AP ammo is more effective for bringing down aircraft of all kinds, because it kills engines almost every time. HE is best for soft ground tagets. Btw: On the La-5 you can choose full AP or HE loadouts for the ShVAKs. Edited October 25, 2015 by Finkeren
Willy__ Posted October 25, 2015 Posted October 25, 2015 @Fink: It really depends. The 23mm with HE ammo causes catastrophic damage with very few shells, meanwhile if I choose either only AP or HE for the la5 I have trouble shooting down airplanes, at least in my experience. I would take the mixed ammo for the la5 if you plan taking on planes.
Libel Posted October 26, 2015 Author Posted October 26, 2015 I find that when fighting Stukas, the HE will happily snap wings and cause major airframe damage, whereas the AP tends to overpenetrate and not do much unless you hit something major.
Finkeren Posted October 26, 2015 Posted October 26, 2015 It might be a personal preference. I just get a feeling, that when I use all-AP every single salvo that hits means either pilot kill or serious engine damage that will pretty much win the fight for you, which I honestly prefer to the odd chance of blowing off a wing with HE. A small video I did a while back to prove another point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQINqnPBij0 I used all-AP on the VYa-23 and did fatal damage to four He 111s in a row with very few hits.
Brano Posted October 26, 2015 Posted October 26, 2015 Both ShVAK and MG151/20 were rechambers from their HMG predecessors = larger projectile but still HMG case with same amount of propellant. VYa was a brand new design of 23mm cannon with its respective ammo.
Beagah Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 Related question about AP versus HE, which 30mm round the germans used more on the ME 262?
Finkeren Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 Related question about AP versus HE, which 30mm round the germans used more on the ME 262? There were AP rounds developed for the MK 108, I think, but I don't think they were used much operationally. The muzzle velocity of the MK 108 is pretty bad, so an AP round wouldn't be very effective, you'd get much better penetration from a 15mm MG 151. In action I think the MK 108-equipped planes used a combination of Minengeschoss (which is about the purest form of an HE-shell you can imagine short of just firing a solid piece of PETN) and HE-incendiary. The 30mm Minengeschoss rounds did the job well enough without much penetrating capability. This is the result, when the British tested a single shot from the gun on an old Spitfire airframe:
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now