Metacritic banter already started..

[1PL-Banzai-1Esk]

In Ireland it is a custom to say 'Thank You' to the Bus Driver when getting off. Why would you not thank a Baker or let say Game Developer?

 

Put a good word on Metacritic if you enjoy the game , and I believe that regardless of it's limitations or great expectations that it just couldn't fulfill in such a short developing cycle, it's a great game and can only get better. Making so might boost BoS sales and we will all benefit from it, Devs will keep their jobs and create more content for us, we all win.

[Freycinet]

The people scoring 6 or below simply have an axe to grind and are not objective in the least bit. The game is a solid 7 in my opinion and will only get better. Being fair and reasonable is no longer a trait most people have these days.

 

Give me 110% and that is all I will accept or I will make your life miserable is the standard it seems.

 

Peoples sense of entitlement is so over the top these days it's sad. Accepting people and things for what they are rather than trying to change them to suite you makes for a healthier life.

 

Personally I could do without the unlocks but it does provide goals and objectives, you know something to work towards. If you want the additional content than unlock it, if you  don't want to put forth the effort than that fine as well and that is your choice. The Dev's have made it available to anyone willing to put forth the effort.

 

The game still works fine without the additional plane skins and load outs.

 

True words by a true oldtimer in simming, good to see you again Targ. And I totally agree: the sense of entitlement from people doing absolutely nothing but moaning and whining is really quite sad. Especially for them. So many people getting their knickers into a bind over absolutely nothing. "Boohoo, I have to spend half an hour to unlock a skin".... Eh, what?.... - I guess the positive thing to take from this is that a lot of people lead such happy lives that they don't have really serious issues to complain about. Good for them! :-)  

[Freycinet]

I just finished my best offline campaign mission.

  We took of in para together with my fellow comrade Unknown Unknownovich.It was just after 5:30 PM,sky was getting dark and clouds were dangerously low.My estimation - no higher than 800m.And they were plenty.Our order was to escort zveno of peshka's from neigbouring BAP over german airfield.

  We took off in order and shortly after joined our big brothers.We climbed together thru clouds to some 3km.I almost lost them due to poor visibility.I checked course according compass as I couldnt see anything thru layer of clouds beneath.I told myself: "Either this is correct way or you are most probably flying to hell''.Suddenly there was a clearance in clouds.Like a wall of seawater created by Moses.I could see bends of Don river down under.Peshkas started their bombrun.We closed in and saw how bombs were leaving their bellies and fell down on that damn fashist opressors.That was a good feeling indeed.I lost concentration and did not pay attention what was going on around....

  There they were.Like hungry wolfs they fell upon us from high above.Four messers.I did not have much time to think.Quickly checked that peshkas ran away into clouds and my wingmen was nowhwere to be seen.Damn Unknown Unknownovich.I knew he was lacking discipline since we started to fly together,but this was really first time I would appreciate his help a lot.Two messers were behind me,ready to open fire.I could feel their lust for kill.But no!Not today and not me! Only maneuver that came into my mind was doing split S and try to lure them down and do turnfight.They followed.Leader of german zveno dived too much and then tried to bank and turn very sharply.That was my moment.I climbed slowly behind him to cut his escape route.He saw me and pushed his nose down to slip away.I did not follow.Something told me he will try to make a battle turn to gain advantage over me.Just as he was pointing his nose up,I got for few seconds into good firing solution and pressed trigger.My SHVAK in unisono with UB hurled salvo of bullets on messer.I could see hits on his rudder and something separated from his fuselage.But he kept flying and zooming up away.I swore at my poor shooting.Such an opportunity wasted.Suddenly there was another line of tracers coming from 3oclock.That was Unknown Unknownovich! He literally saw off messer's right wing.Damn bastard.I never thought I will be so happy to see that siberian ugly face.I shouted loud: ''Well done you devil creature!''

