4SCT_Vespa Posted October 26, 2014 Posted October 26, 2014 Hi all, I'm wondering if the LA-5 gunsight is in the correct position or maybe I'm wrong and I missed something...
avlSteve Posted October 26, 2014 Posted October 26, 2014 (edited) disable trackIR with F9 if using trackIR use the insert - home - delete - end - page up - page down keys, and press F10 to save it; becomes your default view F9 again to re-enable trackIR Edited October 26, 2014 by avlSteve 1
bivalov Posted October 26, 2014 Posted October 26, 2014 Hi all, I'm wondering if the LA-5 gunsight is in the correct position this is historically correct position of gunsight, real pilots even were flying with opened canopy for better aiming. you can use this as it , or you can set what you want and pressing f10.
PostumusAgrippa Posted October 28, 2014 Posted October 28, 2014 this is historically correct position of gunsight, real pilots even were flying with opened canopy for better aiming. you can use this as it , or you can set what you want and pressing f10. Seriously? You can't even see the middle line of the crosshair projection. Seems like kind of a glaring error to overlook.
bivalov Posted October 28, 2014 Posted October 28, 2014 Seriously? You can't even see the middle line of the crosshair projection. Seems like kind of a glaring error to overlook. position of gunsight in cockpit is really correctly, exactly for s8 and around. and personally i dont know, and dont sure in correctness of this realisation, BUT, i seen documental and other mentions, that air intake really "interferes when aiming". if you not agree, well, you easily can send here your source...
Brano Posted October 28, 2014 Posted October 28, 2014 It is OK in that position and it has been changed by devs due to claims that before it was too low.What Bivalov wrote is correct.And some soviet pilots didn´t aim at all thru PBP gunsights,they led their shooting with tracers.Shoot when you see rivets
Matt Posted October 28, 2014 Posted October 28, 2014 With a 3D vision, this would be less obstructive. But with our cyclop view, you basically can't fly with your head in a realistic position. You either have to move your head to either side or use the way too high (for constant flying and closed canopy) head position. That's why i actually preferred the previous incorrect position of the gunsight, but since this one is now historical accurate and all those people wanted to have it this high (and still fly Yak mostly ), i won't complain.
PostumusAgrippa Posted October 29, 2014 Posted October 29, 2014 Have to say I'm glad I didn't get the La-5 now. Going off of the screen, it's not even that the air intake is obscuring the view from the gunsight, it's that the gunsight is obscuring the view of the target. Kind of counter-intuitive for an aiming device, I'm sure you'll agree.
avlSteve Posted October 29, 2014 Posted October 29, 2014 You can adjust the default view to whatever you want. Center the gunsight is what I did. Am I missing something?
1CGS LukeFF Posted October 29, 2014 1CGS Posted October 29, 2014 Have to say I'm glad I didn't get the La-5 now. Going off of the screen, it's not even that the air intake is obscuring the view from the gunsight, it's that the gunsight is obscuring the view of the target. Kind of counter-intuitive for an aiming device, I'm sure you'll agree. Umm...you can adjust the gunsight so it's in the center of the sight glass. This is all much ado about nothing.
BlackDevil Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 The sim pilot has one eye in the middle of his virtuell head. Real pilots had two eyes left and right of center. This is why the gunsight of russian planes seems to be centered in sim, and in german planes we have to move to the right to center the german gunsight. In RL it was opposite, but there is no way to model a two eyed virtuell pilot.
Brano Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 Maybe in 10 years or so virtual reality entertainment will reach such level of real perception.I´m looking forward for my retirement
LLv34_Flanker Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 S! I hope so too Brano, a bit over 10 years left But shall see if they want to change that too..urgh.
Brano Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 OT/ With actual demographics trend I will most probably never reach retirement age (could be 100 years old age threshold) OT/
4SCT_Vespa Posted November 1, 2014 Author Posted November 1, 2014 Thanks a lot for all your feedback. I was just wondering if it was correct.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now