=LD=Hethwill Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 (edited) Still remember this guys being kicked in the teeth and being named scammers when they announced the Island. Let's see further development even further down the road. Regarding implementation into a dynamic world as in a digital game... still takes a while. If they can break the barrier and give each point its own memory, hell yeah, would be a galaxy jump forward towards a complete new worl regarding entertainment in all forms. Edited September 17, 2013 by =LD=Hethwill
=BKHZ=Furbs Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 Looks very interesting indeed, though i wish the narrator would stop saying "dartar"
RAF74_Winger Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 though i wish the narrator would stop saying "dartar" Like fingernails down a blackboard. Urrgh.
Heywooood Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 I've got a euclidian tree in the front yard!! and the new girl down the block has a coupla HUGE data sets, gives me an algorythm a cat couldna scratch... everythings coming up Millhouse!
FuriousMeow Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 I saw this a couple years ago, I thought it was proven to be horse waste?
falstaff Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 ...Instant low-overhead ray-tracing engines? ..room temperature fusion? ...too much time on your hands? God forbid he ever gets 'tartar' on this teeth...
Mingan Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 I saw this a couple years ago, I thought it was proven to be horse waste? That's what it is. No computer can run unlimited data. Case closed.
falstaff Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 (edited) Plus... 'Exciting' in a technical title? 'Geoverse'...? Let's try Wittgenstein's 'Exciting Tractatus' and not forgetting Bertrand Russell's 'Exciting Principia Mathematica' - part of the future of flightsimming? I doubt it. and shouldn't 'flight simming' be 'co-ordinated aeronautical spacial awareness techniques involving the use of aerodynamic aerofoils and a blood big gun in a dynamically changing hostile environment? With snow' Edited September 18, 2013 by falstaff
VeryOldMan Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 There is a lot that does not fit on this story. All the image processing and rendering industry knows it. Possibly is a very good system, that is being overadvertized by a megalomaniac marketing department. The numbers they cite dos not even match (the scale of samples to the number of points on the scene do not match, indicating that there is some obfuscation by some marketing dude there). Notice how he makes an example loaded from a pen drive.... of a street scanned in the milimiter scale etc... focusing n how fast it can load. Well. Just make your calculation gentleman.. how many square mm of combined surface all that street surfaces have? Hint.. is a number far larger then the number of bytes that can fit in ANY pen drive.
Freycinet Posted September 18, 2013 Author Posted September 18, 2013 They may be frauds, but I think it makes sense what they say: instead of retrieving the totality of data sets and load them into RAM you just retrieve the data that is actually displayed. It all depends on their data storage-and-retrieval system... If it is as effective as they say then they're onto something big. If not.... Oops!
falstaff Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 It isn't that simple. There is main memory ram, there is CPU primary and secondary cache, there is the maths floating-point co-pro (or used to be) and there are the parallel (and serial) architectures that process it all, and the memory fetching routines...and on...and on...and on.... This is the same would-be theory has underpinned many different would-be renderers and rasterisers over the years (and audio engines probably)...i.e. you only display what is needed. Where they all tend to fall down is that you need intelligent predictive algorithms (as Carmack said) and backup 'dartar' so that you can do quick re-draw if the user does something unexpected...as well as caching two or three screen-draws, whilst also allowing for post-processing. And you have to allow for partial occlusions and lots of other things.... You can end up creating more workload, not less, to cover all circumstances and eventualities. This type of idea is not new, it has been around fore donkey's years in one guise or another. Getting it to work in real-world applications, in real time, has always been the hard part. It is not as simple as fraud yes or no. The title is still chuckle-worthy in any case. I feel like asking for an 'exciting' can of baked-beans in my local supermarket....
VeryOldMan Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 (edited) They may be frauds, but I think it makes sense what they say: instead of retrieving the totality of data sets and load them into RAM you just retrieve the data that is actually displayed. It all depends on their data storage-and-retrieval system... If it is as effective as they say then they're onto something big. If not.... Oops! In fact the majority of the systems is goign the opposite direction. This is the only area where this is logical because of the size of the data. But Ram is THOUSANDS of times faster than a hard drive, does not block other process, neither is blocked by them. This is NOT the way that the technology is moving, its a peculiarity of an application that needs terabytes of data. No game will have an installation of terabytes of data.. so its out of the forseable future. I do not think they are a fraud. I think they just have an overly hyped marketign department, just like apple that makes inferior hardware but manage to convince peopel to pay twice the price for it, creates horrible inferior usability but convinces the world that its better, just because a man coudl present well his products. Edited September 18, 2013 by VeryOldMan
AndyJWest Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 Is it even capable of drawing objects moving within the 'visualisation system' world? Not much use for a sim otherwise...
VeryOldMan Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 Is it even capable of drawing objects moving within the 'visualisation system' world? Not much use for a sim otherwise... probably not, would not make sense ont aht approach. It can be used to render terrain altough,, and that is the greatest asset. But one of the reasons it has not much usability in Flight sims, is that you will not have such detaile data, except for modern cities, therefore useles for a combat sim.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now