  We were alone.Down under clouds,few hundred meters above ground.Messers were gone.I decided that it was just enough fun for today and called Unknown via radio to get back to formation.He obeyed,most probably because he was happy about scoring a kill,for which he will get nice sum of rubels and extra bottles of vodka.I was also happy for him.Who knows,at the end he may become a very good wingman.We climbed above clouds to avoid ground fire when crossing frontline.It was getting really dark.6:00 PM was long over.I scanned horizon just to be sure that noone is following us.Noone.....noone? What the hell was that? Looked like three spots at my hight and two others above.Planes! But were they ours? Germans? They were closing in from my 9 oclock.I was desperately trying to recognize the type.Come closer...a bit more...a bit more..Stukas with escorting messers! Oh,my dear reader,I was almost out of ammo and Unknown was most probably too.But what? They did not see us! Most probably due to clouds we were dipping in.They flew away and left stukas alone.Soo tempting,soo irresistible.I was craving to smash at least one of them down.I turned hard and gained a bit of altitude.Unknown followed.I chose to attack last stuka in formation and started to close in from above.Perfectly sitting in my crosshair I fired my guns.After short salvo they went silent.I shouted into radio: ''Orechov net!'' But who cares.I have my trusty LaGG,it is weapon of its own.I decided to bring fashist down with the body of my airplane.I came slowly from above and scratched my belly against his canopy.Terrible noise.I thought this is the end.My LaGG will break apart and I will day inside him.But no! We survived! And stuka started to descend in slow spiral.I saw only one parachute....Bei vraga!

  I quickly checked where we are and headed straight to aerodrome.Fuel was disappearing from my tank far more quickly then usual.Most probably main tank was damaged during my taran.I saw in the distance flares shot up towards the night sky and bonfires lit along the runway.Home.I made it.And Unknown Unknownovich made it too.I ordered him to separate and land.Touchdown was one of my best executed so far.I rolled at the end of runway and turned right to park the plane.Unknown was behind me finishing his rollout.We parked both next to each other and smiled.We cheated death today.Will see what tomorrow brings.

 

Fantastic write-up!  :-)

[Nil]

The people scoring 6 or below simply have an axe to grind..

Grind is the word.. not especially and axe, but a campaign

I love the game but I guess some were dissappointed that in the official poll (that not a lot of people even knew about, and my post at trying to get the ones that missed it directed to it were deleted 5 minutes later)

Over 70% voted that the unlocks would either lower their interest in the product, or they wished there were another way, were totally ignored.

 

Just an ingame 'do you want to do it the way we want you to do it, or do you want whatever the heck you want' checkbox would've silenced all parties.

 

But giving it a 1-2 or a pure 10 would almost seem too biased to defending and hating it. I fully respect the ones that at least have the sim, and rate it as such, as tastes differ a lot from person to person.

 

I tried WT for 20 minutes, and I hated it soo much that I couldn't even rate it a one. It might be unfair to WT, as they have their crowd, and I spent too little time in it to be able to judge. But I absolutely hated what I saw, and what I did in that one!

 

Fallout 1 and 2 a pure 11 from my side, until when they removed the children from the game, since having slaver tattoed in your face and having the 'childkiller perk' made the game almost impossible to continue with anyway!

 

[Bearcat]

This type of view is present in every new release for a series.

 

one thread

"This is BS, they just sold us the same old game"

 

and the next thread

"this is BS, why didnt they just sell us the same old game"

 

Yes but you must admit .. in this case there is a very.. multifaceted dynamic going on.

 

No it is not.I do not have account there and I do not plan to create one.But feel free to use it as you like.

 

You should do it. I was not going to sign up either but I did just to write my review. If you are worried about getting spam.. just use your junkmail email address.... What?!! You don't have a jumkmail eaddress...? I actually used my flight sim address since that is the only type of thing I will be reviewing there.

 

I just put my review up. 5000 characters.. I got 4995.

[DD_bongodriver]

So suddenly metacritic  is the source of all that is good and holy, very different story to the other week.

[Bearcat]

No just a source.

[Dakpilot]

So suddenly metacritic  is the source of all that is good and holy, very different story to the other week.

