Jump to content

So ... what's the verdict on the FW 190 now???


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

LOL ... Its the banana forums and UBI Zoo all over again.

Edited by AirHog
6./ZG26_Custard
Posted

I find if you lift her petticoat too much she goes all over the place. Very twitchy at times!

  • 1CGS
Posted

 

 

I don't think they are really interested in historical accuracy so much ( there are too many examples for it unforunately)

 

Just because you keep saying that doesn't make it any more true. 

  • Upvote 1
  • 1CGS
Posted (edited)

Ridiculous! Show me a PC flight game where real air and it's flow is modelled in real time!

 

 

Watch, and be amazed. :) That's the same engine powering BoS.

 

(Something about airflow modeling as well at 0:01 ;))

 

Edited by LukeFF
  • Upvote 1
SCG_Space_Ghost
Posted

Just because you keep saying that doesn't make it any more true. 

 

Just because you keep saying that doesn't make it any less true.

  • 1CGS
Posted

Just because you keep saying that doesn't make it any less true.

 

I'm sorry, who are you? 

  • Upvote 1
SCG_Space_Ghost
Posted (edited)

I'm sorry, who are you?

Names on a forum are relevant..?

 

Hahahahahaha. Sure got me!

 

No, wait... I got it! You're LukeFF, I should just take whatever you say as absolute fact... My bad... I forgot again...  :rolleyes:

Edited by 4./JG26_Adler
303_Kwiatek
Posted

Names on a forum are relevant..?

 

Hahahahahaha. Sure got me!

 

No, wait... I got it! You're LukeFF, I should just take whatever you say as absolute fact... My bad... I forgot again...  :rolleyes:

 

:good:

Posted

 

 

That's what Crump usually claims when he's lost, isn't it. It's also usually my point of exit in debates with him, just as much as it is here. Good luck!

 

Since when have I ever been lost with you??

 

Was it when you could not figure out how to align EAS calculations with your parrot'd equations using TAS?

 

Or is this when you claimed such things as EAS was invalid for aircraft performance comparison?  

 

Or the time you claimed pressure altitude is the basis for an engines critical altitude?

 

Which is it? 

GOAT-ACEOFACES
Posted (edited)

Watch, and be amazed. :) That's the same engine powering BoS.

 

(Something about airflow modeling as well at 0:01 ;))

 

 

Very cool Luke!

 

Be interesting to see how the nay-sayers try an explain that one away! ;)

 

i.e.

 

I say: "There is even nowadays not a single molecule of air within a PC flight game, let alone the fluid of it" ...

Edited by ACEOFACES
SCG_Space_Ghost
Posted

Very cool Luke!

 

Be interesting to see how the nay-sayers try an explain that one away! ;)

This is after how many times Luke propagated the idea that it is NOT the same engine..?

GOAT-ACEOFACES
Posted

What part of me never stating what engine it is apart of did you not understand?

SCG_Space_Ghost
Posted (edited)

What part of me never stating what engine it is apart of did you not understand?

Who said a [Edited] thing about you? Chill out [Edited]. Doesn't matter much to me mate.

 

Got your smug face on yet?

 

"LMFAO"

Edited by Bearcat
GOAT-ACEOFACES
Posted (edited)

Who said a [Edited] thing about you?

Ah, I see where you are confused!

 

Allow me..

 

When someone quotes someone else, as you did me..

 

And than asks that person a question, as you did me..

 

It is generally assumed that you were talking to me and asking me a question..

 

To which I answered

 

Chill out or[Edited]. Doesn't matter much to me mate.

 

Got your smug face on yet?

 

"LMFAO"

Agreed, your question did not matter much, but, what can I say, I feel obligated to help out confused people, such as yourself.

 

Hope that helps!

Edited by Bearcat
Posted

OK guys.. this thread has run it's course...

 

I am certain that anyone who wants to know how the 190 is now... can find out in the 10 pages of this thread..

 

and yes... Luke that was one of the early videos that made me go ... wow!

 

fork%20in%20me_zpsqhnnvzkq.jpg

SCG_Space_Ghost
Posted (edited)

Ah, I see where you are confused!Allow me..When someone quotes someone else, as you did me..And than asks that person a question, as you did me..It is generally assumed that you were talking to me and asking me a question..To which I answeredAgreed, your question did not matter much, but, what can I say, I feel obligated to help out confused people, such as yourself.Hope that helps!

You do a deplorable job at designing your own context.

 

You do ride a fine high horse, though.

 

I suggest you reread my post.

 

Paraphrasing: You said Luke's find was cool and you implied that naysayers would be unable to argue the lack of fluid dynamics.

 

Paraphrasing: I said "Sure, nice to see Luke admit it is the same engine after 2 years of him propagating the fact that the engine is different."

 

I will give you that IBTL there.. but just for the record.. The BoS engine is different.. It is different to a similar degree that the original IL2 engine is different from the Forgotten Battles Engine.. it is the same.. but different..

Edited by Bearcat
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...