Graphics seriously disappointing

[sallee]

Furious, groomers address is 1923 Main Street. Taxidermist address is 1932 Main Street. You might wanna check your receipt.

And Electrocuted Fruit Bats 'R' Us is at 1925.

[Trident_109]

I took one of my cats to the groomer, is it that bad? I was told it was the best in the area and that when done with her she'd look more appealing than expertly aged jerky. Now that I think about it, she has been quite rigid with her movements since she was brought back home...

LOL. Think you need a new groomer.

 

 

EDIT: I see Sallee mentioned Fruitbat. That's what I originally thought when I saw the avatar and was wondering what ever became of him? Haven't seen him in a while.

Edited September 6, 2014 by Robert

[Cybermat47]

Graphics are only 10% of what makes a game good, don't worry about them

 

And personally I think the graphics are just fine.

Edited September 6, 2014 by Cybermat47

[71st_AH_Mastiff]

And I drink my milk with Tobasco......What a pointless discussion.....

have you tried the Milk and Pepsi? its real good!

[Mastermariner]

If you cant fight it..derail it.

 

Master

Edited September 6, 2014 by Mastermariner

[1./JG42Nephris]

Ever see tracers in the real world? 

Pretty much. Firing the MG3 in my military times.

Never noticed them from 4km , maybe at dawn or night.

Completely flattened out against bright horizon after a few hundred meters.

 

 

 

 

Ever see lasers in the real world?

 

We all know what is meant by laserz.

Edited September 6, 2014 by 1./JG42Nephris

[BigPickle]

your all talking complete arse.

 

Reptiles for the win

[1./JG42Nephris]

Good for ya , you dont.

[Bullets]

For people with pretty good machines, I would recommend using Nvidia Control Panel to overwrite the graphic settings, You can select Much higher AA settings and add supersampling and anisotropic filtering... Obviously you cant use this if you are using SweetFX but the benefits looks wise of the settings I have achieved using Supersampling Far outweigh the "prettiness" of SweetFX.. I can see an aircraft in great detail up to thousands of meters away with no jaggies! If only there was a way for the colours to be improved a bit in BOS.. and texture sharpness like there was in ROF!  

[MarcoRossolini]

Don't understand this. The game looks pretty good, perhaps I've set my bar too low.

[Leaf]

For people with pretty good machines, I would recommend using Nvidia Control Panel to overwrite the graphic settings, You can select Much higher AA settings and add supersampling and anisotropic filtering... Obviously you cant use this if you are using SweetFX but the benefits looks wise of the settings I have achieved using Supersampling Far outweigh the "prettiness" of SweetFX.. I can see an aircraft in great detail up to thousands of meters away with no jaggies! If only there was a way for the colours to be improved a bit in BOS.. and texture sharpness like there was in ROF!  

 

That's the main reason I don't use SweetFX, I like my 8x Anti-Aliasing and Supersampling too much! :D

[SCG_Neun]

So we have one thread saying that the Dex's have spent too much time and resources on graphics and they are "to high" in quality and now this one saying the graphics are lower quality than expected in 2014.  I pronounce this BoS' Goldilocks moment;  "Just right".

I love it....you are so right on that Mike.  As an ole timer....having watched the progression of graphics in flight sims...coupled with smooth game play in heavily populated skies......I have to say, BOS is superb in my "old timers" perspective.  Really, I would think that some young new simmer with high graphic expectations would be the one to "seriously" comment on how disappointing the graphics are in this sim.  I go back to my Christmas Vacation quote on things like this......"The little lights aren't twinkling Clark."  "FAQ" has a right to have an opinion for sure....but the first post?  Man, that just kills me.

[Rama]

This thread has derailed.

Locking.