 

Well you seem happier by a factor of 5....   maybe the joy is spreading

 

Cheers dakpilot

[DD_bongodriver]

Well you seem happier by a factor of 5....   maybe the joy is spreading

 

Cheers dakpilot

 

Huh?

[LLv34_Flanker]

S!

 

 I wrote a long personal view on BoS and it was lost because forums had logged me out while typing! MEH!

[DD_bongodriver]

MEH!....that was nearly my review.

[LLv34_Flanker]

S!

 

 Oh snap

[Brano]

Frankly,I've never posted review of any game on such kind of ''review'' site or whatever it is.And I do not feel the need to preach gospels to the others.I am customer,who had spent his 70 euros for the product.And its my business how I will use it.I do not care what others do with their money and what products do they buy.If they don't like it,they can burn it,claim it,sue the developers for that they were deceived.

Those who are really interested in this hobby will not come to this product by reading some strongly subjective "reviews''.And for publicity,there are payed people called PR Managers.I think 1CGS studio has one.

[Vaxxtx]

If people think they NEED to post 10's to make sure the game scores well, it shows lack of merit by the game itself. It shows that people are worried the game cant stand on its own.

[GrieverGriever_XIV]

If people think they NEED to post 10's to make sure the game scores well, it shows lack of merit by the game itself. It shows that people are worried the game cant stand on its own.

tbh, I voted 10 not because I think it deserved a 10, but because too many people seem to want to see it fail by giving it a 0. Not a 3, not a 5, a 0. Its hard for me to believe that anyone would give this a dead on 0, so I just gave a 10 to counter weigh the people who are  trying to lower the score. My real rating would be a 7 or an 8. 

[Vaxxtx]

tbh, I voted 10 not because I think it deserved a 10, but because too many people seem to want to see it fail by giving it a 0. Not a 3, not a 5, a 0. Its hard for me to believe that anyone would give this a dead on 0, so I just gave a 10 to counter weigh the people who are  trying to lower the score. My real rating would be a 7 or an 8. 

This is what I am talking about.

 

Count the zeros and count the 10's. My statement still stands. If you think this game needs infalted scores and cant stand on its own merits, keep throwing out 10's, and watch the backlash like last time...

[SOLIDKREATE]

Its really funny how much energy and attention these guys put to the game which they claim to dislike .

 

When I dont like a game, I just uninstall it, forget it and move on. Next step is that I install a game which is good in my opinion, play it and have a great time. Simple as that

 

Yes it really is. You have to remember that most of the reviews are done by kids. They are used to War Thunder and Call of Duty.

[GrieverGriever_XIV]

This is what I am talking about.

 

Count the zeros and count the 10's. My statement still stands. If you think this game needs infalted scores and cant stand on its own merits, keep throwing out 10's, and watch the backlash like last time...

I get where youre coming from, both parties are part of the problem, but you need to understand that giving it a score of 0 isnt leaving the game to its own merits. If half the people give it 0's, and the other half give it honest scores like 7 or 8, the average will still end up being 2-3/10. Do you honestly think this game is a 2/10?

[LLv44_Mprhead]

If people think they NEED to post 10's to make sure the game scores well, it shows lack of merit by the game itself. It shows that people are worried the game cant stand on its own.

 

People don't think that they NEED to post 10's to make sure game scores well, they think that they need to post 10's to counter those 0 and 1 scores, so that game would get a score what represents how it really is. Personally I don't believe that it's necessary, if enough people post "real" score, those ones and zeroes will drown in and became irrelevant.

[TheBlackPenguin]

People don't think that they NEED to post 10's to make sure game scores well, they think that they need to post 10's to counter those 0 and 1 scores, so that game would get a score what represents how it really is. Personally I don't believe that it's necessary, if enough people post "real" score, those ones and zeroes will drown in and became irrelevant.

 

This, and I think those reviews who have started out "ignore those 9 or 10 reviews because", are the worst of the lot. Anyway, I think you'll find a small minority are trying to flood as much as they can with the 0 and 1 reviews and will attack anyone who actually likes the sim as a "fanbois". Its also important to rate the review too...

