6./ZG26_Emil Posted March 6, 2015 Posted March 6, 2015 I found something online but have no idea where it came from. I'd like to test in game climb rates against historical data. If anyone has charts it would be much appreciated. Emil
303_Kwiatek Posted March 21, 2015 Posted March 21, 2015 (edited) Nice chart. 15 m/s is really poor. Even worse then RL Fw 190 A-3 16 m/s. Yak-1 was not even comparable with 109. More close to Fw 190 at 1.3 Ata but even Fw 190 was better at 1.3 Ata not mention emergency 1.4 Ata. Edited March 21, 2015 by 303_Kwiatek
Askania Posted March 21, 2015 Posted March 21, 2015 Source: Stepanets, A.T. Yak Fighters of the Great Patriotic War. 1
Askania Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 the flight test was done with fully opened radiators (overheating of oil and water). 1
303_Kwiatek Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 (edited) It is understandable casue Yak-1 had problem with overheat at full RPMs with M-105 PF engine. I read that after every one or two kilometer in climb there was need to level flight and cool engine. For comparison climb rates Yak-1 vs German planes: - Yak-1 ( 2700 RPMs) - 15 m/s - Fw 190 A-3 - 1.32 Ata - 16 m/s - 109 F- 4 1.32 Ata - 18.5 m/s - 109 G-2 1.32 Ata - 21 m/s Edited March 25, 2015 by 303_Kwiatek 3
III/JG2Gustav05 Posted April 5, 2015 Posted April 5, 2015 190A3 in BOS is a dog in climb. Hi Kwiatek, Could you send such information to dev team and to see their response?
303_Kwiatek Posted April 13, 2015 Posted April 13, 2015 No im rather not interested as much. I know their atitutude. It is enough to look for Yak-1 and LAgg-3 performance and handling in BOS.
TRA_Rogue Posted May 18, 2015 Posted May 18, 2015 I've found these 2 charts. Also interesting to note the Mig-3's performance at higher altitudes.
III/JG2Gustav05 Posted May 19, 2015 Posted May 19, 2015 (edited) No im rather not interested as much. I know their atitutude. It is enough to look for Yak-1 and LAgg-3 performance and handling in BOS. The problem is if they leave Yak-1 's over-performed like this how about the scenario of BF109G6 VS LA5FN during 1943 -1944? This is a simulation not other kind of genre. Edited May 19, 2015 by III/JG2Gustav05
Sgt_Joch Posted May 25, 2015 Posted May 25, 2015 Gordon, Khazanov, "Soviet Combat Aircraft of the Second World War", vol. 1, has a summary of 4 flight tests done on the Yak-1 with the 1,180hp rated M-105PF engine between mid-42 and early 43. time to climb from ground level to 5 km. test 1- test weight: 2,917kg, time: 6.4 minutes; test 2- test weight: 2,780kg, time: 4.7 minutes; test 3- test weight: 2,900kg, time: 5.6 minutes; test 4- test weight: 2,884kg, time: 5.4 minutes.
303_Kwiatek Posted January 28, 2017 Posted January 28, 2017 (edited) Gordon, Khazanov, "Soviet Combat Aircraft of the Second World War", vol. 1, has a summary of 4 flight tests done on the Yak-1 with the 1,180hp rated M-105PF engine between mid-42 and early 43. time to climb from ground level to 5 km. test 1- test weight: 2,917kg, time: 6.4 minutes; avg climb rate - 13 m/s test 2- test weight: 2,780kg, time: 4.7 minutes; ( lightened Yak-1 with reduced armament and load - 17 m/s) test 3- test weight: 2,900kg, time: 5.6 minutes; ( 14,8 m/s) test 4- test weight: 2,884kg, time: 5.4 minutes. ( 15 m/s) Edited January 28, 2017 by 303_Kwiatek
=TBAS=Sshadow14 Posted January 28, 2017 Posted January 28, 2017 (edited) stat compare toolhttp://www.ecv56condor.com.ar/stcompare.php Edited January 28, 2017 by =r4t=Sshadow14
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now