 

I've rated it based on how much I am enjoying it, despite the current limitations, please ignore everyone and do the same.

 

Right now there is 42 positive reviews, 5 mixed and 17 negative. Its more than a double for positive, and I wonder how many reviews, both overly positive or negative will get deleted for abuse.

[LLv34_Flanker]

S!

 

 Given the tight budget and short development time, BoS fares quite well for what it delivers. It works "out of the box" and has elements of a good product, albeit unpolished yet. If devs had a bit more time and money, I bet the release would have been a bit different from what it is now. For me the biggest gripes lowering my score are: forced Graphics presets, XP/unlocks and lack of a proper and immersive campaign with rosters, squadrons and all that. Rest is more or less there and patches can fix a lot. So a 7 is a high score for now, but could turn into something higher over time.

[TheBlackPenguin]

I don't have a Metacritic account, I don't plan on registering a Metacritic account. My review wouldn't influence the overall score one way or another.

 

Any game that is totally reliant on Metacritic to score highly is in such dire straits that my humble review couldn't possibly make any difference.

 

On the other hand, I don't use Metacritic when deciding what game to spend my money on.

 

Its an OK gauge on how well received the game is, for instance X:Rebirth when it was released was a bug ridden mess, and it duly got slated:

 

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/x-rebirth

 

Il2:BOS by contrast has done quite a bit better.

[Mac_Messer]

Why do people go there and give 9/10, saying that through whole 3 lines? Don`t they have more to say? When I see such reviews I smell something fishy.

 

Dishonest reviews go a long way to ruin the real picture!

[=RvE=Windmills]

Nobody cares about userscore Metacritic. I don't know how out of touch you have to be with gaming to consider userscore metacritic as a valid indicator of quality. It's literally only a battle between fanboys and haters voting 10/10 or 1/10 for awful reasons.

 

Unless the game scores less then 4 there really isn't a problem at all.

 

It was pretty hilarious to see a dev threaten to stop the entire project because of that though, good times.

[Nil]

I think it's not an honest opinion to rate it a 10, just to counter 'bad press' if you yourself don't consider it to really be a 10, that I don't think anyone honestly can say at this moment.. It's good, but recent weeks turbulence have.. kinda change the 'community to devs and comm. managers' total interaction.

But metacritic isn't the be all or lose all platform. As an example: Out of the Park Baseball 2007 is the #2 spot ever for PC!?
Critics rated it at 96 (of 100) and users 2.7 (out of 10) Never even heard about the game until I checked the list a while back, and don't even want to hear about it, since a Basball-manager game/sim just isn't my thing!

Correct 'wrongs' at Steamforums too if you like.. with an honest opinion! Some over there thing this it the prequel to the arcadegame 1942.. but with less realism!?

Edited October 23, 2014 by Pigmachine

[Mac_Messer]

 These are some of the same guys who as soon as the DC SWWII project was announced they jumped on it like pink on pork.. insinuating.. ".. now we will have another real sim...." and we all see how that turned out.

What do you mean? DCS WWII is coming along nicely. We got the Mustang, we got the Dora, both are gorgeous aircraft with high standard. The 109K4 is coming in November and it is looking the same top quality as the first two, the Normandy map is wip. Pretty good so far imo.

Edited October 23, 2014 by Mac_Messer

[Mac_Messer]

I know that on the occasions I look at metacritic to get an overview of a game I focus on the low scores. You do need to filter out a variable amount of rubbish depending on the type of game but I'm looking specifically for issues that I wouldn't like about a game. The positive virtues of games are frequently overstated in my opinion by gamers, reviewers and developers.

Yeah, that is the right approach and the reason for reviewers to substantiate their opinon as much and clear as possible. When I look at the site, I always go for the latest reviews, because the earliest ones usually are from the biggest zealots of either side of the rating be it 0 or 10.

[Lusekofte]

 Rating10 is more a counterweight for those who vote 0 to 2

all ratings above that up to 8 I can understand, I rated 7 myself. I think that is pretty fair. It is anyway subjective. 

 

The forced SP unlock thingy is a looser, SP campaign is not adequate, the lack of a Mission editor for all is simply not acceptable, The light kite behavior have to be addressed, 

But the best ever game physics rise the game above mediocre in my opinion.

I do not respect people not able to ignore a game they don't like, I see absolutely no reason why I should accept  patronizing comments from hostile people.

But that is what we face here a community divided between games, IL2 FB against cod, cod against bos and visa versa. 

More people will come to this genre will generate more people to cod and DCS, so if I did not like this , I would welcomed it anyway

[pilotpierre]

I registered with metawhatever and gave it a 10. After playing flight sims for 30 odd years this in my opinion is head and shoulders above anything I have experienced to date.

Whereas I dont like the idea of unlocks, the devs have been upfront about them for some considerable time. And, in fact I am thoroughly enjoying the campaign and attaining the unlocks.

Yes, I am a fanboy and have no problem with that whatsoever.

[Napping-Man]

I posted my review...9.  So that automatically invalidates my opinion and makes me a fan-boy I guess.   I based my review on one simple rule:  Am I having fun?  Don't care what other's are saying...just if I thought I got my money's worth.

 

And for me, I haven't had this much fun with a Sim in a long time.  So people can go ahead and call me whatever you want...I'll just go back to having a grand time with my flight-simulator.

[Mac_Messer]

People don't think that they NEED to post 10's to make sure game scores well, they think that they need to post 10's to counter those 0 and 1 scores, so that game would get a score what represents how it really is. Personally I don't believe that it's necessary, if enough people post "real" score, those ones and zeroes will drown in and became irrelevant.

Sure, but as the metacritic displays the "most helpful" reviews first, one has to thumb down both types of those extreme reviews.

[[KWN]T-oddball]

The people scoring 6 or below simply have an axe to grind and are not objective in the least bit. The game is a solid 7 in my opinion and will only get better. Being fair and reasonable is no longer a trait most people have these days.

 

Give me 110% and that is all I will accept or I will make your life miserable is the standard it seems.

 

Peoples sense of entitlement is so over the top these days it's sad. Accepting people and things for what they are rather than trying to change them to suite you makes for a healthier life.

 

Personally I could do without the unlocks but it does provide goals and objectives, you know something to work towards. If you want the additional content than unlock it, if you  don't want to put forth the effort than that fine as well and that is your choice. The Dev's have made it available to anyone willing to put forth the effort.

 

The game still works fine without the additional plane skins and load outs.

 

Axe to grind? more like %100 justifiable complaint, the dev's already knew that a lot of the community was against unlocks but they went ahead with their plan anyways, fair enough this is a business after all but what is really illogical is they put time and resources into a mickey mouse unlock system ahead of maybe the most important  item to both on and off line players....the FMB!

 

the  FMB would give all players the opportunity to build and or play other people's mini-campaigns, CO-OP's or DF scenarios or just get their feet wet with the new tool. the true list of prioritizes should have been FMB,Dserver, Skins (<<<these 2 interchangeable according to whether you are on or off line) then the unlocks, speaking of Skins it appears that you can unlock different skins for the same plane....which means there are in fact Templates..... why not give us at least one at time of release?...

 

the Dserver is really only important to the MP crowd but the SP crowd also benefits from it as well because a lot of campaigns and CO-op's that are made for on-line can also be flown off line which adds more content  making the game that much more attractive and adds depth along with another positive selling point.

 

777 has no bigger development team or sales force then it does with its customers, every skin made becomes a screen shot posted here there and everywhere. Online wars, dog fight servers, campaigns all at some point wind up as a youtube video... I have watched a 30 minute movie 3 times in 2 days...it was made using another flight sim but is so well  done that my BF4 friend started telling me how much he loves ww2 in general...he does not like flight sims but this has peaked his interest. The screen shots the videos and the enthusiasm of an immersed  community are walking talking visual points of sale waiting to happen.

 

I give it a 5, I have enjoyed what I have seen so far but I took 2 away for no FMB 2 away for no Dserver and 1 for skins, IMHO they really put the cart before the horse by not focusing on the FMB over the unlock  system.

[Vaxxtx]

Axe to grind? more like %100 justifiable complaint, the dev's already knew that a lot of the community was against unlocks but they went ahead with their plan anyways, fair enough this is a business after all but what is really illogical is they put time and resources into a mickey mouse unlock system ahead of maybe the most important  item to both on and off line players....the FMB!

 

the  FMB would give all players the opportunity to build and or play other people's mini-campaigns, CO-OP's or DF scenarios or just get their feet wet with the new tool. the true list of prioritizes should have been FMB,Dserver, Skins (<<<these 2 interchangeable according to whether you are on or off line) then the unlocks, speaking of Skins it appears that you can unlock different skins for the same plane....which means there are in fact Templates..... why not give us at least one at time of release?...

 

the Dserver is really only important to the MP crowd but the SP crowd also benefits from it as well because a lot of campaigns and CO-op's that are made for on-line can also be flown off line which adds more content  making the game that much more attractive and adds depth along with another positive selling point.

 

777 has no bigger development team or sales force then it does with its customers, every skin made becomes a screen shot posted here there and everywhere. Online wars, dog fight servers, campaigns all at some point wind up as a youtube video... I have watched a 30 minute movie 3 times in 2 days...it was made using another flight sim but is so well  done that my BF4 friend started telling me how much he loves ww2 in general...he does not like flight sims but this has peaked his interest. The screen shots the videos and the enthusiasm of an immersed  community are walking talking visual points of sale waiting to happen.

 

I give it a 5, I have enjoyed what I have seen so far but I took 2 away for no FMB 2 away for no Dserver and 1 for skins, IMHO they really put the cart before the horse by not focusing on the FMB over the unlock  system.

This. Good post, and valid points.

[Dusty926]

Axe to grind? more like %100 justifiable complaint, the dev's already knew that a lot of the community was against unlocks but they went ahead with their plan anyways, fair enough this is a business after all but what is really illogical is they put time and resources into a mickey mouse unlock system ahead of maybe the most important  item to both on and off line players....the FMB!

 

the  FMB would give all players the opportunity to build and or play other people's mini-campaigns, CO-OP's or DF scenarios or just get their feet wet with the new tool. the true list of prioritizes should have been FMB,Dserver, Skins (<<<these 2 interchangeable according to whether you are on or off line) then the unlocks, speaking of Skins it appears that you can unlock different skins for the same plane....which means there are in fact Templates..... why not give us at least one at time of release?...

 

the Dserver is really only important to the MP crowd but the SP crowd also benefits from it as well because a lot of campaigns and CO-op's that are made for on-line can also be flown off line which adds more content  making the game that much more attractive and adds depth along with another positive selling point.

 

777 has no bigger development team or sales force then it does with its customers, every skin made becomes a screen shot posted here there and everywhere. Online wars, dog fight servers, campaigns all at some point wind up as a youtube video... I have watched a 30 minute movie 3 times in 2 days...it was made using another flight sim but is so well  done that my BF4 friend started telling me how much he loves ww2 in general...he does not like flight sims but this has peaked his interest. The screen shots the videos and the enthusiasm of an immersed  community are walking talking visual points of sale waiting to happen.

 

I give it a 5, I have enjoyed what I have seen so far but I took 2 away for no FMB 2 away for no Dserver and 1 for skins, IMHO they really put the cart before the horse by not focusing on the FMB over the unlock  system.

Ok guys, answer me this:

 

What is the big deal with the Full Mission Builder? I ask in honesty, why do you guys care so much? I absolutely hated using it in the old IL-2, and games afterwards that did the same thing have always been the same way for me: Clunky, hard to use, and way too friggen' time consuming versus what you get in the end.

 

I mean absolutely no offence to people who DO like Full Mission Builders, I just want to know what makes you guys so attached to the idea.

 

Oh, and by the way, taking off a point for skins? Really? I don't think that's exactly.....correct, if-you-ask-me.

Edited October 24, 2014 by Dusty926

[[KWN]T-oddball]

Ok guys, answer me this:

 

What is the big deal with the Full Mission Builder? I ask in honesty, why do you guys care so much? I absolutely hated using it in the old IL-2, and games afterwards that did the same thing have always been the same way for me: Clunky, hard to use, and way too friggen' time consuming versus what you get in the end.

 

I mean absolutely no offence to people who DO like Full Mission Builders, I just want to know what makes you guys so attached to the idea.

 

Oh, and by the way, taking off a point for skins? Really? I don't think that's exactly.....bright, so-to-say.

the FMB opens up a creative outlet for some very talented and knowledgeable people to be able to recreate virtual missions of real life historical battles or lengthy campaign based on historical events or may some training CO-OPs or maybe even air race tracks in short it adds content.

[Vaxxtx]

Ok guys, answer me this:

 

What is the big deal with the Full Mission Builder? I ask in honesty, why do you guys care so much? I absolutely hated using it in the old IL-2, and games afterwards that did the same thing have always been the same way for me: Clunky, hard to use, and way too friggen' time consuming versus what you get in the end.

 

I mean absolutely no offence to people who DO like Full Mission Builders, I just want to know what makes you guys so attached to the idea.

 

Oh, and by the way, taking off a point for skins? Really? I don't think that's exactly.....bright, so-to-say.

Maybe the fact some people want to make a good campaign? Maybe the fact people want to make a Co-op campaign? Maybe the fact people want to set up historical missions? All this because the developers didn't do any of that.

 

Ever look at the campaigns made for DCS, CLoD, or even IL46? There are some brilliant ones out there. That's why.

 

Not sure if you are new to flight sims, but its a very big part of what IL246 and IL2 CLoD very popular. Seriously go look at all the user made campaigns.

[Dusty926]

Maybe the fact some people want to make a good campaign? Maybe the fact people want to make a Co-op campaign? Maybe the fact people want to set up historical missions? All this because the developers didn't do any of that.

 

Ever look at the campaigns made for DCS, CLoD, or even IL46? There are some brilliant ones out there. That's why.

 

Not sure if you are new to flight sims, but its a very big part of what IL246 and IL2 CLoD very popular. Seriously go look at all the user made campaigns.

Personally, I'm not really a big fan of stuff like historical missions or scripted campaigns and the like.

 

I much prefer something like Falcon 4.0's [bMS] dynamic campaign, that's much more what I prefer.

 

I can certainly see now why you guys like all that, and really want a FMB, but it's just not my thing, and I'd prefer to have something dynamic, rather than historically scripted.

[Vaxxtx]

Personally, I'm not really a big fan of stuff like historical missions or scripted campaigns and the like.

 

I much prefer something like Falcon 4.0's [bMS] dynamic campaign, that's much more what I prefer.

 

I can certainly see now why you guys like all that, and really want a FMB, but it's just not my thing, and I'd prefer to have something dynamic, rather than historically scripted.

I don't think you understand. Without a FMB you wont see any dynamic campaigns. And until a dev gives an answer, I don't know if its even possible for a dynamic campaign in BoS.

 

DCG for IL2 is a dynamic campaign generator. Dgen is a dynamic campaign generator. I much prefer these. They can also be historically accurate....or not. But without a FMB you are NOT going to see them. That's why.

[[KWN]T-oddball]

Personally, I'm not really a big fan of stuff like historical missions or scripted campaigns and the like.

 

I much prefer something like Falcon 4.0's [bMS] dynamic campaign, that's much more what I prefer.

 

I can certainly see now why you guys like all that, and really want a FMB, but it's just not my thing, and I'd prefer to have something dynamic, rather than historically scripted.

http://www.lowengrin.com/news.php

[39bn_pavig]

Skins, Dserver and FMB are coming. Give the developers a break. Hasn't anyone noticed them pumping out patches at midnight or beyond over the last couple of weeks? Sheesh.